Vol 12. Propless Mentalism @MagicTuts

Vol # 12 Prop-less / Mentalism AA
Introduction
Welcome to the volume of this month .
In the volume of this month, we take a look at the mentalism of support less . If I was really honest , I
have tried to distance themselves from the record on the subject of - of its controversial nature , which
is the subject has a single , directed divided community . After taking a recent survey ( through social
media ) is , it seems , the topic , which is slightly affected in detail and people from both camps (
people , who like to support smaller and mentalism people, Who expressed their disgust for this ), want
a series of ideas , gathered in one place , thus deciding to write this volume .
I do not expect to change the view with the information in this volume , or claim , that any correct
camp . I should here simply discuss my results on the subject and share some of the ideas about the
subject .
In fact, I think one thing , which one thing is for sure , this volume is going to annoy a few
feathers WHAT IS NOT MY INTENTION .
I think , that it - time , when I make my position on this subject area is very clear , as I have seen on
many forums people , requiring the entire process of things , which I did not say . I want to make it clear
from the start ; I am not a defender of support mentalism less . I DO NOT approve of support material less
, and I am not in adverse use of supports .
I don’t even give a fuck ( mind the explicit ) if I am honest about the methods . I love a good
presentation , I like a good premise, and no matter , the method corresponds to the most convenient
representation , which I create .
In fact , I really do not know , what is mentalism less support . Imagine , that , acknowledging I really do
not know , what it is and trying to capture the entire volume of the subject matter !
The reason , I do not know , what it is , is that , because the definition is controversial . Trying to give any
type of determination is another contentious issue , from which I refuse to even try to be a part of .
How do we even begin to consider , what is the support ?
This question is the one , that I am well thought of before , than to try to write this volume . The
effects in this volume , all are very close to , that ' I ' believe mentalism support smaller , to be .
I'm going to try to stick close ( just a little wondering , outside if completely necessary ), participant ,
not having to consider /, generates information from books , playing cards , index cards, and so on .
d . - Take the game notes , are mentioned in this volume briefly ( namely , in the essay ) to express
the point , but are not going to
used in the standard sense ( I promise , you'll understand , when you consider the essay ).
On the subject of the participant will be nothing involved in recording to record at any time and only
time , artist writes that - or , as a reference point ( to make the disclosure of the theater ).
The idea of using reverence point remains true throughout this volume as an example , to express my
point , if we are going to look at , ' which hand ' style routine in what , the participant simply would
imagine coin ( instead , to physically contain a coin ), I feel when it comes to discovery , it can be
boring and flat for the audience . The reason , it can not lead to the delight of the audience , is ,
that the only evidence , they have you , was correct , the participant response . If the reaction
member is flat , it is - then , what can be expected from their audience .
If the participant is physically contains a coin , the audience has the confirmation , when a contestant
opens their hand , and it gives them the time , in which they can respond ,
and the routine comes at a faster pace . I will however , when the subroutine coverage as it gives you
( the reader ) the choice to perform routine however , you wish and if you want to show the
information verbally , that is your prerogative . The only routine , you will not be able to show in this
volume orally , must be ' called the place ' for reasons , you understand , when you consider the
effect , the participant of the subroutine does not record NEVER anything , and so it turned it into this
volume .
Another specification , which I try to stick - that , that mentalism should also be everywhere , at
any time of mentalism . Impromptu , should not be more than a few established seconds .
Most importantly, the material should have a solid result . I want to ensure , that each of them , in the
subroutine has a solid result so , you do not worry about the concept of failure . I do not want to rely
on the probability or bold performance , to ensure , that the routine is performed .
These restrictions are limitations , I suppose , that mentalism support less . This does not make for a
second middle value , that my determination will fit your or someone - or even , as I honestly feel , that
the definition is subjective .
Anyway , are now , when we looked , in which we are going to stick to the specifications , I would like
to speak openly about some of the common gripes , which some rightly so ( the time ) had a less
support material .
One common gripe - then , that the process , to bring to a conclusion the effect is too long,
and often does not make sense .
These are terribly important factors in any routine . If the routine is getting to the point , it is too long
or too difficult for the participant , to follow , it was never ( even if you use a support ), going to be
good or interesting routine . Similarly , if the process does not make any sense at all then , for
participating / audience becomes glaringly obvious , that method should be put out there as there are
like a sore slider .
I personally believe , that , if the process seems unusual then , it's up to nothing more than a
background , which is not a good enough . If you are skilled in making the correct frame for the
method , in order to exist within it , very easy to make any process seem logical from the point of view
of the participant .
Mark the reader *** Warning Tangent !
I would like to elaborate on its point , using a simple analogy .
Since it is - a tangent here, simply , to better detail the point , I'm trying to express , I am going to use
an example , using the support - as it is - the subprogram type , we all at some point perform , and
therefore it is the most logical sense .
If I am asked , that you ( the reader ) responded in your head , which is a more impressive feat -
1. That , to ask , to a participant chosen playing card from a deck of cards and disclosure of
OR
2. That , to beg , to the participant thinking about playing cards and then disclosure
that .
What would your answer be ?
In all honesty, no answer is wrong - Let me explain .
Good invisibility know , how to draw the tongue , around a simple process , to structure it in the light ,
which makes it seem more impossible .
Let me explain , I personally believe , that it is easier to cause a playing card from a deck
mechanically , than it is psychologically ( if I'm at 100% honest ) way , how we make this mechanical
option seem more fair and more impossible than a psychological option ?
Let's pretend , that we are working with rosette participant ,
-
Artist : " Being completely honest , if I asked , that you think about your favorite playing card , the
probability , I could take an educated guess as to , what it is . For example, this could be a queen or
an ace foundations or number seven , as it has the tendency to be the favorite number of most
people .
The fairest way I can think of off of the top of my head , to get , you , to think of a playing card at
random should make you choose one of the deck , then put it back where - somewhere in the deck ,
which guarantees , that I would never touch the deck or cards . That way, even , you did not know , what
kind of card you are going to think, and it exclusively dictated by chance . "
- To a member it would seem a lot fairer than they thinking a playing card . Note , I give the Party
time , to think about , what could be their favorite map and if they really thought about the
queen , ace or number seven , as long as you take ( which are very often choose the cards ),
then , the point , you done is not even controversial . It adheres to the sense of the party , that
they consider logical and so if you were to ask them or the audience , a massive census would
consist in the fact , that the choice of cards from the deck is the fairest way for participants to
think about the map at random
The method is simple , if you just called a playing card and then said , that " I do not want to affect ,
deck , to look at your card put it in and rearrange the cards . Keep the card in front of you , I do
not need them ," a fully seemingly as fair as possible .
If we look at things on the back , and we wanted to make it seem , that psychologically compelling
playing card fairer than the mechanical compulsion card , it's as simple as a change in the script ,
Artist : " I want to be really honest from the off , every time , when I propose to assume that , that
someone - then people think , invented the most crazy decision . I want to ensure , that all - as fair
and a surcharge as much as possible . If I asked , that you physically have chosen playing card from
a deck , the skeptics would have left and just would argue , I used some form of sleight of hand , to
ensure , that you're done with a particular card .
There is really only one way , that I can think of , to ensure , that this is as true as possible . If you
imagine a deck of cards in the air and just imagined one playing card from a deck of the imaginary
time there is no way , that I , perhaps , using sleight of hand , because the card only exists in your mind .
"
It can be seen , as it would be in a structured way , which the participant thinks and if you ask the
participants after the expression of the above scenario , the participant will assume , that the fairest
way to choose a card is psychological , party
and the audience as a mass census would agree upon , which is , perhaps , not have been more true
.
The way you structure the process / paint process , is the most important for both , even the most
bizarre of the process may seem completely logical if structured properly . In fact , when you really
think about it , most of the things in mentalism do not make sense - support or not .
Here are just a few examples of things , that do not make sense to me -
Why does the participant record their thoughts ?
Why participant writes in bold block letters , when they write down a thought ?
Why should a participant think about the first word from a page in a book ?
Why should a participant choose a long word from a book ?
Why the participant chooses a word from the Book of - first ?
Why performer tearing paper party time sheet , they recorded that - something ?
Why performer should handle part of the map when , as a participant wrote that - something ?
If we really had super powers , why would we bend spoons with them ?
If we could predict that - anything , why would we have predicted , to which the number of participants
, scrolled to a game of dice , reversed ?
If we could buy the right for the future , why don't we use our opportunities to predict the lottery ?
Questions could go on and on and on , these are just a few .
Most of that , what we do as mentalists without context , can be questionable and ignore the
party and the natural logic of the audience .
Next press my point , if I asked you - that the connection ( without context ) contact code has a
playing card ?
The answer is absolutely none at all .
However , if you just say ,
Artist : " I want , that you think of a playing card , but I do not want , that you just think about the first
map , which appears in your head . I want to kill two birds with one stone .
One of the most private thoughts , we are hesitant , to share even those closest to us , it is a contact
code
to our bank . Of course , it would be rude of me to show your contact code , instead I want to , so that
you are mentally choose one figure and then the thought of playing card suit .
Then combine the two , to create a random playing card .
If I somehow manage to show a playing card , do you think , will prove it with a little more thought , I
could guess your contact list . "
Now there is a context .
In the code, and contact cards now have a connection , which did not exist before and logically
linked .
Not only , that , by doing that - something as simple as opening a playing card
( which is much easier than disclosing the contact code ) You meant that you could guess the member's
contact code , and you get additional credit for nothing more than adding a script proposal .
If you feel a part of mentalism support less and thought , that the process was odd or no sense ,
perhaps , that routine , which lack a logical process / context for the process , in order to exist within
- it did not have an odd process . Process with a bit more thought , perhaps , fully imelsmysl .
After these words - part of mentalism support smaller , floating around today fully , lacks logic and
the only doubt is bad and there is nothing , what can be done about it . On the other hand, it is -
just my opinion , and your opinion might be that , that some of the things , be shared in this volume
, no parity .
I hope , when you really think some of the ideas in this volume , you'll see , as I have tried to make the
process as little as possible at the same time being so logical as possible from the point of view of the
audience .
Another common gripe , which have many mentalists, - then , that so easily get the participant to
write down their thoughts, and a quick glance it .
This - 100% - the first true statement , but only because it is - a linear option is to obtain
information , not mean , that it should be the only option , open to the artist , to obtain , the
information said .
Sometimes the routine just does not warrant the need for participants to record it - it - sometimes
logically in terms of choreography , it's not good at all and less logical than the manifestation of the
approach is less support .
The book test, for example , where the point is , to ask , to anyone - the chosen word and then write it
? If they are going to spell a word one way or another , it would not make more sense to ask , to what
do people think about - or a word and write it ?
Only , because it is - a viable method , does not mean , that it is always meant , to be move to
the option , I would like to share a story and then finish my opinion about this apprehension .
This story takes place in the 'Davenports', which is based in London - the story , which I am sure , that
Daniel Young ( working at said establishment ) would be checked , whether the doubt someone - either
the authenticity of , what happened .
I was halfway through one of my visits to the two-year Davenports, when a gentleman , who looked like
a businessman , crawled into the vault . I was sustained about the glass of the counter , the speaker
Dan since when looking around storage businessman , which close the counter .
I pulled back and let the gentleman talk to Dan . Man confidently asks Dan , if he had any - any books
on anyone - that , writing that - then and
ways to secretly count it . He explained , that was interested in magic , he saw , that the mentalist did
it , and was so impressed by them , he wanted to learn everything about it .
Dan explained to the guy , to talk to me about all things related to mentalism . I continued to perform
multiple effects , which are required , the performer did not record things in the traditional sense ( as
the telephone contact , unlocked , opening zodiac sign , spider psychological force ), and the guys
response was insane .
After calming Man , on which meet my performance in the way , which I would never have expected . He
said , that that - something to the tune of " You should be on a different level guy , which we ordered in
the past three years . We have XX in logged and entertain at corporate events , and after seeing it I
thought several times , that he should be
in the state in one way or another , secretly see what , that someone - then wrote , and it's not
really telepathy . I have no explanation , what I just saw . Can I take your business card and call you
about a potential order for you instead of XX? It will be a refreshing change . "
I will not name the artist and all , I will say , then , that the perpetrator is known a mentalist, who I know
charges a huge amount of money for , what he is doing .
Did I bring the gentleman up to date on his proposal ?
No . I did however insist on several things in my reply to the gentleman . I just told him , that I am not on
a different level, and I closely follow the work of the XX and learned many things from him . I also
explained that to my knowledge there is no way to secretly consider it , that someone - then wrote ,
because , if there was a way to do it , it would have saved me a hell of a task .
I then gave in a little , as if to let him in on the secret and said a silent speech , " If I'm really honest ,
the reason , that we force people to write things , is that so , that information was the last thing , about
which they thought consciously , and this makes our lives so much easier to get someone - then emit it ,
what we need, even accidentally , than it does , if it is mixed among a series of other random thoughts
."
The guy looked like a serious impression , that he was admitted to a secret - we all know , was not really
a secret , but he is relieved his sense of logic , and he left the shop in order , he came to find ( without
giving it that - a ) .
Not only , that , the next time he looks XX, it re instills a sense of wonder , he felt , when he first
looked XX, perform .
It got me τηινκινγ ... a lot .
Many times I thought the debate from both camps ( traditional methodologists, and prop less
methodologists), each makes a great point, and when everything is reduced to its simplest form ,
I'm on the fence and trying to do something , I think , the most logical thing ( which many strong
supporters in both camps refuse to do )
- Take the items , which I love from each side of the fence and use them holding hands together .
That way I get the best of both worlds and the reason , it works , best of all , because every set of
methods other balances .
If you have a way to guess the information without using a stand warrant and are conveniently using
that methodology it is on one participant . Have a second participating record that - the bottom ,
which you could use as a forward order , to get the idea of a third party if the third party , used by
another process ( the choice of words in the book ).
And if any - any member of the audience assumes , that someone - it has to be written
that - something for the artist , to see it , their assumptions choke point , that you are displaying
information , which is never recorded the first participant .
One may wonder at this point , if I had to use one forward at all , why not just use it twice and show
all three details , well you are open , to do this , but with the option we have opened ourselves , if we
show the information support is less first orally , then we just destroyed the concept of the possibility
of forward - if the analytical type of really trying to support the track that - ever . Each method
works nicely to complement the other , and it is - the way , that ' I ' feel , that the support is less than
should be included in a set of works .
It can never be considered to be all and to end everything in the same way that no one should have a
traditional methodology .
Another grasp of the general question that is being revealed is - where can support be
used - is there less mentalism ?
Of course , this cannot have a place in the corporate or professional action of mentalism .
While I agree , that the support mentalism smaller hands better close-up scenarios , and in social
situations even better this does not mean for one
second , it can not be used in step / corporate set ( if it - much of mentalism and used correctly
).
Bob Cassidy confirms this view , which opens with a macro - effect of the nature of the support
less , which completely destroys the audience .
That , really , really pisses me off - to the point I feel sick , is some 'mentalists', will be happy to go out
and use ( in turn ) the electronic dice , electronic coin detector , an electronic device experience and
assert , that they - mentalist. Please , do not think , what I say , that the above-mentioned electronics
has no place in mentalism , in fact each is a brilliant self , and I strongly recommend , that each of them
, but the presence of the electronics to make your work for you , I'm sorry to say , does not You
mentalist.
They should be used wisely unsophisticated methods , combined with the actual mental acumen , to be
worthy of the former caused mentalism . In my opinion , this is the equivalent of "milli vanilli scandal ."
This is funny ; the same people are people , who complain , I never could talk to someone every time ,
when they cause a corporation and have , to listen to an automated speech , which offers them a
series of options .
We become lazy ; it seems , that most people do not want to study classics longer . Rarely do people
not in a hurry , to learn from the greats . Never forget , that we are standing on the shoulders of giants ,
and the classic - that - that , to be studied ( more so than the support is less than or e-mentalism ).
Skill is one thing , which have traditional mentalists, which slowly begins to fade , and I understand ,
why there is concern for the future of mentalism .
Mentalism should not be used in a professional context for this , to be relevant ; it can be used
socially and for fun as long as it is respected .
If any - or mentalist claims , that was the authority on the subject , because they perform at weddings ,
or on cruise ships it again - not always the case . Neither does it
make them a better mentalist than a mentalist who only wants to perform socially . I know mentalists in
both camps, and some of the best singers / mentalists, I know , those , who do not want to use their
gift for corporate , cruise ships or wedding settings .
I also by no means consider myself an authority , nor do I want to be considered an authority ;
this is too much responsibility .
Do I have a friend ( who will remain nameless ), who is a well respected agent / trainer and writer ( who
is also , it turns out , a mentalist), who has worked with many celebrities in film , television and theater ,
which has such an aversion to mentalists, is performed on cruise ships , he asserted , that , if he found
out , that I had to work on a cruise ship ( which I have no intention to - not because I believe , have
that - it is not so with the work on a cruise ship , I just do not like the idea of being captured on bo that
), it would no longer respect me as a mentalist.
His reasoning , I feel aligned with the width of the - of his pure respect for mentalism .
He believes , that it is - an art form , which should be respected as much , how much the music , TV
or theater, and if you agree with this feeling then , you should know that , what happens to the
agents , when they fall into despair .
( He filled me on the following information - I was blissfully uninformed of her ).
The agents on the decline start up , giving acting classes , then go to the theater , pantomime , local
production and when things become really scarce , they go and work the cruise ships at the last stop (
mind the pun )
His question - why is this - the last stop of the agent , when it is , it seems , one of the first stops
mentalist?
One way or another , what I take from all this is much simpler -
It never hurts to know the array of effects / principles from the areas of range of mentalism so , so
that you can be prepared for any given situation , professional or social .
There is nothing wrong with studying mentalism effects , which can be used in social productivity -
Even if you did perform professionally . There are no rules .
Finish the famous ***
Now I got rid of my rant , let's go back to the introduction to

