Name: Roland Andrei G.

Porteza
Grade and Section: 12HUMMS03
Teacher: June Ray Filler

Language Proficiency Of Selected CCP Students, First Semester Of Academic Year 2010-2011
RESEARCH TITLE

Guide Questions ANSWER

1. What kind of writing The kind of writing that the author have used is expository,
style do you think the because it uses the data or factual evidences based upon the study.
author used in the study? It provides answers to the research topic related to the statement
back in thesis.
2. What are/is the The independent variable is the CCP students while the dependent
independent and dependent variable is the language proficiency. The students are being
variable/s of the study. measured in order know what proficiencies on a certain language
Justify your answer they have. By assessing the students with different kinds of focus
in language such as vocabulary, grammar, and etc. In order to see
its results.
3. What is the main idea of The main idea of research is to let the readers know why is that the
the Research English proficiency of the Filipino has declined due to the more
exposure of the Tagalog language and others. It also wants to tell
us on what are the different areas of proficiency they have under
certain measurements.
4. What is the research gap The test was only conducted with the collegiate students enrolled
of the research article in English courses while it was also mentioned that the problem
also influenced the written output of the elementary, secondary
and tertiary levels.
5. Provide three main Language proficiency meaning and definition, it basically
themes of the Review of describes the fluency and the capacity of an individual to provide
Related Literature and such a well-structured writings using the English language. The
discuss each theme American occupation in the country which explain why is that the
English language is our secondary language and how it was
introduced to the Filipinos. The requirement in order to work into
the other countries, test will be conducted that measures if you can
communicate well using the universal language which allows you
to work or study abroad.
6. What do you think was It is Quasi-experimental because it attempts to establish cause and
the research design that was effects relationship among the variables. The outcome of the
employed in the study? Cite students results which will determine their proficiency in English
evidence to justify your language is being measured.
answer.
7. Do you think it was the Yes, because it is only measuring through tests, and by
appropriate research design determining the process used to examine the causes and effects of
for the study? Why or why the given variables.
not?
8. In a scale of 1 to 5. 5 4.5, because it gives the readers a proper facts and evidences on
being the highest and 1 what is the current profieciency the Filipino has and measures the
 being the lowest. What highest marks and lowest marks of the students on their courses in
scale can you give to the the certain focus of the English language which provides an
research based on insight on what problems should be taken care of.
relevance, uniqueness and
contribution? Justify the
scale you will be providing.

Rubric for Evaluation

5 The student shown excellent understanding of the reading material and questions
provided in the task. Able to provide in-depth and magnificent arguments, articulation
and synthesis of the content.
4 The student shown very good understanding of the reading material and questions
provided in the task. Able to provide substantive arguments, articulation and synthesis of
the content.
3 The student shown good understanding of the reading material and questions provided in
the task. Able to provide sufficient arguments, articulation and synthesis of the content.
2 The student shown lack of understanding of the reading material and questions provided
in the task. Able to provide insufficient arguments, articulation and synthesis of the
content.
1 The student shown no understanding of the reading material and questions provided in
the task. Arguments are baseless, not shown any articulation and was able to provide a
synthesize of the content.
0 The content shows no sense.