Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 • Pressure drop
3 • Minimum viscosity
Fluid in outer
tube (1 pass)
Fluid in inner
tube (1 pass)
Fluid in outer
Fluid in inner tube (1 pass)
tube (1 pass)
Rear header
Shell
Easily cleaned
Q = U.A.ΔTLM
Temperature-Driving Forces
For multiple-pass shell-and-tube exchangers, the flow
directions of the two fluids are combinations of
countercurrent and co-current flow, reducing the
effective value of .
For a 1-2 exchanger, with assumptions 1, 3, 4 and 5:
Q = U.A.FTΔTLM
Temperature-Driving Forces
Example
A hot stream is cooled from 200 to 140 oF by a cold stream
entering at 100 oF and exiting at 190 oF. Determine the true
ΔTLM and select the appropriate shell-and-tube configuration
Example
GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Fluid allocation: shell or tubes
Where no phase change occurs, the following factors will determine the allocation
of the fluid streams to the shell or tubes.
Corrosion. The more corrosive fluid should be allocated to the tube-side..
Fouling. The fluid that has the greatest tendency to foul the heat-transfer
surfaces should be placed in the tubes.
Fluid temperatures. reduce the shell surface temperatures, and hence the need
for lagging to reduce heat loss, or for safety reasons.
Operating pressures. The higher pressure stream should be allocated to the tube-
side.
Pressure drop. For the same pressure drop, higher heat-transfer coefficients will
be obtained on the tube-side than the shell-side, and fluid with the lowest
allowable pressure drop should be allocated to the tube-side.
Viscosity. Generally, a higher heat-transfer coefficient will be obtained by
allocating the more viscous material to the shell-side, providing the flow is
turbulent.
Stream flow-rates. Allocating the fluids with the lowest flow-rate to the shell-side
will normally give the most economical design.
Fluid arrangment
Factors Tube side Shell side Factors Tube side Shell side
Phase Gas / Vapor Liquid Viscosity Low High
Corrosion More Less Temperature Far from amb. Close to amb.
Fouling High Low Pressure High Low
Hazardous More Less Pressure drop High Low
Flammable High Low Flow rate Low High
36 4 3 34 5 31 6 34 12 29 7 8 27 28 18 36 32
36
15
16
33
17
1 5 34 3 10 35 35 12 34 11 13
Construction
• Floating head backing (longitudinal baffle)
Construction
• Packed floating tubesheet & lantern ring (AJW)
Construction
• Externally sealed floating tubesheet (BEW)
Construction
• Outside–packed floating head (AEP)
Construction
• Pull through floating head (BET)
Construction
Floating head exchangers
Spec Advantages Disadvantages
The tubesheet at the rear header is not welded to
Packing materials produce
the shell, allows to move or float. The tubesheet at
limits on design pressure and
the front header is a larger diameter than the shell
temperature. More expensive
and is sealed in a similar manner to that used in
(typically of order of 25% for
the fixed tubesheet design. The tubesheet at the
carbon steel construction)
rear header end of the shell is of slightly smaller
P, S, T, W than the equivalent fixed
diameter than the shell, allowing the bundle to be
rear header pulled through the shell. tubesheet exchanger.
(S more
Allows differential thermal expansion between the Tubes can not expand
popular)
shell and the tube bundle. Both the tube bundle independently so that huge
and the shell side can be inspected and cleaned thermal sock applications
mechanically should be avoided
A floating head exchanger is suitable for the The floating head cover is bolt
rigorous duties associated with high temperatures to the tube sheet, so it
and pressures requires the use of space.