volume of this month .
Just five years ago , while the number of support-type effects less existed the concept assumption ,
that the contact code or name without the party , writes that - either , were seen as an impossible
dream . I spent a few years ago
almost two years , being interviewed by mentalist's worldwide ( online and otherwise )
and slowly but surely I made people to believe , that it is absolutely possible - even if my original
method in order , to do so has been hit and miss , it had a ' method '. I am very open and honest , the
method was not the greatest method , it was very raw data and it was not even close to that , to be
infallible , but it worked for me , when I was comfortable , where and when to use it .
I share the original method in this volume , as I feel , that it serves as a good reminder of , how far
we've all come to success in this area of mentalism . Plus , I feel , that there is that - something
enchanting about the method , and I honestly still occasionally use it . In fact, this volume inspired me ;
I'm going to revisit the effect and update it .
I really hope , that these routines give you moments of fun and cause a feeling of excitement ,
when you run them - matter , the context in which you are performing .
Peter Turner 2017

Elegant Introduction
Note to the reader , *** it - one of the effects , which falls in the controversial category , of
which I spoke extensively in the introduction to this volume .
Do you have a menu - pale when it comes to choosing , you submit this effect . This effect can be
made as outlined in general terms ( the way , that I'm doing it ), or orally, which I personally would not
recommend for the reasons , you understand , when you consider the refusal routines .
I love this routine and I think , that the treatment of attention on that in particular is that , where I would
put my focus , because it gives you a beautiful , to be used with any subroutine , which has a
psychological nature .
Effect
Artist acquainted with the participant , after , to meet artist explains , that one can not simply assume
the thought of another , but must use intuition , if they hope to get remotely close to the private
thoughts of another creature .
Offering to explain , that he has in mind , the Executive says that - something on the map , folds it
and puts in the participant's hands for safe keeping .
He explains , what he thinks about the letter , he asks , to party to only one in their mind ( never
saying something - or loud ) tried to think about , which means it's letters , can be .
Artist then explains , what he thinks about the name , which starts with the letter , which he thought , but
a few seconds ago, and requests , to the participant thinking about the name , which appears in their
head , that starts with each letter , of which they thought .
Participant confirms , that they did it .
This is explained by the Executive , of possible participants , thinking of the same letter , are each
twenty-six , features that , they thought , that the same name as one in well over a thousand
of - of all names , which can be created from the letters of the alphabet .
Artist asks the participant , he calls , they thought - a participant said , that Daniel , performer points
to part of the map , which implies , that the participant has to open it .
The participant opens it and inside is the name Daniel !

Renouncement
First , what I begin to outline a routine , I think , that it is - the perfect display ' questionable
choreography '.
I 'll be honest right from the off , it is - then , as I introduce billet into play in the way , which I feel ,
original ( I say this is the least egotistical way possible ), I'm really proud of this simple alignment .
Note to the reader *** Please , read before the effect of skipping over it presupposes , that the billet
used in the subprogram as a movement to - you can display the information by word of mouth , but as I
stated in the introduction to this end , to do so would be a waste of a beautiful opportunity .
In order to effectively refine the necessary steps , to bring this effect to the implementation , let's run
with the name - This is , how big the effects of the support is less than is not infallible , but the result is
100%, which sounds contradictory , but bear with me , I promise , that all explain .
This method was inspired by , watching older restarts Derren Brown episodes and has its roots in the '
Brain Game Benecheka '.
The most important factor in this routine, remember the name of the participant - as it is - only
factor dictating that , what name you will write in the billet .
We pretend , that I meet a member named James .
Artist : " Hello my names Pete , your name ?"
Member : " James ."
Artist : " This is - a pleasure to meet you, James , I'm sure , you know what , that is , I'm doing , all , what
I want , that you know , then , that it is impossible to guess what , that someone - then think . Really
need to use intuition , to be able to be near somebodies private thoughts . I just want to prove it . "
Artist says that - something on the map , keeping it without first looking at the participant .
*** Mark the reader
It - it , where you need to look at the participant's name , to solve it , that you record - in this case , the
participant cause James . If I were asked to choose from within the letter name , I , probably , would go
for the letter ' M .' ( Which is a brain game -esque roots , I was talking about ). Then I would think of the
first plug-in name , which appears in my mind , which runs from
that letter - That would be ' Mark .'
MARK - then , I'd recorded in the billet .
This is the rule to follow - let's look at another example .
Let's pretend , that the party called Derek , the letter , which I will choose the inside of the name ,
would be the letter 'R' and the first plug-in name , which appears in my mind , would be ' Rob '.
This - the same logic , that you apply on your party , choose , the letter in their name do not think
of the first plug no fit for name of both sexes , which appears in your head , and make a note of it
.
Pay close attention to the next part of the script , as it is clever and deceptive .
After , you have written the name , part of the map ( billet ) is placed in the participant's hands for safe
keeping , and the address of the artist .
Artist : " James , we run a little and then quickly move on to that - something more ambitious . I think
about a certain letter of the alphabet , and I want , that you have tried to solve , what it is . The
moment I say , your brain immediately jump off , to some the letter you think , that this is , I do not
want , that you do , it's just looking at me .
I am going to be very honest , this is not the first letter of your name , this is another . Get a different
letter in the memory , and with any letter you have in mind , think of the first plug-in name , which pops
into your head name , which I think , not suitable for persons of both sexes , it categorically .
*** Mark the reader
Pay close attention to this paragraph of scripting -
Artist : " I'm going to be very honest , it is not the first letter of your name , it's - the other . Get a
different letter in the memory , and with any letter you have in mind , think of the first plug-in name ,
which appears in your head . The name , of which I think is not suitable for both sexes , it is
categorical . "
- This line is completed in a few seconds and is suggestive to

party , what is required , so they chose the letter in his name , I read a paragraph back a few
times , because it is very easy to miss the subtlety , reading . The great thing about this routine
is that you never actually tell me , what you want , that the party was thinking about the letter
in their name . This line performance is flying so quickly , that the audience will not hear it as
being what - or unfavorable
- scenarios that are realized in a moment again , completely hides it further .
Asking plug name , which is not suitable for persons of both sexes , limiting options for further
participant .
We will continue the routine after using this line .
The Contractor addresses the participant ,
Performer : " If you managed somehow to think of the same letter as me , which would be one in
twenty-six being that , you just chose a letter from the alphabet at random .
The chances of you thinking of the same name , I would be one in well over a thousand of - for all
of the different names , which can be created from those letters .
About what name did you think ? "
*** Mark the reader
It - it , where the name will hit or not , I think , that both results will be pleasantly surprising - first,
we will cover a hit, and then cut of Miss .
Member : " Mark ."
Artist : " Do you really use your intuition , to pick up on this (? Participating bows ), had this one - or
even , that it will be different .
If you ( Performer address of another element of the group ) must have been thinking about the
letter again that - it is just as obvious as the first letter in your name , but random letters and then
think about the name , which is pushed into your head , what would it be ? "
Member # 2: " Sarah ."
Performer : " You see a completely different one . It should have been you , and you need to enjoy
your intuition , did you say Mark right ?"
He points down on the part of the map and gesturing party , to open it .
The participant opens it , and it says Mark !

