Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article 1403: The following contracts are unenforceable unless they are ratified:
(1) Those entered in the name of another person by one who has been given no
authority or legal representation, or who has acted beyond his power
(2) Those who do not comply with statutes of frauds
(3) Those where both parties are incapable of giving consent to a contract
Unauthorized Contracts: Contracts entered into the name of another person by one
who has been given no authority or legal representation; acted beyond his/her power.
Article 1404: Unauthorized contracts are governed by article 1317 and the principles of
agency in Title X of this book
Article 1405: Contracts Infringing the Statute of frauds, referred to in No.2 of article 1403,
are ratified by the failure to object to the presentation of oral evidence to prove the same,
or by the acceptance of benefits under them
Article 1406
Article 1407
Article 1408
Article 1409
ART. 1409. The following contracts are inexistent and void from the beginning:
(1) Those whose cause, object or purpose is contrary to law, morals, good
customs, public order or public policy;
(2) Those which are absolutely simulated or fictitious;
(3) Those whose cause or object did not exist at the time of the transaction;
(4) Those whose object is outside the commerce of men;
(5) Those which contemplate an impossible service;
(6) Those where the intention of the parties relative to the principal object of the
contract cannot be ascertained;
(7) Those expressly prohibited or declared void by law. These contracts cannot be
ratified. Neither can the right to set up the defense of illegality be waived.
Void Contracts - are those which, because of certain defects, generally produce no effect at all.
They are considered as inexistent from its inception or from the very beginning.
Inexistent Contracts - refer to agreements which lack one or some or all of the elements (i.e.,
consent, object, and cause) or do not comply with the formalities which are essential for the
existence of a contract.
In a legal sense, a void contract is treated as if it was never created and becomes
unenforceable in court. For example, a contract between an illegal drug supplier and a drug
dealer is unenforceable from the onset due to the illegal nature of the agreed-upon activity.
Void/Inexistent Contracts distinguished from other defective contracts
VOID RESCISSIBLE
Defect is inherent in the contract itself Defect is in their effects, either to one of the
parties or to a 3rd party
Matter of law and public interest Based on equity and more a matter of private
interest
No legal effects even if no action is taken to No action, remains valid and produces all its
set it aside effects
VOID UNENFORCEABLE
Can never be ratified and become Can be ratified and thereafter enforced
enforceable
VOID VOIDABLE
One of those essential requisites is wanting, Essential requisites for validity is present,
either in fact or in law or is declared void by BUT consent is vitiated
statute
No contract, but only appearance of one, Valid until set aside, validity may only be
produces no effect even if not set aside by assailed directly, never by a 3rd person
direct action (collateral attack allowed)
Action to declare nullity does not prescribe, Action for annulment prescribes in 4 years
permanent, even if the cause of nullity ceased
to exist
Article 1410
Article 1411
Article 1412
Article 1413
Article 1414. When money is paid or property delivered for an illegal purpose, the
contract may be repudiated by one of the parties before the purpose has been
accomplished, or before any damage has been caused to a third person. In such case,
the courts may, if the public interest will thus be subserved, allow the party repudiating
the contract to recover the money or property.
An exemption to the rule, in pari delicto in Articles 1411-1412 which states no recovery is
allowed to any of the parties. In Article 1414, recovery can only be done if the purpose or the
illegal act has not yet been accomplished and there is no damage caused to third persons.
Example: If Blue paid Black, in advance to murder Pink, an illegal purpose, Blue can recover
what he paid before the purpose has been accomplished, or before killing Pink.
But if the purpose is already been done, no recovery and both Blue and Black must be
persecuted for murder.
Article 1415. Where one of the parties to an illegal contract is incapable of giving
consent, the courts may, if the interest of justice so demands allow recovery of money or
property delivered by the incapacitated person.
Another exemption to in pari delicto rule, but this only applies if one of the parties is
incapacitated such as being a minor or being insane.
Using the previous example, assuming that Blue is a minor, then Blue is entitled for recovery of
reward given that the purpose has not yet been done. But if already done, Blue cannot recover
and Black should be persecuted for murder. Bluecan skip from persecution since he is a minor
and exempted from criminal liability.
Article 1416. When the agreement is not illegal per se but is merely prohibited, and the
prohibition by the law is designed for the protection of the plaintiff, he may, if public
policy is thereby enhanced, recover what he has paid or delivered.
Another exemption when both parties are in pari delicto. Recovery may still be allowed given
that the purpose is not illegal, just merely prohibited, the prohibition is designed for the
protection of the plaintiff, and public policy would be enhanced by allowing the plaintiff to
recover what he has paid or delivered.
For example, Blue donated to Pink everything that he possessed and owned, having nothing left
for himself. This is prohibited, but not necessarily illegal. Since public policy would enhance if
Blue is able to recover, then Blue will be permitted to do so, he can recover at least enough to
support himself and his family.
Article 1417
Article 1418
Article 1419
Article 1420. In case of a divisible contract, if the illegal terms can be separated from the
legal ones, the latter may be enforced.
(1) When the consideration is entire and single, the contract is indivisible so that if part of
such consideration is illegal, the whole contract is void and unenforceable.
(2) Where the contract is divisible or severable, that is, the consideration is made up of
several parts, and the illegal ones can be separated from the legal portions, the latter
may be enforced.
Example: A sneakerhead went abroad and made a deal with nike that he would pay them a
thousand dollars monthly and that the company would deliver to him firsthand limited edition
shoes. In this case, their contract is indivisible because there is no way you can separate this
one whole contract. However, the obligation of nike is divisible because they can choose what
time of the month they would send him the shoes, which kind of shoes, and whose shoes would
be sent.
Article 1421. The defense of illegality of contracts is not available to third persons whose
interests are not directly affected.
In voidable contracts and unenforceable contracts, third persons are not allowed to bring
an action of illegality of the contract whose interest are not directly affected.
Article 1422. A contract which is the direct result of a previous illegal contract, is also
void and inexistent.
Example: Mr. A made up a contract to Mr. B selling a parcel of land, which was the truth is an
illegally acquired Title of a Land, then later on Mr. B sold the Title to Mr. C, later on Mr. C
learned that the title for the parcel of land he bought was illegally acquired.
Mr. C cannot sue Mr B but both of them can sue Mr A because he is the origin of the
illegally acquired contract.