You are on page 1of 4

THE TRIALS OF THE RIZAL promulgate rules and regulations for the

BILL immediate implementation of the


provisions of this Act.
By: Dr. J.B. LAUREL, Jr.
SECTION 4. No provision of this Act
shall be constructed as prohibiting or
Why we need to study RIZAL limiting the study of the works of other
Filipino heroes:
 Required by the law
 Lesson and values SECTION 5. Any public or private
college or university found violating,
failing to comply with, or circumventing the
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 1425 provisions of this Act shall be punished
600 B.C. accordingly:

AN ACT TO INCLUDE IN THE


CURRICULA OF ALL PUBLIC AND Approved: June 12, 1956
PRIVATE SCHOOLS, COLLEGES AND
UNIVERSITIES COURSES ON THE Published in the Official Gazette, Vol. 52,
LIFE, WORKS AND WRITINGS OF JOSE No. 6, p. 2971 in June 1956.
RIZAL, PARTICULARLY HIS NOVELS
NOLI ME TANGERE AND EL
FILIBUSTERISMO, AUTHORIZING THE APRIL 3, 1956
PRINTING AND DISTRIBUTION Senate Bill No. 438
THEREOF, AND FOR OTHER
PURPOSES. In 1956 , Senator Claro M. Recto filed a
measure which became the original RIZAL
Be it enacted by the Senate and the House Bill recognizing the need to instill heroism
of Representatives of the Philippines in among the youth at the time when the
Congress assembled: country was experiencing social turmoil.

SECTION 1. Jose Rizal's Noli Me Tangere


and El Filibusterismo are hereby declared
compulsory reading matter in all public
and private schools, colleges and The original version reads as follows:
universities in the Philippines. "AN ACT TO MAKE NOLI ME TANGERE
AND EL FILIBUSTERISMO
SECTION 2. The works mentioned in
COMPULSORY READING MATTER IN
Section 1 of this Act shall be in the
ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES
original editions or in their unexpurgated
English and Natural Language versions.
AND UNIVERSITIES AND FOR OTHER
PURPOSES."
SECTION 3. The Department of APRIL 17, 1957
Education shall take steps to
Senator JOSE P. LAUREL, as Chairman of to the tenet of their faith and includes
the Committee on Education, began his the violation of religious freedom.
sponsorship of the measure and began  "Let us not create a conflict between
delivering speeches for the proposed nationalism and religion; between
legislation. the government and the church."
Rodrigo said.

"The objective of the measure was to  But, Senator Recto claimed that the
disseminate the ideas and ideals of the great sole objective of the bill was to foster
Filipino patriot through the reading of his the better appreciation of Rizal's
work, particularly Noli Me Tangere and El times and of the role he played in
Filibusterismo" combating Spanish tyranny in this
country.

