Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The increasing need of magnesium sulfate heptahidrat by various industries and the limited availabil-
ity of this material in nature are two reasons to produce MgSO4.7H2O synthetically. Basically, such a
material can be produced from dolomite. A laboratory scale of dolomite-based epsomite making
which employed two crystallization processes was conducted. Those were stirring and non-stirring
methods and the results showed that stirring one yielded 98.2312 to 98.7244 % MgSO4.7H2O salt.
The non-stirring method produced salts of 97.5929 – 99.0378%. Yet prior to salt processing, magne-
sium sulfate solution was evaporated at 100 – 110°C to get solution densities around 1.35, 1.38 and
1.4 g/ml. The bigger the density the bigger the MgO and SO3 contents
Stirring and Non-Stirring Methods Used to ...Tatang Wahyudi and Budhy Agung 1
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Figure 2. Glass devices and gadgets used for experiment in epsomite making
using stirring (left) and non-stirring (right) methods
Raw Material
(Dolomite)
Water-diluted
H2SO4
MgSO4.nH2O
and
CaSO4..nH2O
Solid-solution
separation
CaSO4.nH2O
MgSO4.nH2O (solid, to be
(solution) used for another
purpose)
Filtration
Evaporation
Cystallization Cystallization
(stirring method) (non stirring method)
Filtration Filtration
Drying Drying
MgSO4.7H2O MgSO4.7H2O
crystal crystal
Stirring and Non-Stirring Methods Used to ...Tatang Wahyudi and Budhy Agung 3
lution and calcium sulfate deposit occurred which Not only does stirring process affect rate of crys-
were then separated. One more filtration was re- tallization but also solution density speeds up
quired to get impurity-free solution. The solution crystal formation. Non-stirring method crystalliza-
was then evaporated at 100 - 110°C. During evapo- tion proved these phenomena. Compared to both
ration process, water within solution diminished parameters, temperature seems less significant
and resulted in thicker solution. The process could in influencing formation of MgSO4.7H2O crystals.
be terminated when the desired density param- A series of tests using three different tempera-
eter for epsomite making, namely 1.35, 1.38 and tures (15, 20 and 27° C) provided relatively similar
1.40 g/cc was achieved (measured by Baume hy- product quantity for both stirring and non-stirring
grometer). Prior evaporation process, solution den- methods (Table 1). All crystallization process
sity was 1.24 g/cc. The final step, when making lasted for ± 30 minutes.
epsomite, was crystallizing the solution using ei-
ther stirring or non-stirring methods. Stirring rate Analyses show that the bigger the density solu-
for stirring method was determined around 124.22 tion used as the feed the bigger the MgO and SO3
rpm – the best rpm based on preliminary tests. contents and the lesser H2O content. This phe-
nomenon occurs as bigger density magnesium
When evaporation process started, a small amount sulfate results in lessening H2O concentration. The
of MgSO4.6H2O crystals occurred. The culprit was magnesium sulfate itself becomes thicker and
temperature condition during the process. Tem- thicker. Correlation between solution density and
perature of 48.2 - 67° C was a favorable condition the contents of MgO, SO3, H2O from either stir-
for MgSO4.6H2O crystallization while the epsomite ring-method or non-stirring-method MgSO4.7H2O
(MgSO4.7H2O) crystal occurred at 15 to 48° C. crystals at each crystallization temperatures is
Changing the process from evaporation condition shown in Figure 4.
to crystallization one did not immediately decrease
temperature from 100 - 110° C to 15, 20 or 27° C – Although uneven increase of MgO, SO3 and H2O
the desired temperatures used in this laboratory contents slightly occurred, low or high crystalliza-
scale-research. It took more or less 45 to 60 mi- tion temperatures did not affect those substance
nutes prior to reaching such temperatures. The contents immediately. In some cases, the con-
MgSO4.6H2O and MgSO4.7H2O crystals which tents went up and then went down though the tem-
were formed before reaching desired crystalliza- peratures increased. It was observed that stirring
tion temperature took place only on the surface of method provided relatively even magnesium sul-
magnesium sulfate solution. This was an advan- fate heptahydrate contents while those came from
tage as separating both crystals was quite easy. non-stirring method performs varying contents.
When reaching the desired temperature, crystalli-
zation only produced MgSO4.7H2O crystals. Fil- Crystallization process using stirring method yields
tering followed by drying was conducted to sepa- epsom salts that are relatively stable in content,
rate the crystals from its filtrate. In terms of dri- i.e., 98.23 – 98.73 %. The product variably con-
ving away the excess of filtrate on crystal-contai tains MgO, SO3 and H2O, namely 16.23 - 16.31%,
ning filter paper, a drying process was conducted 32.07 - 32.41 %, and 48.98 - 50.46 % respec-
by putting the filter paper on the scrap paper and tively. It is assumed that stirring process kept thick
left at room temperature. magnesium sulfate solution in homogeny condi-
tion. Range of yielded products for each conducted
Tests using stirring and non-stirring methods show process is relatively the same, i.e., 0.5%.
