Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COLOUR Psychology
#Competitive Exams
#Essay Writing
#Current Affairs
#Historical episodes
#Pakistan Affairs
# General Knowledge
# Global Issues
# Geopolitics
# International Relations
# Foreign Policy
Critical Analysis:
His dismissal from service by the Lahore High Court on Friday is of consequence
both legally and politically. It is also open to interpretation. Both the PML-N and PTI
have claimed this development as a vindication(justification) of their positions.
While PML-N president Shahbaz Sharif and Maryam Nawaz Sharif tweeted saying
Nawaz Sharif’s innocence had been proved as it was established that Mr Malik’s
conduct was compromised, Barrister Shahzad Akbar of the Asset Recovery Unit said
in his tweet that Maryam Nawaz was also culpable(condemnable) in leaking the
video of the judge and could face punishment. The law will, however, take its own
course.
▪ The PML-N legal team will need to decide how they want to factor in the
dismissal of the judge in the Azizia steel mills case, keeping in mind the
repercussions on Nawaz Sharif’s acquittal in the Flagship reference case.
However, it is fairly clear that in terms of a political narrative, the PML-N will
use this to reinforce its position that Mr Sharif’s ouster (kick out,expel) and
convictions were part of a conspiracy to remove the PML-N from power and
usher( direct) in the PTI.
▪ For its part, the PTI has already taken a position that Mr Malik was
compromised by the PML-N itself. The logic may wear thin(shabby, weak)
but in a polarised environment like ours logic can easily be sacrificed at the
altar of political expediency(advantage).
Conclusion:
Of greater concern, however, is the impact of this sordid (dirty) episode on the
overall judicial system. Already burdened with credibility issues, the Judge Arshad
Malik affair will raise additional questions about how cases are handled under
various pressures, and judgements likely compromised under duress(pressure). It
may be a while till we find out who actually made Arshad Malik go rogue (pursue
own interest), but it is now increasingly becoming clear that elements inside the
judicial system are vulnerable to influence from private parties and state agencies. It
is obvious that Mr Malik has not been the only one manipulating justice to cater
(take care, supply with) to various agendas. It is high time the superior judiciary
took steps to stem the rot( to stop increasing).
IT was yet another instance of a rail tragedy waiting to happen. The collision
between a train and a passenger bus carrying Sikh pilgrims on an unmanned(not
having staff) level crossing near Nankana Sahib, the birthplace of Guru Nanak, on
Friday afternoon could have been averted and 22 precious lives saved if the railways
had secured the crossing instead of leaving it unattended.
Key Points:
▪ The responsibility for the deadly accident lies squarely (fairly) with the
Pakistan Railways. It isn’t the first such accident nor will it be the last one
unless the railway authorities accept responsibility for the unfortunate incident
and start taking action to avoid similar happenings in future.
▪ A few months back when a train rammed (forcefully hit) into a passenger bus
on another unmanned crossing in Rohri, resulting in the loss of 19 lives.
▪ Or of the one near Pattoki where two newly married couples were killed in
May.
▪ Meanwhile, yet another accident took place on Saturday; at least two people
were injured when the Shalimar Express, en route to Lahore from Karachi,
collided with a cargo train. Accidents involving trains on railway crossings are
quite frequent in Pakistan.
Yet no effort is ever made by the railway authorities to properly secure them. Instead,
after every accident we find railway officials shifting responsibility for securing these
crossings to the provincial governments or blaming road users for being ‘too
reckless’(heedless).
Critical Analysis:
Pakistan has a long history of train accidents owing to years of lack of investment in
railway infrastructure and the absence of minimum operational passenger safety
standards. Pakistan Railways is not known for its passenger services and facilitation.
But that is nothing when it comes to its appallingly (shockingly) bad safety record
and deadly accidents. In recent years, the frequency of train accidents, because of
derailment(going off) and engine failure, has been increasing.
▪ Last year is considered to have been the worst in the history of the railway
because of a surge in the number of train accidents and lives lost. Most
accidents are not reported by the media because these do not involve the loss
of life and are now seen as routine.
