Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11 †meena sahai@hotmail.com
Communicated by D. Passman
1. Introduction
21 Let KG be the group algebra of a group G over a field K of characteristic p. A
lot of work has been done on the problem of solvability of the unit group U =
23 U (KG) of KG as can be seen in [3–5, 10]. Also computation of the derived length
of U and its connection with the order and nature of the commutator subgroup
25 G is an interesting object of study. For finite groups G and p = 2, a complete
description of group algebras KG such that U is metabelian or centrally metabelian
1
27 or γ3 (δ (U )) = 1 is given in [11, 13, 14]. When p = 2 and G is a finite group, group
algebras KG with metabelian unit groups have been described in [6] and [9]. In [2],
29 Baginski has proved that if G is a finite p-group with cyclic commutator subgroup
of order pn (p > 2), then derived length of U is equal to log2 (pn + 1) where r
31 denotes the upper integral part of the real number r. This was extended to arbitrary
groups with cyclic commutator subgroup of order pn (p > 2) by Balogh and Li [1].
33 In this paper, we give a characterization of group algebras of finite groups G over
fields of characteristic p = 2, 3 with solvable unit groups of derived length three.
1
1st Reading
March 8, 2010 17:54 WSPC/S0219-4988 171-JAA 00393
(1) U = 1;
5 (2) p and G satisfy one of the following conditions:
(a) p = 7, G = C7 and γ3 (G) = 1;
7 (b) p = 5, G = C5 and either γ3 (G) = 1 or γn (G) = G for all n ≥ 3 with
xg = x−1 for all x ∈ G and for all g ∈
/ CG (G ).
1 For c > 1, we may assume that H is cyclic. Consider the group G = G/P
and apply the case c = 1 to obtain (P, H) ≤ P so that G = P . Let x ∈ P and
3 Q = P , x. Then Q is normal in G and nilpotency class of Q is less than c. By
induction hypothesis (Q, H) and hence (x, H) = 1.
5 Remark 2.1. If p = 5 and (P, h) is abelian, then the above argument leads to
(x, h)h ∈ (x, h) and (x, h)5 = 1.
7 Proposition 2.1. Let CharK = p ≥ 9 and let G be a finite p-group such that
U = 1. Then G is abelian.
Proof. If not, let G be a minimal counter example. Then every proper section of
G is abelian. So G = x, y, G = z where z = (x, y) = 1 is central in G and
z p = 1. Let u = 1 + x + y, then
u1 = (u, y) = 1 + u−1 x(z − 1),
u2 = (u, x) = 1 − u−1 y(z − 1)z −1 ,
and u3 = (u, y −1 ) = 1 − u−1 x(z − 1)z −1 .
Clearly (u1 , u3 ) = 1. Now
v = (u1 , u2 )
= 1 − u−1 −1 −1
1 u2 [u x, u−1 y](z − 1)2 z −1
= 1 − u−1 −1 −1
1 u2 u {[x, u−1 y] + u−1 [x, y] − [y, u−1 ]x}(z − 1)2 z −1
= 1 + u−1 −1 −2
1 u2 u {[x, y]u−1 y − [x, y] + [x, y]u−1 x}(z − 1)2 z −1
= 1 + u−1 −1 −2
1 u2 u yxu−1 (z − 1)3 z −1
and
w = (u3 , u2 )
= 1 + u−1 −1 −1
3 u2 [u x, u−1 y](z − 1)2 z −1
= 1 − u−1 −1 −2
3 u2 u yxu−1 (z − 1)3 z −2 .
Since U = 1, so [v, w] = [u−1 −1 6 −3
1 β, u3 β](z−1) z = 0 where β = u−1
2 u
−2
yxu−1 .
6
The annihilator A of (z −1) in KG is a two-sided ideal. The above equation implies
−1 −1
that β u1 and β u3 commute in KG/A where w is the image of w ∈ KG in
KG/A. Hence
0 = [β −1 u1 , β −1 u3 ](z − 1)6
= β −1 {[u1 , β −1 ]u3 − [u3 , β −1 ]u1 }(z − 1)6
= β −1 [u1 , β −1 ](1 + z −1 )(z − 1)6 .
1st Reading
March 8, 2010 17:54 WSPC/S0219-4988 171-JAA 00393
This gives
3 It may be mentioned here that the contradiction for the minimal counterexample
can also be obtained from [2] but the above proof is independent.
5 Corollary 2.1. Let CharK = p ≥ 9 and let G be a finite group such that U = 1.
Then G is abelian.
(1 − y2−1 ){(1 − x−2 )(2 + y1 + y1−1 ) + j(2 + x + x−1 )x−1 y1 (1 − y1−2 )}z1 z2 = 0.
3 z = 0 or, i(x−1)
On simplifying this we get i(x2 −1){v −1 (t−1)−x−1 (1+x)} tz =
0, a contradiction.
5 Corollary 2.2. Let CharK = 7 and let G be a finite nonabelian group such that
U = 1. Then G is central cyclic of order 7.