Construction
• Fixed tubesheet exchangers (BEM)
Construction
Fixed tube sheet exchangers
Spec Advantages Disadvantages
The tubesheet is welded to the shell. This
Provides maximum heat transfer area results the shell side and out side of the
for a given shell & tube diameter tubes are inaccessible for mechanical
cleaning
Provides for single and multiple tube No provision to allow for differential
Normally passes to assure proper velocity thermal expansion developed between
use L, M, N the tube and the shell side. This can be
rear header Less costly then removable bundle taken care by providing expansion join on
designs the shell side
Design pressure is up to 40 bars
(below 1000mm diameter), and 25
bars (above 1200mm diameter)
Design temperature is up to 350oC
Construction
• U–tube exchangers (CFU)
Construction
• Tank suction heater
Construction
U–tube exchangers
Spec Advantages Disadvantages
Because of U–bend, some tubes are omitted at the
Allows differential thermal centre of the tube bundle, tubes can be cleaned only
expansion between the shell by chemical methods (difficult for mechanical
and the tube bundle as well cleaning), so tube side fluids should be clean
as for individual tubes
Due to U–nesting, individual tube is difficult to replace
Normally
use M, U Both the tube bundle and Mixed counter and parallel flow
type the shell side can be
inspected and cleaned Tube wall thickness at the U–bend is thinner than at
mechanically straight portion of the tubes
Less costly than floating head
Draining of tube circuit is difficult when positioned
or packed floating head
with the vertical position with the head side upward
designs
Construction
• Kettle floating head reboiler (AKT)
Construction
• Kettle floating head reboiler (AKT)
Construction
• Reboiler with vapor disengagement
Construction
• Two exchangers in series
Construction
Internal Outside– Pull–
Packed lantern
Fixed tube floating head packed through
Type of design U–tube ring floating
sheet (split backing floating floating
head
ring) head head
Rear head type L, M, N U W S P T
Relative cost from A
(cheapest) to E (most B A C E D E
expensive)
Provision for differential Expansion Individual tubes free Floating Floating Floating
expansion
Floating head
join in shell to expand head head head
Removable bundle No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Replacement bundle
possible
No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
• Height inch at 28 ⁄
Tubesheet
(mm) 16 20 25 38 57
Tubesheet thickness (mm) 21 26 32 48 70
Tube – tubesheet joint
Weld
Tube bundle
Tube bundle
Shells
9000
Shell side nozzles <
2230
Tube side nozzles, noncorrosive and nonabrasive single phase fluids <
740
Tube side nozzles, other fluids <
Flat plates Flanged only heads Flared shell or Formed heads Toroidal
pipe segments
Toroidal Bellows
Bellows with reinforcing rings & insulation cover Flanged & flued heads
Baffles
• Baffles installation heat transfer, fluid dynamics, vibration
• Baffles spacing is generally 0.2 ÷ 0.4
Triple segmental
Baffles
Helical
Longitudinal
Baffles
Front Rear
6 tube pass
Tube passes
Tube passes
Shell passes
1−2
2−4
1 − 1 Cross flow
1 − 2 Cross flow
GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Objective: To design a shell-and-tube exchanger to
perform heat transfer from a hot stream to a cold
stream.
Specifications: Given stream physical properties,
mass flow rate, process stream source and target
temperatures, and the mass flow rate and source
temperature of the duty stream.
The mechanical design of a shell-and-tube heat
exchanger involves two main steps:
1. Computation of the heat duty
2. Shell and tube configuration
GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Pressure drop
GENERAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Computation of shell-and-tube exchangers involves
iteration, since the heat transfer coefficients, pressure
drops and heat transfer area all depend on the design’s
geometric configuration, which needs to be determined.
The geometric configuration (to be determined) includes
the following:
1. Shell diameter
2. Tube diameter
3. Tube length
4. Tube packing configuration (pitch) and spacing
5. Number of tube and shell passes
Design procedure for a double-tube heat exchanger
We assume that all the process conditions previously
explained are completely defined. This means that we know
the flow rates, inlet and outlet temperatures, allowable
pressure drops in both streams, and fouling resistances.
1. Selection of Tube Diameter.
2. Calculation of the Film Coefficients.
3. Calculation of the Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient.
4. Calculation of the LMTD.
5. Calculation of the Heat Transfer Area.
6. Calculation of the Total Tube Length and Number of
Tubes.
7. Calculation of the Pressure Drop.
8. Changes to the Original Design.
Design procedure
Decide number of shell
Assume overall coefficient
and tube passes.
and pressure drops ∆
Calculate ∆ and
Yes
Cost estimation
Decide baffle spacing and
Determine number of estimate heat transfer
tubes, shell diameter coefficient of shell side, ℎ Optimization
or not?
Determine fluid velocity Estimate heat transfer
and check coefficient of tube side, ℎ Final design
Temperature for fluid properties
For hot stream: ≥ ∆ = −
For cold stream: ≤ ∆ = −
∆ ∆
Log mean temperature difference: ∆ = ∆
∆
̅= +
• ∆ >∆
= ̅+∆
̅= −∆
• ∆ <∆
= +
̅= +
• ∆ =∆ = +
∆ =∆ =∆
Heat transfer coefficient of tube side
• Single phase:
. .
≤ 2100 = 1.86
.
. .
> 2100 = 0.023 1+
Heat transfer coefficient of tube side
• Condensation:
⁄
−
ℎ = 0.76
stratified flow
1+
. .
= 0.021
2
annular flow : gravitational acceleration 9.81 ⁄
: condensate thermal conductivity, ⁄ ℃
: condensate density, ⁄
: vapor density, ⁄
: condensate dynamic viscosity, ⁄
: tube loading (condensate flow per unit length of tube), ⁄
Heat transfer coefficient of shell side
• Single phase:
.
. ⁄ .
= 0.4 + 0.06
= 0.25 ÷ 5.2
= 0.67 ÷ 300
= 40 ÷ 10
1+
• Condensation: = 0.021 . .
2
Heat transfer coefficient
• Boiling ℎ= ℎ + ℎ
ℎ . .
= = 0.019
1−
=
= :
. . .
0.00122 . .
ℎ = . . . . − −
= :
. .
. .
ℎ = 0.104 1.8 +4 + 10
10
8
6
5
4
3
. . .
2
1−
1
0.1 2 3 4 5 6 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 2 3 4 5 6 8 100
Heat transfer coefficient
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
1
10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
.