Conclusion:
Surprisingly, the government has for the last two years focused on launching new
train routes instead of investing in railway infrastructure and updating its operational
safety guidelines. This would involve securing unmanned level crossings in order to
prevent fatal accidents.
➢ that they would make public the joint investigation team report of
❖ From CSS Point of view this Opinion will help in covering Essay
paper, Current Affairs and General Science
Quick Notes:
Today, fossil fuels are mined and then burned to release the energy stored
inside them. They are widely used because there is currently supply, and
because they are fairly cheap to mine and drill for (mining is an activity that
allows the extraction of valuable minerals from the ground).
Examples:
▪ Solar energy
▪ Wind energy
▪ Hydro energy
▪ Tidal energy
▪ Geothermal energy
▪ Biomass energy
Global energy demand has risen in the past century which led to
▪ Fossil fuel consumption drove the growth but with-it carbon emissions also
rose.
▪ Electricity demand has dropped six percent and global carbon emissions
have dropped around six percent, with a highest 17 percent drop year-on-year
in April, all because of the covid-19 pandemic.
What should we expect in future? Fossil fuel demand (excluding natural gas) is
expected to decrease in the West in all future scenarios from 2018-2040. This
makes sense as advanced economies can afford to make the shift from conventional
to renewable energy sources.
ICEP Dawn Analysis
In East, Fossil Fuel demand is expected to increase in future:
On the contrary, fossil fuel consumption in the East is expected to increase in the
majority of scenarios in next 20 years.
The rise in the renewables which was estimated before corona and fossil fuel decline
it triggered, would still be valid with slight variation. Which is to say, for instance,
solar power which supplied less than 0.01 percent of electricity in 2018,
increased to 2 percent in 2018, and is expected to provide 20 percent of
electricity globally.Be it the circular debt conundrum or the overall governance
problems of Pakistan, administrative and fiscal decentralization is the only viable
solution. Anyone arguing otherwise doesn’t understand the problem, doesn’t want to
resolve it or is protecting certain vested interests (political/financial). In this
government’s case it appears to be a mix of all three.
The game-changing green revolution that is believed to be the outcome of the hit that
the fossil fuel industry received in contemporary times is not grounded in reality and
seems mere wishful thinking. Covid-19 may however speed up the rise in the
renewables in the advanced economies (reasons for which are discussed later).
There will be two kinds of impediments that renewables will have along the way.
▪ For advanced economies low capital turnover and capital stocks will still be a
problem as technology which is to be used in future in the energy industry is
produced earlier. There is a lot of investment at stake and with-it politics
comes into play as well.
▪ As far as the developing countries are concerned, they have received a huge
financial hit because of the pandemic and despite the decline in fossil fuel
industry they will continue to find the shift to renewables, eveb if they are
expensive, and would seek an autonomous increase in energy efficiency. This
opportunity in the developing economies will be lost to the lack of the fiscal
space which is necessary to make the energy shift.
Pakistan: Landscape of Energy
He further said,
▪ “Thar coal is an expensive source of fuel and it will stay like that for 15-20
years when price crossover is expected.
▪ The Main reason for this is that a lot of investment is required in Thar
which takes a lot of time and without it, cost of production will be high. The
main problem with the present government is its indecision. You need to shut
down old power plants, for instance, Jamshoro and Muzaffargarh, but I am not
sure if government can do that keeping in view their inability to make a
decision, and vested interests”.
Renewable Power in Pakistan:
▪ “The problem with renewable power is it doesn’t have a base load and it is
only feasible in Pakistan when the total cost of generation of renewable energy
is less than the fuel cost of your cheapest fuel generation.
Circular Debt Issue:
▪ Pakistan’s energy mix now stands with natural gas at 34.6 percent, oil at
31.2 percent, hydro at 27 percent, nuclear at 2.7 percent and renewables at
1.1 percent. As far as the menace of circular debt is concerned, it stands at Rs
1.8 trillion., The government instead of decentralizing distribution and handing
it over to provinces (so it can be managed efficiently), has moved a law to pass
circular debt to consumers.
