Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT We examined the antiobesity and antioxidant effects of supplementation with doenjang, a fermented soybean
paste, in overweight Koreans with the PPAR-c2 C1431T polymorphism. Sixty overweight subjects were randomly assigned to
consume either 9.8 g/day of doenjang or placebo for 12 weeks. Before and after the intervention, anthropometric and
metabolic parameters, along with abdominal fat distribution and PPAR-c2 polymorphisms, were measured. Fifty-one subjects
completed the study, doenjang (n = 26) and placebo (n = 25) groups. Relative frequencies of the PPAR-c2 genotypes CC, TC,
and TT were 70% (n = 41), 25.9% (15), and 3.4% (2), whereas those of the PPAR-c2 alleles C and T were 81.6% and 18.4%.
Visceral fat area (VFA) was significantly decreased by doenjang supplementation in subjects with a mutant T allele of PPAR-
c2 compared to those with a C allele after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. Plasma free fatty acid, insulin, and
homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) levels were also significantly increased in the doenjang group.
Doenjang pills significantly activated radical clearance capacity (ORAC and DNA tail length) in subjects with the C allele.
The catalase (CAT) activity was increased twofold in the doenjang-treated group with the C allele, but this phenomenon was
reversed in those with the T allele. Doenjang-treated subjects tended to have low dietary carbohydrate and sodium intakes
compared with those given placebo. We found that doenjang supplementation decreased visceral fat accumulation and aging
most effectively in subjects with PPAR-c polymorphisms. This study suggests that doenjang has antiobesity and antioxidative
effects in overweight individuals with mutant alleles of PPAR-c2.
KEY WORDS: doenjang (fermented soypaste) soybean obesity antioxidant PPAR-c2 polymorphism
119
120 CHA ET AL.
include soy sauce, doenjang, tempeh, miso, and natto. supplements during the study. A physical and pathological
Doenjang is a traditional Korean fermented soy bean paste questionnaire was administered and anthropometric mea-
similar to Japanese miso, which is fermented from meju surements were made. In addition, all biochemical samples
using Bacillus and Aspergillus species of bacteria.7,8 Fer- were collected in accordance with the Ethics Committees of
mentation of soybeans alters the profiles of isoflavonoids the CTCF2. However, nine participants, four in the doen-
(genistein and daizein), small peptides (Glu-Tyr and Glu- jang group and five in the placebo group, failed to complete
Phe), and urea cycle intermediates (i.e., arginine as a NO the study. Seven participants were disqualified because of an
precursor, citrulline, and ornithine).9,10 Such alterations inadequate intake of the prescribed supplements or not
have important effects on the prevention of metabolic dis- participating in other aspects of the study, while two par-
eases, including obesity. ticipants voluntarily withdrew. Finally, 51 subjects (doen-
Although PPAR-c is well known for its role in adipo- jang = 26, placebo = 25) completed the study after 12 weeks
genesis, it also plays a crucial role in maintaining normal and statistical analysis was carried out for the final 51 sub-
physiology, including insulin sensitization.11 Mutations in jects. This study was conducted according to the guidelines
the PPAR-c gene are associated with obesity and diabetes- laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures
related phenotypes.12 The polymorphism C1431T, located involving human subjects were approved by the Chonbuk
in exon 6 of PPAR-c, is associated with susceptibility to National University Ethical Board of Clinical Experiments.
cardiovascular diseases,13,14 leptin concentrations,15 and Informed and written consent was obtained from all subjects
Downloaded by University Of Melbourne from www.liebertpub.com at 04/30/18. For personal use only.
area (VFA) was quantified by measuring the intra-abdomi- secutive days and one weekend day) with a 24-h recall were
nal cavity at the internal aspect of the abdominal and oblique analyzed using the CanPro3.0 software (The Korean Nu-
muscle walls surrounding the cavity and the posterior aspect trition Society).
