SBM SCORING MATRIX VALIDATION FORM

Name of School: Division:

Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)

Performance Rating & Equivalent

Thematic Area Computation
Indicators Points
Access (45%) Enrolment Increase % of Inc. A. ENROLMENT INCREASE
1 – Marginal: At least 3% increase
SY 2010-11 750
(3.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase

SY 2011-12 800 6.67% (5.0 - 6.99%)

3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0 % – up)
1 x
SY 2012-13 820 2.50% B. Justification based on Community Mapping

1 – Marginal: At least 85% increase

(85 – 89.99%)
2 – Average: At least 90% increase

Ave. 4.58% (90 – 94.99%)

3 – High: At least 95% increase
(95% – up)

Efficiency % of Dec. Baseline: 7.06

(25%) Dropout Rate
1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease
SY 2010-11 5.05% (0.01 - 2.0)
SY 2011-12 2.10% 2.95% 2 – Average: At most 4% decrease
SY 2012-13 0.25% 1.85% (2.01 – 4.0)

Average: (2.95 + 3 – High: Has 0 DR or more than 4%

2.40%
1.85) / 2 decrease (4.01 – up)
0
Completion Rate: % of Inc. Baseline: 75%
SY 2010-11 94.50% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
SY 2011-12 95.20% 0.74% (5.0 – 6.99%) 2 x
SY 2012-13 96.35% 1.19% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
(7.0 – 9.99%)
Average: 95.35 0.96%
3 – High: At least 10% Increase
0 (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CR
Baseline 75%:
Cohort Survival Rate % of Inc. 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
(5.0 – 6.99%)
SY 2010-11 85.50% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
SY 2011-12 90.00% 5.00% (7.0 – 9.99%)
SY 2012-13 96.00% 6.25% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
Average: 90.50% 5.63% (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CSR
0
Sub-total: 8.99%
NAT MPS % of Inc. OPTION 1: Get % of Increase
Elementary: Baseline: 67%

SY 2010-11 68.50%
 SY 2010-11 68.50% 1 - Marginal: At least 2% increase
(2.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase

SY 2011-12 72.50% 5.52% (5.0 – 6.99%)

3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0% - up) or at least an ave.

SY 2012-13 76.30% 4.98% of 75% MPS

Secondary: Baseline: 48%
Quality 2 x
1 - Marginal: At least 7% increase
(30%)
(7.0 – 7.99%)
2 – Average: At least 8% increase
(8.0 – 9.99%)
3 – High: At least 10% Increase

Average: 72.43% 5.25% (10% - up)

or at least an ave. of 75% MPS
OPTION 2: Get the MPS Average
1 – Marginal : 26 – 50%
2 – Average : 51 – 75%
3 – High : 76 – 100%

Sub-total:
Interpretation Good
Better
Best
Legend:
Numerical Rating
Description
Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
mance Improvement of “Better” can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.

Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

SBM Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle

Weight Results
Principles Computation
Leadership 30% 14 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Curriculum &
Learning 30% 16 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Accountability 25% 9 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Resource
Management 15% 11 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Subtotal 100% #DIV/0!

Interpretation Good
Better
Best

Legend:
Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best

Step 3: Compute for Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance
Improvement 60% 1.55 0.93

B. SBM
Assessment 40% #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Score (DOD)
TOTAL 100% #DIV/0!

Interpretation:
Developing (Level I)
Maturing (Level II)
Advanced (Level III)

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical
Description
Rating Scale

0.50 – 1.49 Developing

1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

Note: For Operational Try-out

Legend:
Put all data in the light green colored box.

Efficiency:
Drop-out = If the average is more than the baseline (7.06%) put zero ( 0) in the orange box.
 Completion and Cohort Survival = If the average is less than 75% put zero ( 0), if more than 75% and less than 95%
don't make any changes, and if 95% or up put ( 3) in the orange box.

Quality:
Option 1
NAT (National Achievement Test) = if the average is less than 67% for the Elementary, and 48% in the Secondary pu
zero (0). Don't make any changes if the average is more than the baseline, and if the average is 75% and up put three ( 3),
the orange box.
Option 2
Get the MPS Average then; put one ( 1) for Marginal, two (2) for Average, and three (3) for High, in the orange box.

Marginal: 26 – 50% Average: 51 – 75% High: 76 – 100%

M

Computation Results

0.45 0.45

0.25 0.50
 0.3 0.60

1.55

Results

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!