Conclusion:
This was expected of a government which exhibits a severe dislike for the
Eighteenth Amendment and wishes to roll it back. The consequences of the
aforementioned law, which enables government to pass circular debt to consumers in
the form of a surcharge in the bill, will be dire as people are already struggling to
meet their expenses owing to poor economic conditions and rise in unemployment.
❖ From CSS Point of view this will help in covering Essay Paper,
Current Affairs.All things related to Education and its
revamping.
Introduction:
In the federal budget for 2020-21, the government earmarked Rs83.363 billion for
Education Affairs and Services against the revised allocation of Rs81.253 billion for
the current fiscal year, showing a snail’s pace increment of around 2.5 percent.
The World Economic Outlook 2020 of the IMF financial surveillance projects that
world economic recovery is expected at 5.5 percent, that of China at 8.2 percent,
India at 6 percent and Pakistan at one percent.
While global economies struggle to fight the current pandemic, it is time for our
federal and provincial governments to rethink education models, to reprioritize
education resources and enhance learning and productivity simultaneously. Financial
models predict that an estimated $11.5 trillion can be saved globally by 2028 if
countries develop and adopt efficient learning systems in sync with future economic
needs.
Overall, these skills can transpire (occur) through multiple formal and informal
learning interventions. Central to non-traditional learning opportunities is the
development of social-emotional intelligent skills dovetailed (join closely together)
with an enabling environment that shapes today’s children to lead with empathy,
inclusivity, cooperation and values of global citizenship.
As organizations turn agile, move towards flexible work models and expect multi-
talents from the workforce, it is critical that the children of today are provided
personalized learning practices based on individual experiences, skills mastery and
alternate narratives. A recent RAND Corporation comparative study on student
learning outcomes between schools providing personalized learning and traditional
schooling methods concluded that personalized learning strategies are “making
greater progress over the course of two school years, and that those students who
started out behind are catching up to perform at or above national averages.”
The writer consults for the parliament of Pakistan on the UN’s Sustainable
Development Goals.
Twitter: @HassanHakeem87
Rising influence of China in South China Sea and Indo-Pacific region alerts US
strategic Allies
As China brashly(aggressively) tries to impose its own system of rules and order in
the Pacific, the United States and our allies in the Indo-Pacific confront a time for
choosing. We must choose to advance our vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific.
We must choose to ensure the success of the principles of regional and global order
that remain essential to our shared security and prosperity. These are difficult choices
that will come at increasingly greater cost. Beijing will do its best to make sure that
the right choice and the easy choice are never the same, but we believe Americans
and our allies are up to the task.
For instance, U.S. allies like Australia are already making the tough choices, while
braving Beijing’s bluster and bullying. By standing by its calls for an independent
inquiry into the origins of the coronavirus and by remaining open to trade while
refusing to trade away fundamental values, Australia has set a proud example for all
the world. As Beijing lashes out across the region from the Himalayan Mountains to
the South China Sea, Australia’s actions serve as a reminder for our other allies that
in a free and open Indo-Pacific, right makes might — and not the other way around.
Australia should not be alone in this effort. The United States stands with our allies,
and we are prepared to make our own tough choices.
In the United States, we have seen how even in the most rancorous(resentful)
political times, Republicans and Democrats have joined together to renew the
country’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific region, like when the Asia Reassurance
ICEP Dawn Analysis
Initiative Act (ARIA) became law in December 2018. As was stated in the U.S.
Department of Defense Indo-Pacific Strategy Report, released in July 2019: “This
legislation enshrines a generational whole-of-government policy framework that
demonstrates U.S. commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific region and includes
initiatives that promote sovereignty, rule of law, democracy, economic engagement,
and regional security.”
In the coming days, the U.S. Senate will take the next step toward renewing the
country’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific region by passing the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, which establishes a new Pacific
Deterrence Initiative that will complement ARIA and implement its vision of a
more robust U.S military presence in the Indo-Pacific. This initiative will enhance
the security commitments set forth in ARIA, and help guide Congress and the
Pentagon in making the tough choices necessary to prioritize the Indo-Pacific
and extend critical deterrence initiatives to check our adversaries.