They successfully managed to comprehend the intuitive name .
Mark the reader ***
It - it , where the effect would have ended here - should hit behalf .
Look at the language in these paragraphs -
Artist : " Do you really use your intuition , to pick up on this (? Participating bows ), had this one - or
even , that it will be different ."
Note , I have noticed , that the party has hit on the name , therefore ,
I mentioned , they used their ' intuition '. This is important as it was then , when you read the turnover
( party , missing , you will see , it is different ). Another row , which really sells fact , it is by chance ,
Artist : " If you ( Performer address of another element of the group ) must have been thinking
about the letter again that - it is just as obvious as the first letter in your name , but random letters
and then think about the name , which is pushed into your head , what would it be ? "
I know , that it will hit , as soon as the participant expresses words of their choice , and so I want to
distance the participant and audience by the potential of the method , asking someone - then even
changing a few things ( subtly , of course ), asking the second participant , it helps the audience in the
wrong memory . Obviously , if the party does not hits then , I would not use that line . This is important ,
to remember , do not make if you hit , then do not ask the second participant .
Note , how this time I say - " not as obvious as the first letter in your name random letters " - which is
different from that , I asked the first participant ( only very slightly different ), BUT it is - then , the
audience will always remember me , asking the first participant .
Note , I also do not consider asking the name of the plug , when I ask the second participant . Again,
this helps sell fair subtlety fact , it's completely random . Names are going to be the worlds , apart of
being , that the second party will avoid purposefully go for the same letter as the first and as you
mentioned , that the name will be different , the second participant will make a conscious effort , to
make a different name .
Then move to the disclosure .
Mark the reader ***
Now let's look at the party , transmissive name , it can happen , but I think , that you will truly
appreciate Miss ( which is odd , to say ) for the reasons , you will understand in a moment . Finish the
famous ***
Artist : " What name are you thinking ."
Member of " Christopher "
Performer : " Did you just guess that name right ?"
- Notice , as I mentioned , that the participant , the name suggests , made no mention
intuition as I did , when they hit .
Member : Yes .
Artist : " Open the part of the map , and I think , that it proves my point ."
The participant opens part of the card .
Artist : " You see , you can not just assume whose - the private thoughts .
I would like to attempt this on the contrary , you have written the name down , and I will use
intuition , to try to pick up on the name . "
Mark the reader ***
You have now completely aligned the billets ! You are essentially going to attempt the same
experiment on the contrary , but you can just see the billet , to get the name , and therefore the
result of the subroutine is 100%!
Open to this sub-program takes less than 30 seconds , to come to a conclusion , if it hits , you have
incredible small miracle, and if it does not make you have a perfect alignment for the party , writes
that - that and having a valid alignment for orders at a stand .
It - it , why I classify this as a routine controversial support less . I hope , that you excuse the fact , that
I have included this effect in this volume , but I felt , it fits perfectly and is , to describe some of the
points in a finer sense , which I expressed in the introduction of this volume .
Not only , I think , that it is important to detail , how to use the support is less mentalism mentalism
combined with tradition . Please , remember this , if you when - or want to use the psychological
effect of - any kind , you can just use this method , and you never have to worry about routines not
be 100%
Guess what?
Mark the reader ***
I 'm going to share three changes , using the same method . I made my the upmost, to ensure , that it is
as optimized as possible , and I have a road , tested it extensively . When you know the technique , it
might seem really simple , but I promise you almost , you would not believe , how amazing it plays out .
In second gear through this volume, I also added a series of methods to further trick this simple
name prediction .
Effect
The contractor offers to predict just the thought of a name on behalf of its participant . Artist but does
not want to , that party was thinking about someone - something , they know , however, creates a
random name in their mind , which is the only rule , that the name should not be a fit for both sexes so ,
that he ( performer ) is not confused and thrown off than - it is just as inappropriate , as the man
caught on the floor , on which the party thinks .
In ten seconds after the party , thinking about the name , the contractor can show this .
Variety # 2
Artist asks , that the party was thinking about playing cards and name . The participant creates a
playing card and a random name .
The contractor is able to successfully withdraw both .

Variety # 3
Party requests , to three people at random generated name in their mind . Artist looks at these three
members and is then , what he believes , that the names .
Each participant confirms , that the perpetrator was correct !

Renouncement
I think , that you'll be pleasantly surprised , how simple it is . It was born off the back of not
wanting too much of the process , making the process , easy to understand for the participants
and so faithful as possible .
The best way to show you , how big it is , is that , to perform interactive -esque effect for you
the reader .
After a moment , when you think about the name , see . name in its simplest form , thus , Edward Ed
would not choose fit for both sexes the name , because it will confuse things . This is the only
agreement that should be followed when creating a name .
Clear your mind in this experiment , we use divination , to generate a random name .
Think about the two digits of your contact code pretty much on the air in front of you for example , if
you chose 9 and 8, you would see big 9 on the air , and big number 8, but for obvious reasons it
doesn’t go for the same numbers as I , it should be your own thoughts not mine . Imagine any two
numbers , which you think of as a two-digit number, and now instead , to see these figures in the air ,
because of their imagined the words written in the air as a ' ninety-eight . "
Now , when you're done , it's in your mind tends to the first letter in the word and think of the first
plug-in name , which appears in your mind , which starts with any letter , it - you , think . Again ,
please , do not go for the name of suitable and see for both sexes , it is the name in its simplest form
, peter would be Pete .
Did you get a random name in mind ?
If you think of someone - then , you know with the same name , it is only by chance , what do you
think about this man , really see . this name is at the forefront of your mind .
Think about the number of letters in that name -
Well there are a few people , reading this at the same time , I will try to suggest names , which do
you think - here goes
One of you is thinking of Frank or Fred ( you changed your mind between the two ); Can I see the name
Tom and Steve ?
I was close ??
If I was not close , you , probably , thought about Sean Sean /. I rarely get , those names come up and
I will explain the method , you will understand why .
Method , if you have not already figured , ' limits , without seeming restrictive '.
Let us look at the limitations ,
In - First , since no fit Unisex names are not used this idea , it drastically reduces the number of names ,
which can think participant . I delete the number 9, which means that all of the names , that begin with
N, also destroyed , and I delete the number 8, which means , that all the names , beginning ' with E',
also destroyed .
Let's look at the numbers and names , which could relate to those numbers , and then we'll look at ,
both immediately go to the same name ).
1 would be 'O' - ( does not apply , because there is no way , that member may choose the word '
one ' method , which we have issued a set )
2 and 3 - start with 'T' - ( After , like , destroying everything fit Unisex names we are left with Tim Tom /, I
always infer Tom , I do not mind to miss only a slight mispronunciation ), one thing really to pay attention
to is that , if you are in another country outside England and have names , more popular , than Tom then
changes the name , which you use in your submission for any name , which , probably , will think
participant . Take into account the fact , that I'm , that participant thought about the name , which
appears in their head , and again it drastically reduces the number of possibilities .
4 and 5 - Begin ' to F' - (Fred /, Frank is the only name , that I can think of ).
6 and 7 - Begin with 'S' - (Steve / Sean , I have found , that Steve hell of a lot , more consistent
than Sean , but it is good to take into account , that Sean could go ).
8 and 9 are deflected at the start of the subroutine , and so the names , to run with those letters , and
rejected . The reason , I have chosen those letters , to reject , is that , because there are a lot of
names , which could be created , using the letter 'N'. I dismissed the letter 'E', because the letter E has
mainly four letters in the name , and for an instant reduction process ( outlined later ), I chose this letter
, to eliminate also . You can decide to eliminate any numbers , that you feel , that should be eliminated
- I personally found , they are the best numbers , to reduce .
Note to the reader ***, these names work well here , if you are , Sean Sean / going longer , than Steve
just pumps up it instead of Steve . I can honestly say , I never did , so Sean approached . But talking to
my American friends, they said , that Sean could come more often than Steve .
the principle is still the same, and if you were under way - or worry about the participant , going for
that name in the performance , simply add this line in the script - " If for example you end up , they
thought about the name Sean , imagine it , you feel , that Sean might look like . for obvious reasons, I
now say , that Sean does not go for it . "
It rejects the name Shaun / Shaun of the list completely and stops any concerns about it being
a problem ( which I have never found , that is ).
The thing , which I found really interesting about , getting people to think about the name this way , is ,
it seems so random , and yet it is - a very restrictive attention board to a process , which I paint this
redness in productivity ( I do not make it out as fortunetelling ).
You'll notice , I asked ( by performing an effect on you the reader ) to think about the plug-in name .
There are ways to ensure , that the participant chooses plug name , which is not so transparent, and if
you really like , make your party chose either sex , I also cover this a little later also .
Just knowing the number of letters in the name you are either immediately down to one or the names .
If you have a name , what you find , it continues to pop up , simply add it to the list of names and use it
as part of your performance ( I know , it reiterated that point several times , but I really feel , that it is
important to note ).
Try to keep the formula as simple as possible , you will find , it's very safe , and it is stunning only , as a
quick routine is finished, and how big a reaction .
Now that we have the basic structure of the outlined subroutine . Let's put it all together and
damage it down part by part .
Total Performance / Failure Subtlety Changes

# 1 Performing to one member ( for a group or
one
on one )
Mark the reader ***
We assume , that the singer met with the participant .

