Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Completion of this work will satisfy the following learning outcomes from module BMS512:
LO1 Analyse a range of financial strategies including budgets, financial management and accounting
LO2 Evaluate approaches to procurement and contracting within an organisation
LO3 Assess the commercial context that an organisation operates within
CASE STUDY
S plc is to add a new line of computer games to its highly successful product range. You are required to
provide an evaluation of the new investment with a five-year expected live. The following budgeted
projections relate to the new investment proposal for this new line.
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Projected sales revenues in 600 1000 1200 1000 800
£000s
TASK
Write a report to address the following
A)
3) What is the payback period for the new investment? If S plc imposes a three-year maximum
payback should the project be accepted?
4) Determine the net present value for the new investment? Should the investment proposal be accepted?
Explain why?
5) Describe the logic behind the net present value approach. What is the relationship between net present
value and cost of capital.
7) Calculate the internal rate of return for the investment proposal. Should the proposal be accepted?
Would a change in the cost of capital affect the internal rate of return?
8) Discuss why the net present value method is often regarded to be superior to internal rate of return.
[LO1]
B)
S plc finds that the cheapest source of long-term finance available to it is through a bank loan.
Critically contrast this with an equity issue for all its long-term finance requirements.
[LO3]
C)
Required:
1) Calculate the breakeven sales revenue, the sales revenue to achieve a target profit of £120,000
and the margin of safety.
3) Cost-volume-profit analysis provides important information for management decisions. The analysis
illustrates relationships that prevail under a particular set of assumptions. Critically comment on these
assumptions.
[LO3]
D)
1) Distinguish between three categories of suppliers: strategic suppliers, preferred suppliers and
transactional suppliers.
2) Compare the advantages of single sourcing and multiple sourcing in the context of procurement.
3) Explain what cross-sourcing is using an example and how it benefits the buyer.
[LO2]
Other relevant assessment information:
You will need to include and reference at least 8 different sources including 4 academic textbooks
and 2 academic journals to help provide supporting evidence for any assertions that you make within
your report.
Your report should outline your research, judgements as well as the conclusions drawn. 3,000 words
(+ or - 10%). All written work should be submitted online, through Turnitin. You must include both
a reference list and bibliography.
The completion of your work will satisfy 75% of the assessment for this module
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT
The skills development opportunities identified in this report are:
Written communication, teamwork and research skills in the completion of assessments and during
the formative assessment and interaction within the classroom.
Application of theory to organisational practice
MARKING CRITERIA
Question A: Investment Critically discuss the importance of the capital investment 40%
decisions. appraisal process to S plc.
Cashflow statement for an investment proposal.
Calculation of payback, NPV and IRR for the investment
proposal and related comments on these measures.
Discuss why the net present value method is often regarded
to be superior to internal rate of return.
Question B: Long-term S plc finds that the cheapest source of long-term finance 15%
sources of finance. available to it is through a bank loan.
Critically contrast this with an equity issue for all its long-
term finance requirements.
Question C: Cost-volume- Cost-volume-profit analysis for and existing product line 25%
profit analysis.
100%
Undergraduate Generic Marking Criteria Foundation Degree Level 5
Level 5 (Foundation Degree/Diploma) Classification Level 5 (Foundation Degree/Diploma) Classification Level 5 (Foundation Degree/Diploma) Classification
Exceptional work with presentation of the Outstanding work with presentation of a very Extremely good work with presentation
highest standard. The work contains high standard. There is comprehensive of a high standard. Evidence of strong
coherent arguments and ideas. There is a understanding of key concepts and knowledge and understanding together
detailed understanding of subject matter knowledge and evidence of critical analysis with some critical analysis and insight.
and critical analysis of issues/problems. and insight. Accurate interpretation of data Source material is used effectively to
Points are made clearly and concisely, with arguments, ideas and solutions support arguments, ideas and solutions.
always substantiated by appropriate use of presented effectively and based on strong
source material. There is evidence of a research and reading.
sound ability to critically interrelate
theories with examples from practice
where appropriate.
Very good presentation. Sound knowledge Presentation is of a good standard but some Adequate presentation. The work is
and understanding with an emerging shortcomings. Evidence of a sound descriptive and/or lacks critical analysis
ability to critically engage with and apply knowledge base but limited critical and where required but is relevant with
the concepts involved linking them to practical application of concepts and ideas. limited though sufficient evidence of
practice where appropriate. Good use of Content is largely relevant although points knowledge and understanding. There is
source material which supports most may not always be clear and structure may some evidence of reading although
points clearly. Content is wholly relevant lack coherence. Contains some critical arguments/ proposals/solutions often lack
and is coherently structured. reflection and some use of source material to coherence and may be unsubstantiated by
illustrate points. relevant source material or partially
flawed. Links to practice are made where
appropriate.
Level 5 (Foundation Degree/Diploma) Classification Level 5 (Foundation Degree/Diploma) Classification Level 5 (Foundation Degree/Diploma) Classification
Poorly structured, incoherent and wholly Very poorly structured, incoherent and The work is extremely poorly structured
descriptive work. Evidence of a weak wholly descriptive work. Evidence of a very and presented. It demonstrates no real
knowledge base with some key aspects not weak knowledge base with many key knowledge or understanding of key
addressed and use of irrelevant material. omissions and much material irrelevant. Use concepts and principles. Much material is
Flawed use of techniques. Limited of inappropriate or incorrect techniques. irrelevant, incorrect or omitted. No
evidence of appropriate reading and no Very little evidence of appropriate reading evidence of critical thought. No effective
evidence of critical thought. Little and no evidence of critical thought. No links use of supporting material. No links to
reference to practice where appropriate. to practice where appropriate. To obtain a practice where appropriate. Not a
mark of 20% the work must show evidence genuine attempt to engage with the
of a genuine attempt to engage with the assessment requirements and/or subject
assessment requirements and with the subject matter.
matter.