This document discusses control in physiological systems through three paragraphs. It covers homeostasis at various levels from cells to the whole organism. Control occurs through static and dynamic equilibrium, linear and nonlinear regulation, and rhythmic oscillating systems. Feedback features prominently in control mechanisms at the chemical, hormonal, and nervous system levels. Control utilizes enzymes, hormones that act on cells or chemical levels, and endocrine-kinetic hormones that control other glands. The hierarchical structure of the human body exhibits control at each level from genes to intact physiology. Redundancy provides reliability through duplicate organs and control loops.
This document discusses control in physiological systems through three paragraphs. It covers homeostasis at various levels from cells to the whole organism. Control occurs through static and dynamic equilibrium, linear and nonlinear regulation, and rhythmic oscillating systems. Feedback features prominently in control mechanisms at the chemical, hormonal, and nervous system levels. Control utilizes enzymes, hormones that act on cells or chemical levels, and endocrine-kinetic hormones that control other glands. The hierarchical structure of the human body exhibits control at each level from genes to intact physiology. Redundancy provides reliability through duplicate organs and control loops.
This document discusses control in physiological systems through three paragraphs. It covers homeostasis at various levels from cells to the whole organism. Control occurs through static and dynamic equilibrium, linear and nonlinear regulation, and rhythmic oscillating systems. Feedback features prominently in control mechanisms at the chemical, hormonal, and nervous system levels. Control utilizes enzymes, hormones that act on cells or chemical levels, and endocrine-kinetic hormones that control other glands. The hierarchical structure of the human body exhibits control at each level from genes to intact physiology. Redundancy provides reliability through duplicate organs and control loops.
The study of control in physiological systems reveals
a range of manifestations of complexity. A central feature is homeostasis at various levels in the hierarchy from intracellular mechanisms to mechanisms operating at the level of the whole organism. Much of the major focus is related to the internal environment of the intact physiological organism, but control systems also feature prominently in relation to the way we deal with externally sensed information (via the eyes, ears, etc.). CONTROL IN PHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
The patterns of regulation and control occurring within
physiological systems are many and varied. Static and dynamic equilibrium, linear and nonlinear regulation, weak and highly stable rhythmicity (oscillating systems) – all are instrumental in the maintenance of the living state. In most engineering applications of feedback control, the focus is temporal control, studying and seeking to minimize transient errors in the approach to a goal value. In the physiological state, however, in addition to such temporal aspects, control also involves geometric or functional patterns (in the context of neural control) and the minimization of their deviations from normal resting values. CONTROL IN PHYSIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Let us return now to chemical regulation and control within the
physiological system and examine some of its dynamic features. A range of regulatory mechanisms is involved, both in the maintenance of the environment within the individual cell and in their aggregation into the behavioral patterns of the entire organism. Control is evident at each level. For example, at the lowest level there is both transcriptional and translational control involved in protein synthesis, incorporating genetic effects transmitted via RNA. Feedback features in all these control mechanisms. Proteins may either be incorporated into the cellular structure or may, as enzymes, be involved in subsequent chemical reactions occurring within the cell. Enzymes
The rate of chemical changes in physiological
systems is generally controlled by such enzymes, which act as biological catalysts. In the simplest enzyme controlled reaction, an enzyme E and chemical substrate S form an enzyme-substrate complex X which in turn decomposes into the original enzyme E and the product of the reaction P. This system of reactions can be represented by the equation: Assuming first order reactions, such that rate of change is directly proportional to the concentration of the ingredients of the reaction, the mass transfer equations for the system are given by: where E, S, X and P are the quantities of free enzyme, substrate, complex and product respectively. The k values are the rate constants for the appropriate reactions, so that for instance kXP is the rate constant relating rate of production of product to the quantity of complex. Hormones
Hormones are powerful chemical agents secreted by endocrine
glands such as the pancreas and the thyroid gland. Control in such chemical reactions, however, is not confined to the action of enzyme systems. For example, there is a large number of chemical reactions that form a part of glucose metabolism taking place in the lever that are under enzyme control. However, this set of reactions is also controlled by a range of hormones, including insulin, glucagon, adrenalin, growth hormone and the thyroid hormones. Three types of hormonal action are evident from a control perspective. The first type of action is associated with hormones that act on smooth muscle or other cells to stimulate an effect such as muscle contraction . These are sometimes referred to as kinetic hormones. The consequence of this action is perceived by a neural detector. For example, arterial baroreceptors monitor changes in blood pressure following the secretion of adrenalin from the adrenal medulla. The fact that neural transmission is involved in the feedback pathway from the site of the kinetic action to the particular endocrine gland ensures that within seconds the appropriate changes in hormonal output can occur. The second type of hormonal action manifests itself in the change in blood concentration of a particular chemical. Hormones bringing about such action are sometimes referred to as metabolic hormones. For example, insulin secreted in the pancreas brings about a decrease in the level of blood glucose. The feedback in this case is chemical, the lower level of blood glucose in the blood perfusing the pancreas being recognized and inhibiting further insulin secretion. The limitation of this type of control stems from the fact that this local chemical feedback has an effective time constant which is typically of the order of tens of minutes. The third type of hormonal control involves endocrino-kinetic or trophic hormones (sometimes also known as endocrine-kinetic hormones). These are produced by one gland which, in turn, controls the activity of another . For example, ACTH is a trophic hormone secreted by the anterior pituitary which, in turn, acts upon the adrenal cortex in controlling the rate of secretion