Artist : " If I am asked , that you think about the name , the likelihood is
in fact , that you will think of someone - then , you know . I really do not mind you thinking of
someone - then , you know , the problem is , that the more skeptical people , watching , will always
assume , that I somehow found from Facebook or some other social platforms . "
- One thing , for which I am always fighting , is that , to make the most fair seeming to point in
performance time , that the method occurs . As mentioned in the introduction, I always try to
calm the logic of the participant . This framework allows me to implement the method , while
the presence of the participant agrees , that it is more true than just thinking about the name
.
Artist : " let's make a name in the strangest yet most fair way , that I can think of off the top of my
head , imagine , say ..., that the two numbers from your contact encode and see those numbers ,
because the two-digit number like 98, but for obvious reasons it’s not for those numbers , as I said
them . "
- What have we achieved , there must be eliminated 9 and 8 that

drastically reduces the number of names . Note , that it happens before , than I even mention
that - or the use of numbers , to generate the name , and therefore does not seem to suspect
or restrictive . Note , I ask , to party thinking of two numbers , it subtly makes the whole thing
seem a little more impossible , when in fact the second figure is little more than fluff , to make
the effect seem larger .
Participant could think of one number , and it will still work , or they could think of a random
number from that - then , such as ' life equation ' or any other force , which guarantees results
, and again it subtly would limit party small amount names . A massive , massive thing , which
makes this routine in flight is easy , is , to make it appear , that you invent the process of off
the top of your head . If you think , that you were a process in place , the process is no longer
a strange process , it is by accident , and the occasional well .
I think , that it is important at this point to talk about ' drawing something - something red ', if
you specify , that the process is going to be a strange and random , it does not seem out of
place , it becomes a natural part of the process . One rule , I always adhere to , is that , if
there is a defect routines , paint it red and trying to make a defect appear , it is - the fairest
part of the process . Using the contact code again , I feel a great solution , because we can
say that - something like , " let's take that - the more impossible than the name , let's say , two
numbers from your contact code ". Let's continue from the point of the participant who sees
two numbers on the air .
Artist : " Instead , to consider these numbers as digits , imagine seeing the number , the recorded
broadcast as words ."
Member : " Good ."
Artist : " In your mind tend to first letter ( Pause for one second ) and allow the first plug name , runs
with any letter , about which you think , now appear in your mind , but , please , do not go for fit for
Mixed persons floor behalf , I need you , to be dogmatic . "
- This is a simple set of instructions ; this paragraph is the most

an important paragraph of all , as this completely leads the participant to one of the limited
results .
Artist : " The name , you think now about you , can coincidentally know someone - then with the
same name , but you have reached this name by chance is not an option . Concentrate on your
behalf ."
- This is just to press the point , that the name was not achieved by chance selection .
Artist : " Imagine a name in its simplest form for me , so , for example, peter would be Pete ."
- This is - the only area , we need to apply any real work - Figuring
number of letters . I personally use the principle of CUPS Michael Murray , as I think , that it is -
the most elegant tool for the job . With permission from Michael Murray, here 's how we use his
principle of CUPs.
Artist : " Think about the exact number of letters in that name ."
- If the participant responds immediately , what did they think

the number of letters , this is a good bet , the name is 3 or 4 letters long , once you become
good in this method , you will be able to differentiate between 3 and 4 letters . If they struggle
a little , then the name is probably 5 letters long - This swing is in short a principle of the Cups .
This allows you to be able to know a rough amount of letters in one word . Please , refer to the
work of Michael , to see all his wonderful use for this principle .
Using the principle of Cups with a hovering operator will give you an instant amount of
letters .
Work out at first , if you think , that this - the letter 3/4 or letters 4/5, using the cups ,
and then the address of the participant for the sake of example , we will assume ,
that the participant thinks of 3 letters .
Artist : " It's three ... ( Pause )."
- Member says , that you are correct . Let's look at the same statement , if the member
thought about the four letters of the name .
Artist : " This is three ... ( pause ), do not four indicate the long right in letters ?"
- Note , I finished the operator at this time before the confirmation from the
participant stopped me in the middle of my statement .
These same views apply to 4/5 letter names as well .
Mark the reader ***
I often feel , that mentalism lacks impression Drama / force . Everything , it seems , flows very smoothly
, and the participant is easy to feel , that you know their thoughts before , than it is to arrive at the
opening - which is what - that , I believe , that we should strive to avoid .
As mentalists, we must predict others that are not predictable .
Let's assume for a moment , we watched the show as a city Holby or ER ( for those outside the UK , they
- TV shows about hospitals ), imagine a patient , brought to the hospital , which is in a critical condition
and needs
in operation and the surgeon , said " there is 100% - s chances of success " before , than the work
took place . After observing the surgery takes place is another story , where the doctor approves ,
that the patient must take the tablet , and the condition will be allowed for 24 hours . People ,
checking in and out of hospital with injuries easily as cuts or sore throat , I can guarantee , that the
show would become boring rather quickly .
In fact , thinking about it the most perfect show I can think of , to present my point , a hospital for
animals Based show . In 98% of time on such a show , which the animal is experiencing , but the
producers show , there is a way to edit the show so , that was the suspension of the impression , every
moment is a dynamic , by speech , complete the conversation between the ' professionals ' of the animal
each time , carefully created , to indicate the chance of failure on parts of veterinarians and suggests a
possible decline in the animal .
Only at the very end of the show , we understand the result of each special occasion . The creators of
the show there is a way to draw an image in our mind , which assumes , that the animal is or is going to
do it or not , and it keeps us trapped .
Then , when the animal does not make it , it immediately breaks for us the viewer - the reason for
this , then , not only because , the animal lost its
life ( which breaks in itself ), but because they affect us the sad story of the time we start to get
comfortable with the fact , that the animals survive . You have never
Have you noticed that the saddest broadcast of stories was during our most convenient viewing
moments ? - Which is no coincidence .
This kind of view should be applied to mentalism . This will add the impression of drama and impossibility
. If a participant is thinking , you know the number of letters in the name , which they think , and you
are on - apparently expect the number of letters with ease , it suggests , that you are somewhat close
to the suggestion the name , which they think .
If however , you are wrong to imagine the number of letters in the name , and you do not remotely
close , it will lead the participant to think , that you are completely off track and then when you do
show the name , you will break completely participant and audience for six . Of course , it is not
reduced and closed , I thought about the name , here it is - to be facial expressions , but you get my
point .
This routine does require , that you know , that the number of letters in the name leads to withdrawal
effects . Once you are fully satisfied with the principle of Cups , incorrectly refers to the number of
letters , to create the drama , the simple yet elegant principle , what I feel , if you rejected it , would
be a shame .
Because the abundance of explanations here are a few alternative methods to the possibility to bring
the number of letters , if you used Cups principle earlier in your performance , and for any reason you
do not want to use the same principle for fear of catching a party at you using it ( which should not
happen , but there is nothing wrong with acting for sure ).
One method looks for the appropriate number of digits , the method is simple , because it is - one in
three chances , to be correct , assuming - the name can only be a 3, 4 or 5 characters long .
Addressing the party and saying ,
Artist : " Okay, so , how many letters , I think , are in the name ... hmm , I would say 4 ( pause slightly ,
to expect a reaction ) or 5"
If a participant responds , nodding , or confirming any of them if you know the length of the name , if
not then you - immediately to a name ' Tom '. If a participant does not speak , when you deliver , the
above scenario just say ,
Performer : " I did not ask , do not give me a clue , I spoke out loud ."
This type of quick suggestions - that - then , I've always loved , a very simple yet elegant , and makes
sense of participating , they accidentally added a hint that - then , that they should not have .
Otherwise, it should reduce the number of letters through a proxy . It - it - it , that I like to use in the
performance , because it allows me to completely , not absent , either to know the exact number of
letters or reduce the number of characters ( or objects , words in general , you use it for ). We are
going to use the use of the second participant for this , to address the second participant -
Artist : " Dave , I would like , that you have tried to suggest the number of letters in the name , you
feel , it's three , four or five ?".
Dave : " Three ?"
If a participant , everyone says Dave , is correct , great credit taking on the fact , that you have chosen
Dave , who knows , he could have imagined . When Dave slips look at him and say , " You are too far from
absent , it only proves , how much of a feat it is to even guess the number of letters in the name ." The
most important thing to remember here is , to say , that " You are too far from absent ", because it
makes it seem , that you know the number of letters in the name .
You must listen carefully to , what they say Dave and the participant , if the assumption is
correct Dave moved to the disclosure .
If however he does not , which is more likely to happen , you are up to two numbers .
If he resolves four , you know , it - three or five letters long . If he resolves five , you know , it - three or
four letters long and if it resolves three , you know , what it is for or five letters long . It may seem like a
given to some , but the number of e-mails / messages , which I get every week , because I do not
describe things like this , completely ridiculous .
Let's look at each scenario one at a time .

Dave eliminates the three letters , leaving these four letters and five letter names . Keeping in mind Fred
, Frank and Steve remain
The interesting thing here is , that Frank Fred / is not worlds apart and can be connected together
- After the first elimination of Steve .
By far the easiest way to do this is using Derren's repetition of this trick . Address the member , "
Continue to speak the name to yourself
many times as Steve , Steve , Steve - If this - Steve , the participant must respond , and your job is done
. If however, a participant does not respond , you know , you up the last two names .
I’m just pushing the blame on the participant so far , displaying two names -
Artist : " stared at me , imagine saying this name, and it is suppose to talk to me ... well , I normally would
not consider it this hard . I think , that it - because you thought about a name, and then changed their
minds or were torn between two names anyway , that does not matter , I'm going to tell you two names ,
let's see , how close I get ... Fred or frank ? "
This should be a big hit , the one thing , which is very important , to remember here , is the moment , I
mention , that the party was thinking about the two names , I quickly bothering to tell them , they do
not think of two names , saying, " One way or another , that it does not matter " is quite fast and then
continue to speak so , that party has listened . The reason , it is - an interesting method , consists in the
fact , that the audience would assume , that it is the truth , and therefore assume , that you are not
only tied the name , of which the participant thinks only one , from which they changed their minds
also .
Once you have determined the number of letters per name , you immediately know the name or are up
to two names . Using any return process ( discussed many times in these volumes, you will quickly be up
to one ). The great thing about this effect is , that , as soon as you know the number of letters , you
pretty much know the name .
Variant # 2 The Psychological Variety of the Fiction

cards
It uses the same method , but instead , to ask , to party thinking of two numbers from their contact
code this time , it will be a playing card . The method , which you structure it , is completely up to you
as a performer , I only offer instructions that , I found the job nicely .
Artist : " One thing , that I am often asked - can I use my powers for low funds ? As long as the honest
answer is yes , I am not inclined to use it , what I do outside of the context , which you can see here .
I often try to think of a range of scenarios ; my skills might come in handy . One such arena
would be in a card game . Obviously , I have learned a few of you a few , so , I need it , to be
random , we are going to create fake gambling scenario in what , we
make a random playing card and the opponent . I think , that I will attempt this with you . "
Artist indicates a gentleman , followed by sitting a table .

Artist : " I want , that you think about the random playing card , because the obvious reason not to go
for a card , you feel , that everyone else could . See . Card in the air to a large extent ... as many as
nine of the foundations ."
- It gives you a first opportunity for a hit , if they went to
nine out of a miracle of basics ! If not you use this card as an example .
Artist : " obviously , now I have mentioned , that the number nine is not going to do , but you have a
map in mind ? Good . Now imagine a name card recorded
in the air as the words . In your mind tend to the first letter in the word and think of the first plug-
in name , which appears in your head , but , please , do not go for the name of either sex
Suitable for individuals , it must be categorically . "
- Of course , it reduces us to about the same number of outlined names

in the first change .
Artist : " You have now created a random playing card and a random opponent for me , to try and
play the game of psychological warfare with ."
- When applying , to the participant thinking about the number of letters in the name of
and knowing the exact amount, you will now be up to every second value when it comes
to playing cards and you will know the name !
Fishing for a lawsuit is easy and outlines in the psychological playing cards
volume I of these rows .
One thing to remember is , that certain values are chosen more than others -
I found this
3 is selected more so than 2.
4 is chosen more so than 5.
7 is chosen more so than 6 ( if it is not a magician , you perform to then 6 more , so than 7).
You can assume the name and playing card in one .
If you place an invisible deck to the table before the effect , you have to any situation , which arises . If
you are not able to call the card out loud
any reason ( if you're off by one, and so on . d .), you always have the classic methodology , relying
as perfect for any situation . It again expresses the point , I have tried to weave throughout the entire
volume , the traditional methodology and the methodology of the support is less so well hand in hand
.
Variety # 3
Kind of hoya
This change is very , very similar to an interactive effect , apart from which I performed on you at the
beginning of this effect , with the audience .
If you perform this effect to three participants at the same time , you can just say ,
Artist : " Keep a straight face and do not give anything . Even if I say your exact idea , please , do not
react .
Close your eyes for me and don't forget to keep the poker surface . I feel ( point to one of the party
) outright or Fred , ( specify who - what else ), Tom , and ( enter the last party ), Steve .
Open your eyes to me , only yes or no - did I get your thought ? "
First participant : " Yes ."
Artist : " Your ?"
Second participant : " Yes ."
Artist : " And yours ?"
Third participant : " Yes ."
- Pointing to the participants ( while their eyes are closed ) the audience will assume , that you intend
to separate the thoughts of each person . The participants , of course , can not see , it never knows ,
that you have indicated to them . When they confirm , that you hit on the name , this - all proof , which
requires audience . If one party says , do not ask them , what he calls , they think about and say , " Two
of the three , not bad ."
This is a simple change , but so powerful , imagine sitting at a table and pinning three thoughts on
names without a quick look at a billets or using one in advance !
Extra Thoughts
If you would like to apply that same logic to all names , it is necessary to compile a list of names of
bush , that crop up most frequently in your area .
Again, I would recommend eliminating names of both sexes . Rosette names are much more
difficult to get hit from than plug-in names .
2/3 could be Tina or Teresa
4/5 could be Fiona or Faye
6/7 could be Sarah or Stacy
These are names that I can think of from the top of my head . Being honest , I have always performed
this routine , using a plug-in names . I really experimented with rosette names , but this was not true ,
and I quickly returned to using plug-in names .
I do however think of a clever way to make the participant to tell you a person's gender , which
they think , never knowing , what they have .
Performance would have to be a little longer , this adds a small amount of process to the subroutine ,
but it is interesting and therefore does not detract from work efficiency .
Artist : " I do not know , do you know this , but whose - the characteristics , and traits can completely
lead you to someone's - the name . Do not believe me ? How many people are named Herbert Percy or
you know , that it is cold ?
Jokes aside , man , that you think , they are high or small ?
Let the participating answer .
What color hair ?
Let the participating answer .
What are his hobbies ?

