Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V o L.. 4 4, N O. :? S U M M E R 1 9 8 5 161
---------------- •.•.....
r, r< ,,
V O L. 4 4, N O. 2 S U M M ER 1 9 8 5 163
-,
;
V·
t·'
How much stress is thet e ;unn11~ 11t,· 1.,, , .. ,., ·. ,111,I l11d1,111~
111 lhe arca uf lhe Iloud-couu ul prtJJc<·(· t 1, 11,< :o 1t1:111~ rn
lhe psychosornatic stress scalc, th(~ fonn, , ~ :,·~pnudl',I "yes" Psychosomanc
strCHS
.Sucial stress
l
(more stress) to u mcan oi 9.lJ qu,·st1<111~ 1'11,· lndiuns re- Barra
sponded "yes" to a mean of 8.12 quesuons. The ditíerence Barra P.l. Doll- P.I,
between the two groups is not stausucatíy significant, But it Dollmann Ibirarna mann Ibrrarna
is important to place these means in perspective with the (N = 65) (N = 46) (N = 64) (N = 46)
.means of other groups, John Berry studied stress using thís Man? -.31• -.27 -.04 -.03
I '•l scale in 12 diflercnt ethnic groups (Ucrry l 97o; Ucrry and Old'l .15 .15 -.25· -.07
Annis J 974), including nine Canadian Indian groups, Viet- Suííered lesses? .003 .14 .02 -.20
namese refugees in Canada, and Canadian Enghsh farm and W1II suffer lesses? .16 .21 .16 -.003
mining vlllagcs. The rneans for psychosoruauc stress varice! Awaiung
from 1. 79 for the Canadian farrners to 7./n for the Cree urdem n llka 1 ion? .16 .26 .16 .04
Dissatisfied with
Indiana. Thus, thc means ot'the Ibirama farmers and Indians
indemnification? - .ü6 -.23
are higher than for any other studicd group. Except for the Married? -·.05 .0') - .21 .09
case of the Cree (who also sutlered the intrusrou oi' a liam Became ili'! .JO ..H!'' .Ili .2J
into their territory), the differences between the Ibrrarna groups
and those studied by Berry are ali stansucnlly significunt.
"Pure lndian"?
DÍS1i11lÍ~f1t:d
- -.24 •. li
These resuits Ieavc lillk doubt about thc h1gJ1 ucg, ce ui 1.11tre~s wíth lc11dcr~hip'I - .13
among the Ibirama farmers and Indians. Psychosornatic
As for "social stress," the Barra Dollmann farrners gave stress .33" .37•
stressful responses m a mean of 2.65 of lhe 13 questions,
while the Indians responded with more stress in a mean of • p < .05; • p < ,01.
4.83 questions. This diflerencc between the two groups is
highly stgnrticaru (F= 13.3, p < .001). 'lhe lndians sufler
much more social stress.
Whal are the reasons for the high degree ot psychosornauc women may in part be dueto their greater difficulty in relating
stress among the farrners and Indians and lor the high social to public agencies. Most women are accustorned to domestic
stress arnong the Indiana? To what extent can the stress be and agricultural work, and have Jittle contact with outside
attributed to the Ibirarna dam? Although this study does not authoriues, The darn meant that many had to become more
inelude a totally unaflected community, there were many involved with these outsiders, Various authors have com·
Barra Dollmann farmers and reservauon Indians who lived mented that women generally experience greater stress during
and worked above the flood line and would not lose their transitions ofthis type (see Scuddcr 1973, 1975a for exam-
own lands. Thus, it is possible to rnake compansons to dis- ples), although there are cases where women may sutfer less
tinguish the effects of the darn from other possible stressors. stress (see Spring 1982 for an exarnple).