United States Studies Centre reports findings of need of the Pacific Deterrence
Last year, a seminal report from the United States Studies Centre (USSC) at the
University of Sydney provided one of the clearest explanations of why the need for
the Pacific Deterrence Initiative is both real and urgent. The report shows how China
is attempting to “undercut America’s military primacy” and “sowing doubt about
Washington’s security guarantees in the process.” In the face of this development, the
report describes an “increasingly worrying mismatch between America’s strategy and
resources,” especially in the Indo-Pacific. Even as “America’s military services have
started to implement much-needed changes,” the report warns, it’s not clear that
America will have the “budgetary capacity or strategic focus to deliver these in a
robust and timely way.” We share these concerns, and the Pacific Deterrence
Initiative is designed explicitly to address them.
• First, the Pacific Deterrence Initiative will enhance budgetary transparency and
congressional oversight by organizing our defense budget around critical Indo-
Pacific priorities. The initiative will make it easier to translate regional
ICEP Dawn Analysis
priorities into budget priorities, and ensure that security requirements are being
matched with the necessary resources.
• Second, the Pacific Deterrence Initiative will focus resources on key capability
gaps to give U.S. forces everything they need to compete, fight, and win in the
Indo-Pacific. The initiative would focus new resources in many of the areas
recommended by the USSC report, including a more distributed regional
defense posture, resilient logistics networks, fuel and munitions (war
supplies) storage, missile defenses for U.S. bases, and more experimentation to
test and prove new operational concepts.
• Fourth, and finally, the Pacific Deterrence Initiative will help preserve peace in
the Indo-Pacific by bolstering credible deterrence. The initiative will focus
resources on efforts to deny our adversaries the possibility of a quick, easy, or
cheap victory. By injecting uncertainty and risk into the calculations of our
adversaries, we can discourage them from choosing the path of aggression.
SUDDENLY, the debate on government performance seems to be all over the place.
On second thoughts, it may not be so sudden. The incumbent government is about to
complete its two years and that is usually the time when people stop giving any
allowance for the newness of the government and expect solid delivery on the
promises made by the ruling party.
Performance has been the cornerstone of Imran Khan’s campaign for prime
ministership. He gave special attention to the preparation of his party’s election
manifesto and explained in detail its various aspects at a well-attended seminar in
Islamabad at the start of the election campaign. He then came up with another
instrument, not used by any other political party of Pakistan earlier, of capsuling the
initial party plans in ‘Imran Khan’s first 100 Days Agenda’ and launched it with a lot
of fanfare.
Once in power, a special cell in the Prime Minister’s Office was created to monitor
the progress on the implementation of the 100 Days Agenda and to periodically place
the findings online for all to see. A party enthusiast even established a ‘Khan Meter’
to independently monitor the progress on social media. A debate on the PTI
government’s performance in the first 100 days was promoted by the party itself by
presenting a report at a media event despite the fact that the government did not have
any landmark achievement to show except for the formation of over 50 task forces
and committees to do preparatory work on its programme.
Sadly, the PTI and the government it heads have gradually moved away from
publicly reporting their performance. Occasional media reports indicate that Prime
Minister Imran Khan seeks periodic performance reports from his ministers, but there
is hardly any public evidence that such reports are presented or discussed. The
government has shared no such report or even its sanitised version with the people.
The most recent performance debate about the PTI government was triggered by
none other than a vocal member of Prime Minister Imran Khan’s cabinet, Fawad
Chaudhry, who until about a year ago was the official spokesperson for the
government of Pakistan and now holds the portfolio of science and technology in the
federal cabinet. In an interview with senior journalist Sohail Warraich on VOA Urdu,
Fawad Chaudhry made a number of interesting and candid points about the working,
weaknesses, setbacks and failures of his party’s government over the past two years.