of the vertebral body. The subcutaneous fat area (SFA) was
calculated by subtracting the VFA from the total fat area. Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18.0 for
Laboratory analysis
Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are pre-
Blood was collected after overnight fasting. Whole blood sented as the mean – standard error (SE). Mean differences
samples were allocated, allowed to clot, and centrifuged at before and after supplementation were tested by t-tests or
1168 g for 15 min to obtain serum. Whole blood and serum analysis of variance. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r)
were stored at - 80C for genetic and biochemical analysis. were used to describe the linear association between vari-
The following profiles were measured using a Hitachi-7600 ables. Values of P < .05 were considered statistically sig-
analyzer (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan): fasting blood sugar, nificant. Gene interactions and supplementation among the
total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density li- test and placebo groups were evaluated by v2 tests, and
poprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein relationships among the factors and genes were evaluated by
cholesterol (LDL-C), apoA-I, apo B-100, glucose, insulin, paired t-test and analysis of variance after adjusting for age,
fructosamin, and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C). Homeostatic sex, and BMI.
Downloaded by University Of Melbourne from www.liebertpub.com at 04/30/18. For personal use only.
Table 2. Baseline Characteristics Adjusted by Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index
According to C and T Alleles of PPAR-c Gene
C allele T allele
HDL mg/dL 53.5 – 1.0 54.6 – 1.0 58.4 – 1.8 50.7 – 2.5 NS
LDL mg/dL 130.8 – 2.8 121.8 – 2.7* 105.8 – 7.4 117.4 – 10.4 NS
TG/HDL 1.9 – 0.1 1.7 – 0.1 1.5 – 0.2 1.8 – 0.2 NS
FFA lEq/L 601.9 – 20.5 572.5 – 20.3 658.1 – 34.2 450.1 – 47.9** NS
Apo A1 mg/dL 1.42 – 0.02 1.48 – 0.02 1.54 – 0.04 1.42 – 0.06 NS
Apo B mg/dL 0.85 – 0.02 0.82 – 0.02 0.70 – 0.06 0.77 – 0.08 NS
Insulin resistance
Glucose mg/dL 83.9 – 0.9 81.9 – 0.9 87.5 – 1.9 87.2 – 2.6 NS
Insulin lU/mL 5.9 – 0.4 5.6 – 0.4 9.0 – 1.0 3.7 – 1.4* NS
HOMA-IR 1.3 – 0.1 1.1 – 0.1 2.0 – 0.3 0.8 – 0.4* NS
Fructosamin lM/L 247.8 – 2.2 244.2 – 2.2 258.3 – 6.9 244.5 – 9.7 NS
HbA1C % 5.40 – 0.04 5.44 – 0.04 5.46 – 0.11 5.31 – 0.15 NS
Tissue toxicity
AST IU/L 19.0 – 0.4 20.2 – 0.4* 21.6 – 0.8 20.0 – 1.1 NS
ALT IU/L 18.9 – 0.7 19.6 – 0.7 23.4 – 1.8 20.5 – 2.6 NS
Creatinine mg/dL 0.68 – 0.01 0.69 – 0.01 0.86 – 0.05 0.74 – 0.06 NS
Na excretion mmol/day 186.3 – 7.3 220.6 – 7.2** 171.3 – 13.6 188.8 – 19.1 NS
Antioxidant
DNA in tail % 20.8 – 0.3 21.5 – 0.3 19.5 – 0.7 22.6 – 1.0* NS
Tail length lm 39.9 – 0.3 38.9 – 0.3* 37.5 – 0.8 42.0 – 1.1 NS
ORAC TE/mL 19.2 – 0.3 19.9 – 0.2 19.6 – 0.9 19.2 – 1.0 NS
TRAP mM/L 1.723 – 0.002 1.716 – 0.002** 1.730 – 0.004 1.722 – 0.005 NS
Catalase K/gHb 34.4 – 1.2 31.5 – 1.2 33.9 – 2.9 44.1 – 4.1 NS
GSH-Px U/gHb 31.3 – 1.6b 25.1 – 1.6a** 36.5 – 2.6b 36.9 – 3.6b 0.011
SOD U/gHb 1886.6 – 25.4 1930.4 – 25.1 2142.4 – 76.5 1865.9 – 107.2 NS
Nutrition intake
Energy Kcal 1551.1 – 32.2 1446.2 – 32.6* 1492.6 – 87.6 1662.6 – 122.7 NS
Carbohydrate g/day 221.8 – 5.9 225.1 – 6.0 219.2 – 17.6 264.4 – 24.7 NS
Protein g/day 64.4 – 1.8 55.7 – 1.8** 57.1 – 4.3 60.9 – 6.0 NS
Fat g/day 43.6 – 1.4b 35.2 – 1.4a*** 39.0 – 2.4ab 37.2 – 3.4a 0.006
Sodium (Na) mg/day 3569.6 – 106.9 3669.5 – 108.2 3389.9 – 234.0 4016.2 – 327.8 NS
Potassium (K) mg/day 2353.6 – 58.6 2158.9 – 59.3* 2222.1 – 163.5 2108.5 – 229.0 NS
Na/K ratio 1.54 – 0.04a 1.71 – 0.04ab** 1.57 – 0.08a 1.93 – 0.12b* 0.032
Values are presented as mean – SE, adjusted by age (19–65 years), sex [male (n = 8), female (n = 43)], and BMI. P-values indicate significant differences among
the four groups.