Overall heat transfer coefficient
• For cleaning:
∆
=
1 1 1
+ ln +
ℎ 2 ℎ
1
= =
∆ 1 1
+ ln +
ℎ 2 ℎ
1
≅
1 1
+
ℎ ℎ
Overall heat transfer coefficient
• For dirty:
1
= =
∆ 1 1
+ + ln + +
ℎ 2 ℎ
1
≅
1 1
+ + +
ℎ ℎ
Pressure drop
Fluids Pressure drop, ∆
Gas / Vapor
2
“return loss” ∆ =
Reynolds number,
Pressure drop of shell side
.
+1
Darcy equation ∆ =
145 × 10
= = 12 −
= ; triangular
4 −
− = ; square
= = −1
∆ : pressure drop of shell side : number of baffles
: friction factor ⁄ : baffle spacing
: specific gravity : cross section area of shell
: density of fluid in shell ⁄ : shell inner diameter
: shell velocity ⁄ : equivalent diameter of shell
: tube outer diameter
: tube pitch
Pressure drop of shell side
⁄
Friction factor,
Reynolds number,
Example of heat exchanger design
Design a shell and tube heat exchanger to preheat a stream of
30 ⁄ℎ containing ethylbenzene and styrene from 10℃ to 97℃ by
saturated steam at 0.7 . Maximum pressure drop is 0.8 .
Stream properties:
Density: 856 ⁄
Viscosity: 0.4765
Specific heat: 0.428 ⁄ ℃
Thermal conductivity: 0.133 ⁄ℎ ℃
Process fouling: 0.0002 ℎ ℃⁄
Steam fouling: 0.0001 ℎ ℃⁄
Example of heat exchanger design
1. Fluid properties
Parameter Symbol Units Cold stream Hot stream
Fluid EB / Styrene Steam
Mass flow ⁄ℎ 30000 2111
Inlet temp. ℃ 10 115
Outlet temp. ℃ 97 115
Density ⁄ 856 0.97
Viscosity 0.4765 0.01262
Specific heat / Latent heat ⁄ ⁄ ℃ 1.792 2215.75
Thermal conductivity ⁄ ℃ 0.1546 0.02685
Fouling factor ℎ ⁄ 0.0002 0.0001
“Energy balance” = ∆ =
Example of heat exchanger design
2. Configuration definition
Parameter Symbol Units Tube side Shell side
Fluid arrangement EB / Styrene Steam
Number of passes ⁄ 4 1
Correction factor 1 (phase change)
Overall heat transfer ⁄ ℃ 170 ÷ 340
105 − 18
Log mean temperature ∆ ℃ ∆ = = 49.33
105
ln 18
+ 36
=
Shell inner diameter 0.75 0.363
=
1
=
1 1
+ + +
ℎ ℎ
Example of heat exchanger design
5. Pressure drop calculation
.
2
∆ = +
145 × 10
∆ ∆
Example of heat exchanger design
5. Pressure drop calculation
Parameter Symbol Units Shell side
Baffle spacing 0.363
Number of baffles = −1 29
−
Cross section area = 0.0263
12 −
Equivalent diameter = 0.0183
.
+1
∆ =
145 × 10
Example of heat exchanger design
Summary
Total area = ; ;
Tube length = ; ; ; ;
Shell diameter = ; ; ;
ℎ ℎ ∆ ∆
;
Computer programs
= + 1.72
= + 14℃
Tube bundle vibration
• High flow rate and pressure drop
• Avoid the cross flow
• Promote longitudinal flow
Testing
• American Institute of Chemical Engineers’
Standard Testing Procedure for Heat Exchanger
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
Heat transfer
Pressure drop
Physical size
Cost
Example 1
Water at the rate of 68 ⁄ is heated from
68℃ to 75℃ by an oil having a specific heat of
1.9 ⁄ ℃. The fluids are used in a counterflow
double pipe heat exchanger, and the oil enters
the exchanger at 110℃ and leaves at 75℃. The
overall heat transfer coefficient is 320 ⁄ ℃.
Calculate the heat exchanger area
Example 2
Instead of the double pipe heat exchanger of
Example 1, it is desired to use a shell–and–tube
exchanger with the water making one shell pass
and the oil making two tube passes. Calculate the
area required for this exchanger, assuming that
the overall heat transfer coefficient remains at
320 ⁄ ℃
Example 3
Water at the rate of 30000 ⁄ℎ is heated from
100℉ to 130℉ in a shell–and–tube heat exchanger.
On the shell side one pass is used with water as the
heating fluid, 15000 ⁄ℎ entering the exchanger
at 200℉ . The overall heat transfer coefficient is
250 ⁄ℎ ℉, and the average water velocity in
the diameter tubes is 1.2 ⁄ . Because of space
limitations, the tube length must not be longer than
8 . Calculate the number of tube passes, the
number of tubes per pass, and the length of tubes,
consistent with this restriction
Example 4
A heat exchanger like that shown
as Figure is used to heat an oil in
the tubes c = 1.9 ⁄ ℃ from
15℃ to 85℃. Blowing across the
outside of the tubes is steam that Gas flow