Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Division of Pediatric Emergency and Intensive Care Hemodynamic Disturbance in Septic Shock
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Brawijaya
MICROVASCULAR
DISTURBANCE
INOTROPY Mortality after Fluid Bolus in African Children with Severe Infection
Frank-Starling Curve in Sepsis PRELOAD
AFTERLOAD A Mortality atKathryn
48 Hours
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
olic dysfunction in sepsis. patients. Patients with septic shock had a greatly diminished response P.O. Box 230, Kilifi, Kenya, or at kathryn
10.6% (111 of 1050 children), 10.5% (110 of 1047 children), and 7.3% (76 of 1044
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
ol s
ol s
ol s
ol s
ol s
ol s
and showed a marked rightward and downward shift of the
bo
bo
bo
bo
bo
bo
bo
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
diography, however, have .maitland@gmail.com.
children) in the albumin-bolus, saline-bolus, and control groups, respectively (rela-
us
us
us
us
us
us
us
Frank–Starling relationship. Reproduced with permission from [17].
in
in
in
in
in
in
in
r filling [20] and aberrant
ol
m
m
e
fl
0.08
•
A BS T R AC T
Control: maintenance
0.7
uid 0.06
• The
Background
CONCLUSION: 0.6
role of fluid resuscitation in the treatment of children
0.04 with shock and life-
No Bolus From Kilifi Clinical TrialsAlbumin bolus
Facility, Kenya
Cardiovascular collapse
• Fluid boluses0.5increased 48-hour
threatening infections who live in resource-limited settings is not established.
Methods 0.02
Medical Research InstituteSaline
(KEMRI)–Well-
come Trust Research Programme, Kilifi,
No bolus
bolus
Kenya (K.M., S.O.A., T.L., B.B.); Well-
mortality in critically ill children with
We randomly assigned children with severe febrile illness and impaired perfusion to come Trust Centre for Clinical Tropical
0.00 Medicine, Department of Paediatrics,
impaired perfusion in these resource-
receive boluses of 200.4
to 40 ml of 5% albumin solution (albumin-bolus
0 6
group) or 0.9% Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College
12 18 24 30 36 42 48
saline solution (saline-bolus group) per kilogram of body weight or no bolus (control (K.M., B.B., M.L.), and the Medical Re-
limited settings in Africa
0.3
group) at the time of admission to a hospital in Uganda, Kenya, or Tanzania (stratum search Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit
(J.C., E.C.R., A.G.B., D.M.G.) — both in
A); children with severe hypotension were randomly assigned to one of the bolus groups London; the Department of Paediatrics,
only (stratum B). All 0.2
children received appropriate antimicrobial treatment, intravenous Mulago Hospital, Makerere University,
IS FLUID BOLUS THERAPY SAFE?
maintenance fluids, and supportive care, according to guidelines. Children with mal- Kampala (S.K., R.O.O.), Soroti Regional
nutrition or gastroenteritis
0.1
Referral Hospital, Soroti (C.E.), Mbale Re-
were excluded. The primary end point was 48-hour mor- gional Referral Hospital, Mbale (P.O.-O.),
tality; secondary end points included pulmonary edema, increased intracranial and St. Mary’s Hospital, Lacor (R.N.) —
pressure, and mortality
0.0 or neurologic sequelae at 4 weeks. all in Uganda; the Joint Malaria Pro- Maitland, et.al, NEJM 2011 Maitland, BMC Med 2013
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 gramme, 32 34 Teule
36 Hospital,
38 40 Muheza,
42 44 Tanza-46 48
Results nia (G.M., H.R.); and the Department of
Hours since Randomization
The data and safety monitoring committee recommended halting recruitment after Paediatrics, University Hospital of Wales,
Cardiff, United Kingdom (J.A.E.). Address
3141 of the projected
Hr 1 3600 children Hr in
2 stratum A were
Hr 3 enrolled. Malaria
Hr 4 status (57%
Hr 5–8 Hr 9–24
reprint requests to Dr. Maitland Hrat24–48
the
overall) and clinical severity were similar across groups. The 48-hour mortality was KEMRI–Wellcome Trust Programme,
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
10.6% (111 of 1050 children), 10.5% (110 of 1047 children), and 7.3% (76 of 1044 P.O. Box 230, Kilifi, Kenya, or at kathryn
u
u
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
bo s
bo us
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo us
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu .maitland@gmail.com.
