You are on page 1of 6

Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 95 (2018) 242–247

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tafmec

Interfacial toughening of carbon/epoxy composite by incorporating styrene T


acrylonitrile nanofibers

Rasoul Esmaeely Neisianya,b, , Saied Nouri Khorasania, Jeremy Kong Yoong Leeb,c,
Mohammadreza Naeimiradd, Seeram Ramakrishnab
a
Department of Chemical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
b
Centre for Nanofibers and Nanotechnology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117575, Singapore
c
Lloyd’s Register Global Technology Centre, 1 Fusionopolis Place, #09-11, Galaxis, Singapore 138522, Singapore
d
Department of Materials and Textile Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T

Keywords: In this research, Styrene Acrylonitrile (SAN) nanofibers, produced by the electrospinning method, were used in
Carbon/epoxy composites order to improve out-of-plane and impact properties of a conventional carbon fiber/epoxy composite. The
Interfacial toughening prepared SAN nanofibers were directly deposited on the surfaces of conventional carbon fiber fabrics. Vacuum
Mechanical properties assist resin transfer molding (VARTM) was employed for fabricating carbon/epoxy composite. The morpholo-
Electrospinning
gical study of the electrospun SAN nanofibers indicated the prepared SAN nanofibers were smooth, continuous,
Nanofibers
and without any formation of beads, with average diameters assessed to be 480 ± 102 nm. Mechanical prop-
erties studies of the composites indicated that embedding SAN nanofibers in the hybrid composite (carbon/
epoxy composite containing SAN nanofibers) led to 26%, 37%, 27%, and 8% of flexural strength, flexural work
to fracture, interlaminar shear strength, and impact absorption energy, respectively compared to acquired results
from control composite (without nanofibers). Statistical analysis was furthermore carried out to prove the sig-
nificant differences of the obtained results. Finally, fractographical analysis by field emission scanning electron
microscope (FE-SEM) confirmed that embedding nanofibers in the hybrid composite caused tougher fracture
during composite breakage.

1. Introduction weaker than mechanical properties of reinforcement phase leads to


weak out-of-plane properties of laminated polymer matrix composites.
Carbon/epoxy composites have been widely used in plenty of ap- In addition, the ply-by-ply nature of the laminated polymer matrix
plications due to their excellent specific mechanical properties and composites can be vulnerable to delamination because of the micro-
manufacturability as well as superior corrosion resistance compared to cracks creation and propagation in the frail resin-rich layer. This serious
metals which make them suitable for substituting metals in many ap- problem prevents employing these type of materials in the critical ap-
plications including aerospace, ground vehicles, and wind turbines plications [5]. Therefore, numerous researches have been conducted in
[1–4]. The mechanical properties of polymer matrix composites are order to boost the mechanical properties of the matrix such as using
predominantly determined by the mechanical properties of the com- carbon nanotubes [7–11], inorganic and rubbery micro/nanoparticles
ponents (matrix and reinforcement phase), the volume fraction of each [12–15], using metallic micro/macro-fibers [16–20], curing process
phase, fiber-matrix interfacial interactions between matrix and re- modification [21,22], blending [23–26], and even combination of these
inforcement phase, fiber alignments, etc. [5]. In particular, the lami- techniques [27]. Despite the aforementioned methods have led to me-
nated structure causes anisotropicity in materials with the in-plane chanical properties improvement of the matrix, but causes in con-
mechanical properties dominated by properties of reinforcement phase siderable limitations that restrict their usefulness in composite mate-
(fibers). Therefore, the in-plane properties of laminated structures are rials including troubles in the nanofillers distribution and dispersion,
strong enough for a lot of applications., while properties of the matrix and increase in the viscosity of resins [28] which adversely influence
dictate the out-of-plane mechanical properties of the laminated com- the manufacturing process and consequently mechanical properties of
posite [6]. The mechanical properties of the matrix are significantly fabricated parts. In addition, the researches confirm that modifications


Corresponding author: Department of Chemical Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.
E-mail address: r.esmaeely@ce.iut.ac.ir (R.E. Neisiany).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.03.006
Received 16 February 2018; Received in revised form 12 March 2018; Accepted 12 March 2018
Available online 13 March 2018
0167-8442/ © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
R.E. Neisiany et al. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 95 (2018) 242–247

Fig. 1. Schematic cross sections of the hybrid composite and control composite.