This is an answer that is important ; a person’s hobby will usually lead you completely
to the man’s floor ! When you get an answer participant , you will find , that they are too obvious ,
which should lead you to the floor .
As an additional thought, you can also get additional hits from the characteristics .
I found , that , if you want to add features to the routine phase , completing it and asking ,
that the party was thinking about the plug name , usual description , the selected participants -
Tall
Dark hair ( brown and black t . D .)
Medium build
The way to get closer to this is simple ,

Artist : " I want , that you think about this man , in a moment you are going to make some of the
characteristics of this man ."
Write down the ' high ' word and save it to you directly ,
Artist : " Is this person tall or small ?"
If a participant says high , then flip it over and show the party , you were correct . Write down the
words ' black hair ' reason , I use the dark hair , it is , it covers a range of colors .
Artist : " What colored hair does this person have ?"
Member : Brown .
Again, turn your piece of paper , to show , that you hit . Record the word 'Medium'
Artist : " Is this person a thin , heavy set or carrier ?"
Member : " Carrier "
If you felt especially bold , then you could record a word sport and ask for a person’s hobby and if
it hits BOOM ! Miracle .
If none of the above hit ( which may be the case ) simply says ,
Artist : " I'm going to make some notes , as you go along "
Just write it , that the participant , and then finish , saying ,
Artist : " You said , that man was XX, and their hair color was XX and their hobbies XX, there is only
one name , which I know now - XX"
It wraps a routine manner , which causes the participant to believe , that the description , which they
gave you , you somehow brought the idea of the name !
The inverse of the principle of limitation
This method is not new in his views or original to me , but I feel , that it is a little studied and the way ,
which I have used it , absolutely new .
I personally believe , that this method is going to open a lot of doors , when we fully grasp its potential
and examine it a little more .
To briefly outline the concept , we will use a quick example , aimed at the English reader ( this
method does not rely on the English language ), but this brief example using British coins .
Do not miss it - even if you're not from England , it is - the method of scheme and explains the
method completely even I , you do not know the coins .
Read the following passage and follow it forward , if you're British , are manipulated .
" Imagine to reach his pocket and take out a coin and see the coin , as if it was four times its own size ,
so , if it was a coin of one pound , it would now be like a huge coin per pound increased size . Since
obvious reasons do not go for that coin . in fact, let's make it more casual , if a coin , that you think ,
even the name or change the value of an odd , if it is - an odd change in value even in this case , do
you think of completely brand new oh coin . did you do that ? "
Coin , to which should now think , is the coin of 5 pence . It may be 1 penny , but this is unlikely to be the
number of times a word , each was mentioned in the previous paragraph .
The reason this works , is that , if you look at the coin - 1 point 2 points 5 points 10 points 20 points 50
points £ 1, £ 2
There is only 1 point 5 points and 1 £, which are odd value coins ,
I mention a pound coin ( refer to it as coin of one pound , thus ,
I mention that often ), and so the pound deviates and the word , each repeatedly pushes people
away from the penny . Also statistically 5 points are more likely to be selected .
The method must find a category which - or , what have categorical groups within it , where one
category is much larger than the other .
That way , when the audience think about what - the random similarity , lies in the fact , that they will
choose from a larger group .
If the participant has a change of mind , they should ( based on probability alone ) end up in a
smaller group , and then you can limit further ,
to guarantee almost ( I use the word almost , since nothing is set in stone ), a definitive
result .
Here is one idea , I set up the use of this principle , I feel ( WARNING COMMENT CLICHÉS ) is worth the
price of this entire volume . I DESTROYED with this , and it went right into my completion set .
Phantom Dictionary Test Effect

Artist asks , to the audience to create a dictionary in their mind , think of a word to the dictionary
from within , and then be able to quickly get the word out !
Renouncement
As noted earlier, the method for this should be incredibly obvious , but still fun and very devious . I will
briefly outline one view and then will corrupt the view down part by part .
We assume , that there are three members ( this can be done one-on-one ).
Artist : " I want to imagine between the four of us , we are going to create an imaginary dictionary , (
artist's views on the first participant ), what color is the dictionary ?"
Participant number one : Blue .

Contractor addresses participating number two ,
Artist : " What is the name of this blue dictionary ?"
Participant number two : The Book of Words .
Artist : " Perfect , finally ( he looks to the participating number three ), you have the most important
job of all . In the dictionary of words separated az, therefore , I , your head thinking about the first
letter , which appears in your mind .
In fact , I do not want you to check out , thinking , I put pressure on you in one way or another, and
that the letter , about which you think , is the letter , which all would have chosen , so let's go with
the opposite of , what you are thinking right now .
If you are thinking about changing the vowel to consonant , if - compatible change to the vowel
so , that you are on an entirely new letter .
Got one ? "
Participating Number Three : Yes .
Artist : " Think of a word , which is longer than 5/6 of letters long , which can be visualized as an image
, that - that , which suggests physical touch , which starts with any letter , you go ... If you can not think
of anything Starts with the letter , remain within either category , you are in and change the letter . "
Member : " I did it ."
Artist : " Imagine word written in the air , see . Letters , thoroughly explained , and suggested to consider
this item as picture , stretched in the air ."
Artist : " Word , do you think about the Elephant ?"
Member : " Yes !"
Even reading the subroutine to be seen , as this routine is reached . The method is simple , there are
21 consonants and only 5 vowels - If a participant had to choose a letter at random , they are much
more likely to choose a consonant .
If there is a participating change to the vowel , if they are consonant

and harmonious , if they are on a vowel , they should think about the vowel - Based on
probability , and I even covered , packed , they are not .
Let's look at the words , which can be seen as a picture

( which the participant may assume to be physically touching ) created from off the back of the
vowels .
A - Aircraft - ( I have rarely had it , fit )
E - Elephant
O - Splitter - ( I have rarely had it , fit )
I - ( Cannot think of one )
U - Umbrella
' Elephant ' is the most likely choice of all these words , to occur .
One key proposal , to remember , " think of the word , which is more durable than the letter 5/6, which
starts with the letter . The only rule , should be able to visualize the thing , that you think of as an image
, and it should be that - then , which suggests physical touch . If you are struggling to make it to the
letter , you go , stay within the same category, and change the letters .
This ensures , that , if a participant is struggling with a vowel , they move to another , the speed , in
which the participant creates a word , should give you a good indication as it was then , when I
realized that string . I created a series
outs ( mechanical outs) that you can use this , I will outline in this effect . But first, let's take a look at
the finer details in this effect .
Do you have one in four chance of one only guesses , to get the thing , that the party is thinking
about law and by using any method , or returns process ( littered through these volumes ), should
quickly be able to negate the one word with ease .
I know the issue , burning on your mind - what , if the participant chooses to begin with a vowel ? If
you were worried about this being the case , that you could always use this as a forecast type effect as
opposed to a telepathy effect . You could , if you were addicted , create a series of outs ( multiple
outs) if you so demanded .
When you ask , that party called the word out loud , if a participant says the word out loud , which
starts with a consonant , then just say - good and let's do it again , to prove , like worlds apart both
words , we will go with any word , which you finish then .
Possible participants , choosing two vowels in a row , are ultra-thin . I think , even , that the process is
a little more durable , it completely destroys a routine method, and makes it impossible to keep track
.
Mark the reader ***
I revisit this effect ( during my second transfer of this volume ) from this point ; I found an incredibly
simple yet elegant way to fulfill this effect on the fly . I would skip the introduction for this change ,
where the participant creates an imaginary dictionary and a title for the said dictionary .
To this effect, we are going to use our mobile phone as an electronic billet ( it will make sense in a
moment ) to write down our forecast - I 100% sure , that it will work on any smartphone
-
Go to the notes app and write
" choose - Umbrella "
If you wanted the right thing , go to the newsletter and make a text message on the phone , such
as ' Spider ' from the power of the spider ( outlined in general
terms of psychological led forces ) or a playing card , which can easily cause .
Switch back to the umbrella note .
Then open the Internet and look for the word elephant and open the image of the elephant . Close
each application - on iPhone, you double-tap the return button
and swipe the app , it will shut it down . When the application is reopened , it will immediately
open to that page .
Then , when you are with your participant , open the application notes and put them in the name of the
first , than " choose - Umbrella ", thus , it now says "the XX-th, choose - Umbrella ". Then close the
application again . You now have two multiple outs.
Address of the participant ,
Artist : " I think , this is going to be important later ."
Lock the phone .
Follow the vocabulary test , when it comes to opening words , start to look for the color , which I
would recommend to bring , " I can feel it , there is really white / is greyish ?" If a participant says yes
- followed with " you , I go to the airplane ?" if a participant says , " no " ask them , what they have
gone , it has to be an elephant - If it is a large , simply unlock the phone ( without removing it off
the table ). Ask , that they clicked on the internet and saw that , what you expected , that they would
go to .
If a participant says , they went to an umbrella , just unlock your phone

and ask them , that they clicked on application notes , and you'll get a hit .
If a participant does not speak the color problem , then ask , if they went to the splitter , if a
participant says , " no " ask them , for what they really were - They are , perhaps , will say , "
Umbrella " - if the participant goes to an umbrella , just ask , so that they open the phone and
open the notes application , and the effect will come to a strong conclusion .
What happens , if a participant does not go for any of the words ?
Just say , that " I think , what it says I do , that I should know about you ," and then move to the right and
to do , to a participant has opened distribution means the application , and it will be a hit . This ensures
, that you have a solid routine , which comes to a firm conclusion very quickly .
Phone is a natural way to transmit information on the fly, and is another way to reduce the number of
supports , which we have to move around on our personalities , to quickly move to anywhere anytime
mentalism routine .
This routine is simple and elegant, and fun , to perform , because it is quick and there is little , to
remember .
The only thing , left the scheme , is a process , which I represent routine ( if I want to run a quick
change of this effect ). There is a small lie , used to introduce for this purpose , but a lie , I'm sure ,
that 99% of people will not pick up on .
Artist : " The English language is one of the fastest growing languages in the world , today there are
close to half a million words , and more than 40,000 of those words are words , which can be visualized
as the formation of images . Each of those words created from the 26 letters in the alphabet .
Letters az performed simultaneously through a dictionary and I'm going to do , that you create a full ,
randomly . "
This is - the way , which I imagine the effect , with participants creating an imaginary dictionary ,
then , that I use , if I decide to , I want to shake up routine is very little .
As you can see , it is - a simple , but beautiful routine and routine is , I feel , is going to attract the
most attention of all this volume , because it is - a neat effect .
To challenge the method , which you think , think about ways , that you could use a ' Reverse limitation
principle ' think of the category , which you might use , to create a miracle .
Name a place
Mark the reader ***
This is my version of the classic , this is of course a completely new kind of Bruce Bernstein / ' Bob
Cassidy Place Subroutine '.
In the past, I explored this wonderful graph in many different ways , and I found this way to be the
most linear - the most linear , being accepted as an effective part of mentalism .
There is NOTHING wrong with the original ' Name / Place ' subroutine at all and if you don't know the
original , I urge you to check it out - you won't be disappointed .
Effect
One participant is asked to think of a place , and after thinking the place instructed , they can change
their mind - even after , as a performer conveys what , what he feels , that the party will go for . Artist
continues , to write down , that puts , he feels , that the party is going to end on , after , they changed
their minds , and throws the paper in the glass , in order to isolate the forecast . Artist gives the
participant five seconds , to make a decision .
Let's assume , that the party says - ' Paraguay '.
The second participant is asked to think of the name - artist writes his prediction and discards the
piece of paper in the glass ( again , in order to isolate the forecast ) and then asks the
participant to , on behalf of what he thought ,
Let's assume , he says Franck .
Tips artist paper from the glass on the table and gestures for one of the party , to open the
sheets of paper .
It is shown , that the singer recorded ' Paraguay ' and ' Frank '!
Renouncement
It is simple and elegant , the routine uses several traditional methodologies - I really hope , that you
appreciate the fineness / twisting , that I have applied these methodologies .
Mark the reader ***