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
l
l
children) in the albumin-bolus, saline-bolus, and control groups, respectively (rela-
s
s
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
m
m
bo
e
e
Problems (3): Cause of Mortality
tive risk for saline bolus vs. control, 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.90;
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
Drs. Levin, Babiker, and Gibb contributed
o
o
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
No. at RiskP =1050
0.01;1047
relative risk1037
for 1033
albumin
1030bolus
1024vs. saline
1021bolus,
10161.01;
101095%1015CI, 0.781001
to 1.29; equally to this article.
1044 1018 1010 1011 992 980 996 954 945 975
Died P = 0.96;
13 and12relative
14 risk 13 for15
any bolus
9 vs.8control,
7 1.45;
6 95% 6 CI, 91.13 to
4 1.86;
17 P =20
0.003).
14 38 34members
* Additional 20 of16 13 Expan-
the Fluid 9
Clinical Questions of
% The 4-week
1.2 1.1mortality
1.3 1.3 was 1.5
12.2%,
0.912.0%,
0.8 and
0.78.7%
0.6 in the
0.6 three
0.9 groups,
0.4 1.7 respectively
2.0 1.4 3.8as Supportive
sion 3.5 2.0Therapy 1.7 (FEAST)
1.4 study
0.9
(P = 0.004 for the comparison of bolus with control). Neurologic sequelae occurred team are listed at the end of the article.
in 2.2%, 1.9%, and 2.0% of the children in the respective groups (P = 0.92), and This article (10.1056/NEJMoa1101549) was
Fluid Resuscitation
B Mortalitypulmonary
at 4 Weeks edema or increased intracranial pressure occurred in 2.6%, 2.2%, and 1.7% published on May 26, 2011, and updated
(P = 0.17), respectively.
1.0 In stratum B, 69% of the children 0.14(9 of 13) in the albumin- on June 2, 2011, at NEJM.org.
bolus group and 56% (9 of 16) in the saline-bolus group died (P = 0.45). The results N Engl J Med 2011;364:2483-95.
were consistent across 0.12
0.9 centers and across subgroups according to the severity of Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society.
shock and status with respect to malaria, coma, sepsis, 0.10 acidosis, and severe anemia.
Conclusions 0.8
• What’s the trigger?
Cumulative Probability of Death
Fluid boluses significantly increased 48-hour mortality 0.08 in critically ill children with
impaired perfusion in 0.7these resource-limited settings in Africa. (Funded by the Med-
ical Research Council, United Kingdom; FEAST Current
ISRCTN69856593.) 0.6
0.06
Controlled Trials number,
0.04
Albumin bolus • What kind of fluid?
Saline bolus
• How much?
n engl j med 364;26 nejm.org june 30, 2011 2483
No bolus
0.5 0.02 of Medicine
The New England Journal
• How fast?
Downloaded from nejm.org on May 25, 2013. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
0.4 0.00 Society. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
• When to stop?
0.3
0.2
0.1 • Goals?