*APRIL 19, 1956


MAY 2, 1956
-House Bill No. 5561
 Report of Committee on Education,
"An Act to Include in the Curricula of All
recommending approval without
Public and Private Schools, Colleges and
amendment.
Universities courses on the Life Works and
Writings of JOSE RIZAL, particularly his
novels NOLI ME TANGERE and EL MAY 9, 1956
FILIBUSTERISMO, Authorizing the
Printing and Distribution Thereof, and for Debate about the amendment of
Other Purposes." original bill started
-The time when the conflict reached the Notable Defenders:
House of Representatives. The Bill is
 Congressmen Emilio Cortez
identical copy of Senate Bill No. 438.
 Mario Bengzon, Joaquin R. Roces
 Rancap Lagumbay
APRIL 23,1956 Outspoken Opponents:
Debates in Senate Bill begun  Congressmen Ramon Durano
 Senator Mariano J. Cuenco,  Jose Nuguid
 Francisco Rodrigo  Marciano Lim, Manuel Zosa
 Decoroso Rosales  Lucas Paredes
-are identified as rabid Catholic opposed  Godofredo Ramos
the said Bill.  Miguel Cuenco
 Congresswomen Carmen D. Consing
 Tecla San Andres Ziga
 The Catholic church claimed that the  As the daily debates wore in
two novels contained news inimical Congress and throughtout the
country, it become more apparent
that no agreement could be reached
on the original version of the Bill.  Congressman Miguel Cuenco -
"measure was unconstitutional"
 However, Senator Laurel, sensing  Congressman Bengzon - "The
the futility of further strife on the substitute bill represented a complete
matter, rose to propose in his own triumph of the Church Hierarchy"
name an amendment by substitution.  No less than 51 congressman
appearing as its co-authors, including
May 12, 1956 the majority and minority leadership
in the Chamber.
Senator Lim, proposed the exemption of
students from the requirements of the bill. May 17, 1956
The amendment to the amendment state:
Congress was to adjourn sine due in few
days, since the President had declined to
certify to the necessity of the immediate
"The Board shall promulgate rules and enactment of measure. There is need of
regulations providing for the exemption of complying with the constitutional
students for reason of religious belief stated requirement that printed copies thereof be
in a sworn written statement from the distributed among the Congressmen at least
requirement of the provision contained in three calendar day prior to its final approval
the second part of the first paragraph of this by the House.
section; but not from taking the course
provided for in the first part of said
paragraph."
1. Senate Bill No. 438 was approved in
 The amendment is unanimously third reading with 23 votes in favor.
approved. 2. House Bill No. 5561 was also
 The second reading also approved approved on third reading with 27
unanimously. votes in favor (6 were against, 2
abstained and 17 were absent).
3. This bill was passed by the latter
Chamber without amendment.
4. Provided that the number of the
Senate bill should appear in enrolled
MAY 14, 1956 courses.
 Congressman Arturo Tolentino, JUNE 12, 1956
the brilliant House Majority Floor
Leader, sponsored the amendment by President Ramon Magsaysay
substitution identical to Senator  He was a Filipino statesman who
Laurel's substitute bill as amended served as the 7th President of the
and approved on second reading in Philippines, from December 30,
the Upper House.
1953 until his death in an aircraft On November 15, 1995 , the Technical
disaster. Committee after deliberation and careful study
 On June 12, President Ramon based on Dr. Onofre D. Corpuz’ and Dr. Alfredo
Lagmay’s criteria selected the following nine
Magsaysay signed the bill as
Filipino historical figures to be recommended
Republic Act 1425. More than 50
as National Heroes:
years after the “Rizal Law”, Catholic
Ateneo de Manila is at the forefront  Jose Rizal
of Rizal studies, especially with  Andres Bonifacio
fellow columnist and Rizalist  Emilio Aguinaldo
Ambeth Ocampo teaching there.  Apolinario Mabini
Ateneo’s main library is named after  Marcelo H. del Pilar
Rizal.  Sultan Dipatuan Kudarat
 Juan Luna
 This fulfilled the words of Rizal who  Melchora Aquino
through Filosofo Tasio in Noli Me  Gabriela Silang
Tangere, said:
Criteria/ Standards
"I am writing for the generations of  Concept of nation: aspire and struggle
Filipinos yet to come, a generation that will for nations freedom
be enlightened and educated, a generation  Contribute to system of life of freedom
that will read my books and appreciate them and order
without condemning me as a heretic."  Contribute to quality of life and destiny
of nation.
 Part of people expression
December 26, 1994  Thinks of the future
 Entire process
President Fidel V. Ramos
Rizal wass Choosen because?
 In the preparation for the centennial  Encourage people to unite in fighting
commemoration of Dr. Jose Rizal's Spaniards
martyrdom, President Fidel V.  Model of peace
Ramos issued Memorandum Order  Filipino sentimental
No. 247, directing the Secretary of
the Department of Higher Education,
Culture and Sport (DECS) and the
Chairman of the Commission on
Higher Education (CHED) to take
steps to fully implement to the letter
the intent and spirit of R.A. 1425,
popularly known as Rizal Law.

You might also like