This leaves us with the case when CharK = 5. If G is a finite group such that
9 U = 1. Then G = P H where P is a finite five-group, H is an abelian 5 -group
and |P | ≤ 5. So G = (P, H)P . First assume that P is abelian. By Remark 2.1 for
all x ∈ P , h ∈ H, (x, h)h ∈ (x, h) and (x, h)5 = 1.
1st Reading
March 8, 2010 17:54 WSPC/S0219-4988 171-JAA 00393
Proof. We have G = (P, H). First let H = h be a cyclic group and G = 1. By
replacing P with (P, h), if necessary, we may assume that P = G = (P, h). For
x, y ∈ P , let α = x − 1 and as in [1, Lemma 2.4], let
x1 = x,
y1 = (1 + hα, h)
= 1 + (1 + hα)−1 hx((x, h) − 1) ≡ 1 + h((x, h) − 1) (mod ∆(G )2 KG),
y1 = (1 + hα, x) ≡ 1 − h((x, h) − 1)(x − 1) (mod ∆(G )3 KG),
z2 = (y1 , y) ≡ 1 − h((y, h) − 1)((x, h) − 1) (mod ∆(G )3 KG)
and z2 = (y1 , y) ≡ 1 + h((y, h) − 1)((x, h) − 1)(x − 1) (mod ∆(G )4 KG).
z3 ≡ 1 + h2 ((y, h)h − 1)((x, h)h − 1)((x, h) − 1)2 ((y, h) − 1) (mod ∆(G )6 KG).
3 As (x, h)h ∈ (x, h) for all x ∈ P , so (y, h) ∈ (x, h). Hence G = (P, h) is a
cyclic group of order 5.
If H is not cyclic, let h1 , h2 ∈ H so that (P, h1 ) = z1 and (P, h2 ) = z2 where
z1 = (x, h1 ) = 1 and z2 = (y, h2 ) = 1 for some x, y ∈ P . If z1 ∩ z2 = 1, then
(z1 , h2 ) = (z2 , h1 ) = 1.
Put x1 = x,
y1 = (1 + h1 α, h1 ) ≡ 1 + h1 (z1 − 1) (mod ∆(G )2 KG),
y1 = (1 + h2 α, y) ≡ 1 − h2 (z2 − 1)α (mod ∆(G )3 KG),
z2 = (1 + y1 , x) ≡ 1 − h1 (z1 − 1)2 (mod ∆(G )3 KG),
and z2 = (y1 , y) ≡ 1 + h2 (z2 − 1)2 α (mod ∆(G )4 KG).
Then z3 = (z2 , z2 ) ≡ 1 − [h1 (z1 − 1)2 , h2 (z2 − 1)2 α] (mod ∆(G )6 KG)
2 3
≡ 1 + h1 h2 (z2 − 1) (z1 − 1) (mod ∆(G )6 KG).
Lemma 2.3. Let CharK = 5 and let G be a finite group such that U = 1. If
7 x ∈ G such that x5 = 1 and xa ∈ x for some a ∈ G, then xa = x or x−1 .
we have
u1 = (u, a) = 1 + u−1 ax(xk − 1) ≡ 1 + ka(x − 1) (mod ∆(G )2 KG),
u2 = (u1 , x) ≡ 1 − k 2 a(x − 1)2 (mod ∆(G )3 KG),
v1 = (v, a) ≡ 1 + ka2 (x − 1) (mod ∆(G )2 KG),
v2 = (v1 , x) ≡ 1 − k 2 (k + 2)a2 (x − 1)2 (mod ∆(G )3 KG)
and (u2 , v2 ) ≡ 1 + k 4 (k + 2)[a(x − 1)2 , a2 (x − 1)2 ] (mod ∆(G )5 KG)
= 1 + k 4 (k + 2)a[(x − 1)2 , a]a(x − 1)2
= 1 + k 4 (k + 2)a{ax(x − 1) + (x − 1)ax}(xk − 1)a(x − 1)2
= 1 + k 4 (k + 2)a2 x{(x − 1) + (xk − 1)}(xk − 1)a(x − 1)2
2
= 1 + k 4 (k + 2)a3 xk+1 {xk+1 − 1 + x(k+1) − 1}(xk(k+1) − 1)(x − 1)2
≡ 1 + k 5 a3 (k + 1)2 (k + 2)2 x
(mod ∆(G )5 KG).
1 Thus if k = 3, then U = 1.
We remark that the above lemma also follows as a consequence of [1, Theorem
3 1.1].
Proposition 2.3. Let CharK = 5, G a finite group such that G = P H, where P
5 is a nonabelian five-group, H = h is a cyclic 5 -group and U = 1. Then |G | = 5.
Proof. When P is nonabelian, by applying Lemma 2.2 to the group PG we get
7 |G
P | = 1 or 5.
