Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit title Manipulating Energy for Survival MYP year Year 2 Unit duration approx. 46
(hrs) hrs
Statement of inquiry
Inquiry questions
Part 2: You will determine ONE feature of your of energy manipulation, there is an immediate tie to
clothing design that can be scientifically student interest.
investigated and design, do, and process an
experiment about that feature. Based on your
results, you will use your data to either support the Students have to specifically name and describe the
design choice OR as evidence that you should form of energy that they are changing/controlling in
change your design. order to help a person survive in an extreme climate,
and therefore, there is a direct link between the SOI and
the assessment task.
Part 3: You will share your clothing design using
your chosen forms of media to advertise or
promote your clothing design to each other with
the possibility of presenting your product to a
“Dragon’s Den” of scientists, fashion
professionals, and each other.
I can select parts of the electromagnetic -Class discussion/direct instruction & co-
spectrum that represent visible light. constructed notes
I can describe the relationships between -Jump ropes & wavelength demonstration
energy and wavelength. -Class discussion/direct instruction
-Co-constructed notes
I can discuss how heat is transferred -Class discussion/direct instruction & co-
between things. constructed notes
-Color experiment data processing
I can discuss some human adaptations to -Class discussion/direct instruction & co-
heat and cold. constructed notes
I can design an experiment that will E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring
test one particular feature of my -Google Doc feedback from teacher
clothing design. on e-packet
I can identify a part of my clothing design E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
that can be scientifically investigated. -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can create a scientifically supported, E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
testable hypothesis that uses the words -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
“if,” “then,” and “because.” on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can define all of my experimental E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
variables. -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can design an experimental method to E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
test my hypothesis. -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can collect precise data. E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
-Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can apply experimental data to my E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
clothing design. -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can process my experimental data. E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
-Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet
I can organize my data into a table. E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
-Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can mathematically transform my data. E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
-Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can visually represent my data in an E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
appropriate graph. -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can interpret experimental results to E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
figure out what they mean. -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can examine my experimental methods E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
to see if they really tested what I wanted -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
them too. on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can discuss how I would help my E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
experiment to be better if I were to repeat -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
it some other time. on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
from teacher on e-packet
I can make a claim about my jacket E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
design supported by my experimental -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
evidence. on e-packet
I can connect my experimental evidence E-packet for project -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Student/teacher in-class
with scientific reasoning (background -Google Doc feedback from teacher conferring
knowledge/research/what we’ve learned on e-packet -Google Doc feedback
in class) to support my claim. from teacher on e-packet
I can evaluate the quality of the Ongoing discussion (whiteboard wall list)
resource based on the url, author, Teacher Think Aloud
and/or source. Collaborative Notes
I can set realistic completion goals. E-packet planning calendar -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Packet available one
-Google Doc feedback from teacher piece at a time
on e-packet -Small group teacher
assistance for goal
setting
I can bring necessary supplies to class E-packet planning calendar -Student/teacher in-class conferring
in order to reach my goals. -Google Doc feedback from teacher
on e-packet
I can meet my own and my teacher’s E-packet planning calendar -Student/teacher in-class conferring -Packet available one
completion goals. -Google Doc feedback from teacher piece at a time
on e-packet -Small group teacher
assistance for goal
setting
Prior to teaching the unit During teaching After teaching the unit
-Students must have learning experiences prior to -Very important to follow the learning targets as -In the instruction next time, even more explicitly
the unit with the Claim Evidence Reasoning they are so task-based. use the inquiry questions to drive the learning in
routine. that section of the unit.
-Giving regular feedback on the e-packet has been
-Students must have practiced planning time consuming but ultimately will be the same -Start with having students actually look through
experiments in a cooperative way before they are total amount spent on “grading” at the end in a their own closets at home to determine what
asked to do it in an assessment situation traditional assessment model features exist in their own clothing. Before starting
individually. to do web-based research, start with what we
-Students need instruction on each section of the
actually own ourselves.
e-packet as they get to that particular section. An
overview of the whole e-packet at the beginning -Students were able to truly be inquirers in this unit
was helpful but too overwhelming to mentally as there was an open structure that allowed for
process the whole thing in detail. student choice within a framework. Feedback from
students has agreed with teacher observations.
-Students need to be reminded specifically to go
back to their previous work and examples. They -Structure of assessment task allowed for “feeding
can usually answer their own “Is this good?” forward” to students. “Conversation” between
question with their previous whole-class examples teacher and student (face-to-face or through
but need to be reminded. Google doc) really pushed students to higher
achievement.
-Use of Google Doc critical as without it students
have been saving “versions” over and over and -Students need more explicit instruction and
many are unable to keep track of which version is modelling around the ideas of the Criterion D
their latest. factors. E-packet assessing indicates that there
was a gap in understanding on this particular
aspect of the criteria.