Results

0.93

#DIV/0!

#DIV/0!
n 75% and less than 95%

d 48% in the Secondary put

75% and up put three ( 3), in

High, in the orange box.

 SBM SCORING MATRIX VALIDATION FORM back
Name of School: ________________________ Division: ____________
Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)
Performance Rating & Equivalent
Thematic Area Computation Results
Indicators Points
Access (45%) Enrolment Increase % of Inc. A. ENROLMENT INCREASE
1 – Marginal: At least 3% increase
SY 2014-15 500 (3.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase
SY 2015-16 520 4.00% (5.0 - 6.99%)
3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0 % – up)
1 x 0.45 0.45
SY 2016-17 550 5.77% B. Justification based on Community Mapping
1 – Marginal: At least 85% increase
(85 – 89.99%)
2 – Average: At least 90% increase
Ave.
4.88% (90 – 94.99%)
3 – High: At least 95% increase
1 (95% – up)
Efficiency % of Dec. Baseline: 7.06%
Dropout Rate
(25%) 1 – Marginal: At most 2% decrease
SY 2014-15 21.00% (0.01 - 2.0)
SY 2015-16 10.00% 11.00% 2 – Average: At most 4% decrease
SY 2016-17 1.00% 9.00% (2.01 – 4.0)
3 – High: Has 0 DR or more than 4%
Average: 10.00%
decrease (4.01 – up)
3
Completion Rate: % of Inc. Baseline: 75%
SY 2014-15 56.00% 1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
SY 2015-16 78.00% 28.21% (5.0 – 6.99%)
SY 2016-17 90.00% 13.33% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase 3.0 x 0.25 0.75
(7.0 – 9.99%)
Average: 74.67% 20.77%
3 – High: At least 10% Increase
(10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CR
3
Baseline 75%:
Cohort Survival Rate % of Inc.1 – Marginal: At least 5% Increase
(5.0 – 6.99%)
SY 2014-15 46.00% 2 – Average: At least 7% Increase
SY 2015-16 79.00% 41.77% (7.0 – 9.99%)
SY 2016-17 89.00% 11.24% 3 – High: At least 10% Increase
Average: 71.33% 26.50% (10% - up) or an ave. of 95% CSR
3
Sub-total: 3.00 3.00
NAT MPS % of Inc. OPTION 1: Get % of Increase
Elementary: Baseline: 67%
SY 2014-15 45.00% 1 - Marginal: At least 2% increase
(2.0 – 4.99%)
2 – Average: At least 5% increase
SY 2015-16 69.00% 24.00% (5.0 – 6.99%)
3 – High: At least 7% increase
(7.0% - up) or at least an ave.
SY 2016-17 80.00% 11.00% of 75% MPS
Secondary: Baseline: 48%
Quality 1 - Marginal: At least 7% increase 3 x 0.3 0.90
(30%) (7.0 – 7.99%)
2 – Average: At least 8% increase
(8.0 – 9.99%)
3 – High: At least 10% Increase
Average: 64.67% 17.50% (10% - up)
or at least an ave. of 75% MPS
OPTION 2: Get the MPS Average
1 – Marginal : 26 – 50%
2 – Average : 51 – 75%
3 – High : 76 – 100%
Sub-total: 2.10
Interpretation Better
Legend:
Numerical Rating
Description
Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
mprovement of “Better” can apply to the Division for SBM Validation.
Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

SBM Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle

Weight Results
Principles Computation
Leadership 30% 13 2.60 0.78
Curriculum &
Learning 30% 18 2.57 0.77

Accountability 25% 12 2.40 0.60

Resource
Management 15% 12 2.40 0.36
Subtotal 100% 2.51
Best
Interpretation

Legend:
Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best

Step 3: Compute for Final Rating

Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance
Improvement 60% 2.10 1.26

B. SBM
Assessment 40% 2.51 1.00
Score (DOD)
TOTAL 100% 2.26
Maturing (Level) II
Interpretation:

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical
Description
Rating Scale
0.50 – 1.49 Developing
1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

Note: For Operational Try-out

Legend:
Put all data in the light green colored box.

Efficiency:
Drop-out = If the average is more than the baseline (7.06%) put zero ( 0) in the orange box.
Completion and Cohort Survival = If the average is less than 75% put zero ( 0), if more than 75% and less than 95%
don't make any changes, and if 95% or up put ( 3) in the orange box.

