Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Demuyakor (2020) investigated Ghanaian international students’ levels of satisfaction of online learning in
higher educational institutions in China. The results of the study indicated that students supported the
implementation of online learning programs. They were satisfied with their online learning experience during
the transition from FTF to online and perceived the online courses as effective. On the other hand, students
who participated in the courses while outside China indicated that they spent a lot of money to secure internet
data for online learning. In addition, students who lived in dorms indicated that the internet connectivity was
very slow.
Knipe and Lee (2002) examined the concern that teaching and learning using video conferencing is not of the
same quality of the one experienced in a traditional classroom environment. The results indicated that the
teaching and learning that the students in the remote site experienced was of less quality then students in the
traditional classroom. Candarli and Yuksel (2012) conducted a study to explore students’ perceptions of video-
conferencing in higher education. The participants of the study were second and third-year university students
Gonzales et al (2020) conducted an experiment among 450 students from three subjects in different
degrees of higher education at Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain to identify the effect of
COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance. The results of this study answer fourresearch
questions:
Yang & Li (2018) support the idea that online teaching training is necessary both for students and
instructors
ASSESSMENT PAHASE
Validity
As assessment main objective is to evaluate the students’ learning on the specific
learning outcome, the assessment method should be appropriate to evaluate the
achievement of the learning objectives (Hsiao & Watering, 2020).
2.4.2 Reliability
The most difficult issue in remote assessment is ensuring academic integrity. The
assessment design should consider preventive measures to make assessment free from
cheating and fraud. The preventive mechanisms during the assessment time and
detecting mechanisms after submission should be employed (Hsiao &Watering, 2020).
2.4.3 Clarity
During the assessment time, since there is no face-to-face communication and students
may not have a chance to ask clarification, the assessment should be clear to students.
Particularly when students are not familiar with the new assessment method, it is
essential to explain the procedures and expectations clearly and provide related examples.
This also applies if questions are asked at a different level than would normally be
expected. Make sample questions, and if possible discuss these questions online with
the students before issuing the assessment (Hsiao & Watering, 2020).
Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: A survey
of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media
Technologies, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/8286
Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 33(3), 301–311.
Hsiao, Y. P., & Watering, G. A.v. d.. (2020). Guide for choosing a suitable method for remote assessment
considerations and options: University of Twente.
Gonzalez T, de la Rubia MA, Hincz KP, Comas-Lopez M, Subirats L, Fort S, et al. (2020) Influence of
COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education. PLoS ONE 15(10): e0239490.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239490