Table 3 shows the correlations of ditferent variables with ln Barra Dollmann okler people show less social stress
psychosomatic and social stress. The simple fact of havmg than do younger, This seerns contrary to the findings ofmany
lost something because of the dam predicts stress neuher researchers who claim greater general stress for the elderly
among the Indians nor arnong the farmers. Perhaps this result in situations of forced social change (Scudder 1973; Spring
is predictable since many people claimed satisfaction with 1982). The finding deserves more investigatíon. Perhaps the
the índemnities they received; a few even remarkeil that thcy older people in the Barra Dollmann sarnple felt more at ease
did vcry wcll. For' example, one man used lus mdemniznnon with their neighbors and rriends sirnply because they knew
to buy a retirernent nome for his parents and lO set up a very them beuer after so many years of'Iiving together, The sample
successful butcher shop. dtd uot rnclude older people who movcd out of lhe arca and
lt seems the question of uncertaimy is more important. who might weJI Lxhibit much greater social stress.
The lndi~os and farmen who know thcy will lose land but Tabl~ 3 also shows correlluions between psychosomutic
have not yet been Indemniâed show slightly more psycho- and social stress. Thís confirms the general arguments about
somatic stress than the others {although these differences do how the two may influence each orher. For example, Berry
not reach statistical significance). The problern of'indemni ties (as quoted in Richardson J 97 5) points out that stressed in-
is more serious for the Indians since none of the lands they dividuais are more likely to engage in fights, commít crimes,
will lose has been indemnified. ln the case of the farrners, or, become alcoholic.
only tbe land to be taken by a new roudway around the dam Finally, Taolc 3 also shows a corrclation between "lead-
still needs to be indemnified. This probably explains the ership dissatisfacuon" and scc1al stress. (The leadership in•
higher correlati<>n betwcen ••awaiting indemnification" and satisfacuon variable is based on questions l asked lhe lndians
•• psychosomatic stress\' among lhe Indiana, about who i11 fact werc their Ieaders and who the lndians
A few other correlations in Table 3 also deserve comment. would /1ke their lcaders to be. People who changed many
ln general, men show less psycb.osomatic stress than do wom- names from one guestion to the other were coded as less
en. This sex ditference may be common in many ordinary satisfied.) This assocíation was expected since questions about
l
snuatíons, but it is also possible that the greater stress for leadersh~p formed part of lhe social stress scale. I repQJ1 the ·•t,
:
164 HUMAN ORGANIZATlON
1.'
\ l
l
h,. _
JA Ili. F 4. INDIGENOUS LEADERS
'! ------·--·--------------
L,·,1J·
Leaders ers
in fact desired
Intercorrelations
%of
votes
%of
votes
--------
B e D. E F G H I J K
A (70) (52) .03 -.05 .JJ .33 -.07 . IS -.03 -.16 .23 .23
B (52) (39) .59 .44 .25 -.48 .43 -.41 -.40 .33 .19
e (39) (33) .24 .15 -.35 .28 -.28 -.31 .29 . IS
D (30) (22) .69 -.37 .29 -.33 -.26 .07 .53
E (30) (22) -.37 .29 -.33 -.25 .08 .53
F (24) (24) -.31 .75 .69 -.20 -.20
G (24) (24) -.28 -.22 .13 .46
H (20) (20) . 79 .17 .I'/
1 (J 3) ( J 5) - .14 .14
J (J 1) {J 3) .JO
K (11) (9)
·----·- . -------·------- --- ------
conclnuon hcre bccuusc lcudcrslup problcm« ~(·,·r11 p,111H u:· - dcrnnuies or other contracts between outsiders and the In-
larly acute arnong the lndians and merit special attcnuon. dians. According to some Indians, these "bribcs" allow out-
Scudder's (1973) argument about how outsidc ugcncres crente siders to buy lndian products (Iike lumber) for much less
local leadership crises may be particularly important hen-. than their actual value. The FUNAI practice of'paying these
Iictitious salaries is new in the reserve, having originated
shortly after the beginning of the fíood-control project.