0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Levin,18et.al.,20Lancet
22 24
Respir 26
Med 28
2019
Days since Randomization
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3–7 Day 8–14 Day 15–21 Day 21–28
s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo us
bo s
bo
bo
bo
bo
bo
bo
o olu
lu
lu
o olu
lu
l
s
s
in
in
in
in
in
in
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
b
b
m
m
e
e
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
o
o
Sa
Sa
Sa
Sa
Sa
Sa
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
N
fl
cacy of treatment of shock included use of secondary one of 191 children who re
resuscitation strategies and incidence of organ failure. xyethyl starch) developed a
urticarial rash in the same
Mortality trial 5/56 (9%) children who
None of the studies were designed or adequately pow- (Gelafundin) and one (1/7
ered to examine mortality as a primary outcome. The developed allergic reaction
Mortality after Fluid Bolus in African Children with Severe Infection Mortality after Fluid Bolus in African Children with Severe Infection
A Mortality at 48 Hours A Mortality at 48 Hours
• 3141 children with septic shock • 3141 children with septic shock
Kathryn Maitland, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Sarah Kiguli, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med., Robert O. Opoka, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med., Kathryn Maitland, M.B., B.S., Ph.D., Sarah Kiguli, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med., Robert O. Opoka, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med.,
Charles 1.0 0.14
Engoru, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med., Peter Olupot-Olupot, M.B.,
RR: Ch.B.,
1.01 (95% Samuel
CI, O. 0.78Akech, M.B., Ch.B.,
to 1.29; p = 0.96) Charles 1.0 0.14
Engoru, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med., Peter Olupot-Olupot, RR:M.B., Ch.B.,
1.01 (95% Samuel
CI, O. 0.78Akech, M.B., Ch.B.,
to 1.29; p = 0.96)
Richard Nyeko, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med., George Mtove, M.D., Hugh Reyburn, M.B., B.S., Trudie Lang, Ph.D., Richard Nyeko, M.B., Ch.B., M.Med., George Mtove, M.D., Hugh Reyburn, M.B., B.S., Trudie Lang, Ph.D.,
•
Open randomised
Bernadette control
0.9 Brent, trial
M.B., 0.12 M.B., B.S., James K. Tibenderana, M.B., Ch.B., Ph.D.,
B.S., Jennifer A. Evans, Albumin •
Open randomised
Bernadette control
0.9 Brent, trial
M.B., 0.12 M.B., B.S., James K. Tibenderana, M.B., Ch.B., Ph.D.,
B.S., Jennifer A. Evans, Albumin
•
Intervention: NS orand 5%Diana
albumin 20-40
Jane Crawley, M.B., B.S., M.D., Elizabeth C. Russell, M.Sc., Michael Levin, F.Med.Sci., Ph.D., Abdel G. Babiker, Ph.D.,
0.8
0.10
M. Gibb, M.B., Ch.B., M.D., for the FEAST Trial Group* •
Intervention: NS orand
0.8
5%Diana
albumin 20-40
Jane Crawley, M.B., B.S., M.D., Elizabeth C. Russell, M.Sc., Michael Levin, F.Med.Sci., Ph.D., Abdel G. Babiker, Ph.D.,
0.10
M. Gibb, M.B., Ch.B., M.D., for the FEAST Trial Group*
mL/kg in 1 hour Saline mL/kg in 1 hour Saline
Cumulative Probability of Death
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
N bo s
lu
lu
u
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
ol
bo s
bo us
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo s
bo us
bo s
bo s
Pediatric SSC 2020: Type of Fluid Resuscitation Pediatric SSC 2020: Type of Fluid Resuscitation
bo
bo
tive risk for saline bolus vs. control, 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.90; Drs. Levin, Babiker, and Gibb contributed tive risk for saline bolus vs. control, 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.90; Drs. Levin, Babiker, and Gibb contributed
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
o olu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
Sa in b
l
l
s
s
in
in
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
lu
b
P = 0.01; relative risk for albumin bolus vs. saline bolus, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.29; equally to this article. P = 0.01; relative risk for albumin bolus vs. saline bolus, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.29; equally to this article.
m
m
bo
e
e
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
lin
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
bu
P = 0.96; and relative risk for any bolus vs. control, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.86; P = 0.003). *Additional members of the Fluid Expan- P = 0.96; and relative risk for any bolus vs. control, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.86; P = 0.003). *Additional members of the Fluid Expan-
o
o
Sa
Sa
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
Al
N
N
No. at Risk 1050 The 4-week
1047 1044mortality
1037 1033 was1030
12.2%, 12.0%,
1024 1018and10218.7% in the
1016 1010 three
1015groups, respectively
1010 1001 1011 992 980
sion as 996 Therapy
Supportive 954 (FEAST)
945 975 study No. at Risk 1050 The 4-week
1047 1044mortality
1037 1033 was1030
12.2%, 12.0%,
1024 1018and
10218.7%
1016in the
1010 three
1015groups, respectively
1010 1001 1011 992 980
sion as 996 Therapy
Supportive 954 (FEAST)
945 975 study
Died 13(P = 0.004
12 14 for the13comparison
15 9 of bolus
8 with 7 control).