Fig. 2. (a) FE-SEM images of the electrospun SAN nanofibers (b) the diameter distribution.

in curing process cannot impressively improve the mechanical proper- epoxy composite. Therefore, the SAN nanofibers were directly de-
ties of the resins [29]. posited on the surfaces of carbon fabrics and subsequently, subjected to
Dzenis and Reneker firstly proposed a developing composite a wet-layup process (followed by VARTM) in order to fabricate hybrid
strengthening method, with use of nanotechnology, which has since carbon/epoxy composite which the resin-rich area enriched with the
gathered much research interest. The technique involved embedding SAN nanofibers. The hybrid composite panel was then evaluated by
un-oriented electrospun nanofiber mats between layers of the re- three-point bending, interlaminar shear strength, and impact tests to
inforcement phase in order to improve the mechanical properties of the determine the effect of SAN nanofibers incorporation on the interfacial
weak resin-rich area [29]. Using electrospinning technique for fabri- toughening of the prepared hybrid composite.
cating nanofibers with surface area-to-volume ratios greatly higher than
their conventional micro fiber counterparts offers the facile and eco- 2. Experimental
nomical method for improving mechanical properties of the resin-rich
area with minimal effects on the manufacturing process [5]. The use of 2.1. Materials
electrospun nanofibers in boosting the mechanical properties of resin-
rich layers of laminated composites has therefore been keenly in- SAN powder (Mw = 185 g/gmol, acrylonitrile 30 wt%) was pro-
vestigated during recent years [30,31] as well as enhancing fracture vided by Sigma-Aldrich. N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%) were
toughness of epoxy adhesives [32] and neat resins [33,34]. Previous also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as the solvent of SAN
researches showed the nanofibers diameter, the nanofiber mat thick- powder for electrospinning process. Same as our previous works
ness, the nanofiber type, and the interaction between nanofibers and [37,38], the unidirectional carbon fiber fabric was supplied by
matrix strongly influence mechanical properties of the laminated Shanghai Horse Construction. Moreover, the epoxy resin (EPON™ Resin
polymer matrix composites [35]. Chen et al. showed that surface- 828), and its curing agent (EPIKURE™ Curing Agent F205) were pur-
functionalization of electrospun carbon nanofibers is highly effective in chased from Hexion Inc and used as epoxy matrix.
improving impact energy absorption, interlaminar shear strength, and
flexural properties for both nano-epoxy resins and hybrid multi-scale 2.2. Electrospinning
conventional carbon/epoxy composites [36].
The present research aims to study the influence of incorporating Based on the obtained results in our previous work [39] the 25 wt%
SAN nanofibers on interfacial toughening of a conventional carbon/ of SAN powder was dissolved in DMF using a magnetic stirrer for 24 h

243
R.E. Neisiany et al. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 95 (2018) 242–247

Fig. 3. FE-SEM micrographs of (a) conventional unidirectional carbon fiber fabric, (b) the electrospun SAN nanofiber layer on the surfaces of unidirectional carbon fiber after 0.05 g m−2
deposition, (c) the SAN nanofiber layer on the surfaces of unidirectional carbon fiber after 1 g m−2 deposition.

Table 1
Mechanical properties of reinforced composite by incorporation of the electrospun SAN nanofibers and control composite.