Leadership within the I ndian Reserve Who is right about these factíons? Are they Indian tradi-
riens, or are they, at least in part, created by FUNAl? Are
The Ge-speaking Indians of Brazil are rcnown for thcir they an admirable characteristic of a culture with a strong
factionalism. With a history ofnumerous fights and kilhngs egatitarian ideology, or are they dcstructive ín dividing the
between political opponents, the Xokleng and Kaíngang are Indians before outside exploiters? To undcrstand these ques-
no exccpuon (Henry 1941: Urban 1978). Recently, physicuí tious I decidcd lo examine in more dctail the nature oí' thc
fights between leaders of the ditlcrcnt factions havc bcrome lndian lacuons. 1 askcd all the lndians intcrvicwed to gi ve
almost reurine, and lhe reserve has cxperienced ut least une me the namcs of live lcadcrs m lhe reserve, 11111.J of Irve pcople
ruurder in the past Icw ycars. To what cxtent can thc lead- whom the Indrans would likc to be íeadcrs. ln Tuble 4 thc
ership problems wíthin the Indian reserve today be aurib- J l rnost voted leaders are identified by letters ofthe alphabet,
uted to this general Gc tendency for political fighting and to and thc percentage of votes each received are shown in the
what extent can they be attributed to contemporary proh- first two columns, For example, 70% ofthe interviewees said
lems? that "A" was a leadcr, but only 52% said they wanted him
According to Urban ( 1978:69, 323, 350-354), facuonatism to be a leader. It is worth noting that leaders "D" and "E"
is at lhe "heart" of Xokleng social life, and may forrn the ranked Iourth as actual leaders, but fell to sixth place as
· basis for other aspects of life as well, such as kinship ,111d "wanted" lcaders.
ruual Today, Urban (1978:354) arguos, lhe Indrans ha vc The correlauon matrix in Table 4 shows that the people
succeedcd in turning the "Brazilian national socrcty macro- who wanted B as a leader gcnerally also voted for C, D, E,
cusm in some measure into an image of their íactional 1111- G, J and K. But thosc who voted for B did not vote for F,
crocosm." That is, the Indians have managed to marupulute H or 1. As can be seen from the table, there are two olear
outsiders (Jndian foundation bureaucrats, siate and national factions in the reserve. ln one are B, C, D, E, G, J and K; in
congressmen, míssionaries and anthropologists) to support the other are F, H and 1. Those who voted for leadcrs of one
their own internai disputes. Santos (1973) has recorded nu- Iaction generally did not vote for thosc of the other. Only
rnerous exarnples of Xokleng factional politics that drcw i11 lcudci "A" t!> sumcwhut abovc 1hi~ tacuoualrsm, siuce almost
importam outsiders in deals over such forest products as ali accepted hirn as a leader.
heart ofpalm and tine woods, ln this context, the dam seems Is this factionalism more pronounced than normal for Ge
like just one more reason to exacerbate these factions. groups? By way of cornparison l decidcd to do this same
It is irnportant to understand how rnuch the Indians are exercise with data from another Ge group rescarched in 1976
manipulating outsiders and how much they are being ma- and 1977-the Mekranoti-Kayapo of southern Para state,
nipulated. According to some Indians, for exarnple, it is FU- Brazil (see Werner 1981, 1982). The Mekranoti are also known
NAI (the National lndian Foundation) that is dividing the for their "factionahsm" (for exarnple, see Turner 1969). ln
lndians by paying "salaries" to some who, in fact, do nothing the Mekranotí case I asked a randorn sarnple of30 adults to ~·
to earn the money. These "salaried" Indians forma support give me the narnes of 10 male leaders and 10 female leaders,
group for FUNAI's politics, especially in questions of in- To make for a more exact cornparison with the Ibirarna ~·n
V O L. 4 4, NO. 2 S lJ M M E R 1 9 8 5 165 :j
j •
1 .,~ •••.•... , ..
r
TABLE 5. ORIGINS Of FACTIONALISM of their family, On lhe othcr hand, Ieaders F, H, and I were
"elected" by "mestizos." Being a member of A 's farnily had
little to do wíth their Ieadcrship positions.
