Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Patiño disclosed the information about the Katipunan to his sister (Honoria),
who was an inmate in an orphanage managed by Sor. Teresa.
Sor. Teresa, then, urged Patiño to confess the information on the Katipunan to
the Tondo curate.
First Cry of the Revolution
Lesson 13
The Spanish authorities started to crack down on the
suspected members of the Katipunan and to cordon
Manila.
The revolutionaries tore their cedulas and proclaimed the start of the
fight for Philippine Independence.
These three events, to state the obvious, did not all happen at the
same time and place. When and where the “Cry” should be
commemorated thus depends on how it is defined.
First Cry of the Revolution
Lesson 13
The “Cry”
Among the historians who have studied the “Cry” in greatest detail,
there is a sharp divergence of opinion as to how the term should be
defined.
Isagani R. Medina also takes the “Cry” to mean the pagpupunit, but says
it happened before the decision to revolt had been taken.
a. Pasya
b. Pagpunit
c. Unang Labanan
“Homenaje del Pueblo Filipino a los Heroes de ’96” (Ala-ala ng Bayang Pilipino sa mga
Bayani ng ’96)
First Cry of the Revolution
Lesson 13
The name Balintawak was often used as shorthand to denote that general area, and
the “Cry” had become popularly known as the “Cry of Balintawak” even before the
monument was erected.
It could not have been to mark the site of Apolonio Samson’s house in barrio
Kangkong; Katipuneros marked that site on Kaingin Road, between Balintawak and San
Francisco del Monte Avenue.
First Cry of the Revolution
Lesson 13
Nobody professed in 1911, though, that the statue marked the “exact spot” where the
first battle had been fought.
A contemporary map of 1896 shows that the August battle between the
Katipunan rebels and the Spanish forces led by Lt. Ros of the Civil
Guards took place at sitio Banlat, North of Pasong Tamo Road far from
Balintawak.
The testimony of only one eyewitness (Dr. Pio Valenzuela) is not enough to
authenticate and verify a controversial issue in history.
Historians and their living participants, not politicians and their sycophants, should
settle this controversy.
First Cry of the Revolution
Lesson 13
Raging Controversy
Conflicting Accounts
The controversies on the Katipunan continued even on the date and the
place of the First Cry.
But even until now, some historians claim that the date and place declared by
the NHCP are still disputable.
They concur, a few mavericks excepted, that the “Cry” took place
between August 23 and 26, 1896 in what was then the municipality of
Caloocan.
The doubt about the exact site could be put aside, as Ambeth Ocampo
has suggested, simply by calling the occasion the “Cry of Caloocan”.
Settling the problem, he said, would rebound to the “credit, honor and
glory of historical scholarship in our country.”