Three-point test Short beam strength (MPa) Impact absorption energy (J/m)

Flexural strength (MPa) Work to fracture (kJ/m2)

Control composite [37] 472.07 ± 44.05 28.80 ± 1.60 28.32 ± 2.67 2017.94 ± 210.95
Hybrid composite 595.32 ± 25.10 39.44 ± 1.05 36.00 ± 1.65 2172.90 ± 165.35
Enhancements in comparison with control composite (%) 26 37 27 8
|tstat | 5.44 12.70 5.54 1.30
tCritical 2.45 2.36 2.36 2.31

at room temperature in order to obtain a homogeneous solution. The manufacturer’s specification.


obtained solution was filled in a 10 mL syringe with a blunted needle The hybrid composite panel was prepared to contain the epoxy
gauge 23. The conventional unidirectional carbon fiber fabrics were matrix reinforced by 6 layers of unidirectional carbon fabric (parallel
wrapped around a 20 cm diameter grounded drum. The electrospun aligned) compromised 5 layers of the SAN nanofibers (in the resin-rich
nanofibers were directly deposited on the surfaces of the unidirectional area). A 27 mmHg vacuum pressure was applied during the first curing
carbon fiber fabric. The electrospinning process parameters were ad- step for 6 h and held for a further 12 h in order to completely cure at
justed as follow: SAN solution feed rate of 0.3 mL h−1, a 15 cm an air room temperature. The hybrid composite panel was then post-cured in
gap between the needle tip and collector, and a 19 kV DC voltage in an oven at 60 °C for 30 min. Furthermore, as described in our previous
order to provide a stable electrospinning process for fabrication of the work [37], the control composite was fabricated from six layers of
uniform nanofibers without any signs of beads. Electrospinning was carbon fabric via hand lay-up method followed by VARTM without
held until one gram of the SAN nanofibers was deposited on one square nanofiber deposition between the carbon fiber layers. Fig. 1 schemati-
meter (1 g m−2) of the unidirectional carbon fabrics. cally illustrates the cross-section of control and hybrid composite.

2.3. Composite preparation 2.4. Characterizations

As mentioned before, the carbon/epoxy composite panel was pre- 2.4.1. Morphological investigations
pared via hand layup technique followed by the VARTM method in The morphology of the electrospun SAN nanofibers and the mor-
order to provide the highest wetting of the nanofibers and carbon fiber phology of the SAN nanofibers on the surfaces of the carbon fabric, the
fabrics by the mixture of resin and its curing agent. The epoxy resin and thickness of the nanofiber layers, and the surfaces of the fractured
its curing agent were mixed in the mass ratio 100:58 according to composites were studied by using of a Hitachi S-4300 field emission

244
R.E. Neisiany et al. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 95 (2018) 242–247

uniaxial machine. Short beam shear strength test was conducted by a


1 kN load cell Instron 5500 machine. The cross-head speed (of short
beam shear strength test) was set at 1 mm min−1. Meanwhile the span-
to-thickness ratio was adjusted at 4. The Izod impact test was conducted
by employing a CEAST® Resil impactor machine. All the tests were
performed at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C). The obtained results were
compared with a control composite (without nanofibers). It should be
noted that statistical analyses were conducted to prove the significant
difference in the mechanical properties of control and hybrid composite
due to the incorporation of SAN nanofibers.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Morphological studies