Lcaders A's fümily •• Pure Indian"
As these correlatíons show, some leaders in the Indian
A . 14 .13 cornmunity enjoy their positions because oftheir family ues .
B .38 .36 This supports the argurnent ofthe faction clairning that FU-
e .44 .36 NAI is co-opting this family, and thereby díviding the com-
D .59 .24 munity. This co-optation fits well with Scudder's (1975a)
E .40 .008
argurnent about how Iarge private or governrnent bureau-
F -.17 -.64
cracies gain contrai of areas alfected by engineering works,
G .37 .27
H -.15 -.52 and suggcsts one source of the high social stress among thc
J -.13 -.65 Indians, This finding is also in hne with arguments that see
J .34 .25 a feeling of lack of contrai over one's own affairs as socially
K .45 .20 stressful. Compared to the Barra Dollmann farmers who are
Dissatisfled with not so easíly manipulated by outside bureaucracies, tbe In-
leaders? -.17 .08 dians may experience more social stress because they have
less control over their own affairs, Much of'this outsíde con-
trol pré-dates the Ibirarna fíood-control projcct, but the dis-
putes over indemnization seem particularly acute. ln addi-
. tíon, it should be remembered that there are also other
Indians I decided to õonsider ónly the first five male names problerns in the lndian community between "mestizos" and
given by tbe Mekranoti. (The Ibirama Indians did not narne "pure Indians" that are not restricted to the "bribes" paid
women.) The correlation matríx that rcsultcd from the Mek- by FUNAI.
r11noll duUt wu,s quite diJ1brc11t Iroru thc Ibíramu mutrix. Thir-
ty-one ofthe 55 Ibirarna correlations were equal to or greater
than .25, but only 9 of the 55 Mekranoti correlations were Conclusions
equal to or greater than .25. Thus factionalisrn among the
Mekranoti was much weaker, People simply did not divide The farrners and lndians affected by the construction of a
themselves imo clearly distinct factions. flood-control darn in Santa Catarina show higher dgrees of
.· The polítical schisms of.the Ibirama Indians cannot be stress than do people elsewhere. At least ín part this stress
attributcd simply to the general tendency forOc fuctionalii;m, Hccm~to bc ussocíated wilh problema broughl about by lhe
~í111.:c at least sorne G~ groups (the Mekranoti) do not exhibn dam, such as the delay in paying índemnities. The case of
this degree of political rivalry, What, then, are the other the Indians in Ibirama also supports the contention ofScud-
factors that rnight be responsible for lhe internai divisions der about how large bureaucracies that handle construction
of the Ibirama lndians? works can create a crísis in local Ieadership, and increase
Depending on who is talking, the splits in Posto Indígena general social stress.
Ibirama are seen dífferently. For some lndians, the principal If psychological and social stress result frorn engineering
division is between "pure Indians" and "mestizos,"-the projects, we rnust ask who should be held responsiblc for
lauer accused of wanung to get ahead at lhe ex pense of the thcse "Iudden costs." Do wc have the right to ask local pop-
"pure Indíans." For others lhe maio split is between the ulations to suffer for the: benefit of'dístant cities? And íf'stress
"famiíy" of'Ieader A, which receives salaries from FUNAI, (cspecially social stress) prevenis people Irom organizing
and everyone else, themsclves satisfactorily in defense oftheir rights, then what
To examine these ideas I divided the interviewees ínto is the role of outsiders who want to help? And what are the
"pure Indiana" and "mestizos" using the Indians' criteria as oblígauons of the agencies responsible for the projects? We
colíected by one ofthe Indians. 1 also divided the intervíew- need to clarify these questions in order to guarantee that
ees into the members ofleader A's family and everyone else. projects, like the construction of dams, really benefit ali and
The purpose of this exercise was to see if thc pcople who not just those who live far from the problems.
voted for one or the other íeader could best be classified as
"pure Indians" or 11s ''mombcrs of A 's family."
