Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E q 7 -/!i
SPONSORED A N D P U B L I S H E D BY
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Copyright 0 1979 by
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
All Rights Reserved
Printed in U.S.A.
FOREWORD
At a meeting held in Chicago on October 31,1951 between the ring manufacturers and the engineers of
the Diesel engine manufacturers, it was brought out that the lack of standards on rings above the SAE
diameter limit had resulted in much confusion and increased costs due to tooling and special Set-up, as well
as lack of interchangeability.
It was recommended that a committee be organized to draw up ring standards for the diameter range
above 8 inches, which would serve a ring guide for future engine designs. There was no thought to use these
standards for present engines or service replacements as this would be an impossible accomplishment unless
incorporated when piston replacements were made.
A committee was organized of the ring manufacturers and a second meeting was held in Detroit on
January 15, 1952. At this meeting proposed standards for ring specifications were approved by all members
of the committee. Since this range of ring sizes is beyond the scope covered by the SAE, and since the
Diesel field is well covered by the Diesel and Gas Engine Division of the ASME, it was requested that those
rings be made an ASME standard. A draft of the proposed standard received the approval of the Society
and was designated an ASME standard on September 2, 1954. This standard served the industry well. How-
ever, as technology in the ring area progressed the need to expand the standard was recognized.
At a meeting of the ASME Standards Committee on Piston Rings on September 20,1977 a revised draft
was developed. Recognizing the anticipated changeover to SI units, this standard has been developed to fall
within this environment. This draft received the approval of the Standards Committee and was approved as
an American National Standard by the American National Standards Institute on October 4,1978.
iii
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
9 0 0 9 2 7 5 0024677 b ô L
STANDARDS COMMITTEE
K. W. Thurston, Koppers Company Incorporated, Piston Rings and Seals, Baltimore, Maryland
H. G. Braendel, Power Systems Engineering, Malvem, Pennsylvania
H. W. Engelman, Ohio State University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbus, Ohio
J. R. Kennedy, Cooper-Bessemer Company, Mount Vernon, Ohio
û. K. Klein, Dover Corporation, C Lee Cook Division, Louisville, Kentucky
M. H. Lowrey, DeLaval Turbine Corporation, Engine and Compresser Division, Oakland, California
A. E. Swartz, Muskegon Piston Ring Company, Muskegon, Michigan
E F. Thomas, Double Seal Ring Company, Fort Worth, Texas
C. F. Wilke, Dresser Industries, Dresser Clark Division, Olean, New York
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword
Standards Committee Roster
1. Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2 . DefinitionofTerms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
3. Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4 . CylinderDiameter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. RingWidth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
6. RingW all . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
7 . Groove Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
8. RingEndclearance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9 . PistonRingTension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10. Ringshape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
11. Dowel Pin Holes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
12. Conformable Type Oil Rings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
13 . Identification Marking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
TABLES
FIGURES
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
2.1.8 Net Gap (9). Free gap minus end clearance. 2.2.3 Piston Land Diameter. The diameter of the
2.1.9 Back Surface. Surface of the entire inner diam- piston adjacent to the ring groove.
eter of the ring. 2.2.4 Groove Depth.
2.1.10 Side Surface. Surface between the outside and Larger Adjacent
inside diameter of the ring. A ring has two side sur- Groove Depth = Piston Land Dia. - Groove Root Diameter
faces. 2
END CLEARANCEJ
(E.C.)
SIDE SURFACES
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
END CLEARANCE 7
FIG. 2
9009275 0024684 T 4 9
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
2.2.5 Effective Groove Depth. The groove depth cylinder materials. Typical properties of piston rings
minus the groove fdlet at bottom of groove. are :
2.2.6 Effective Back Clearance. The clearance be- Tensile Strength 30-40 x lo3 PSI
tween the back surface of ring and the effective groove Maximum Allowable
depth when the ring is flush with the surface of the Transverse Stress 40-55 x lo3 PSI
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
piston. Modulus of Elasticity 9-16 x lo6 PSI
2.2.7 Side Clearance. Groove width minus ring width Brinell Hardness,
(rectangular rings only). Individually Cast 160-275
Tensile Strength 80-120 x IO3 PSI zero minus tolerance. The piston ring diameter is made
Maximum Allowable to fit the smalier dimension of the cylinder to avoid
Transverse Stress 70-150 x lo3 PSI any possibility of the ring ends butting. To avoid con-
Modulus of Elasticity 21-26 x lo6 PSI fusion whenever the cylinder size is named, it is rec-
Brinell Hardness, ommended that the minimum cylinder diameter be
Pearlitic Type 240-300 used for this purpose. Table 1 shows the suggested
Martensitic Type 250-440 cylinder diameter increments. Table 2 shows the sug-
gested cylinder diameter tolerances.