Fig. 2a and b show the FE-SEM micrograph of the electrospun SAN


nanofibers and nanofibers diameter distribution, respectively. From
Fig. 2a, it can be discerned that the electrospun nanofibers were pre-
pared without any signs of bead formation. To assess the average value
of the nanofiber diameter and distribution over 50 measurements of
nanofiber diameter were carried out by analyzing the FE-SEM micro-
graph using Image J software. The average nanofiber diameter was
determined to be 480 nm. The standard deviation of nanofiber dia-
meters was further determined to be 102 nm.
In order to assess the morphology of the deposited SAN nanofibers
on the surfaces of conventional unidirectional carbon fiber fabrics, FE-
SEM was again employed. Fig. 3a shows FE-SEM micrograph of carbon
fiber fabric, meanwhile, Fig. 3b indicates the electrospun SAN nanofi-
bers on the surfaces of unidirectional carbon fiber fabrics after
0.05 g m−2 deposition of the nanofibers on the fabric. It can be ob-
served that the SAN nanofibers randomly deposited on the surface of
carbon fiber fabrics and rotation of collector and transverse movement
of the needle did not have any effects on nanofiber orientation. Fur-
thermore, FE-SEM was used to assess the thickness of nanofiber layer
Fig. 4. FE-SEM micrographs of the fracture surfaces of (a) control composite (b) hybrid after complete deposition of the nanofibers (1 g m−2 deposition of
composite containing SAN nanofibers. nanofibers on the surfaces of carbon fabric) before composite pre-
paration. Fig. 3c shows the SAN nanofiber layers on the surfaces of the
Table 2
unidirectional carbon fibers. From this FE-SEM micrograph, the thick-
T-test results of flexural strength of the control and hybrid composites. ness of the nanofiber layers was determined to be 22 nm before com-
posite preparation. Chen et al. reported that the optimum thickness of
Flexural strength of the composites Control composite Hybrid composite nanofiber layer is approximately 20 μm and the thickness more than
Mean 472.07 592.32
this amount leads to decreasing diffusion of resin through the nanofi-
Variance 1939.28 0.19 bers and subsequently the mechanical properties of the obtained com-
Observations 5 5 posite will be decreased [40]. Therefore, it can be expected 1 g m−2 of
Significance level 0.05 the SAN nanofibers on the surfaces of carbon fibers can provide the
df 6
maximum of the fracture toughness improvement.
tStat −5.44
P(T ≤ t) 0.001
tCritical 2.45 3.2. Interfacial toughening assessments

As explained in Section 2.4.2, three-point bending, and short beam


scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). The surfaces of the samples shear tests were carried out to evaluate the effect of incorporation
were coated with a fine layer of gold prior to morphological studies. electrospun SAN nanofibers on out-of-plane properties of hybrid
carbon/epoxy composite. The obtained results of three-point bending
2.4.2. Interfacial toughening evaluations test are summarized in Table 1. The results in Table 1 shows that the
In order to investigate the effect of embedding SAN nanofibers on incorporation of the electrospun SAN nanofibers in the resin rich area of
interfacial toughening of the hybrid composite three-point bending, and the composite had a significant positive impact on the flexural strength
short beam shear tests were performed in accordance to the standards as well as work to fracture, resulting in enhancing of 26% and 37%,
ASTM D790, ASTM D2344, respectively to reveal the effect of in- respectively. Strong bonding of the electrospun SAN nanofibers to the
corporation SAN nanofibers on out-of-plane properties of the carbon/ epoxy resin (matrix) can be assigned to the higher specific surface area
epoxy composite. In addition, the Izod impact test was carried out ac- of electrospun SAN nanofibers on how their diameters (approximately
cording to ASTM D256 to reveal the effect of SAN nanofibers in- 500 nm) are remarkably smaller than the diameter of carbon fiber
corporation on the impact energy absorption of the hybrid composite. (approximately 5 μm). These results enhanced the interfacial bonding
The aforementioned tests were conducted with the instruments and strength, and consequently, the flexural strength of the hybrid com-
procedures described in our previous work [37]. The bending test was posite. Furthermore, during applying a load, the SAN nanofibers are
carried out with adjusting the cross-head speed at 1 mm min−1 and the broken and/or be detached from the matrix (epoxy). These two phe-
span-to-depth ratio at 40 by using a 5 kN load cell Shimadzu AG-25 TB nomena dissipate strain energy, delay the onset of fracture of the hybrid

245
R.E. Neisiany et al. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 95 (2018) 242–247

Fig. 5. Load-displacement curves of short beam shear strength test of (a) control composite and (b) hybrid composite.