Table 5 shows the resuírs of this study. The correlation
REFERENCES C/TED
between "voting for leader B" and "being a mernber of A's
fomily" is .J8. The correlation bctwcen "votiug for leadcr
Aakster, C. W.
13" and "being a pure Indian" is .36. ln this case the two 1974 Psycho-SocialStress and Health Disturhanccs. So.:ü:ty and
correlauons are similar so there is no way to distinguish Medicine 8:77-90.
whether people vote for B because they are "pure Indians" Aspehn, P.
or because they are mernbers of A 's family, But for other 1982 Social Impact Assessmeut in Hydroclec1ric Powcr Di:vcl-
Ieaders the ditferences are clearer. The members of A 's farnily op111ent in Southem Brasil. ln lndian SIA. C. Gcisle, R. Grccn,
l
had a strong tendency to vote for leaders D and E, while D. Usner, and P. West, eds. Pp. 338-370. Ann Arbor: Univer-
"pure Indians" did not follow this tendency ("D" and •'E" sity of Michigan Press.
are sons of leader A). This implies that these two leaders Aspelio, Paul, and S. C. dos Santos
1981 Indiao Areas Threatened by Hydroelectric Projects in Bra-
enjoy leadership posiuons primarily because ofthe influence
.--· --·
---------· --· ··- .. -
zil, Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Af. Santos, S. C. dos
fairs. 197 3 Indios e Brancos no Sul do Brasil: A Dramática Experiencia
dos Xokleng, Aorian6polis: Edeme.
Berry, John
1976 Humuu &:01011,y und Cognitive Stylc. New York: Wiley.
Berry, John W., and Robert C. Annis
Scudder, Thayer
1973 Summary: Resettlement. ln Man-Made Lakes: Their Prob-
1,,
\<
1974 Acculturative Stress: Tne Role of Ecology, Culture and lems and Environmental Efl'ects. W. C. Ackermann, G. F. White,
Differentiation. Joumal ofCross-Cultural Psycbology 5(4):382- and E. B. Worthington, eds. Pp. 707-719. Washington, DC:
405.
Berry, John, R. M. Wintrob, P. S. Sindell, and T. A. Mawhinncy
n.d. Psychotogical Adaptation to Culture Change Arnong the
American Geophysical Uoioo.
1975a Resettlernent, ln Man-Made Lakes and Human Health.
N. F. Stanley and M. P. Alpers, cds. Pp. 453-47 J. London:
1
James Bay Cree. Kingston, Ontario. Canada: Queen's Univer- Academic Press.
1975b Social lmpacts of Integrated River Basin Development
1
sity.
Cochrane, R., and A. Robertson on Local Populations. Budapest, Hungary: UNOPtµN Interre-
1973 Thc Llfc Eventa lnvemory; A Mc1m1rc of the Relalive , giouul Seminar on River Basin and lnterbasin Dcvelopmcnt,
i1 Severily of Psycbo-Social Stressors. Joumal of Paychoecmatlc Work.ing Puper nu. 30.
-~ Research 17:135-139. 1976 Kariba Dam: The Ecological Hazards of Making a Lake.
,',~: Dasrnann, R. F., J. P. Milton, and P. H. Freeman
197 3 Ecological Principies for Economic Development. London:
ln The Evolution of Hurnan Adaptations: Rcadings in Anthro-
pology. J. J. Poggie, G. H. Pelto, and P. J. Pelto, eds. Pp. 427-
' ' John Wiley . 435. New York: Macmillan.