abcd
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate statistically significant differences at P < .05.
Significant differences between the test and placebo groups are indicated with asterisks (*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001) in the T and C alleles.
BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; VFA, visceral fat area;
SFA, subcutaneous fat area; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; FFA, free fatty acid; HOMA-IR,
homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance; HbA1C, hemoglobin A1C; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ORAC, oxygen
radical absorbance capacity; TRAP, total radical-trapping antioxidant potential; NS, nonsignificance.
INTERACTION OF PPAR-c AND FERMENTED SOYBEAN ON OBESITY 123
Table 3. Effects of Doenjang Supplementation on the Age-, Sex-, and Body Mass Index–Adjusted Characteristics
According to PPAR-c Polymorphism
FFA lEq/L - 68.9 – 22.1a 88.1 – 21.9b - 54.9 – 36.1a 56.7 – 48.6ab 0.011
Apo A1 mg/dL - 0.17 – 0.01 - 0.19 – 0.01 - 0.25 – 0.03 - 0.22 – 0.04 NS
Apo B mg/dL - 0.14 – 0.01 - 0.16 – 0.01 - 0.12 – 0.03 - 0.15 – 0.03 NS
Insulin resistance
Glucose mg/dL - 4.2 – 0.8 - 1.8 – 0.8* - 7.1 – 1.5 - 7.2 – 2.0 NS
Insulin lU/mL - 1.1 – 0.4a 1.3 – 0.4b - 1.9 – 0.9a 0.4 – 1.2b 0.018
HOMA-IR - 0.3 – 0.1a 0.3 – 0.1b*** - 0.5 – 0.2a 0.1 – 0.3b 0.009
Fructosamin lM/L - 6.3 – 1.4 - 10.0 – 1.4 - 8.7 – 2.1 - 15.7 – 2.8 NS
HbA1C % - 0.16 – 0.03 - 0.90 – 0.03 - 0.25 – 0.07 - 0.28 – 0.10 NS
Hematology
WBC · 103 cells/lL - 0.75 – 0.17 - 0.17 – 0.17* - 0.37 – 0.23 - 0.67 – 0.29 NS
RBC · 103 cells/lL - 0.10 – 0.03 - 0.17 – 0.03 - 0.08 – 0.05 - 0.13 – 0.07 NS
Hb g/dL - 0.3 – 0.1 - 0.4 – 0.1 - 0.4 – 0.2 - 0.4 – 0.2 NS
Hct % - 0.8 – 0.2 - 1.4 – 0.2 - 1.1 – 0.4 - 1.0 – 0.5 NS
Platelet · 103 cells/lL - 6.4 – 6.7 - 9.9 – 6.5 - 2.8 – 6.7 - 10.4 – 8.8 NS
Tissue toxicity
AST IU/L - 0.50 – 0.40 - 0.95 – 0.39 - 2.9 – 0.56 - 1.30 – 0.75 NS
ALT IU/L - 0.9 – 0.70 0.6 – 0.70 - 5.2 – 1.20 - 0.4 – 1.70* NS
BUN mg/dL - 0.84 – 0.37 - 0.34 – 0.36 - 0.96 – 0.55 - 0.08 – 0.74 NS
Creatinine mg/dL 0.07 – 0.02 0.02 – 0.02* 0.05 – 0.05 0.02 – 0.07 NS
Na excretion mmol/day 3.1 – 15.1ab - 8.9 – 14.7a 105.6 – 23.5b - 5.6 – 30.3a* 0.014
Antioxidants
Tail DNA 4.4 – 1.1 3.7 – 1.1 2.9 – 1.3 0.9 – 1.7 NS
Tail length 3.1 – 0.8 1.1 – 0.7 3.2 – 1.1 - 2.6 – 1.4* NS
ORAC - 0.7 – 0.4a 1.4 – 0.4b** 2.5 – 1.4c 1.0 – 1.6b 0.002
TRAP - 0.09 – 0.00 - 0.08 – 0.00 - 0.10 – 0.01 - 0.09 – 0.01 NS
Catalase - 14.9 – 2.5ab - 9.4 – 2.4b - 17.4 – 4.0ab - 29.2 – 5.2a 0.021
GSH-Px - 1.9 – 2.0 1.0 – 2.0 - 7.3 – 3.2 - 8.6 – 4.2 NS