6 6Neurologic
9 4 sequelae
17 20 occurred
14 38 34listed20at the end
team are 16 of the
13 article.
9 Died 13(P = 0.004
12 14 for the13comparison
15 9 of bolus
8 with7 control).
6 6Neurologic
9 4 sequelae
17 20 occurred
14 38 34listed20at the end
team are 16 of the
13 article.
9
% 1.2 1.1 1.3
in 2.2%, 1.9%, 1.3 1.5 0.9
and 2.0% of the0.8 0.7 in
children 0.6the respective
0.6 0.9 groups0.4 1.7 2.0 1.4
(P = 0.92), and 3.8 3.5 2.0 1.7 1.4 0.9
This article (10.1056/NEJMoa1101549) was
pulmonary edema or increased intracranial pressure occurred in 2.6%, 2.2%, and 1.7% published on May 26, 2011, and updated
% • SUGGEST:
1.2 1.1 1.3
in 2.2%, 1.9%, 1.3 1.5 0.9
and 2.0% of the0.8 0.7 in
children 0.6the respective
0.6 0.9 groups0.4 1.7 2.0 1.4
(P = 0.92), and 3.8
This
3.5 (10.1056/NEJMoa1101549)
article
2.0 1.7 1.4 0.9
pulmonary edema or increased intracranial pressure occurred in 2.6%, 2.2%, and 1.7% published on May 26, 2011, and updated
was
• SUGGEST:
(P = 0.17), respectively. In stratum B, 69% of the children (9 of 13) in the albumin- on June 2, 2011, at NEJM.org.
B Mortality at 4 bolus
Weeks
(P = 0.17), respectively. In stratum B, 69% of the children (9 of 13) in the albumin- on June 2, 2011, at NEJM.org.
B Mortality at 4 •bolus
Weeks
group and 56% (9 of 16) in the saline-bolus group died (P = 0.45). The results N Engl J Med 2011;364:2483-95. Against
group and 56% using gelatin.
(9 of 16) in the saline-bolus group died (P = 0.45). The results N Engl J Med 2011;364:2483-95.
were consistent 1.0across centers and across subgroups 0.14according to the severity of Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. were consistent 1.0across centers and across subgroups 0.14according to the severity of Copyright © 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society.
•shock
Using crystalloids,
and status rather
with respect to malaria, than
coma, sepsis, albumin.
acidosis, and severe anemia. shock and status with respect to malaria, coma, sepsis, acidosis, and severe anemia.
0.12 • 1 RCT of gelatin vs. 0.9% saline 0.12 in 60 pediatric septic shock showed no
Conclusions 0.9 Conclusions 0.9
• boluses
No difference
significantly of mortality
48-hourbetween difference in mortality, days of using vasoactive, or AKI. (Upadhyay, Indian
Fluid increased 0.10in albumin
mortality and saline
critically ill children with bolus [RR: 1.01; 95% CI, Fluid boluses significantly increased 48-hour mortality 0.10in critically ill children with
impaired0.78 to0.81.29;
perfusion p =resource-limited
in these 0.96]. (Maitland, settings inNEJM 2011) by the Med-
Africa. (Funded impairedPediatr
perfusion2005)
0.8 in these resource-limited settings in Africa. (Funded by the Med-
ical Research Council, United Kingdom; FEAST Current 0.08 Controlled Trials number, ical Research Council, United Kingdom; FEAST Current 0.08 Controlled Trials number,
Cumulative Probability of Death
0.1 0.1
Weiss, et.al., Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020 Weiss, et.al., Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020
0.0 0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Days since Randomization Days since Randomization
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3–7 Day 8–14 Day 15–21 Day 21–28 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3–7 Day 8–14 Day 15–21 Day 21–28
s
fl
fl
Volume of Fluid Resuscitation: High Volume? Volume of Fluid Resuscitation: Low Volume?