composite, and consequently lead to the higher work to fracture. Fig. 4 Table 1. The results in Table 1 indicate that incorporating the SAN
shows the delaminated interlaminar surfaces of control composite and nanofibers between carbon layers led to a 27% enhancement in the
hybrid composite after three-point bending test. It can be discerned that short beam shear strength of the hybrid composite when compared to
the fracture occurred in the resin rich area (interlaminar regions) for the results acquired for control composite. The reason for this im-
both types of the composites. From Fig. 4a the control composite provement is attributed to the strengthening effect of the SAN nanofiber
fracture surfaces are relatively smooth (conforming for brittle fracture) incorporation had on the resin rich area of the hybrid composite. In this
due to oriented fracture features. The features were created from the case, the electrospun SAN nanofibers exert their effect as nano-re-
extensions in the formed micro-cracks which initiated at the locations inforcements in the interlaminar areas, by stress transfer from the resin
of the stress concentration. In contrast, Fig. 4b revealed that the more rich area (epoxy matrix) to the reinforcing phase (carbon fibers). They
roughness in the fracture surface for the hybrid composite confirming act to damp the microcracks propagation in the resin rich area by acting
for tough fracture. These results reinforced that presence of the elec- as a bridge in this layers hence the microcracks are created due to the
trospun SAN nanofibers could deflect the created microcracks, leading high-stress concentration [43]. In addition, statistical analysis confirms
to direct the microcracks along more tortuous paths, and consequently, that incorporation SAN nanofiber between carbon layers significantly
increasing the resistance of resin rich area to crack propagation. Hence increased the interlaminar shear strength of the hybrid composite.
the microcracks break away from the SAN nanofibers; they induce Izod impact test was also carried out to determine the fracture re-
kinked fracture surfaces, which offer more strain energy will be dis- sistance of the hybrid composite at high strain rates via evaluating the
sipated. Voids/holes were also discerned in the fracture surfaces of the absorbed energy during impact. The impact test results indicated in
hybrid composite which can be attributed to deboning and pull-out of Table 1 reveals that the impact absorption energy of the hybrid com-
the electrospun SAN nanofibers from the epoxy matrix. The nanofiber posite was increased by 8% with the incorporation of the electrospun
breakage and nanofiber pull-out are possibly the two mechanisms SAN nanofibers. This enhancement is possibly assigned to the SAN
which are responsible for positive contributions to the enhancing of the nanofibers hindering the propagation of the microcrack and also attri-
fracture toughness of hybrid composite enriched with the nanofibers buting to distributing of the applied loads, consequently storing some
[37]. Similarly, this improvement was also reported for epoxy adhesive measure of impact energy, which allowed for more energy to be ab-
by modified carbon nanotubes [41,42]. In addition, as mentioned in the sorbed before the catastrophic fracture. However, statistical analysis (t-
experimental section, the statistical analysis (t-test) was carried out to test) suggests a negligible effect of incorporating SAN nanofibers on
confirm the significant difference between obtained mechanical prop- impact absorption energy of the hybrid composite compared to control
erties. The t-test results are summarized in Table 1. Table 2 indicates composite.
the T-test results of the flexural strength of the control and hybrid
composites. According to t-test results, incorporation of the SAN na-
4. Conclusions
nofibers between carbon layers significantly increased the flexural
strength and bending work to fracture of the hybrid composite com-
The electrospun SAN nanofibers were used to improve the out-of-
pared to control composite (due to |tstat | > tcritical ) [29].
plane properties of a conventional carbon/epoxy composite. The ap-
To assess the effect of incorporating the electrospun SAN nanofibers
plication of electrospun SAN nanofibers prepared with this technique is
on the interlaminar shear strength of hybrid composite, short beam
easily streamlined with the existing VARTM composite fabrication
shear test was performed. With using short beam shear test, the com-
method. This can be carried out by facile electrospinning of a nanofiber
posites are assessed for resistance to interlaminar shear fracture in-
layer onto the reinforcing phases via a scalable process. Morphological
cluding free edge delamination in the polymer matrix composites [43].
investigations of the electrospun SAN indicated that the electrospun
In this technique, the interlaminar shear strength is determined ac-
SAN nanofibers are smooth without any signs of beads with diameter
cording to Eq. (1):
size range of nano. The hybrid composite with SAN nanofibers gave a
τs = 0.75 × Pm /( b× h) (1) 26% gain in flexural strength, 37% improvement in flexural work to
fracture, 27% increase in short beam shear strength, and 8% en-
In this equation, τs (MPa) is the interlaminar shear strength of polymer hancement in impact energy absorption in comparison with results
matrix composite, Pm (N) is the peak load, b (mm) is the width of the acquired for control composite. Furthermore, the statistical analysis (t-
specimens, and h (mm) is the sample thickness. test) confirmed significant enhancements in flexural strength, bending
Fig. 5a and b indicate the load-displacement results of control and work to fracture, and short beam interlaminar shear strength, but did
hybrid composite, respectively obtained via short beam interlaminar not significantly affect impact absorption energy of the hybrid com-
shear strength assessments. Short beam strength of the composites was posite. These improvements confirmed great potential in overcoming
calculated according to Eq. (1), and the results were summarized in the shortcomings of the laminated polymer matrix composites even in