SOD 217.5 – 42.6* 65.4 – 41.5* 222.5 – 120.0 77.4 – 155.0 NS
Nutrition intakes
Energy kcal - 56.4 – 48.5 51.1 – 48.5 - 126.5 – 84.7 - 350.3 – 109.5 NS
Carbohydrate g/day 120.5 – 6.4b - 12.5 – 6.4a* - 9.2 – 7.8ab - 32.8 – 10.1a 0.009
Protein g/day - 4.1 – 2.3 0.1 – 2.3 1.0 – 5.2 5.0 – 6.7 NS
Fat g/day - 6.1 – 2.4a - 2.7 – 2.4ab 4.6 – 3.8b 5.4 – 4.9b 0.042
Sodium (Na) mg/day 55.4 – 164.3b - 318.9 – 164.3a 68.3 – 273.4b - 421.7 – 353.3a 0.016
Potassium (K) mg/day - 212.3 – 76.3 - 92.7 – 76.3 - 415.1 – 162.7 224.4 – 210.3* NS
Na/K ratio 0.2 – 0.1b - 0.1 – 0.1a** 0.4 – 0.1b - 0.4 – 0.1a** 0.001
Values are presented as mean – SE, adjusted by age (19–65 years), sex [male (n = 8), female (n = 43)], and BMI. P-values indicate significant differences among
the four groups.
abcd
Different superscript letters in the same row indicate statistically significant differences at P < .05.
Significant differences between the test and placebo groups are indicated with asterisks (*P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001).
WBC, whole blood cell count; RBC, red blood cell count; Hb, hemoglobin; Hct, hematocrit; BUN, blood urea nitrogen.
124 CHA ET AL.
Downloaded by University Of Melbourne from www.liebertpub.com at 04/30/18. For personal use only.
FIG. 1. Presentation of visceral fat area and subcutaneous fat area regression according to increasing age in subjects having PPAR-c poly-
morphisms such as C wild and T mutant allele. B, wild + test (——); -, mutant + test (—); +, wild + placebo (); :, mutant + placebo (––
—). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/jmf
reduction was increased in those with the PPAR-c T allele allele. ORAC was increased in those with the wild-type
rather than the C allele. VFA was increased with increasing allele, but was decreased in those with either the mutant
age, in particular, > 40 years of age. We found that the PPAR-c allele or after doenjang pills were administered for 12
gene was positively correlated with VFA accumulation and weeks. CAT activity was increased twofold in the doen-
aging, but mutant of PPAR-c decreased SFA. (Fig. 1) jang-treated group with the C allele, but this phenomenon
was reversed in those with the T allele. However, SOD was
decreased by doenjang supplementation in the C allele
Differences in blood chemistry in doenjang intervention
group, but there was no significant difference observed in
according to PPAR-c polymorphism
the T allele group. GSH did not differ after age, sex, and
Plasma FFA, insulin, and HOMA-IR levels were sig- BMI were adjusted.
