The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country.

Do
advantages outweigh disadvantages?

The problem of administration has always been attracting concern from the authorities, which
necessitates a plausible solution to the difference in administrative methods among countries. This leads
to a belief that establishing a global government should be favored over the governance of separate
countries. Personally, I wholeheartedly disagree with this belief in view of the difficulties in
establishment and potential conflicts arousing.

Firstly, the difference in the political system among nations makes the process of establishing a shared
authority time consuming and seemingly impossible. Since different countries have different
administrative philosophies, deciding on a shared ideology to be applied worldwide is virtually
impossible. Also, it may cost every country long period of adopting and adjusting, which would otherwise
be spent on social developments and science breakthroughs. Moreover, adjustment to include every
nation in that government is no easy task, especially because every country’s power and strengths have
to be taken into account. Consequently, the process may take generations of leaders to complete, being
both resource consuming and problematic.

Secondly, the decision over the parties in control of the global government results in conflicts among
countries. With more developed nations holding power, this leads to overexploitation of the resources of
poor areas for the benefits of richer ones. Furthermore, the people of undeveloped nations run high risks
of having substandard living conditions due to the policies in favor of those from rich countries. The
consequence is that smaller and less developed countries will wage war against the mighty one for the
power of administration, increasing the chance of the third world war. As a result, the world peace is
seriously jeopardized, driving the human race to an end by means of nuclear weapons and heated
international conflicts.

In conclusion, given the difficulties in founding a shared global government and likely bones of
contention, it is true that forming a global authority has its drawbacks outweigh the benefits.