246
R.E. Neisiany et al. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 95 (2018) 242–247

the critical applications, especially for the terms of enhancing the out- reinforced adhesively bonded single lap joints, J. Adhes. (2017) 1–20.
of-plane properties. [21] R. Akbari, M.H. Beheshty, M. Shervin, Toughening of dicyandiamide-cured DGEBA-
based epoxy resins by CTBN liquid rubber, Iran. Polym. J. 22 (2013) 313–324.
[22] H. Jamshidi, R. Akbari, M.H. Beheshty, Toughening of dicyandiamide-cured
Acknowledgments DGEBA-based epoxy resins using flexible diamine, Iran. Polym. J. 24 (2015)
399–410.
[23] M. Masoomi, M. Tavangar, S.M.R. Razavi, Preparation and investigation of me-
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Iranian Ministry of chanical and antibacterial properties of poly (ethylene terephthalate)/chitosan
Science, Research and Technology (MSRT) for the monetary support of blend, RSC Adv. 5 (2015) 79200–79206.
research visit for the accomplishment of this work at National [24] J. Kamalipour, M. Masoomi, H.A. Khonakdar, S.M.R. Razavi, Preparation and re-
lease study of Triclosan in polyethylene/Triclosan anti-bacterial blend, Colloids
University of Singapore. This work was also supported by a grant from Surf. B Biointerfaces 145 (2016) 891–898.
the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, [25] M. Naeimirad, A. Zadhoush, A. Abrishamkar, A. Pishevar, A.A. Leal, Melt-spun li-
National University of Singapore, Singapore, Lloyd’s Register quid core fibers: physical and morphological characteristics, Iran. Polym. J. 25
(2016) 397–403.
Foundation [Grant number R-265-000-553-597].
[26] A.A. Leal, M. Naeimirad, L. Gottardo, P. Schuetz, A. Zadhoush, R. Hufenus,
Microfluidic behavior in melt-spun hollow and liquid core fibers, Int. J. Polym.
References Mater. Polym. Biomater. 65 (2016) 451–456.
[27] M. Mohammadalipour, M. Masoomi, M. Ahmadi, Z. Kazemi, The effect of si-
multaneous fiber surface treatment and matrix modification on mechanical prop-
[1] B. Wang, J. Yin, L. Wang, Y. Gao, Influence of surfactant modification on structure erties of unidirectional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber/epoxy/na-
and properties of CNT hybrid multiscale composites, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 299 noclay nanocomposites, J. Compos. Mater., https://doi.org/10.1177/
(2014) 344–352. 0021998318755542.
[2] W. Dong, H.-C. Liu, S.-J. Park, F.-L. Jin, Fracture toughness improvement of epoxy [28] B. De Schoenmaker, S. Van der Heijden, I. De Baere, W. Van Paepegem, K. De
resins with short carbon fibers, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20 (2014) 1220–1222. Clerck, Effect of electrospun polyamide 6 nanofibres on the mechanical properties
[3] R.E. Neisiany, S.N. Khorasani, J. Kong Yoong Lee, S. Ramakrishna, Encapsulation of of a glass fibre/epoxy composite, Polym. Test. 32 (2013) 1495–1501.
epoxy and amine curing agent in PAN nanofibers by coaxial electrospinning for self- [29] R.E. Neisiany, S.N. Khorasani, M. Naeimirad, J.K.Y. Lee, S. Ramakrishna, Improving
healing purposes, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 70056–70063. mechanical properties of carbon/epoxy composite by incorporating functionalized
[4] J. Mayén, A. Abúndez, E. Alcudia, J.A. Arellano, J. Colín, I. Pereyra, I. Puente-Lee, electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofibers, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 302 (2017)
Fractographic relation between progressive failure and strain measurement tech- 1600551.