• Rapid fluid resuscitation >40 mL/kg in 1st hour was associated with • Less volume in intervention than control group (14.5 vs 25.7 mL/kg,
improved survival, decreased persistent hypovolemia, and no increase p<0.001). No difference of mortality, PICU LOS, hospital LOS, and LOS
cardiogenic pulmonary edema or ARDS. (Carcillo, JAMA 1991) free days. (Inwald, Arch Dis Child 2019)
• Observational study on 34 children with septic shock • FISh Trial: Multicenter RCT pilot study on 75 children with septic shock
• Mortality rate higher in fluid <40 mL/kg and delay treatment >30 min. • Less volume in intervention than control group (47.1 vs 61.1 mL/kg,
(Oliveira, Pediatr Emerg Care 2008) p=0.01). No difference of mortality, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, incidence of
organ failure, and serious adverse effect in 30 days. (Corl, Crit Care Med
• Retrospective study on 90 children with severe sepsis and septic shock
2019)
• Mortality rate <20 vs. 20-40 vs. >40 mL/kg = 73 vs. 52 vs. 33% (p=0.03)
• RIFTS: Multicenter RCT pilot study on 109 adult with septic shock
Volume of Fluid Resuscitation: Low Volume? Pediatric SSC 2020: Volume of Fluid Therapy
Septic Shock Management Guided by Ultrasound:
A Randomized Control Trial (SEPTICUS TRIAL)
• SUGGEST:
• 38 children with septic shock USSM • PICU available: fluid bolus up to 40–60 mL/kg (10–20 mL/kg per
• Open randomised control trial: pilot study bolus) over the 1st hour,
• Intervention: Doppler US guided
• Control: ACCM protocols of septic shock • PICU unavailable, with hypotension: fluid bolus up to 40 mL/kg (10–
• CONCLUSION: 20 mL/kg per bolus) over the 1st hour,
In intervention group: ACCM
• titrated to clinical markers of cardiac output and discontinued if signs
• Lower 72 hours mortality of fluid overload develop
• Higher prevalence of meeting therapeutic
goals • RECOMMEND: PICU unavailable, no hypotension: against bolus fluid
• Lower lung US score administration while starting maintenance fluids.⭐⭐
• Less liver enlargement in intervention group.
Yuliarto, Pramita, Kadafi, 2020 Weiss, et.al., Pediatr Crit Care Med 2020
Rate of Fluid Resuscitation: Faster vs. Slower? Terminate the Fluid Resuscitation
• No difference of mortality, rapidity of shock resolution, and
complications. However, hepatomegaly at 20 minutes was higher in • Achieving therapeutic goals
intervention (faster) group. (Santhanam, Pediatr Emerg Care 2008) • Meeting fluid refractory condition:
• Single centre RCT on 147 children with septic shock
• Clinical sign: hepatomegaly, rales. (Davis, Crit Care Med 2017)
• Intervention: 40 mL/kg in 15 minutes followed by dopamine vs. Control: 20 mL/
kg in 20 minutes up to 60 mL/kg over 1 hour, followed by dopamine • Measuring fluid-responsiveness
• Reduce risk of MV and increase OI in intervention (slower) group at 6 and • PLR: Measurements in CI changes after PLR can be helpful in predicting fluid
24 hours. But, no difference in mortality, LOS, and resolution of shock. responsiveness. (Lukito, Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012)
(Shankar, Pediatr Crit Care Care 2017) • Dynamic measurement: Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak
• Single centre RCT on 96 children with septic shock velocity shown to predict fluid responsiveness in children. (Gan, Anesth Analg
2013)
• Intervention: FBT 15-20 minutes vs. Control: FBT 5-10 minutes
• Normal pulses with same quality of the peripheral and central pulses,
CRT <2 seconds, warm extremities
• ScVO2 >70%.
Davis, et.al., Crit Care Med 2017 Davis, et.al., Crit Care Med 2017
Thank You