Quality:
Option 1
NAT (National Achievement Test) = if the average is less than 67% for the Elementary, and 48% in the Secondary
put zero (0). Don't make any changes if the average is more than the baseline, and if the average is 75% and up put three
(3), in the orange box.
 Option 2
Get the MPS Average then; put one ( 1) for Marginal, two (2) for Average, and three (3) for High, in the orange box.

Marginal: 26 – 50% Average: 51 – 75% High: 76 – 100%

Enrolment

11E n ro l m e n t
SY 2010-
SY 2011-
12
500
520
SY 2012-
550
13
550

550

540

530
520

520

510
500

500

490

480

470
SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13
back
D ro p - O u t R a t e
Dropout Rate

SY 2010-
21.00%
11
SY 2011-
10.00%
12
SY 2012-
25.00% 1.00%
13
21.00%

20.00%

15.00%

10.00%

10.00%

5.00%
1.00%

0.00%
SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13
back
Completion Rate: back
Completion Rate
SY 2010-
11
56.00%
SY 2011-
78.00%
12
SY 2012- 90.00%
90.00%
13
90.00%
78.00%
80.00%

70.00%
56.00%
60.00%

50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13
back
Cohort Survival Rate
Cohort Survival Rate
back

SY 2010-
46.00%
11 89.00%
SY 2011-
90.00% 79.00%
12 79.00%
SY 2012-
80.00% 89.00%
13

70.00%

60.00%
46.00%
50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
SY 2010-11 SY 2011-12 SY 2012-13
back
SY 2014-15 45.00%
N AT 69.00%
( N a t i o n a l A c h i e v e m e n t Te s t )
SY 2015-16
SY 2016-17 80.00%

80.00%

80.00%
69.00%
70.00%

60.00%

45.00%
50.00%

40.00%

30.00%

20.00%

10.00%

0.00%
SY 2014-15 SY 2015-16 SY 2016-17
back
 SBM-PASBE DCT REPORT ON THE OPERATIONAL TRY-OUT OF THE
REVISED SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS & TOOL

Name of School: _____________________ Division: ____________

I. OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE SAMPLE SCHOOL

A. Final Rating
Areas Weight Computation Results
A. Performance
60% 2.60 Better
Improvement
B. SBM Assessment
40% 2.57 Best
Score (DOD)
Maturing
TOTAL 100%
(Level) II
Interpretation: Better

Description of SBM Level of Practice:

Numerical Rating Scale Description

0.50 – 1.49 Developing

1.50 – 2.49 Maturing
2.50 – 3.0 Advanced

B. Recommendations for Continuous Improvement of the School

AREAS RECOMMENDATIONS (ACTION PROGRAMS)

Performance
I.
Improvement
A. Access
B. Efficiency
C. Quality
II. SBM PRINCIPLES
Leadership &
A.
Governance

Curriculum &
B.
Instruction

Accountability &
C. Continuous
Improvement

D. Resource Management

II. COMMENTS & SUGGESTIONS TO ENHANCE THE SBM PROCESS & TOOL

FEEDBACK PROCESS TOOL

COMMENTS
SUGGESTIONS

III. MAJOR ISSUES / OPPORTUNITIES IN THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF SBM-PASBE

AREAS OF
ISSUES OPPORTUNITIES
CONCERNS
Advocacy
Training

Validation /
Accreditation Process

Provision of Technical
Assistance to Schools

Sustainability
Other (Specify):

IV. Recommendations: Input to Regional Technical Assistance Plan & Policy Directions

AREAS OF
ISSUES RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCERNS
Advocacy
Training

Validation /
Accreditation Process

Provision of Technical
Assistance to Schools

Sustainability
Other (Specify):

Prepared by: SBM-PASBE DCT OF THE DIVISION OF _____________________________

____________________________ _________________________________
Member Member

____________________________ _________________________________
Member Member

_________________________________
Chairman
back
 Sample Template
SBM e
SBM Template

ACCESS:

GRAPHS EFFICIENCY:

QUALITY:

rra/2013
BM e-tool SBM-PASBE DCT REPORT ON THE OPERATIONAL TRY-OUT OF THE REVISED SBM
ASSESSMENT PROCESS & TOOL

ENROLLMEN
T
DROP-OUT RATE COMPLETION RATE COHORT SURV

NAT (NATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT RAT

L RATE