name Arguments for Animal testing name Arguments against Animal Testing

- It is necessary to do medical tests on new
drugs: to endorse their safety to human.
There are so many risk that can be harmed to
human body when using drugs without
having any chemical test. Human existence
are more important than animals, at least that
is what most people think, and everything
must be done to ensure human survival.
Sometime we need to throw a sprat to catch a
herring.
- In fact, many important medical discoveries
involved experimentation on animals
- Researchers are trying their best to
minimize the suffering that animals
experience, even though animals are believed
to not have as much feeling as human. Plus,
human nowadays only doing test for science
purpose, so the sacrifice wouldn’t be wasted.
 if we do animals testing to improve
human life then this is morally acceptable
Outline Topic: Animal Rights
- Replacing animal tests does not mean putting
human patients at risk. The lives of animals
should be respected too. There are alternative
methods of testing new drugs:
+ Using computer models
+ Volunteer study
+ Cell culture technique
 not necessary to perform testing on animals.
We may have a lot of important innovations in
medical which performed testing on animal in
the past but we have no choice back then. Now,
we are living in modern life with the
breakthrough of technology, everything is
possible, even creating a new generation of
cruelty-free products.
- The efforts of reduce the pain that animals
must been through might be correct, but to say
animals don’t have feelings like human is
critically wrong:
+ it has been shown on numerous videos,
documentaries by secret filming in laboratories
that animals feel as much pain as humans do.
- Moreover, there are many researches shown
that most of experiments on animals are for
cosmetic industry. It is not necessary to waste
poor lives for beauty purpose of human.

1. Introduction
- Leader presents the topic. Points out should or not animal have their rights and
deserved to be testing in advantages of human?

2. Discussion:
- Leader: Ask questions to warm up and lead in the topic
+ Have you ever heard of animal testing experiments? (yes/no)
+ Can you name some of the products that have been tested on animals and some
that haven’t? (been: most of our daily life products such as cosmetic, soap,
medicine; it can be listed out easily / haven’t: not much, but the amount is
increasing significant recently)
- Main question: Do you think it justifiable to use animals for experiments?
3. Conclusion
- Leader summing up the opinion of both sides:
Testing on animals have advantages and drawbacks. About the agree opinions, it is
believed that human is more superior than animals and the sacrifices of them for
the sake of humanity are necessary. Moreover, the amount of cruelty experiments
on animals recently has been reduced and only focus on benefiting human life, so it
is not a problem to do tests on animals. On the other hand, the opposite opinion
also gives strong arguments to object the reasons above. Animal lives matter, they
have feelings like human and it is not right to perform testing on them since we had
so many other ways to replace this cruel kind of experiment. This is indeed a
controversial topic, thanks for your opinion! If you have any question, don’t be shy
and give us some!
- Give time for question.

\\//
Outline: Sport and money
1. Introduction
- Leader presents the topic. Points out whether professional sport salaries are too
high or not?

2. Discussion:
- Leader: Ask questions to warm up and lead in the topic
+ Do you like sport? Have you ever been to a sport game? What is the most
interesting show match that you have seen? How much did you spent on it?
+ Do you know how much do the top sport stars get paid in your country? (Đoàn
Văn Hậu 510tr/month; Đặng Văn Lâm 11kUSD/month;…) Do they worth the pay?

- Main question: Do you agree that the budget for professional sports nowadays are
too high? Why?
Arguments for Pro Sport budget is too
high
- Such a waste investing all the money in
sports in the face of people with poor living
conditional: Money spent for specialized
facilities, salaries, … up to billion dollars per
years in general. It should be spent on other
social aspects which take part in developing
country such as accelerating building of roads
or improving telecommunication services.
- It’s not worth to pay for sport icons that high
since all they have to do is, take football for
example, running around and kicking the ball.
They don’t do any vital service. Most of them
living their life with extravagant lifestyle and
it’s unfair to compare to what they have done.
- With those same amount of money, the
investment in other profession such as
scientists, doctors, engineers would do much
better. It is extremely unfair while a doctor has
to work day and night shift to take care of
patients, a scientist has to spend most of the
time finding a new way to cure a dangerous
disease. Come to think of it, the contribution of
a sport player cannot be compared to that of
the other vital profession.
 cost for sportmans should be reduced in
productivity of other experts.
Arguments for Pro Sport is fair enough
- Sports are billion dollars’ industry. Being
recognized in the world map by being
popular by sport is also a way to promote the
country  fans and visitors come to the host
country to watch sports  fostering
blooming tourist industry  leading to
provision of job opportunities and also
provides facilitates building of
infrastructures in a country  enormous
source of income and help a lot of people by
giving them a job.
- Not every sport player is highly paid. Just
only people who receive recognition of the
skills can do it. Sportsmen and women gave
out their blood, sweat and tears to climb up
to the top. To be at the same position as they
are today, they have to beat uncountable
other competitors as well as exchanged their
childhood, their times with family to have
non-stop practicing. For example, it is
widely known that young talents of football
must leave their parents to move to special
academy of gifted students in sport for years
just to develop their skills, but only the best
of the best has the chance and lucky enough
to rise and shine in their future career.
- In present, top sport stars also have to give
up their privacy. The pressure from the
media is intense, it’s hard to live a life
having hundred cameras pointing on you
every time.
- The more they earn, the more taxes they
have to pay.
- A sports career may only last 10 years
compared to 30-40 years of other
professionals.
 the circle of an athlete is a short term.
With all of the contribution they give to
develop the country and the efforts they give
to be recognize, they deserve to enjoy their
top position before giving it up to next gen
talent.
3. Conclusion:
- Leader sum up ideas
Both side of argument have their own point of view. One believes that the money
spent on investing sport is not justified while the other doesn’t.
- Give time for questions.