nificantly increased with increased catabolism of VFA
upon doenjang treatment in those with both alleles com-
Differences in dietary intakes due to doenjang intervention
pared with placebo. The Na excretion was higher in the
according to PPAR-c polymorphism
placebo group compared with doenjang group, to a level
corresponding to that of decreased systolic BP, and Na was We observed an interaction between doenjang and
excreted 30-fold higher in those with the T allele than the C PPAR-c in dietary carbohydrate and Na intakes. The reason
INTERACTION OF PPAR-c AND FERMENTED SOYBEAN ON OBESITY 125
was that subjects with the mutant T allele who took doen- fermented for longer periods improves the insulin resis-
jang consumed less dietary carbohydrates and sodium tance. PPAR-c acts as a central regulator of insulin sensi-
compared with the C allele, even though there was no dif- tivity by increasing insulin-stimulated IRS2-mediated
ference in the dietary doenjang intake. However, dietary fat glucose uptake and TG accumulation.36 In another study,
was slightly increased in the C allele group upon doenjang genistein, daidzein, and small peptides ( < 3 kDa), which
supplementation. The dietary sodium intake was signifi- were produced by longer fermentation of soybeans, in-
cantly different when age, sex, and BMI were adjusted. hibited preadipocyte differentiation and body weight gains
in vivo through PPAR-c activation.24 The mechanism of TG
accumulation in adipocytes of animals and humans is also
DISCUSSION
connected with PPAR-c by the mechanism of insulin sen-
To best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report sitivity. PPAR-c agonists, such as thiazolidinediones, have a
antiobesity effects of long-term fermented soybean product, site-specific effect on the differentiation of human pre-
Korean doenjang, in subjects with PPAR-c polymorphisms. adipocytes, in particular, subcutaneous fat, although pre-
Doenjang significantly decreased VFA, but not SFA, by adipocytes from visceral fat are refractory to drugs like
increasing lipolysis in subjects with the mutant T allele. troglitazone. Visceral fat accumulation is closely associated
Since the food intake and physical activity were not con- with insulin-resistance syndromes, including impaired glu-
trolled, those results of doenjang supplementation in over- cose tolerance, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and cardio-
Downloaded by University Of Melbourne from www.liebertpub.com at 04/30/18. For personal use only.
noncompliance with the study protocol. Even though our chromatography quandrupole time of flight mass spectrometry
study results may not be generalized to the entire Korean (UPLCQ-TOF-MS). Food Chem 2011;127:1056–1064.
population, our results on doenjang intervention can estab- 11. Fajas L, Debril MB, Auwerx J: PPAR: an essential role in
lish the basis for further functional food studies on obesity metabolic control. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2001;11:64–69.
prevention. However, the antiobesity effect of VFA in 12. Doney AS, Fischer B, Cecil JE, Boylan K, McGuigan FE,
overweight subjects with PPAR-c polymorphisms should be Ralston SH, Morris AD, Palmer CN: Association of the
confirmed in various populations, since genetic differences Pro12Ala and C1431T variants of PPARG and their haplotypes
among ethnic groups may be present. In conclusion, this with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2004;47:
study suggests that doenjang has antiobesity and anti- 555–558.
13. Chao TH, Li YH, Chen JH, Wu HL, Shi GY, Liu PY, Tsai WC,
oxidative effects in overweight individuals with mutant al-
Guo HR: The 161TT genotype in the exon 6 of the peroxisome-
leles of PPAR-c.
proliferator-activated receptor gene is associated with premature
acute myocardial infarction and increased lipid peroxidation in
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS habitual heavy smokers. Clin Sci 2004;107:461–466.
This study was funded by the Seoul City R&BD program 14. Wang XL, Oosterhof J, Duarte N: Peroxisome proliferator-acti-
(10526) and the Ministry of Health & Welfare (A000385), vated receptor C1613T polymorphism and coronary artery dis-
Republic of Korea. All authors participated in this work with ease. Cardiovasc Res 1999;44:588–594.
their substantive contributions. Y.-S.C. and S-.W.C. had the 15. Meirhaeghe A, Fajas L, Helbecque N, Cottel D, Lebel P, Dallon
Downloaded by University Of Melbourne from www.liebertpub.com at 04/30/18. For personal use only.
responsibility for conducting and performance of the RCT geville J, Deeb S, Auwerx J, Amouyel P: A genetic polymor-
projects. M.L. and K.P. participated in the biochemical phism of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene
influences plasma leptin levels in obese humans. Hum Mol Genet
analysis and interpretation of data, and Y.K. and Y.P. car-
1998;7:435–440.
ried out the statistics.
