Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Submitted by
LC3 Technology Resource Centre
(A Centre promoted jointly by EPFL, IITD, IITM and TARA)
B-32, Qutab Institutional Area
New Delhi 110016, India
1
1. Background
India is currently the second largest producer of cement behind China, accounting for 6.9% of
the industrial CO2 emissions in India in the year 2015 as per the report on the ʻTrends in Global
CO2 Emissionsʼ by PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency and the European
Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) - 2016. This consumption is expected to grow
between 8%-10% annually. Thus the market and associated CO2 emissions are expected to
double every 8 to 12 years. In the 12th five-year plan released by the Government of India in
the year 2012, the government has taken a voluntary target of reducing the emission intensity
of its GDP by 20-25% from the intensity in 2008 until 2020. This responsibility is being put on
businesses and industries through incentive and taxation schemes. Business and industry will
hence be interested to adopt a low carbon technology if it is feasible and realistic to meet
their climate targets.
In such a scenario, the role of blended cement with reduced clinker factor is very crucial.
Efforts have been made to commercially produce various blended cements in India with
reduced clinker factors using various industrial wastes like fly ash based Portland Pozzolana
Cement (PPC) and slag based Portland Slag Cement (PSC). But the availability of cement grade
fly ash and blast furnace slag is gradually going to be limited which restricts to their
widespread use. Dependence on coal fired thermal power plant is gradually declining and no
further new investment will likely to be made beyond 2025 as the coal resources are going to
be rapidly exhausted and with renewed focus of renewable resource for power generation
(TERI, 2017).
Consequently, alternative sources of SCM’s such as calcined clays are of great interest which
exhibits excellent pozzolanic properties and can be easily used for the production of
cementitious blends which substitute clinker more than 50% without compromising it’s
performance in concrete. Limestone is the main complementary material with the calcined
clay in the blend. The preliminary lab investigation reveals that it can reduce CO2 emission
up to 30% compared to conventional OPC production. Again, the clay can be optimally
calcined below 900⁰C which is significantly lower than clinkerisation temperature (usually
conducted at 1450⁰C) leading to savings in energy and cost of production. On the other hand,
consumption of cement grade limestone can decline to 40%-45% with 50% substitution of
OPC. Thus, it also helps to improve the resource efficiency and reduced dependency on
cement grade good quality limestone. Hence the proposed new technology will be a clean,
resource efficient and cost effective means to fulfil our future demand of cement for concrete
applications.
2
The majority (60%) of CO2 emissions associated with
clinker production (the main ingredient in cement) A key aspect of LC3 technology
come from the decarbonation of limestone is the potential to produce up to
(“chemical” CO2). The consumption of fuels makes up twice as much cement from
most of the remainder. each tonne of clinker and to
Strategies to lower the environmental impact of better use limestone sources
cement manufacturing are already applied by the not suitable for clinker
industry and their future potential has been production.
evaluated in detail in by the IEA (International Energy
Agency) for the Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) study of the World Business Council for
Sustainable Development (WBCSD).
Today the three most important approaches are:
• Improvement of energy efficiency
• Use of biofuels and other alternative fuels and
• Replacement of clinker by substitute materials or supplementary cementitious
materials (SCMs). Materials used include fly ash, various slags and natural pozzolana.
Beyond these approaches the CSI study imagines the remaining reduction in CO2 to come from
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) which is now widely thought to be, at best, very expensive
(e.g. increasing cement prices 2-4 times). Thus this is presently and also in the near future not
relevant for consideration especially under African conditions. Gains from alternative fuels are
projected to increase, but remain a fairly modest proportion of the total. The projected impact
of the third option, substituting clinker by SCMs is limited by the forecast supply of commonly
used SCMs, notably slag and fly ash. For example, although slag can substitute up to 90% and
typically 70% of clinker in blends, the worldwide amount of slag available is only around 5%
of the amount of clinker produced. Fly ash although available in larger amounts (around 30%
of clinker worldwide, but absent in many countries) is of variable quality and much is
unsuitable for cement production. So the option of clinker substitution could go much further
if new sources of SCMs were available.
Low Carbon Cement can now fill the gap above. This allows a clinker substitution of around
50-60%, by a synergetic combination of calcined clay and limestone. This has been
demonstrated in the collaborative research between IIT Delhi and TARA in India and at EPFL,
Switzerland.
The present document proposes a step-by-step, phase wise transfer of LC3 technology for
adoption by cement companies.
3
Due to the lower clinker content, the LC3 technology has several advantages over ordinary
Portland cement (OPC) and Portland pozzolanic cement (PPC). The main advantages are
• Improved resource efficiency
• Lower CO2 emission per tonne of cement produced
• Reduced production cost without compromising the performance of the cement
• Easy processing and supported by existing production facilities hence low capital
investment costs
• Almost double cement output per tonne of clinker
• Enhanced durability of building materials and concrete produced using LC³
5. Service Packages
It can be seen that the technical services for supporting the uptake of LC3 has been divided
into a couple of phases. This is necessary since after testing a particular Phase, if the clay
quality is not feasible then there is no need to go into the next phase or more clays need to
be explored for other areas. It can also be noted that the Phases does not take into account
the commercial services at scale e.g. detailed propsecting of clays to determine the reserve
and quality, analysis and modification/upgradation in production process and systems, choice
of calcinaion and associated plant and machineries, market analysis and product costing.
Although LC3TRC does not provide turnkey services for installing a LC3 production unit
however it provides consultancy services in each and every aspect of LC3 production and
adoption through a range 0f national and international experts.
Thus the following testing services and packages are proposed.
4
in Phase 1 by the cement senior experts to be borne
company. by client
- Laboratory testing and analysis - Selection of clay in
of all the raw clay samples association with cement
company based on
- Lab scale calcination of samples
viability
- Determination of pozzolanic
- 25 kg of clays to be
reactivity of calcined clay
collected and ground at
sample(s)
cement plant facilities
- Consultation and guidance on
- 1 kg clay of each type to
mining policies in different states
be sent to LC3TRC
of interest (Rajasthan, M.P.,
W.B.) - The rest to be kept at
cement plant for future
reference
• Timeline
1 month from the date of receipt of the clays
• Cost
Rs. 405,000 + 18% GST
5
using raw materials from cement
companies
- Evaluation of physical properties
of LC3 produced and strength
determination of LC3 mortar
(from the 2 selected clays)
• Timeline
2 months after receipt of samples
• Cost
Rs. 890,170 + 18% GST
• Timeline
4 months after receipt of all the raw materials
• Cost
Rs. 19,69,000 + 18% GST
6
Additional optional services customized as per requirement:
(Quotation for all the services can be offered as and when required based on the capacity and
other requirement)