I thought , that briefly mention that - that , I feel , has a massive importance . Often , people allow
themselves liberties , expressing , what's my job . I never said , that the classics should be scattered ,
ignored or not followed by .
On the contrary consider as many of the classical texts , as far as possible they are - my driving force .
I constantly visit and revisit the classics .
I have over the years has thought a lot of subtleties , which is an excellent complement to those ,
who stood in front of me . I fully stand on the shoulders of giants , who come in front of me .
If I performed a theatrical performance , I , probably , would choose to use the changes Cassidy , as it
looks more in terms of space , used , to bring the effect to its conclusion . Also , if you have not seen
the ' Bob elimination principle ' using a billet order, you missed one of the most incredible principles in
mentalism ( which is being explored a bit ).
Close-up but I wanted to create a similar routine , that did not have that entire section of the process
- I would like , to seem routine , very transmits , and still ensure a solid result .
The only installation required is to take a billet ( or piece of paper ) and write to Fred through the
center of it and then put a string through it - thus , it is deleted , but Fred still see . Take a second billet
and place it on top of the billet , thus , it remains hidden , when you make a billet .
As an additional idea ( it does not need to ) take a sharpie and purified nail tip so , that it has dried
hard ( representing it useless as a feather ), cut a notch in the lid tricksters and then placed it tricksters
in your pocket next to your work sharper . The reason for the reduction in the cover notch is so , so
only one touch you can differentiate gimmicked tricksters tricksters from working .
*** Mark the reader
If you do not consider the introduction , I urge you to - well , to be able to understand my definition
mentalism ' support -less'. In short , in this routine, party, nothing will ever write , billets are just in the
game so , that the audience can see , that we were correct in our views as a ' landmark '.
You are all set .
This routine is best played out in social situations . Let's draw a scene ; at the performer are a
table with two participants and a group of spectators . The performer is located in the middle of
these two participants . Empty the glass on the table and you are set to begin .
For the sake of keeping it on track and linear as possible , we suppose , that the singer met with the
participants .
The performer turns to the participant alone , puts his hand in the participating shoulder of the
number and examines their eyes and addresses them -
Artist : " I want , that you begin to change your mind through the place for me , thinking about the
countries , and the city continues to change many times ."
The Contractor takes off the shoulder arm of the participating number one turns to the
participating number two and places his hand on the shoulder of the participating number two ,
addressing them -
I want , that you have gone through the alphabet in your mind , to run with A and then B, C, D, but do
not nod forward , back to the top of A, B ... "
Artist allows the participant to move, and then says participating number one , " stop everywhere ,
where you " and then turns to a participating number two " and you stop anywhere , where you are ."
He then addresses participating number one ,
Artist : " Think of the first plug-in name , which appears in your mind , runs with any letter , you go is
now ."
Participant confirms , that they have done so .
It - it , where the first part of the method plays a role . The first participant really has the freedom to
choose any place , the second participant however does not have the freedom to choose a name , this
is power . Strength is more mechanical than psychological / brain . The real beauty is that , like the
force is deflected , to instill in the mind of the party , they also had a truly free choice . When you turn
to a participating number one place a hand on their shoulder ( use the hand , which is closest to the
participant ). Tell them to change their minds many times , as you say this touch on their shoulder very
softly a couple of times . Turn to the participating number two , put a hand on their shoulder ( using the
arm , closest to him ), and ask , so they began to go through the alphabet , runs with ( as you say, touch
the shoulder member , then B again dealing with a shoulder member, and then C shoulder branch
member . Then, do not say anything except touch the participant's shoulder ( sticking with the same
rhythm ) and touch again ( staying in rhythm ), saying , " Do not nod or giving it - or , let's go back to
the top ( tap ), B ( touch ) " touch , where you would say C, then tap for D, this
where you look away and continue to deal with , when you get to the F, look at the party and
say " Stop ! Everywhere , where you and think of first
plug-in name , which appears in your head . " The names of more than , probably , going to be Fred and
Frank . I know that , that ( the reader ) to think , that , because the participants , followed by your touch
, they think , that you know the letter , about which they think ( which is true ), but we are going to dispel
it .
A look at the two party ( party , think of the name ), addresses them ,
Artist : " Concentrate on the name for me , imagine being recorded on the air . Is this a rather long
name right for about 7 or eight letters ?"
Participant number two : "Erm, no ."
Artist : " Wasn't that Lawrence ?"
Participant number two : no .
Artist : " well , I will return to you ."
It , plays an important role in the method , it completely destroys the idea , that you know the letter .
Why would you get it so wrong in terms of the length of the name and the actual letter , which begins
with the name ? The answer - that , that , if you knew the letter , you would not have expressed such a
radical suggestion . This implicitly assumes indirectly , that you do not know the letter . We - now alone
- forward .
Artist turns to the participating number one ( party , think of a place )
Artist : " We run from the place , I think , now that I know , that you are good enough to convey the
place and make you change your mind as many times , as you like , and I think , that I can predict ,
where you end up . Do not teshite yourself no illusion , it's not deja vu in the sense , that it happened ,
before we re-experience it . it's - vu-ja-de in the sense , I just buy the right to have , what will happen
before , it happens . "
The contractor writes down the place and folds part of the card and throws part of the card into the
glass .
Artist : " I'll give you five seconds , to change your mind and no matter , what you say out loud at the
end of the five seconds , the place , to which we go . Five ... Four ... Three ... Two ... the performer holds
one finger and gestures for the participant . "
Member : Paraguay .
There are several things , which occur here , I hope , that you appreciate the beauty of a small
subtleties in action . When you go , to record the place , remove the billet , which you have prepared (
with Fred , struck off on it )
and write to Frank above or below the appointment . Fold the billet order and throw it in the glass .
Obviously , we use one - forward . I've always hated the moment , using one - forward , that the
perpetrator will ask , to party , " said all your mind " or , " thus , it is impossible to change his mind , what
do you think ?" I would like to receive information in a way , that was logical, yet impossible . When
writing your one - forward, first ( in this case the name ) and then asking , to the participant changed
his mind and everywhere , where the party ends after , like , five seconds is the idea , that he / she has
to settle in . This forces the participant to say their thoughts aloud the fairest way possible , which is
important for this sub-program , to come to the net conclusion . Party to change its mind adds a level
of impossibility to all effects , as you write your prediction before , than even the party decided to
settle on the idea on their own . We are at the point in the effect , that the participant said aloud their
thoughts .
The contractor turns to the participating number one ,
Artist : " Think of this name , suppose to say it to me . Suppose to shout this name at me
."
The performer takes out his pen and wrote the name , he crosses out the name and looks at the
participant ,
Artist : " Imagine telling me the name , look at me in the head , the name is saying ."
The artist wrote the name down , collapses part of the card and discards it in the glass .
In fact performer removes a pen , that does not work , says Fred
( Very open way , so that people can follow a pen ) on the part of the map ( there is nothing written ,
because the pen does not work . Artist looks uncertain and then put a string through it , he wrote ( again
, billet is still empty ).
A pen enters a pocket and an inverted billet order . It - it , where there is a moment of mimicry , in
which the artist makes it seem , that he fights, and then deletes the working pen and write down the
place that the two participating number , say it out loud . Think about it for a few seconds , when
both billet open a moment later , and they see the name of Fred , recorded it with a cross through it ,
they would not have amused myself no illusions in his mind that the last billet , recorded on . If you do
not have an additional cheater or do not want to use a gimmicked cheater , you can still use this trick
, pretending to write to Fred on the second billet order ,
cleaning your nail through the billet ( so , that participant can hear the sounds of a fountain to be
recorded ), and then also pretending to hold a cross through it ( again clean your nails ). This will
achieve the same effect , but a little more boldly . Once you have done this , write down any place the
participant has chosen . Now the billeting order only recorded a place on it . Fold the billet order and
throw it in the glass .
Artist : " Staying in the same letter, I'm going to give you 5 seconds , to change the name of the 5 ... 4
... 3 ... 2 ...." ( Artist gestures to party , to say the name aloud ).
Participating Number One : Frank .

Artist : " From what have you changed ?"
Participant number one : Fred .
Artist : " Take the glass , I don’t want to touch it and provide clues to the paper ."
One of the participants does as instructed . Sheets of paper to open and prove , that the
perpetrator was correct !
Mark the reader ***
As long as you have synchronized touch correctly , and you are working with a party , which has an
average level of intelligence ( do not attempt this
with whom - then , who can not pay attention or listen to ), then , you have it - then , it is easy and
largely error free .
The only other name , which I can think of , which is a plug-in and start with the F, is Francis ,
and Frank is a short version of Francis , so , you are guaranteed hits .
Note , I say party to change their mind , remaining in the same letter so many times , as they like .
If they end up at Frank and Fred changed from perfect , if it is on the contrary , it is - still a hit .
A simple unprepared question

This is - another way to get access to the letter , of which the participant thinks without them really
knowing , you know the letter - which makes it perfect for this sub-style name space . I have in the
past , expressed , that knowledge is the first letter of the name and the rough length significantly
enhances the capabilities behalf assumptions .
I’m not for one second sentence , so that you always know the exact name that the participant is
thinking about , BUT even if you are close , the audience will always feel this as a hit . The way you are
limiting the participant ( without seeming restrictive , of course ), helps determine the outcome of the
entire process , which the party chooses a name , and it will greatly improve your chances . I found a
simple string ones , which " do not go to the floor of either the name fit for people , because I need
you , to be as categorical and clear in your mind as much as possible ." This eliminates the node names .
I have also found , that the audience does not really care and focus on the fact , that you are
restrictive , if you say , " Think of the first plug-in name , which appears in your mind ."
If you are worried about such things , please refer to the " Assumption name Billet less " in this volume ,
as there are some interesting ways to structure a definitive selection of sex in that , in order to appear
very clean and open ( non-limiting ) as possible .
Anyway, I felt it fair , to get rid of it before , which I addressed this nice little trick , because getting a
feel for , to pick up on behalf important when using this principle .
Mark the reader ***
I will outline this trick , stays true to the above ' naming places ' routine .
Turn to the participant You want to think about the place and address them ,
Artist : " I would like , that you think about a random place for me , it can be a country or city .
Continue to change your mind many times ."
Then turn to the first participant ,
Artist : " I want , that you begin to go through the letters of the alphabet as a , AB C, run , when I click
your fingers ."
Artist snaps his fingers , then returned to the participant , who thinks about the place , waits a few
seconds and then said ,
Artist : " stop anywhere , where you are now ."
Then, turning to the man , passes through the letters of the alphabet ,
Artist : " You stop anywhere , where you are now . In fact, the letter is not it , that imposing think of the
first plug-in name , which appears in your mind , runs with any letter , you go right now ."
Mark the reader ***
This line is a small line , which is sealed by the contract , which it flies completely . "