16. Valve R, Sivenius K, Miettinen R, Pihlajama ki J, Rissanen A,
Deeb SS, Auwerx J, Uusitupa M, Laakso M: Two polymor-
AUTHOR DISCLOSURE STATEMENT phisms in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- gene
No competing financial interests exist. are associated with severe overweight among obese women.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:3708–3712.
17. Doney A, Fischer B, Frew D, Cumming A, Flavell DM, World
REFERENCES
M, Montgomery HE, Boyle D, Morris A, Palmer CN: Haplo-
1. Despres JP, Lemieux I: Abdominal obesity and metabolic syn- type analysis of the PPAR Pro12Ala and C1431T variants
drome. Nature 2006;444:881–887. reveals opposing associations with body weight. BMC Genet
2. World Health Organization: Obesity and overweight. 2009. 2002;3:21.
Available at: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/in- 18. Lefterova MI, Steger DJ, Zhuo D, Qatanani M, Mullican SE,
dex.html (accessed January 20, 2012) Tuteja G, Manduchi E, Grant GR, Lazar MA: Cell-specific de-
3. Virgili F and Scaccini C: Nutritional phenolics and cardiovas- terminants of PPAR-c function in adipocytes and macrophages.
cular disease. In: Phytochemical Functional Foods. ( Johnson I, Mol Cell Biol 2010;30:2078–2089.
Williamson G, eds.) Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, 19. Shin HD, Park BL: Genetic polymorphism in PPAR associated
United Kingdom, 2003, pp. 5–18. with obesity. Diabetes 2004;53:847–851.
4. Wang HJ, Murphy PA: Isoflavones content in commercial soy- 20. Yun JW: Possible antiobesity therapeutics from nature—a re-
bean foods. J Agric Food Chem 1994;42:1666–1673. view. Phytochemistry 2010;71:1625–1641.
5. U.S. Food and Drug Administration: Food labeling: health 21. Yang JY, Lee SJ, Park HW, Cha YS: Effect of genistein with
claims: soy protein and coronary heart disease. FDA, HHS: Final carnitine administration on lipid parameters and obesity in
rule: soy protein and coronary heart disease. Fed Reg C57Bl/6J mice fed a high-fat diet. J Med Food 2006;9:459–467.
1999;64:57700–57733. 22. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher
6. Park KY, Jung KO, Rhee SH, Choi YH: Antimutagenic effects of DF, Turner RC: Homeostasis model assessment, insulin resis-
doenjang and its active compounds. Mutat Res 2003;523– tance and beta cell function from fasting plasma glucose and
524:43–53. insulin concentration in man. JAMA 1986;256:2372–2377.
7. Kwon DY, Daily JW III, Kim HJ, Park S: Antidiabetic effects of 23. Rice-Evans CA, Miller NJ: Antioxidant activities of flavonoids
fermented soybean products on type 2 diabetes. Nutr Res as bioactive components of food. Biochem Soc Trans 1996;24:
2010;30:1–13. 790–795.
8. Jang CH, Park CS, Lim JK, Kim JH, Kwon DY, Kim YS, Shin 24. Kurihara H, Fukami H, Yao XS: Effect of oolang tea on plasma
DH, Kim JS: Metabolism of isoflavone derivatives during antioxidative capacity in mice loaded with restraint stress as-
manufacturing of traditional meju and doenjang. Food Sci Bio- sessed using the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC)
technol 2008;17:442–445. assay. Bio Pharm Bull 2004;27:1093–1098.
9. Kwon DY, Hong SM, Ahn IS, Kim MJ, Yang HJ, Park SM: 25. Aebi H: Catalase. In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. (Berg-
Isoflavonoids and peptides from meju, longterm fermented soy- meyer HU, ed.) Academic Press: New York and London, 1974,
bean, increase insulin sensitivity and exert insulinotropic effects pp. 673–678.
in vitro. Nutrition 2011;27:244–252. 26. Marklund S, Marklund G: Involvement of the superoxide anion
10. Kang HJ, Yang HJ, Kim MJ, Han ES, Kim HJ, Kwon DY: radical in the antioxidation of pyrogallol and convenient assay
Metabolic analysis of meju during by ultra performance liquid for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem 1974;47:469–474.
