Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Auditing: 1. Purposes of Evaluation - Goals of The System
Project Auditing: 1. Purposes of Evaluation - Goals of The System
A key assessment tool is the project audit, a more or less systematic review into any part
of the project. A project audit is versatile and can focus on whatever senior management
needs. In the view of the manager group for whom it is carried out and the group to
whom it is carried out, the assessment of a project must be reliable.
The most straightforward dimension is the efficiency of the project in meeting both the
spending plan and the timeline. Another, and most complex, dimension is the influence /
satisfaction of the client. The third dimension, once again somewhat straightforward and
expected, is business / direct success. The last dimension, somewhat more difficult and
nebulous to ascertain, is the potential of the future.
Another primary objective of the evaluation is to help translate the achievement of the
objectives of the project into a contribution to the objectives of the parent organisation.
To do this, all aspects of the project are studied in order to identify and understand the
strengths and weaknesses of the project. The result is a set of recommendations that can
help both on-going and future projects.
Benefits of evaluation
- Reduce costs.
- Identify the mistakes, correct them, and avoid them in the future.
Contributions of evaluation
- Provide an congenial environment where project team leaders can work together
creatively.
- Improve the way in which projects contribute to the professional growth of project
team members.
The project audit is a comprehensive review of a project's management, its methods and
processes, its documents, its assets, its budgets and expenses and its degree of
completion. The formal report can be provided in different formats but should include, at
a minimum, comments on some basic points.
Time and money are two of the most important weaknesses in the audit report on the
depth of investigation and the level of detail. Significant cost elements are the collection,
storage and management of auditable data. The self-protective behavior of team members
during an audit and the potential for project integrity to suffer as a result of a negative
audit are two frequently underestimated costs.
There are three distinct and easily recognized levels of project auditing:
- Technical audit-usually carried out under the direct supervision of the project
auditor by a trained technician.
Technical concerns are less likely to be areas of interest as the project progresses.
Scheduling and budget enforcement are the key interests. Management issues are
important things of concern to audits that are conducted late in the life of the project.
Postproject audits are also a legal requirement, because such an audit was stated in the
contract by the company.
Data should be structured to encourage the comparison of expected results with actual
results. Significant variations from projected results should be noted and clarified in a
collection of footnotes or comments. Negative remarks on individuals or groups relevant
to the project should be avoided
The auditor should first and foremost 'say the facts' . The auditor must conduct the audit
in an impartial and ethical way. Also should take responsibility for what is included and
excluded from consideration in the report. The auditor / evaluator should preserve
political and professional independence during the audit and treat all materials as
confidential.
Like the project itself, the audit has a life-cycle consisting of the orderly progress of well-
defined events:
In order for the audit / evaluation to be carried out with skill and precision and to be
generally accepted by senior management, the client and the project team, several
conditions must be met:
Measuring is a crucial part of the audit / evaluation process. Output against the projected
budget and schedule does not normally pose any major measurement problems.
Measuring real spending against the expected budget is more complicated and relies on a
detailed understanding of the accounts department's procedures
Determining which revenues to assign to a project is a very difficult task. All distribution
of costs / revenue decisions must be taken upon implementation of the different projects.
The conflicts are being waged "up front," and the cost / revenue allocation equity ceases
to be so big a problem. As long as allocations are rendered by a formula, major disputes
are prevented or mitigated at least