3.2 Steels Table 1 Cylinder Diameter Increments, inches
There are various types of steel used for piston Cylinder Diameter, Inches Diameter Increment, Inches
rings and expanders. Because of their lower wear
8-15 Not Incl. 0.250
resistance and reduced compatibility, various wear 15-40 Incl. 0.500
resistant surface platings or coatings may be required.
The most frequently used is chromium plating. Plasma Table 2 Cylinder Diameter Tolerances, Inches
type hard surfacing materials are also available for
Diameter, Inches
specific applications. up to Tolerance, Inches
From Not Incl. Minus Zero Plus:
4. CYLINDER DIAMETER 8 14 0.003
Cylinder diameter and ring diameter are terms that 14 20 0.004
are frequently used interchangeably. The cylinder 20 30 0.005
30 40 Incl. 0.006
should be dimensioned to have a plus tolerance with a
Table 3 Ring Widths, Inches
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Nominal Diameter (in.) Diameter (in.) Diameter (in.) Diameter (in.)
Width 8-14 Not Incl. 14-20 Not Incl. 20-30 Not Incl. 30-40 Incl.
~
D 9009275 0 0 2 4 6 8 7 7 5 8
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
5. RINGWIDTH depth is then the total groove depth minus the fillet
Ring width is approximately related to ring diam- or chamfer. The suggested minimum back clearances
eter in that ring widths tend to become larger as are shown in Table 7. They can be used for groove
diameter increases. The maximum ring width should root d i m e ter calculations.
not exceed the values shown in Table 3. The sug-
gested width tolerances are also shown in Table 3.
Any changes in ring side clearance should be made Table 7 Suggested Minimum Back Clearance, Inches
in the piston ring groove in order to use standard ring
widths and eliminate improper instailation in the
Diameter. Inches I Back Clearance
The usual practice to obtain maximum wear life Groove depths for compression and oil rings are to be
and strength is to select the widest ring width which the same.
will not scuff in the application.
6. R I N G W A L L
8. RING END CLEARANCE
The recommended maximum wall vanes with ring
diameter in accordance with the values in Table 5. End clearance depends upon ring design, cylinder
materials and the operating conditions, making it dif-
The recommended walls in Table 5 prevent over- ficult to give specific values.
stressing the ring during installation over the piston
and subsequent closing into the cylinder when using a The minimum end clearances shown in Table 8
net gap 3.5 times the wall. and suggested tolerances in Table 9 may be helpful
and serve as a guide for typical applications.
Should ring wails other than those shown in Table
5 or materials other than those specified in Section 3 Table 8 Minimum End Clearance, Inches
be used, overstressing for opening or closing should
be checked, particularly if the maximum wall is to be
increased. (See piston ring formulae in Section 9.2.) Internal Combustion
Compression Rings 0.35%
6.1 Wall Tolerance Oil Rings 0.20%
Compressors 0.20%
The suggested wall tolerance is shown in Table 6 .
Table 6 Suggested Wall Tolerance, Inches Table 9 End Clearance Tolerance, Inches
Diameter, Inches Diameter, Inches
Tolerance, Inches
Tolerance Minus Zero Plus:
From Not Incl. From Not Incl.
7. GROOVE DEPTH
Groove depth should be sufficient to prevent the 9. PISTON RING TENSION
ring from protruding beyond the largest adjacent Tension is one of the more important ring charac-
piston land when the ring is bottomed in the groove. teristics. In combination with combustion pressures,
It is desirable to keep back clearance to a minimum. tension affects ring drag and holds the ring in contact
If a f d e t or chamfer is used in the bottom of the with the cylinder. Tension is the result of the relation-
groove, the corresponding decrease in effective groove ship of ring diameter, width, wall, net gap, and mod-
depth should be considered. The effective groove ulus of elasticity of the ring material.
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
0.424 E,,
so= 8 14 0.035 0.015 0.015 0.035
14 20 0.035 0.020 0.015 0.040
20 40 Incl. 0.035 0.020 0.015 0.040
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
10
Where,
U.P. = Unit Pressure, Psi
13. IDENTIFICATION MARKING
w = Bearing width of ring, inches
13.1 Vendor Marking
D = Ring diameter, inches
At times it may be desirable to have vendor iden-
TT = Tangential tension, pounds tification. Figure 5 illustrates the most popular types
To = Diametral tension, pounds of identification.
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
11
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
FIG. 6 INSTALLATION MARKINGS
12
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
13
Copyright ASME International
Provided by IHS under license with ASME Licensee=University of Alberta/5966844001, User=trert, rtyrtyrty
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 03/08/2015 08:43:58 MDT
9009275 0024694 998 m
3 c
a
E
z
O
--``,,,`,,,,``,`,```,`,,`,`,,,``-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
14