INTERACTION OF PPAR-c AND FERMENTED SOYBEAN ON OBESITY 127
27. Beutler E: Glutathion peroxidase. In: Red Cell Metabolism: A 35. Harmon AW, Patel YM, Harp JB: Genistein inhibits CCAAT/
Manual for Biochemical Methods. Verlag Grune and Stration, enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPbeta) activity and 3T3-L1
New York, 1984, pp. 71–73. adipogenesis by increasing C/EBP homologous protein expres-
28. Haseeb A, Iliyas M, Chakrabarti S, Farooqui AA, Naik SR, Ghosh sion. Biochem J 2002;367:203–208.
S, Suragani M, Ehtesham NZ: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms 36. Mark Gurnell: PPARc and metabolism: insights from the study of
in peroxisoe proliferator-activated receptor c and their association human genetic variants. Clin Endocrinol 2003;59:267–277.
with plasma levels of resistin and the metabolic syndrome in a 37. Kazawa S, Sun F, Ito M, Kawasaki E, Eguchi K: Efficacy of
South Indian population. J Biosci 2009;34:405–414. Troglitazone on body fat distribution in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes
29. Kandulska K, Nogowski L, Szkudelski T: Effect of some phy- Care 2000;23:1067–1071.
toestrogens on metabolism of rat adipocytes. Reprod Nutr Dev 38. Patel RP, Boersma BJ, Crawford JH, Hogg N, Kirk M, Kalya-
1999;39:497–501. naraman B, Parks DA, Barnes S, Darley-Usmar V: Antioxidant
30. Mezei O, Banz WJ, Steger RW, Peluso MR, Winters TA, Shay mechanisms of isoflavones in lipid systems: paradoxical effects
N: Soy isoflavones exert antidiabetic and hypolipidemic effects of peroxyl radical scavenging. Free Radic Biol Med 2001;31:
through the PPAR pathways in obese Zucker rats and murine 1570–1581.
RAW 264.7 cells. J Nutr 2003;133:1238–1243. 39. Zhao X, Zhang Y, Strong R, Grotta JC, Aronowski J: 15d-
31. Szkudelska K, Nogowski L, Szkudelski T: Genistein affects li- Prostaglandin J(2) activates peroxisome proliferator-activated
pogenesis and lipolysis in isolated rat adipocytes. J Steroid receptorgamma, promotes expression of catalase, and reduces
Biochem Mol Biol 2000;75:265–271. inflammation, behavioral dysfunction, and neuronal loss after
Downloaded by University Of Melbourne from www.liebertpub.com at 04/30/18. For personal use only.
32. Busby MG, Jeffcoat AR, Bloedon LT, Koch MA, Black T, Dix intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
KJ, Heizer WD, Thomas BF, Hill JM, Crowell JA, Zeisel SH: 2006;26:811–820.
Clinical characteristics and pharmacokinetics of purified soy 40. Ricketts ML, Moore DD, Banz WJ, Mezei O, Shay NF: Mole-
isoflavones: single-dose administration to healthy men. Am J Clin cular mechanisms of action of the soy isoflavones includes ac-
Nutr 2002;75:126–136. tivation of promiscuous nuclear receptors. A review. J Nutr
33. Dang ZC: Dose-dependent effects of soy phyto-oestrogen gen- Biochem 2005;16:321–330.
istein on adipocytes: Mechanisms of action. Obes Rev 41. Cho TM, Peng N, Clark JT, Novak L, Roysommuti S, Prasain J,
2009;10:342–349. Wyss JM: Genistein attenuates the hypertensive effects of dietary
34. Napora JK, Short RG, Muller DC, Carlson OD, Odetunde JO, NaCl in hypertensive male rats. Endocrinology 2007;148:5396–
XU X, Carducci M, Travison TG, Maggio M, Egan JM, Asaria S: 5402.
High-dose isoflavones do not improve metabolic and inflamma- 42. Marx N, Duez H, Fruchart JC, Staels B: Peroxisome proliferator-
tory parameters in androgen-deprived men with prostate cancer. J activated receptors and atherogenesis: regulators of gene ex-
Andrology 2011;32:40–48. pression in vascular cells. Circ Res 2004;94:1168–1178.