niques for recently developed configuration of carbon fiber/epoxy laminate, Polym. [30] S.R. Dhakate, A. Chaudhary, A. Gupta, A.K. Pathak, B.P. Singh, K.M. Subhedar,
Test. 57 (2017) 156–164. T. Yokozeki, Excellent mechanical properties of carbon fiber semi-aligned electro-
[5] X.F. Wu, A.L. Yarin, Recent progress in interfacial toughening and damage self- spun carbon nanofiber hybrid polymer composites, RSC Adv. 6 (2016)
healing of polymer composites based on electrospun and solution-blown nanofibers: 36715–36722.
an overview, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130 (2013) 2225–2237. [31] M. Naeimirad, A. Zadhoush, R. Kotek, R. Esmaeely Neisiany, S. Nouri Khorasani,
[6] R. Palazzetti, A. Zucchelli, C. Gualandi, M. Focarete, L. Donati, G. Minak, S. Ramakrishna, Recent advances in core/shell bicomponent fibers and nanofibers:
S. Ramakrishna, Influence of electrospun Nylon 6, 6 nanofibrous mats on the in- a review, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 135 (2018) 46265.
terlaminar properties of Gr–epoxy composite laminates, Compos. Struct. 94 (2012) [32] S.M.J. Razavi, R.E. Neisiany, M.R. Ayatollahi, S. Ramakrishna, S.N. Khorasani,
571–579. F. Berto, Fracture assessment of polyacrylonitrile nanofiber-reinforced epoxy ad-
[7] M.R. Ayatollahi, S. Doagou-Rad, S. Shadlou, Nano-/microscale investigation of hesive, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. (2017), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.
tribological and mechanical properties of epoxy/MWNT nanocomposites, 2017.07.023.
Macromol. Mater. Eng. 297 (2012) 689–701. [33] Q. Chen, L. Zhang, M.-K. Yoon, X.-F. Wu, R.H. Arefin, H. Fong, Preparation and
[8] A.R. Zanjanijam, M. Hajian, G.A. Koohmareh, Improving the thermal and me- evaluation of nano-epoxy composite resins containing electrospun glass nanofibers,
chanical properties of poly(vinyl butyral) through the incorporation of acid-treated J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 124 (2012) 444–451.
single-walled carbon nanotubes, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131 (2014) 40481. [34] Y. Zhao, T. Xu, X. Ma, M. Xi, D.R. Salem, H. Fong, Hybrid multi-scale epoxy com-
[9] R. Baptista, A. Mendão, F. Rodrigues, C.G. Figueiredo-Pina, M. Guedes, R. Marat- posites containing conventional glass microfibers and electrospun glass nanofibers
Mendes, Effect of high graphite filler contents on the mechanical and tribological with improved mechanical properties, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 132 (2015) 42731.
failure behavior of epoxy matrix composites, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 85 (2016) [35] L. Liu, Z.-M. Huang, C. He, X. Han, Mechanical performance of laminated compo-
113–124. sites incorporated with nanofibrous membranes, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 435 (2006)
[10] A. Zeinedini, M.M. Shokrieh, A. Ebrahimi, The effect of agglomeration on the 309–317.
fracture toughness of CNTs-reinforced nanocomposites, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. [36] Q. Chen, W. Wu, Y. Zhao, M. Xi, T. Xu, H. Fong, Nano-epoxy resins containing
94 (2018) 84–94. electrospun carbon nanofibers and the resulting hybrid multi-scale composites,
[11] A. Zadhoush, R. Reyhani, M. Naeimirad, Evaluation of surface modification impact Compos. Part B: Eng. 58 (2014) 43–53.
on PP/MWCNT nanocomposites by rheological and mechanical characterization, [37] R.E. Neisiany, J.K.Y. Lee, S.N. Khorasani, S. Ramakrishna, Self-healing and inter-
assisted with morphological image processing, Polym. Compos., http://www.10. facially toughened carbon fibre-epoxy composites based on electrospun core–shell
