International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)

Volume 5 Issue 5, July-August 2021 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470

Syntactic Level and Dectical Expression of the

Linguistic Atom "Personality" in it
Umidjon Yigitaliyev
Associate Professor of Kakand SPU, PhD of Philological Science, Uzbekistan

ABSTRACT How to cite this paper: Umidjon

this scientific article examines the problem of the deictic expression Yigitaliyev "Syntactic Level and
of the linguistic atom "man" at the syntactic level of the Uzbek Dectical Expression of the Linguistic
language. Atom "Personality" in it" Published in
International
KEYWORDS: man, linguistic human atom, syntactic structure, Journal of Trend in
phrase, sentence, syntactic nomination, modality, grammatical Scientific Research
communication, deixis phenomenon, actual division of a sentence, and Development
theme, rheme (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
6470, Volume-5 |
Issue-5, August IJTSRD45220
2021, pp.1833-
1836, URL:
www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd45220.pdf

Copyright © 2021 by author (s) and

International Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research and Development
Journal. This is an
Open Access article
distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

The sentence is the main unit of the linguistic

syntactic structure. And the word combination and the
accompanying syntactic connection to it are the
components of this phenomenon2. In addition, the gap
has a complex hierarchical construction. It is a totality
consisting of an inalienable linkage of aspects such as
intonation, syntactic nomination3, modality4, formal-
grammatic5 and communicative-dynamic6 structures.
2
Нурмонов А. Танланган асарлар. III жилдлик. I жилд.
– Тошкент: ”Akademnashr”,2012. –Б.288.; Башманов М.
Изучение членов предложения узбекского языка в
дихотомии “язык–речь”. Уровен языка: Автореф. дис.
...канд. филол. наук. –Ташкент, 1991. – 24 с.; Усмонова
Х. Ўзбек тилида гап бўлакларининг позицион тадқиқи:
Филол. фанл. докт. ...дисс.автореф. Тошкент, 2007. –
38 б.; Богланов В.В. Семантико-синтаксическая
организация предложения. – Л., 1977. – С. 5-10.
3
Маҳмудов Н.М. Ўзбек тилидаги содда гапларда
семантик-синтактик асимметрия. – Тошкент, 1984. –
Б.92.; Ҳожиев А., Маҳмудов Н. Семантик ва синтактик
позиция // Ўзбек тили ва адабиёти. – 1987. №2. – Б.60-
63.
4
Нурмонов А.Н. Гап ҳақидаги синтактик назариялар. –
Тошкент: ТошДУ, 1989. – 100 б.; Ёқубов Ж.А.
Модаллик категориясининг мантиқ ва тилда
ифодаланишининг семантик хусусиятлари. –
Тошкент:Фан, 2005. – Б.44-45
5
Сайфуллаева Р.Р. Ҳозирги ўзбек адабий тилида
қўшма гапларнинг шакл-вазифавий (формал-
функционал) талқини: Филол. фанл. докт.
...дисс.автореф. Тошкент, 1994. – 48 б.; Қурбонова
М.М. Ўзбек тилшунослигида формал-функционал
йўналиш ва содда гап қурилишининг талқини: Филол.
фанл. докт. ...дисс.автореф. Тошкент, 2001. – 49 б.
6
Нурмонов А. Танланган асарлар. –Б. 385.; Матезиус
В. О так называемом актуальном членении
предложения // Пражский лингвистический кружок. –
М., 1967. – С.240 – 245.; Ковтунова И.И. Современный
русский язык. Порядок слов и актуальное членение
предложения. – М., 1976. ; Золотова
Г.А.Коммуникативные аспекты русского синтаксиса. –
М., 1962. – С.45.;Панфилов В.З. Грамматика и логика.
– М., 1963; Ҳайитметов А. Ўзбек тилида актуал
бўлиниш ва позицион масалалар. – Тошкент, 1984;
Базаров О.О. Ўзбек тилида гапнинг коммуникатив
(актуал) тузилиши: Филол. фанл. номз. ...дисс.автореф.
– Фарғона,2004. –24 б.

