Case No Date Petitioner v Respondent Case

ACADEMIC FREEDOM
Dissertation
G.R. No. 134625 31-Aug-99 UP BOARD OF REGENTS vs. CA Plagirism; title
withdrawal

ATENEO DE MANILA UNIVERSITY vs. Fraternity Hazing

G.R. 99327 1993 May
Judge CAPULONG Activities; Expulsion

GARCIA vs. FACULTY ADMISSION

G.R. No. L-40779 Nov. 28, 1975 COMMITTEE Denied re-admission

Leading Mass
actions/denied re-
G.R. No. 89317 20-May-90 NON et. al. vs. DAMES re-enrolment;
Constitutional
Riights of students

Refusal to admit
G.R. No. 84401 15-May-91 San Sebastian College vs CA student

granting loans
G.R. No. L-36740 30-Jan-76 REPUBLIC v. PRESIDING JUDGE
through SPA

G.R. No. L-25024 30-Mar-70 SANTIAGO vs BAUTISTA et.al. Honors ranking

Graduation not
G.R. No. 161172 13-Dec-04 MORALES vs. UP Board of Regents granted cumlaude
honors

EMPLOYEE EMPLOYER RELATIONSHIP

GR 110396 6 sept 25, 1998 SALAVARRIA V LETRAN COLLEGE collection of money

Nov 28, 1997 strikes and mass

G.R. 110379 FABELLA V. COURT OF APPEALS
violations

Degree of care and

GR 182353 29-Jun-10 St Joseph College vs Miranda
diligence
 UNIVERSITY OF IMMACULATE
GR 181146 26-Jan-11 AWOL
CONEPCION VS. NLRC

illegal handling of
GR No. 168670 13-Apr-07 OMBUDSMAN V. ESTANDARTE school funds/ magna
carta

Ethics
Teacher selling/
G.R. No. 172334 5-Jun-13 PIA vs GERVACIO
code of ethics

Student-teacher
G.R. No. 49549 30-Aug-90 CHUA-QUA vs. CLAVE
relationship

G.R. No. 183678 15-Mar-10 PUSE vs PUS Bigamy

G.R. No. 198755 5-Jun-13 PAT-OG vs CSC Teacher misconduct

Graft & Corruption

CATACUTAN vs. PEOPLE OF THE Practices/
G.R. No. 175991 31-Aug-11 PHILIPPINES appointments &
promotion

Issuance of Appointment

G.R. No. 176707 17-Feb-10 OBIASCA vs BASALLOTE Appointment

 BARROGA vs DATA CENTER COLLEGE
Diminution of
G.R. No. 174158 27-Jun-11 OF THE PHILIPPINES
Benefits

G.R. No. L-58028 18-Apr-89 CHIANG KAI SHEK SCHOOL vs CA

double
employment and
G.R. Nos. 168951 & 169000 27-Nov-13 POSADAS vs SANDIGANBAYAN
double
compensation

administrative
G.R. 22586 27-Feb-69 BRILLANTES vs GUEVARRA
insubordination
Facts

Plagirism of Private Respondent Arokiaswamy William Margaret Celine (Indian);

exclusion letter to Board of regents did not reach on time hence she graduated;
doctorate to be withdrawn;

Fraternity (Aguila Legis) held initiation rites uypon neophytes; Leonardo Villa died of
serious physical injury; Bienvenido Marques hospitalized for acute renal failure;
imposed dismissal;Capulong appels reinstation; decision of the Special Board
dismissing respondent students is affirmed.

was admited before for courses credit not degree program. Denied in view of the
character of the institution (Theology/seminary). Because of HEI academic freedom;
HEI has authority and discretion to grant ot denied.

respondents justifies that academic deficiencies do not warrrant non re-admission;

excersise cognate rights/free of speech/peace assembly; school has no right to refuse
students; they cannot discriminate againts students constitutional rights to speech &
assebmly otherwise violation to rights to equal protection; However if commits serious
breach of discipline or fails academic standard- forfeits contractual right

Failed 3 academic disciplines; drop roll of students; rule- fail 3 units shall required
repeat; parents manisfest transfer of school; teacher influence teacher to fail him;

disallowed person with special power of attorney to receive treasury warrant of

teachers; only banks and financing consitution are allowed

???