..•
'' Dohrenwend, B. S. Scudder, T., and E. Colson
1973 Life Events llll Stressors: A Methodologicn! lnquiry. Jour- 1982 From Welfare to Developmenc A Conceptual Framework
nal of Health and Social Behavior 14:167-175. for lhe Analysis of'Dislocated People. ln lnvoluntary Migration
' ' and Resettlement. A. _Hansen and A. Oliver-Smith, eds, Pp.
Goodland, Robert
1973 Rio Parana Hydroelectric Project: Ecological Impact Re- 267-287. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. .
connaissance. N ew York: The Cary Arboretum of'the New York. Spring, A.
Botanical Garden Environrnental Protection Program. 1982 Women and Men as Refugees: Differential Assimilation of
; Harmon, D. K., M. Masuda, and T. H. Holmes Angolan Refugees in Zambia. ln Involuntary Migration and
1970 The Social Readjustmeet Rating Scale: A Cross-Cultural Resettlement. A. Hansen and A. Oliver-Smith, eds, Pp, 37-47.
j ' Study of Westem Europeans and Americana. Journal of Psy- Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
ii
chosomatic Research 14:391-400. Turner, Terence S.
Henry, J. 1969 Social Structure and Political Organization Among the
1941 Jungle People, New York: Vintage Books. Northem Cayapo. Departmenl of Social Relations, Harvard
; ~, Holrnes, T. H., and M. Masuda University, Ph.D. Dissertation.
1972 Psychosomatic Syndrome. Psychology T oday April:71-7 3, Urban, G.
106. 1978 A Model of Shokleng Social Reality. Anthropology De-
Lauer, R. H. partment. Universíty of Chicago, Pb.D. Dissertation.
1973 The Social Readjustment Scale and Anx.iety: A Cross-Cul- Weiss, J. M.
tural Study, Journal of Psychosomatic Research 17:171-174. 1972 Psychologícal Factors in Stress and Disease. Scientific
Lazarus, R. S., E. Opton, Jr., M. Tomita, and M. Kodarna American 266: 104-113.
1966 A Cross-Cultural Study of Stress-Reaction Patterns in Ja- Werner, D.
pan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4(6):622- 1981 Are Some People More Equal than Othcrs?: Status ln-
633. equality Among lhe Mekranoti Indians ofCentral Brazil, Jour-
Lumsden, D. P. nal of Anthropological Research 37(4):360-373.
1975 Towards a Systems Model of Stress. ln Llfe Stress and 1982 Leadership Inheritance and Acculturation among the Mek-
Anxiety, 1. Sarason and C. Spielberger, eds. Pp, 191-228. Wash- ranoti ofCentral Brazil, Human Organization 41(4):342-345.
ington: Hemisphere.
O Estad«
l 97S l24/04) Em setembro, o Vule Ileu muis p1·utc11ldo contra
cheias.
'1
1980 (24/ l 2) Obras da Barragem estao paralisadas.
r~
Partridge, William L., Antoinene B. Brown, and Jeffrey 8. Nugent
-' •\ 1982 The Papaloapan Dam and Resetuement Project: Human
1 •
Ecologic and Health Consequences. ln lnvoluntary Migration
and Resettlement. A. Hansen and A. Oliver-Smith, eds. Pp.
245-263. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Perlman, J.
1982 Favela Remova!: The Eradication of a Liíestyle. ln ln-
voluntary M1gration and Reseuíement. A. Hansen and A. Olív-
er-Snnth, eds. Pp. 225-243. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Rahe, Richard H.
1969 Multi-Cultural Correluuons ofLife Change Scaling: Amer-
ica, Japan, Denmark aud Sweden, Joumal of Psychosomauc
Research 13:191-195.
Richardson, Boycc
197 5 Strangers Devour the Land. The Cree H unters of the James
Bay Area Versus Prernier Bourassa and the James Bay Devel-
opment Corporation. Toronto: Macmillan.
167
L ...