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD45220 | Volume – 5 | Issue – 5 | Jul-Aug 2021 Page 1833
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
The time, space and subject of activity of a particular
phenomenon (person – U.Y.) theoretical views on the
point of view-the phenomenon of daiksis7 is still a
new field in our linguistics.
From this point of view, the communicative
construction of the sentence on the basis of the
deuctive process in the language, in other words, the
axial division that arises in the sentence, has an active
impact on its grammatic division, is valid in a close
relationship with it.
Under the influence of a particular person8, the
actual-communicative division of the sentence is
opposed to its formative-grammatical division. If in
the formative-grammatic division the elements of
grammatics are formed, then in the aktual-
communicative division the spiritual elements
associated with the text are formed9. If the main
elements of the formative-grammatical division are
considered possessive and possessive or possessive
construction and sectional construction , the main
elements of the axoal-communicative division are a
certain part or theme of the sentence for the speech
situation, as well as part or remasi of what it reports
(in this the opinion is directed from the known to the
unknown). We will try to base this scientific
hypothesis on the following text. Thus, :
"Tolibjon lay down on the sand and then stared at the
sky without it. It was his childhood sky. Traces of
youth have fallen, there was no trace of this quiet
7 conditioned by the conversational situation, the
Кибрик А.А. Об анафоре, дейксисе и их
соотношении// Разработка и применение
лингвистических процессоров / Ред. А.С. Нариньяни.
Новосибирск, 1983. –С. 107-128.; Шамова Г.А. К
типологии функционирования дейктических средств:
Автореф. дис. ...канд. филол. наук. –Пермь,1992. –19
с.; Иванов Л.Ю. Текст научной дискуссии: Дейксис и
оценка. –М.: НИП «2Р», 2003. – 208 с.; Мисайлова Т.И.
Дейксис как актуализация компонентов речевой
ситуации и денотативного содержания в In stylistic neutral sentences, which are not
повествовательном и описательном художественных
текстах: Автореф. дис. ...канд. филол. наук. –М.,2005. –
25 с.; Лутфуллаева Д. Ўзбек тилида сонларнинг
дейктик хусусиятлари // Ўзбек тилшунослигининг
долзарб масалалари. –Тошкент, 2009. –Б.24.
8
Крушельницкая К.Г. К вопросу о смысловом члении
предложения // ВЯ.1959. –№5. – С.57.; Каримова З.
Логико-грамматическое чление простого предложения
современном узбекском языке в сопоставлении с
английским: Автореф. дис. ...канд. филол. наук. –
М.,1981. – 14 с.
9
Боймирзаева С.Ў. Ўзбек тилида матннинг
коммуникатив-прагматик мазмунини шакллантирувчи
категориялар: Филол. фанл. докт. ...дисс.автореф.
Тошкент, 2010. – 49 б.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD45220 | Volume – 5 | Issue – 5 | Jul-Aug 2021
island where there was a game of infancy10." Here,
first of all, each sentence in this text has its own and
cross-section structures. Each construction, in turn, is
again divided into its internal head and second-level
sections. It is considered a formative-grammatical
division. The same construction in another way
creates a thematic-rematic relationship according to
the hidden expression of the individual in the pronoun
of certain syntactic phenomena, that is, the expression
of an element that is actualized in a communicative
situation.
For example, a certain part (rema) for the
conversational situation in the sentence" Talibjon lay
on the sand, and then stared to the sky without it", as
well as the part (tema) of what is being reported in
this conversational situation, is striking11. However,
the next sentence follows:" it was the sky of his
childhood "and a hint of textual content to the person
(Tolibjon), although" traces of youth have fallen,
there was no trace of this quiet island left in infancy
thoughts". This condition can not be studied from a
formal-grammatical point of view. Here, the course of
the syntactic (through the text – U.Y.) must lean on
expression.
In this case, Russian linguist U.Y.Karaulov points of
you: "Behind any text stands a certain person who
occupies linguistic systems. 12" In other words, the
main tool in highlighting the relationship between
language and personality, the fact that the text was
recognized as a source, was proved by our scientists.
In general, in the text – sentences, which are not
possibilities of the axial division – the components of
the thematic and remamatikmatic division – possess
and co-ordinate the cross section. But this does not
mean that in all sentences not conditioned by a
colloquial situation there is a theme and rema, and
does not mean that it corresponds to the cross section,
of course.
conditioned by a colloquial situation, when the usual
word order is dominant, the subject can arise in a
second-degree non-fragmented case or determinative
task. In such cases, rema occurs within the framework
of the grammatic structure, which consists
10
Саид Аҳмад. Жимжитлик: Роман. – Т: “O’zbekiston”
нашриёт-матбаа ижодий уйи. – 2011. –Б.9
11
Худайберганова Д.С. Ўзбек тилидаги бадиий
матнларнинг антропоцентрик талқини: Филол. фанл.
докт. ...дисс. – Тошкент: ЎзР ФА, 2015. – Б.15.
12
Караулов Ю.Н. Русская языковая личность и задача
её изучения // Язык и личность. – М.: Наука, 1989. –С.
3-8.
Page 1834
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
of"Holder+cross section". For example: the phrase"
Navruz celebrations took place on the Independence
Square " (from live colloquial speech) is a stylistic
neural sentence, usually formed with the correct
order, not conditioned by a colloquial situation. In it,
the place (in the"Independence Square" appears as a
theme, or in the normative case, the theme is
expressed as a place. Rema while ("Navruz
celebrations took place") emerges using the
grammatik basis of borat from"able+verb". Or