Small cheeky essay / effect
One of the points , which I have done in a small amount of depth in the introduction to
this amount - then , how / when I feel mentalism ' support -less', must be used . If you repeatedly use
a - a method in mentalism is completely water down the food , hospitality and the efficiency of , what
you are doing . For example , when I wrote , " Dare to be Bold " ( which contained a large ' double
reality '), I did not understand , how to write or express any opinion , which I would like to share in a way ,
that was understandable . Therefore, I feel , that the essence of the book has been completely lost , and
I feel today ( who knows , what I know now ), that the book is not only badly written , but not in such
detail , as it should be . To fix this , I plan to ( in the future ), rewrite the book and send it to any free ,
who is interested in reading a book .
It was very difficult for the reader to understand , by reading the book , within which I will use only one
of the ideas during each performance ( if at all ), and it made it seem , that all , what I did , it was a
double reality , Based , which is 100% not a case and never was . I also share a few ideas , which used
the ' time stooging' - What remembering , perhaps , was not the best idea as the people once again ,
taken , I used the time stooging as a method , which is not the case . If I had to create an analogy ( I'm
sorry , I , perhaps , is not expressed , at this time ), when the boat you hope never to use life vests , but
you feel much better / safer knowledge , that they are there , and outlining me those methods are the
same . I hope never to have to use them , but if I made it to the top pageant , and that - that is not so
, as it is necessary , I will use the method , if I have to ensure , that the show goes by , I expect , that
this will go . I lost one element opinions audiences me , than the audience .
I guess the point , I'm trying to express , although in a roundabout way that , that it should be used
in moderation at the right time and the right
place , IF it should be used at all . I have many , many ideas , which I have used in the past , which I no
longer use , BUT when the time arises , I feel , that the older routine more relevant , than routine
planning to execute you , could bet , that I use more the old routine , without blinking an eye .
If you decide , that you are going to use all of the ideas in this volume in turn then , I feel , that you
are doing yourself a disservice , confident studying them and change them , to fit your character , but
PLEASE mix and match the material to the traditional methodology .
In fact, here's a story from last night , which fully expresses my point .
I worked alongside another hypnotist in the corporate event staff at the hotel called ' heaths ', I
reached the venue , to find , the hotel is placed a large marquis ( for any English speakers giant tent )
stage and was not 100 guests ( not a massive amount ), and they like the connection , and mix and
a theatrical performance .
The hypnotist asked , if I make the connection, and mixed , and he would make a theatrical performance
- I very rarely bring concerts in working condition , because I'm constantly swamped with balancing
consultation , recording , production company and my social life ( which is the area , I spend the least
amount of time ). They asked me 3 months ago , if I give a concert , and I said , that would be ( even
though , I forgot , that said , I will ), I , probably , was asked , while my mind was on what - something else
, one way or another as a man of my word ( as best , I can ), and not a desire to bring a friend , I moved
some things and went to the concert .
I literally took nothing but a sharpie and business cards with me .
I noticed the roulette wheel at the time of your connection , and mix , and I thought , it would be a
great idea to have some fun , use this , since the support acts in my completion . I managed to steal a
series of passcodes from the notes to someone - the phone and after a tape measure performance , I
quickly moved to the man asking , telephone which it was to assume , that we have created a random
web - site ( which I asked for , so that other viewers have appointed name ) . I asked her , what her
username will be , to which she replied , and then I said - " In your mind , create a password , the one ,
which you can easily remember and perhaps one , which you have used before for authenticity or if you
really you dare to use that , you really would have used . " She thought, and changed her mind , I
handed billet other spectators and asked , that she recorded the name of a friend from school , whom
she had not seen for a long time ). Coming back
audience , think about the password , which I'm beginning to catch , what I feel and it was fast and
powerful discovery .
I then returned to the name , looked billet and began to show the name , which point acid women ,
which reversed , hit by her way through , a small group that , I was interested . She actually interrupted
the performance and said , “ What's going on , what , does he suggest ?” to which her friend , pacified
her and , told her to look . I briefly explained , that her friend thought of the name and that I was going
to try to show it , and her answer was very typical response from someone - or , which is skeptical , "
How will we know , you have that right ?" I just said , that she wrote the name down and had , contain it ,
and she could see at the end , if I was correct or not . I thought at that moment , to establish that , in
advance using a woman so , that she was busy and will not be interrupted during the performance time ,
but quickly changed my mind , because I thought , that was not going to entertain essential chapter ,
and I did not want to confuse things and break in the relationship , which I created with the participants ,
who are very directed to me , in order to successfully execute .
The subroutine came to the conclusion , the group was damn absent , and I made my final statements
and moved on . Later in the evening a woman , it seemed , followed me around the room , close to the
servo , what I was doing , I do not know , why she did it , she did ( the hell with these types of people ,
who does ?) I decided to talk to her for a moment moving from the bar to the marquise .
She told me , she was skeptical, and that she did not think , that it was possible to do half of the things ,
that she had seen , what I've done . To which I replied , that its previous statement was an oxymoron ,
and it should be possible , as it was the witness of this . I asked her , why she thought , it was not
possible , and her response was , that she understands , that I can influence people , but she does not
understand , how could I suggest a name , of which one - the only thought and that maybe somehow I
learned about people through Facebook, knowing , that I came today .
Her reply was perfect , I made a deal with her , that , if I could suggest a name , she thought , she did
not know , that was going to think about it , she admits , that sometimes there are things , we just do not
understand , and we must accept this . I produced pen and billets and when I pulled them out , she said ,
" If I write it down , you could see me , though " - I knew at that point , if she wrote it down , then she
would not hand me billet , and it would burn my hands , so , I simply replied , " it is for me , to write down
my thoughts , you are just going to think about the name so , that it existed only in your head ." I then
went on to use ' Guess who ' from within this volume .
She went for the ' Frank '.
I , of course , tied fact , she thought about Frank , and she completely lost her s ** t.
The following statement , which she did , was a complete 180 from that , what assumptions it has made
previously , " You , should be , born this opportunity ." Then she apologized for the character previously
and left , telling anyone , anyone who will listen , that I just showed her .
Use different propagation methods, and do not assume , that the support is less than or mentalism
mentalism are interactive and any future , who tells you , that this is , is completely wrong . I feel so
severely about this , a GOOD prop subroutine should be less consistent with the rest of your subroutines
naturally and not seem forced into your group . It should be used , to balance the other methods , and
that is why we use a variety of methods instead of one .
I have in the past , these methods and principles , which we use as tools in the toolbar . It does not
hurt to have an array of principles and techniques so , that in any given situation, you have been
prepared .
Here is an example , how to use the traditional way of support to the Segway in support - less
performance easily .
This routine takes some confidence , to perform , as the first phase needs you , to purposefully
stop working .
It is located on the border of , what I would consider mentalism support less technically , the name
indicates , completely support smaller , but the preparation for it is not .
Take the deck of the game of cards and on several of the cards the signatures are placed , but
make them italic thus , they are none , I read capable . Take a map with a large space on the ( as two
of the clubs ) and record Steve quickly , but in a way , it is quite readable .
Perform routine , in which the participant signs a playing card , casually mentioning , that every time the
effect performed , map , obviously , would be different . But as the structure the script - " Obviously , if
you would choose a different card , you have signed a different map . The reason for you , to sign it is
so , so you can immediately identify the fact , that it is - your card ." This can be any effect ,
in which there is a mental flash , or it could be that - something like ' getting to know you ' reading
based effect .
Let that routine to come to a conclusion , and then without missing a beat is controlled by two of the
clubs to the top and force it to the participant , speaking
" For me to be able to assume , that this card remembers every detail of the map . The seeds , the
number of which - either on the map , which makes it stand out , if it was a queen , it could be grown
on the pattern or color ."
This , of course , guarantees , that the participant fully explores a playing card, and takes note of
the name .
The card is returned to the deck , and the goal is , to assume a playing card . Do not rush to asking ,
to the participant thinking about color , suit replay process, and then calls the wrong color map so ,
that you stopped working completely . Look astonished , saying , that " This is not a basis ?" Again
getting another sonorous no . Offer to return to the map later .
Casually say , that " Some people see the pictures better than others , of some people and some of the
images . It is all about finding the best in the design , how and when you have a connection , that - or
maybe ". Turn to another viewer and execute another routine ( one that is fast and straightforward to
punch ).
Return party , which thinks of a playing card . " Because I'm not sure , if you think of the memory card
or the number of the map , let's ignore the card for a second . I need to know , how do you think ,
think of random images for me ... There is still nothing , do not think of a name for me . " Wait for a
few seconds and then declare , that " It's better ! Be honest , is it - the name ,
that you knew , or did you change your mind ? Because it's important , that any name , which you've
been thinking , constantly registers "
Let the member tell you .
If the participant was of the same name then , it will be Stephen . If they changed their minds , simply
advise them to go back to the very first name , they when - ever knew , and concentrate on it .
You are now able to show the name and completely fool the participant and the audience at the same
time .
I would advise you to speak ( after , you have shown the name ), " I feel , that you are much better
in the design of words and names , than you - the number and picture . Let's ignore the map , I do
not think , that I was going to be able to assume this , if I'm honest . "
It is simply , but effectively demonstrates , as it is sometimes good to stop working . Completely

rejecting the card you give a name for himself as a free information , and I think , that we have
to agree , that the name is much more impressive than the card .
If you do decide to , they wanted to show a playing card , which