not granted cum laude honors because her grades of 1.0 in German 10-11 were
excluded in GWA computation since she shifted to Spanish; GWA was analyzed based
on internal rules; academic freedom

allegedly collected money from her studentsl filed a complaint for illegal dismisal;
respondent school was ordered to pay the
complainant severance compensation
DECS issued a return to work order to all public school teachers who participated in
strickes for the demand 13 month pay, allowances.
Teacher left the class while ongoing experiement, acident happened (eyes affected);
injury die to fault and failer to excersise degree of care and diligence; t failure of
petitioners to prevent the foreseeable mishap
Axalan attended seminar and was asked to write letter explaining why he should not be
dismissed for being absent w/o officail leave; he claimed that she held online classes
while attending the seminar; another same incident happen and she explained that she
sought the approval of VP for Academics Alicia Sayson-in which she denied

The complaint consisted of 33 allegations of improprieties

ranging from illegal handling of school funds, irregular financial transactions, perjury,
and abuse
of authority.

Dannug claimed that Pia was directly

selling to her students a book; argued students not forced to buy; Pia was declared
guilty of Conduct Prejudicial to the Best Interest of the Service.

Remedial instruction; fell in love & got married w/ parent consents; respondent filed
Dept of Labor too terminate emplyment; placed under suspension w/o pay; NLRC
ordered reinstatement w/ back wages; not immoral; respondent acted with grave
abuse of discretion; the heart has reasons of its own which reason does not know;
yielding to this gentle and universal emotion is not to be so casually equated with
immorality.

Rene Puse (LPT) married Ligaya and has 2 children, She learned his deception regarding
martial status; filed criminal case for bigamy to PRC; . He argued that the proper forum
to hear and decide the complaint was either the CSC or the DepEd; PRC found liable of
the charges and revoked his license

Pat-og punched Bang-on (14 yr old student) on his stomach resulting to slight physical
injury; Pat-og guilty of the offense.

Petitioner guilty for his refusal to implement promotion and appointments of Posesano
& Divinagracia as Vocational Supervisors III despite the directive of CHED;

Basallote was asked to return to her former position (T1); appointment as AO II was
not forwarded to CSC because of non submission of PDF; Another person was to be
promoted; Basallote file protest; CSC approved Bsallote appointment; there was no
petition for reconsideration is filed within fifteen days; the other person didnot file.
Petitioner Barroga was hired as an instructor by respondent; re-assigned to Vigan; part
deal was to receive monthly allowance; stated in writing allowance effectivity only in
Vigan; Barroga transfereed to Abra as Temporary Head of Educ; refused coz no
additional allowance; filed labor case; alleged that the real purpose of his transfer is to
demotion;re-assignment will entail an indirect reduction of his salary; claimed it should
not be discontinued and withdrawn without violating the prohibition against
nondiminution of benefits; non diminution of benefits will be violated if rippened into a
practice for a long period-consistent; Barroga's case was not permanent

Dismissed from work after 33 yrs of teachingl she sued & demanded separation pay,
social security benefits, salary differentials, maternity benefits and moral and
exemplary damages.

Dr. Posadas violate the constitutional provision against double

employment and double compensation by holding concurrent positions as University
Chancellor and TMC Project Director

Promoted to PII but requested to be assiened to a specific school or remain to current

one; her refuge behind security of tenure is not impenetrable; appointment no
indicated station; She may be assigned to any station as exigency of public service
requires, even without her consent. She thus has no right of choice
RA 4670 Magna Carta for Public School Teachers
RA 6713 Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers
RA 3019 Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act
 KEY TERMS

a form of written command in the name of a court

prayer for writ or other legal authority to act, or abstain from
acting, in some way
prima facie First impression/ First look

Institution in HEI invloves: determine who may teahc;

what may be taught; how it shall be taught and who
may be admittedly to study

a judicial writ issued as a command to an inferior

Mandamus court or ordering a person to perform a public or
statutory duty.
a writ or order by which a higher court reviews a
certiorari
decision of a lower court.

Plaintiff a person who brings a case against another in a court

of law.

Security of tenure (labor Code Art 3) office holder cannot be removed from office unless
for just and auhotrized cause
administrative insubordination
Academic Freedom
referring to the ruling in
Fair Play
Moral Damage
National Labor Relations Commission
acted with grave abuse of discretion
the heart has reasons of its own which
reason does not know
administrative case of immoral,
unprofessional or
dishonorable conduct

it was CSC which first acquired

jurisdiction over the case because the
complaint was filed before it; Thus, it had
the authority to proceed and decide the case
to the exclusion of the DepED and the PRC

ill motive and bad faith

law should
never be applied or interpreted to oppress
one in order to favor another

benefits and perks enjoyed by employees

cannot be reduced and discontinued or
diminished