that the rate of epsomite crystallization from the
former method is relatively faster than that from Different from stirring-method crystallization pro-
the later method. When the process was started, cess, the process by non-stirring method produces
epsomite crystallization occurred after 5 to 15 products that vary in content from 97.54 - 99.03
seconds. The crystallization initially took place sur- %. Its MgO content ranges from 15.68 - 16.21 %,
rounding stirrer which then disseminated to all while the SO3 and H2O contents are 31.16 - 32.12
media. Started at the bottom part of the media, % and 49.31 -50.89 % respectively. Stagnant con-
First MgSO4.7H2O crystallization by non-stirring dition of feed solution is supposed to be the cul-
method occurred a longer time, around 2 – 3 mi- prit why magnesium sulfate heptahydrate recov-
nutes after starting the process. The process was ery varies. During the process, formation of epsom
completed when all crystals filled the vessel. salt molecules in every solution part is not ho-
- stirring method
mogeny. Though range of yielded products is big Crystallizing magnesium sulfate solution that re-
enough (1.49%), epsom salt recoveries from non- tains density of 1.35 g/cc at 15 and 27ºC produces
stirring method are relatively significant. Both stir- MgSO4.7H2O crystals. Figure 5 shows that the
ring and non-stirring method products perform rela- epsomite crystal derived from the tests is quite
tively small iron contents from 3.5 to 154.7 mg/l. similar to that of natural epsomite as shown in
Significant decrease occurs in Fe contents if com- Figure 1. The crystal performs relatively fibrous
pared to the Fe content within raw materials (285 character as owned naturally by the epsom salt
mg/l). though the fibrous character of synthetic epsomite
is not as perfect as that of the natural one. This
Physically, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate crys- might be occurred due to condition for synthetic
tal yielded from stirring method performs fine grain crystal formation in laboratory is quite not the same
size (powder). It is very likely that propeller me- as that for the natural epsomite in the nature. Yet
chanical movement – when used for mixing solu- in terms of convincing that the produced crystals
tion - inhibited the crystal growth. Different from are really epsom salt, both type of products were
stirring method product, the product from non-stir- then analyzed by XRD. Information from XRD analy-
ring method shows needle-like performance. The sis suggests that the yielded products belong to
crystals grew as feed solution was relatively stag- MgSO4.7H2O as shown in Figure 6.
nant.
Stirring and Non-Stirring Methods Used to ...Tatang Wahyudi and Budhy Agung 5
Figure 4. Correlation between MgO, SO3 and H2O contents with
MgSO4.nH2O density, showing the bigger the density
the bigger the MgO and SO3contents and the lesser
the H2O content
64
36
16
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 [°20] 60
000501A2
00-0467 Epsomite, sun MgSO417H2O
64
36
16
4
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 [°20] 60
000501A1
00-0467 Epsomite, syn MgSO417H2O
Stirring and Non-Stirring Methods Used to ...Tatang Wahyudi and Budhy Agung 7
5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Both stirring and non-stirring methods yield rela- The authors wish to thank Miftahudin Arif Mulyana
tively significant epsom salt recoveries. However, – a student of the University of Jenderal Achmad
making epsomite by stirring method is much bet- Yani for conducting laboratory test works, ana-
ter than that of non-stirring one. MgSO4.7H2O crys- lysts and technicians of RDCMCT who lent their
tallization process using the former is faster than expertise and extensive technical support to this
that of the later and results in more evenly crystal project.
formation. In addition, it is known that the bigger
the magnesium sulfate density used as the feed
the bigger the MgO and SO3 contents within REFERENCES
MgSO4.7H2O crystal. However, water content is
getting lesser and lesser. Agung, Budhy et al. 2000. “Pemanfaatan Pilot
Plant Dolomit untuk Pembuatan Pupuk
Market requires product specification that includes Kieserite Gresik, Jawa Timur”. Laporan
97 - 98 % MgSO4.7H2O. The produced magne- Teknik Pengolahan No, 174, Pusat Penelitian
sium sulfate heptahydrate crystal contains MgO dan Pengembangan Teknologi Mineral,
content that has satisfied such specifications and Direktorat Jenderal Pertambangan Umum,
can be used for manufacturing several materials Bandung.
such as printing and dyeing thin cotton fabric,
ballast agent for cotton and silk, manufacturing Anon., 1970. Encyclopedia Britannica. v. 8. A So-
mother-of-pearl and goods from leather, manure, ciety of Gentlemen in Scotland: William Benton
porcelain, pigment, explosives, refractory mate- Publisher.
rial as well as material for matches.
Halsey, D., 1974. William Coulter’s Encyclopedia.
The facts that rate of MgSO4.7H2O crystallization v 15. McMillan Educational Corporation, USA.
is faster and yielded product is evenly distributed
make the stirring method for industrial - scale Kirk-Othmer, 1995. Encyclopedia of Chemical
epsomite making is more appropriate than non- Technology. v 15. 4th Ed. New York: John
stirring method. Such a method will save produc- Wiley & Sons.
tion cost economically moreover if supported by
easy raw material supply. In terms of having de- Oss, J. F. van, 1968. Material and Technology. v
sired crystallization temperature – moreover dur- 1. London: Longmans.
ing post evaporation process, the process has to
be supported by a good cooling system. Partington, 1957. General and Inorganic Chemis-
try. 3rd Ed., McMillan.
Advanced studies on synthetic dolomite-based
epsom salt making need to be conducted. A good Soin, Taito O and Charles O Wilson, 1963. Roger’s
quality of laboratory-scale research for epsomite Inorganic Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 7th Ed.
making can then be applied to be used in indus- Philadelphia: Lea and Fibiger Publisher.
trial scale. Dolomite, raw material for producing
MgSO4.7H2O, is relatively abundance in Indone- Taylor, S.F., 1960. Inorganic Theoretical Chemis-
sia and not yet benefited properly. Moreover, there try. 10th Ed. London: Heinemann.
is an in-between product when using dolomite for
making epsom salt, namely kieserite – a material Weissman, J., 2006. Epsomite. Webpage in
which can be employed for fertilizer. Depends on webmineral.com. Browsed at 8.00 am, 30
market condition, industries can select whether January 2006.
making epsomite or just producing kieserite or
maybe yielding both of them.