of cortico-steroids. The actions of such target gland hormones are complex, multiple and slow. The effects of cortico-steroids, for instance, are such that their actions on peripheral tissues cannot be monitored by changes in a single blood constituent. It is therefore the concentration of the steroid itself that is used as the feedback signal. Also it can be seen that the feedback effects are more complex for this type of hormone. The overall control of the chemical processes of physiology involves the nervous system as well as hormones. Many of these are still not very well understood, though considerable advances in understanding have taken place in some areas; for instance, relating to the vagal control of breathing. Nevertheless, it is clear that a complex array of control actions is involved in the totality of chemical processes to be found in the intact physiological organism. At a simple level there is strong local control action. This enables many of the chemical processes to be regulated without recourse to higher levels of control. This is due to the fact that chemical reaction rates are generally concentration-dependent, giving rise to inherent negative feedback. This, together with the sophisticated array of enzymic, hormonal and nervous system mechanisms involving both chemical and neural transmission, provides a degree of flexibility and adaptability that constitutes an excellent example of effectively functioning control. HIERARCHY
The structure of the overall human organism offers
itself to analysis in hierarchical terms; from genes, through cellular subsystems, cells, organelles, organs to the intact physiological organism. At each level there is feedback and control action of a variety of modes. Equally each level of organization is aggregated into the next level up in this organizational hierarchy (e.g. cellular subsystems aggregate into cells and organs into the intact organism). Examining the control of organ systems a number of mechanisms are evident. As we have already seen, in many processes there is strong, local low level chemical control. This is particularly appropriate for the situation in which disturbances to the metabolic process are unlikely to be large in magnitude. On the other hand, for the likes of carbohydrate metabolism where gross perturbations occur daily, through the feeding process, hormonal mechanisms form an integral component of the regulatory process. REDUNDANCY
One more feature that characterizes the complexity of human
physiology is redundancy. The most obvious examples of redundancy relate to the provision of pairs of organs: two eyes, ears, lungs and kidneys. In the case of the sensory organs, this permits an increased sophistication in sensory perception, such as binocular vision. The duplication of lung and kidney function provides the ability to cope with extremes of operating conditions that would tax the single organ. Moreover, the kidney, whilst of prime importance in the regulation of the body’s water balance, also has a limited capacity to act as a chemical plant and can therefore provide a limited degree of back-up for the major chemical plant – the liver. A degree of redundancy is also apparent in the organ control systems. For example, a number of hormonal control loops are involved in the maintenance of blood glucose levels. Glucagon, adrenalin, growth hormone and the cortico-steroids are all capable in their several ways of remedying low glucose levels. This is not to say that all these hormones are specific in their action, for many hormones mediate a variety of metabolic effects. Nevertheless, a high level of reliability is afforded in the correction of a deficiency in blood glucose. On the other hand there is only a single control loop capable of lowering elevated glucose levels – the insulin controller. This is, however, a robust controller in the healthy individual, thus offsetting to a degree the absence of any back-up system from a system design perspective Redundancy is also apparent in the nervous system. In many instances a small fraction of the available information needing to be transmitted is carried by each of a large number of units. In this way immunity to large scale loss of information is provided, even though small numbers of the central neurons are dying each and every day. Organisms with a higher nervous system are capable of responding selectively to a vast number of specific combinations of sensory stimuli. This ability has led to the hypothesis that information from the dense organs is progressively re-coded to higher levels in a less redundant form. Since the transmission lines – the number of fibers in a sensory pathway – is fairly constant, this reduction process would occur in terms of reduced average activity in the sensory centers, that is economy of pulses. Great economy can be achieved by this recoding, providing of course that it occurs with the minimum sacrifice of information. FUNCTION AND BEHAVIOR AND THEIR MEASUREMENT
From the foregoing sections it is clear that physiological
systems exhibit complexity in a variety of forms. The integration of the system components, the manner in which they are inter-connected and the mechanisms by means of which they are regulated and controlled gives rise to the functional and behavioral patterns that are to be found in the functioning physiological organism. Figure 2.1 provided us with one simplified representation of some of this overall physiological complexity. It is these functional and behavioral patterns which are of interest to us as physiological modelers. However, in order to be able to quantify the dynamic processes and effects that are occurring within the complexity of our physiological systems, we must be able to make measurements. This is where many challenges lay; there are limits as to what can be measured in living organisms. There are constraints, both practical and ethical. For example, it is generally not possible to make invasive measurements on the organs, nor in the tissues, nor of the secretion of the glands of the intact physiological organism. This has traditionally meant that, in terms of chemical variables in the body, measurements have been limited to those that could be derived from blood, urine or breath samples. More is now possible, however, due to technological advance. Making use of advanced imaging modalities it is now possible to derive measurements of say glucose in the brain, assuming that the organ in question, brain, liver or kidneys for example, can be precisely identified from the images in question. So, at an experimental level, our ability to access and hence potentially understand physiological complexity is limited. We are constrained by measurement technology and methodology as to what may be measured directly (in vivo). As far as accessing information regarding other quantities is concerned, the only way forward is by using indirect or inferential methods. This means using models as will be explained below.
Assessment of Genetic Diversity of Benguet Pine (Pinus Kesiya Royle Ex Gord.) From Seed Production Areas in The Philippines Using Microsatellite Markers
UPLB Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research and Extension