Chaudhry wholeheartedly acknowledged that the PTI government had not been able
to meet the lofty expectations of the people who had voted for the party to overhaul
the entire system and not to run a ‘routine’ government. He attributed this lack of
performance to infighting among senior party leaders but, even more importantly,
blamed this on the weak team picked by the prime minister. He did not mince his
words when he said that the implementation of the party programme depended on the
quality of human resource deployed for this purpose and the leadership chose weak
people for key positions.
It was a shocking observation, but he was probably spot on when he blamed Imran
Khan for appointing pliant people in the provinces in the hope that they would
willingly take dictation from him. The domination of unelected advisers and special
assistants over elected ministers in the cabinet also drew his criticism; he felt that
giving a decision-making role to unelected persons was a negation of the
parliamentary system. He seemed to agree with the interviewer that the PTI had also
failed to strengthen party structures and nurture a second-tier leadership.Interestingly,
he said that the prime minister too was concerned about the government’s
performance and he had given five and a half months to the ministers to improve
their performance, otherwise the government would lose the initiative for the change
promised by Imran Khan.
Chaudhry’s candid interview raised a storm of controversies both within the ruling
party and among the general public. One can disagree with some aspects of his
analysis but it has made a significant contribution towards promoting the culture of
assessing and debating the performance of the ruling party and the provincial and
federal governments.
Political parties almost cease to exist as an effective separate entity after winning
elections and forming a government; instead, parties generally become a secondary
appendix to governments. The PTI, PPP and BAP, the political parties which are
leading the federal and provincial governments in Pakistan at present, should develop
and make use of party structures to freely debate and discuss the government
performance periodically. Election manifestos, which generally gather dust after
parties come to power, should be critically reviewed every year, if not more
frequently, to gauge progress on implementation. If political parties adopt a culture of
structured self-appraisal, it will spare them the embarrassment of unplanned public
disclosures and prepare them better to face the electorate.
ASKED how he would like to be remembered, Lee Kuan Yew, that legendary leader
of Singapore, is supposed to have said that he would like to be forgotten.
Wanton misdeeds and crimes against humanity that rightly ensure a permanent place
in the annals of history — nay infamy — apart, the European Union now endorses
one’s right to be forgotten, at least on the internet.
It all started in 2010 when a Spanish citizen went to his country’s regulator asking
that information regarding the auction of his property be removed from the internet.
The matter was referred to the European Union Court of Justice. The court, in its
landmark judgement in 2014, ordered that Google must delete “inadequate, irrelevant
or no longer relevant data from its results when a member of the public requests it”.
Google went into appeal and, in September 2019, the court ruled that, in order to
balance an individual’s right to privacy and to be forgotten with the broader right to
information, Google need not implement the court’s earlier order beyond EU borders.
The order was further explained in the context of concerns by human rights bodies
that universal enforcement of the ruling would impinge on the rights of citizens of
other regions and despotic governments may use it to force search engines to block
information.
The internet is another source of anxiety for those who want to be forgotten.
Yet another aspect of one’s right to be forgotten pertains to how regimes all over the
world are employing technology to pry into citizens’ lives. Even before the advent of
Covid-19, the fast development of surveillance technology was causing concerns. In
an atmosphere bordering on paranoia, it would be unimaginable anywhere in the
world for a government to employ a tracking system explicitly designed to trace and
destroy terrorist cells for locating the victims of a pandemic.
In Pakistan, however, the prime minister does not tire of announcing that his
government has employed a software designed by an intelligence agency in the
country’s war against terrorism for tracing and isolating Covid-19 carriers. Neither he
nor any of his lieutenants has ever tried to put public concerns to rest by describing
how the spyware will be customised for civilian use and what filters will be deployed
to ensure that fundamental civil rights are not breached.
How surreal is it that the internet search for this piece did not confirm the quote
attributed to Mr Yew? Maybe he said it differently, or is the internet partly honouring
his wish? One quote that surely pops up is from Hollywood icon Isabella Rossellini:
“I would like to be forgotten. What’s so good about being remembered?”