1002/pc.24799. nanofibres, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 134 (2017) 44956.
[12] J. Ma, L.T.B. La, I. Zaman, Q. Meng, L. Luong, D. Ogilvie, H.-C. Kuan, Fabrication, [38] R. Esmaeely Neisiany, J.K.Y. Lee, S. Nouri Khorasani, R. Bagheri, S. Ramakrishna,
structure and properties of epoxy/metal nanocomposites, Macromol. Mater. Eng. Facile strategy toward fabrication of highly responsive self-healing carbon/epoxy
296 (2011) 465–474. composites via incorporation of healing agents encapsulated in poly(methyl-
[13] M. Naeimirad, A. Zadhoush, R.E. Neisiany, Fabrication and characterization of si- methacrylate) nanofiber shell, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 59 (2018) 456–466.
licon carbide/epoxy nanocomposite using silicon carbide nanowhisker and nano- [39] R.E. Neisiany, J.K.Y. Lee, S.N. Khorasani, S. Ramakrishna, Towards the develop-
particle reinforcements, J. Compos. Mater. 50 (2016) 435–446. ment of self-healing carbon/epoxy composites with improved potential provided by
[14] S. Salimian, A. Zadhoush, M. Naeimirad, R. Kotek, S. Ramakrishna, A review on efficient encapsulation of healing agents in core-shell nanofibers, Polym. Test. 62
aerogel: 3D nanoporous structured fillers in polymer-based nanocomposites, Polym. (2017) 79–87.
Compos., http://www.10.1002/pc.24412. [40] Q. Chen, Y. Zhao, Z. Zhou, A. Rahman, X.-F. Wu, W. Wu, T. Xu, H. Fong, Fabrication
[15] A. Safaei, M. Masoomi, S.M.R. Razavi, In-situ microfibrillar PP–PA6 composites: and mechanical properties of hybrid multi-scale epoxy composites reinforced with
rheological, morphological and mechanical properties, Bull. Mater. Sci. 40 (2017) conventional carbon fiber fabrics surface-attached with electrospun carbon nano-
971–982. fiber mats, Compos. B Eng. 44 (2013) 1–7.
[16] H. Khoramishad, S.M.J. Razavi, Metallic fiber-reinforced adhesively bonded joints, [41] M.R. Ayatollahi, A. Nemati Giv, S.M.J. Razavi, H. Khoramishad, Mechanical
Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 55 (2014) 114–122. properties of adhesively single lap-bonded joints reinforced with multi-walled
[17] M. Jouyandeh, O.M. Jazani, A.H. Navarchian, M.R. Saeb, High-performance epoxy- carbon nanotubes and silica nanoparticles, J. Adhes. 93 (2017) 896–913.
based adhesives reinforced with alumina and silica for carbon fiber composite/steel [42] S.M.J. Razavi, M.R. Ayatollahi, A. Nemati Giv, H. Khoramishad, Single lap joints
bonded joints, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 35 (2016) 1685–1695. bonded with structural adhesives reinforced with a mixture of silica nanoparticles
[18] S.M.J. Razavi, M.R. Ayatollahi, E. Esmaeili, L.F.M. da Silva, Mixed-mode fracture and multi walled carbon nanotubes, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 80 (2018) 76–86.
response of metallic fiber-reinforced epoxy adhesive, Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids 65 [43] Q. Chen, L. Zhang, A. Rahman, Z. Zhou, X.-F. Wu, H. Fong, Hybrid multi-scale
(2017) 349–359. epoxy composite made of conventional carbon fiber fabrics with interlaminar re-
[19] A. Nemati Giv, M.R. Ayatollahi, S.M.J. Razavi, H. Khoramishad, The effect of or- gions containing electrospun carbon nanofiber mats, Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf.
ientations of metal macrofiber reinforcements on mechanical properties of adhe- 42 (2011) 2036–2042.
sively bonded single lap joints, J. Adhes. (2017) 1–21.
[20] E. Esmaeili, S.M.J. Razavi, M. Bayat, F. Berto, Flexural behavior of metallic fiber-

247

You might also like