similar: in the sentence "wide field passengers are
sparse" (Oybek), the theme is formed with the help of
a determinant state "wide field passengers".
Rema while (commuters are sparse) is formed using a
grammatical basis consisting of "having+cross
section". In the above sentences, the position of cases
or determinant cases at the beginning of the sentence
is the usual normative order 13.
It is known that any sentence will be in a relationship
with the prepositional and postulate in the speech. In
it, as a rule, the syntagmatic attitude is directed in the
direction from the previous sentence to the next. That
is, the animate indicating the actual division of the
sentence will depend on the form of the previous
sentence14. For example, "the woman took a pinch of
soil, brought it to her face. Stared meticulously.15"
When attention is paid to the text, in the influence of
a logical-grammatical description and syntagmatic
attitude, the essence of the meaning of the sentence "a
woman will take a pinch of soil" is observed through
subsequent sentences ("lead to their faces", "sew
meticulously"), referring not only to the behavior of a
woman, but also to national-spiritual values inherent
in a particular nation.
As noted in the scientific literature, the subject is a
subject of information16. The usual typical method of
expression of the theme is the group having and
having. Rema provides information about tema. The
typical method of expression of rema is considered to
be a cross-sectional or cross-sectional group. As it
turns out, the arrival of the owner or owner group
before, the arrival of the cross-section or cross-section
Group is the most convenient and most appropriate
way to express the thematic-rematic relationship,
13
Убаева Ф. Ҳозирги ўзбек адабий тилида ҳол
категорияси. – Тошкент: Фан, 1972. – Б.78.
14
Нурмонов А., Маҳмудов Н., Аҳмедов А.,
Солихўжаева С. Ўзбек тилининг мазмуний
синтаксиси. – Тошкент: Фан, 1992. – Б.99.
15
Тоғай Мурод. Отамдан қолган далалар: Роман. –
Тошкент: “Шарқ” нашриёт-матбаа концернининг Бош
таҳририяти, 1994. –Б. 88.
16
Золотова Г.А. Указ.соч. – С.46.; Базаров О.О.
Кўрсатилган автореф. – Б.16.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD45220 | Volume – 5 | Issue – 5 | Jul-Aug 2021
regardless of what the context or the conversational
situation is. Such a procedure will not be associated
with the context17. Therefore, sentences formed using
the above order are considered contextual or
syntagmatic sentences. In such sentences, as a rule,
words that denote the meaning of the predicate are
subject, words that denote the meaning of the sign-
action are rema18. But a colloquial situation or context
can also distort the above order of the acute division
19
. In this, another paradigm of the acute division
occurs. In this case, the words denoting the sign tema,
the words denoting the predicate can also become
rema.
When more than one subject is involved in a
sentence, the axial division acquires a phased
position. When the sentence is two-themed, The
theme is included in the second theme rema at the
first stage of the separation into Rema. In the second
stage, the rema part is again divided into thematic
Rema. These syntactic processes, in turn, draw a
character characteristic of a person or entity in its
time. That’s why, let's pay attention to the following
text: "We do not know whether an unfortunate person
is sad because he is separated from the wealth that he
has shed when giving. We can not say that they are in
trouble because they are losing their worlds, not from
the soul...". This text refers not only to the painful
fantasies of a "rich man", but also to the fact that an
"official" person lies on the verge of death ("when my
mouth has now risen, my head has reached the
stone") in the process.
In general, the means by which these types of
grammatics and axial divisions are expressed are
grouped around certain functional-pragmatic areas,
regardless of the fact that they have a syntactic-
semantic and formal-grammatical appearance, and the
most basic of these refers to the linguistic atom of a
person as a dichotomy process.
References:
[1] Nurmonov A. Selected works. Volume III. I am
leather. - Tashkent: "Akademnashr", 2012. –
B.288
[2] Bashmanov M. Study of the members of the
sentence of the Uzbek language in the
dichotomy “language-speech”. Language level:
Avtoref. dis. ... Cand. philol. sciences. -
Tashkent, 1991. - 24 p.
17
Падучева Е.В. О семантике синтаксиса. – М., 1974. –
С.12.
18
Нурмонов А. ва бошқ. Кўрсатилган асар. – Б.100.
19
Ўринбоев Б. Сўзлашув нутқида гап бўлаклари
тартиби // Ўзбек тили ва адабиёти. – 1976. №6. – Б.49-
53.
Page 1835
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
[3] Boglanov V.V. Semantic-syntactic organization
of the sentence. - L., 1977. .̶ S.5-10
[4] Makhmudov N.M. Semantic-syntactic
asymmetry of simple sentences of the Uzbek
language. - Tashkent, 1984.-- P.92.
[5] Kibrik A.A. On anaphora, deixis and their
relationship // Development and application of
linguistic processors / Ed. A.S. Narinyani.
Novosibirsk, 1983. –S. 107-128
[6] Shamova G.A. On the typology of the
functioning of deictic drugs: Author's abstract.
dis. ... Cand. philol. sciences. –Perm, 1992. –19
p.
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD45220 | Volume – 5 | Issue – 5 | Jul-Aug 2021
[7] Ivanov L.Yu. Text of the Scientific Discussion:
Deixis and Assessment. –M .: NIP “2R”, 2003.
- 208 p.
[8] Misailova T.I. Deixis as the actualization of the
components of the speech situation and
denotative content in the narrative and
descriptive literary texts: Author's abstract. dis
... Cand. philol. sciences. –M., 2005. - 25 p.
[9] Shvedova N.Yu. On the relationship between
the grammatical and semantic structure of a
sentence // Slovenskoe linguistics. VII
International Congress of Slavists. Reports of
the Soviet delegation. - M. 1973 .-- p. 461
Page 1836