G
If | G
P | = 1, then G = P = C5 by Proposition 2.2. Let | P | = 5. In this case,
there exists x ∈ P such that z = (x, h) ∈ / P and z 5 ∈ P . Since G ⊆ P and P
is central in P , so G and hence (P, h) is abelian. By applying Lemma 2.2 to the
group L = (P, h) h, we have L = (P, h, h) = (P, h) = C5 = z. If (z, P ) = 1,
then there exists y ∈ P with 1 = (z, y) = t ∈ P and (t, h) ∈ (P, h) ∩ P = 1. Thus
t is central in G. By Lemma 2.3, (z, h) = z 3 . Let α = z − 1, u = 1 + hα, v = 1 + yα.
Then u1 = (u, h) ≡ 1 + 3h(z − 1) (mod ∆(G )2 KG),
u2 = (u1 , z) ≡ 1 + h(z − 1)2 (mod ∆(G )3 KG),
v1 = (v, y) ≡ 1 + y(t − 1) (mod ∆(G )2 KG),
v2 = (v1 , z) ≡ 1 − y(t − 1)2 (mod ∆(G )3 KG)
and (u2 , v2 ) ≡ 1 − [h(z − 1)2 , y(t − 1)2 ] (mod ∆(G )5 KG)
≡ 1 − [h(z − 1)2 , y](t − 1)2 (mod ∆(G )5 KG).
Let (y, h) = z l . Then
(u2 , v2 ) ≡ 1 − hy(t − 1)3 {2(z − 1) + (t − 1)} (mod ∆(G )5 KG).
1st Reading
March 8, 2010 17:54 WSPC/S0219-4988 171-JAA 00393
Thus (u2 , v2 ) ≡ 1 + 2[gβ(z − 1)(zt − 1)π, gβ(z − 1)2 α] (mod ∆(G )5 KG),
2
1 where β = 1 + g 2 αg αg + · · ·
Now U = 1, [π, β] ∈ (t − 1)KG and ∆(G )9 = 0 so on multiplying the above
equation by (z − 1)(t − 1)3 , we have
2β(z − 1)gz(z 3 − 1){tπβ(z − 1)2 α − αβ(z − 1)(zt − 1)π}(z − 1)(t − 1)3 = 0.
z
This leads to β 2 αt = 0. Since β ≡ (1 + g 2 α2 + g 4 α4 + · · ·) (mod ∆(G )KG),
3 so on multiplying by α o(π)−3
we have πz
t = 0. But π ∈
/ G , so we arrive at a
contradiction.
5 Corollary 2.3. Let CharK = 5 and let G be a finite nonabelian group such that
U = 1. Then G = C5 = x and either γ3 (G) = 1 or xg = x−1 for all g ∈
/ CG (G ).
21 Corollary 2.4. Let G be a finite group and let K be a field with CharK = p = 2, 3.
Then U = 1 if and only if δ (3) (L(KG)) = 0.
1st Reading
March 8, 2010 17:54 WSPC/S0219-4988 171-JAA 00393
3 Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the referee for many useful suggestions which led to a
5 better presentation of the paper.
References
7 [1] Z. Balogh and Y. Li, On the derived length of the group of units of a group algebra,
J. Algebra Appl. 6(6) (2007) 991–999.
9 [2] C. Baginski, A note on the derived length of the unit group of a modular group
algebra, Comm. Algebra 30 (2002) 4905–4913.
11 [3] J. M. Bateman, On the solvability of unit groups of group algebras, Trans. Amer.
Math. Soc. 157 (1971) 73–86.
13 [4] A. A. Bovdi, Group algebras with solvable group of units, Comm. Algebra 33(10)
(2005) 3725–3738.
15 [5] A. A. Bovdi and I. I. Khripta, Group algebras of periodic groups with solvable mul-
tiplicative group, Mat. Zametki 22 (1977) 3421–3432.
17 [6] D. B. Coleman and R. Sandling, Mod 2 group algebras with metabelian unit groups,
J. Pure Appl. Algebra 131 (1998) 25–36.
19 [7] D. Gorenstein, Finite Groups (Harper and Row, New York, 1989).
[8] H. G. Knoche, Uber den Frobeniusschen Klassenbegriff in nilpotenten Gruppen,
21 Math. Z. 55 (1951) 71–83.
[9] J. Kurdics, On group algebras with metabelian unit groups, Periodica Mathematica
23 Hungarica 32 (1996) 57–64.
[10] D. S. Passman, Observations on group rings, Comm. Algebra 5 (1977) 1119–1162.
25 [11] A. Shalev, Metabelian unit groups of group algebras are usually abelian, J. Pure
Appl. Algebra 72 (1991) 295–302.
27 [12] M. Sahai, Lie solvable group algebras of derived length three, Publ. Math. 39 (1995)
233–240.
29 [13] M. Sahai, Group algebras with centrally metabelian unit groups, Publ. Math. 40
(1996) 443–456.
31 [14] M. Sahai, On group algebras KG with U (KG) nilpotent of class at most 2, Contem.
Math. 456 (2008) 165–173.
33 [15] M. Sahai and J. B. Srivastava, A note on Lie centrally metabelian group algebras,
J. Algebra 187 (1997) 7–15.