I will not personally recommend it , I would advise having a double card in the deck ( without a
signature ). Ask , to party , to think about the map - simulate read the claim and the fact , it is - the
number , runs through the deck and pulls up , keep it to yourself , muttering , that " I think , I know , why
are you thinking about right now ." Participants suggested , you're looking at two of the clubs with the
name Steve , the audience only guess , what you are doing untrained comment .
Ask the participants , who thought about the map , to close their eyes and show everyone a copy of the
unsigned . Then ask , that the party has opened their eyes and explained the group is on the number
three , to say aloud a playing card .
You count to three , everyone says the same card and standard finishes at a tremendous pace .
The beauty of this graduation is , the participant assumes , that you have shown over the map , saying, '
Steve ' about him , and so it cleans itself - why would , party when - or ought to mention it now , if you
have all seen it .
There is no such thing as a stupid question
This is - a simple , but effective change in the very popular " question and answer " type effect .
One thing , I always liked about Q and type routines , it is to force the introduction of , to enter in
response to questions . I'm going to skip the description , that the question and answers , that routine is
like , since header pretty much sums it up .
I have over the years gathered as a massive amount of Q + routines, each of them having a quality ,
which I really liked , but everyone is not fitting my personal style , thus created my own .
Before jumping into the structure of the Q and I think , that it is important to talk about the biggest
method - plausibility .
If the audience does not believe , that can be considered their inner most thoughts , they , of course ,
are not going to entertain you with answering questions about their private life . In fact, it is patronizing
and could be seen as offensive , if you are not likely to occur .
What makes the performer believable - well, in all honesty, there is nobody , the answer , but one of
the main factors is ' synchronization '. Never racing , to move to the Q and subroutine type , expected ,
until a connection has been established between you and your party .
A great time - after , how you ask , " is it - a gift , you were born with , or is it - learned talent ?"
That type of audience is perfect for the question and answers the type subroutine . I would recommend
to perform a small group , behind which sit the table 4-10 and if you can create an environment for the
table , such as candles and so on . etc. ,. Candles and low light - that - that , that can play on a large
scale in your favor and is a nod to the great men .
There is a big responsibility , answering the specific questions of people , the last thing , you want to
do , give the answer , that a. It affects whose - that life , and b. violates your moral obligations as a
performer .
NEVER talk about people , who passed , never try to speak with the dead and will never interfere with
anyone - that to achieve their goals .
Let me give you a quick example , if someone - it wants to know for example , if they get a higher
education , and you say - " yes ", the participant could try to stop their work , because they feel , that it
is in the bag . As a performer, you are responsible to come down from the middle of the road , saying
that - something like , " I feel , that it is possible to achieve something - or , what you put your mind , you
do not have to remove the eye ball yet . Stay consistent to the end , and you definitely graduate . "
This - the same as saying yes , guaranteeing , that the participant knows , that they should try , if
they are to successfully execute .
If there is when - or question , do you feel , too deep , to answer , just honest , participants say , you
could not answer the question , because you do not qualify , to answer such questions .
If you think Q and as a reception on the other hand , it is - probably , not routine for you .
Now that I have it all out of the way , let's start from the beginning . I often feel , that the process
, which most artists opens the question and answers , introduces a subroutine , called and is like
the effect of the mind . I did not want it , I want , that people want to ask questions and get
excited , to feel , that they are going to respond .
I wanted to do it all , at the same time getting free hits .
To answer the first question , I'm just saying the participants to answer the question , they never asked
me .
- This is , probably , does not make sense , which so allow me to give it context .
Once , as a subroutine concluded , refer to the party and say ,
Artist : " One last thing , you always said to ourselves that , if you ever - ever met someone - something ,
which could enter in sync with your thoughts and feelings , you will ask them a specific question - if I
had to give advice to you is now , knowing , what I know about you now , that would be okay ? "
Member , obviously , so to say .
Note the way , which I have argued , that was the question , that they ask ( even if it is not ), offering
advice , the participant should not be able to resist the hearing , it must be said . I would advise you to
open this subroutine to a female participant , as I noticed , that they are more open respond to such
operators .
Once , as a participant said , that they would like to , who follow this line .
Artist : " Hopefully , it would respond to any question , you , perhaps , have to ask me at the same
time ."
- As you can see , that this line is simple and requires , that you will
answering the question as well .
Contractor : " I feel with you at the moment , you have a conflict between your head and your
foundation .
It - it - it , that each of us from time to time go through , I know , that you are at a crossroads , where
you must decide - always trust your base . It is necessary to address the situation head on and talk to
the man said , if you want to see the resolution . I hope , that it makes sense to you . "
- Let's look at , what it could mean , well, not every situation , you could
when - or imagine a situation , where your head tells you to do one thing , your base other .
With a party , wanting to believe in something , you say , that they find relevant to this line and
the situation , you are talking about . You say party is not run from their problems more and
agreement with them head on , you have not defined again , what the problem is . Who say
Again you never determined . This could be related to love , work related , connected each ,
connected family , contain associated assistant and again because the participant finds
relevance in a situation , they will also need to know , who the other person is in a situation . This
first person is just used , to open the routine and help people understand the nature of this type
of subroutine . It works so unanimously and it was what - then , I have used on their own for a
long time , as soon as I answered the question the man , everyone else , it seemed , was a
question to ask me . What is the best way to open Q and a routine ?
Introduction -
Artist : " Each of us sat at the table , has a range of things , going on in our lives right now , that we
can not ourselves always know the answer . These questions tend to get into the career categories ,
money , love , romance or health . I would like , that you all thought about the question , you would like
to reply to and then to think about how , in what category your question falls .
I'm never going to show Your question someone - or more , if you do not want me to answer , I give
you , you completely understand , but again, everything else does not matter knowledge , it is ,
probably , will not make sense . I cannot contact the dead or give advice on diseases .
- This is a really smart way to open Q and the routine , as it calls

participant in one of the fields ( love , career , money ). Note , as I mention love and romance ,
which are technically the same thing , and I also mention health , but later delete that category
certifies people , do not ask questions about the disease . This means , that there are only really
3 categories , which you can ask questions from within . Moreover , it forces member in the field ,
you logically have apologized for that , to give ambiguous answers , that no one will understand !
Obviously , the goal is , to be certain , answering questions as possible , but it buys us drift , to be
specific , which requires you to use your own intuition , and that - that - that , I can not go into
details , as this relies on you .
Additional phase ( Question is free )
This phase is the phase , you will love , or you hate ,

I use it , I feel it is time , because it allows people to know , that they should not feel stupid , if they
have a question to ask , and at the same time it makes them feel , that they may be open to the group
. Group address ,
Artist : " first , before we start , is there anyone , who does not object to the group , knowing their
question as , to all of the table was an example , what types of questions can be asked and how to
answer those questions ."
- No matter , that question is asked , you must play the role of a seer to answer . Imagine , that you
- the whole psychic knowledge , play the role of omniscient psychic . One thing , which I found
really , makes these types of routines , should be pretty philosophical , not to such an extent ,
that you bear with her . I have found , that the reading of " meme " on the Internet really helps
in a large scale , responding to questions . They make it seem , that you have a well-rounded
view of the world and at the same time if a meme, or a history of interest , it makes your
involvement . This gives you the excuse to share one story ( as long as that story cramps with the
question , this
ask ). I urge , you check out the inspirational stories / memes , based around love , money, or
career . I personally have never seen , no one recommends to investigate this type of
information . One thing unanimously understand is , to change the meme so , to base the
message is still there all the same , it is not recognizable in its original form . As a testament to
that , how severely they work perfect type of response , how many times you have seen , that
people share similar memes on social media ? For this first question, I would keep the answer
short and simple , here are a few answers to the questions ( as examples ).
Member : " I'm going to change the place of residence , the following will be contained , I move to be
better than the one , in which I am now ?"
Artist : " You know the answer in all honesty . I feel , that you have always been the kind of person , who
was strong in the creation of the house , the house . You can zoom in or out , and you do it just right . I
think , the real question is , really are you ready for an all new adventure , which will bring the
movement ? This is - the question , only you know the answer to . "
- Note , I played a better half of the participants . I put

participant in a double bind , in which they can not deny the fact , what you are saying . What
woman does not want to admit , that they make a house a home ? Note also , as I also picked up
a way , that politicians respond to questions and apply it here . I ended up asking a participant
to issue , it reflects the attention away from the answer , which you have given the participants'
questions . I also gave the party that - then , to think about in a positive light , which is more
than a question of a house .
It - it , where things start to get really devious , we are going to use the method , known as the " poll
the audience ', to get information .
Artist : " I'm going to run this regularly , satisfied with this people for a table , thinking about love or
romance , if I come back to you later ?"
As you say , it is , to the backend script begins to nod . This will make people , thinking about love nod
back at you - ultimately leading to knowledge , who thinks about love for the table . Sync two of these
people and remember them for later .
Are you ready to start , point to the participant , at which sit the table and use the sign of the
zodiac prediction , are outlined in the ' chapter ' mentalism Zodiac . This will give you instant
communication with the participant , address them -
Artist : " I feel with you , that you were torn , between which a question to ask , these questions are
closely related, even though , they still seem to be on . The answer to your question is the time . Be
really careful , where you want to invest your time , as this is one of the only things in life , you will
never come back "
It - it , which I would recommend using your own intuition , to continue to answer the question . I
understand , that not everyone knows , how to do it , so , you can finish the answer to the question , if
you really need as a so -
Artist : " A new feature , which recently opened up to you , I feel , is positive , as long as you are
constantly - promotion . If this feature is destroying things , you have at the moment is the continuation
of in your life , think twice before , than you take it ."
- Again this is a very ' Barnum Operator ' -esque. You could quite easily get away ( which is a term ,
which I hate ) with operators by giving to Barnum around the table . I did it , experimenting ,
and I realized fairly quickly , that it works, and if people will actually believe you then , it will
be above and beyond that , just to get away from the water . But I prefer to have a routine ,
grow and become more and more , as we go along . The following two phases are simple , yet a
thing of beauty and inspired by the psychomotery subroutine of Jerome Finley . The ' Invisible
Spectator ' trick long preceded my own work and Jerome's work and is a little show up or used
as a tool .
Group address ,
Artist : " There is someone - that of the table , who recently said that - that someone - then , they were
sorry to say - As I promised at the launch , I will never break the tie privacy , but I would like to share a
story , which reminds us , that all the words of the effect may have on the people around us .
At the parent she had a son , who had a very bad mood . He would often do or say some extremely
harmful things , after which he seemed truly repentant . No matter , what made the parent of , she
could not bring a child element to think first , what he responded .
One day , my dishes , she had a great idea . She called her son into a room with her and handed him
a plate . “ Throw that plate to the ground, ” she informed the young man . After some support young
people did , as he was told . As expected, the plate burst into several parts .
" Now let's glue this plate back "
Parental said member , thus , they worked for a long enough time and had a plate , looking close
enough to
its original state , although several cracks and microcircuits were still visible . " Now tell me , you're
sorry to the plate ," said the parent element . Child element looked confused , but he saw , that he
was the parent element was serious . Thus , he said his apology .
" Is the plate now good as new ?" the parent asked . Child element shook his head no ,
because , although she returned together , it will never look the same .
Parent element went on to explain , that is what we are doing to the basics of our favorite , when we
are angry . Although the pain can be corrected , and an apology can be given , the attitude will
never be able to be put back together the same again .
My friend , share a story, and each time , when I think , I could say that - something , which I regret , that
I remember the story . "
- It's - the first way , we are going to use the ' invisible participant ' trick - who - is behind the
table , based on probability , likely , say that - then , they do not mean anything to
anyone - that , as we always do it . This expressive element of the story adds dynamism to
performance while appealing to the audience of the watch . We're going to use this principle
on - to another in a few moments . Before that, we have an additional phase , that DO use a
billet ( I actually use this phase ), and in the spirit , to be open, even though , it is - the head of
mentalism support smaller , I hope , that you excuse me this one , honestly it's worth it and that -
then , I have never seen , that no one is doing in Q and above - it is completely binds all and is
fully compliant in accordance with the mixing of more old and new , to create miracles .
Do you have two options - one can use the real time of a billet , or the two can be used billet in
the work before the show , I will outline both of the methods .
In - First , we will deal work billet real time .
Artist : " It is clear there are people behind the table , which are still on the fence as to whether , if I do
say questions , which are asked . There is only really one way , I can prove , what really matters to raise .
I would like , that you have thought about the question, Sir , where the question is more interesting , than
the answer and the answer is ambiguous . Let me give you an example , a question might be - when I
lasted , cuts my grass ? The answer would be Friday . Take a few seconds and write down the question and
answer here , we
we can use this as evidence later "
- There will be a small amount of time loss here while the participant
records on a billeting order . Fill the time , let the rest of the group , together, use a small
part of what , who you are with them , are sharing a bit about your background . Too often
do we find out that things are about our members and they will never know things about us .
For the group , to be receptive and open they should feel , that you are open . It
will also destroy the loss of time .
Use any method to switch the order so wait , that you had Billet party and considered him . I am not
going to outline the method here , as I want to stay as close to this volume subject as possible .
Artist : " There is only one way , which I can prove , that really raised on the issues . I want , that you
sir gave me an ambiguous answer to the question , which you think . I propose to tell you a question
!"
- When you fix a question , it strengthens the mind in the participant’s mind.
You , should be , raised in previous issues . This is - the best way, without exception , to
ensure , that the audience feels , you really pick up on the issues , I feel , that this phase is
important , to tie it all , but I understand , that we all have different ways to present things .
Variety before the show
It is simply , yet makes all the action seem consistent ( looks , that support less begins to run ). To set up
the exhibition just approaching someone - then ( before then , to sit at the table ) and explain , what
you want , to write down a question with an ambiguous answer ( the same scenario , outlined above ,
using the real-time work order wait a minute ). A quick look at the billet order and then addresses the
participant ,
Artist : " Do you think , that can remember the question , which you recorded later ?"
They will say yes - I never did , so that no one said no .
Artist : " Well, well, we don’t need it then ."

Break the billet into pieces so , that there was nothing for the party , to produce for the table
later . Address of the participant ,
Artist : " Later on, I'm going to ask you to answer the question , I want , you give me an answer to the
question , which you have written down . I will try to suggest a question . So later I will ask the answer ,
make sure , that does not tell me a question ."
- It is - all , there is to it . Do not be tempted to get to this phase

in the routine , to say , " I asked , that you recorded that - the first , we were
for the table ", it is also possible to make real time of a billet , if you're going to feel
guilty about the use of the work before the exhibition .
It - it , where we are moving in the use of " invisible audience " trick in ( which , in my opinion ) a very
smart way . Remember folks , who nodded straight at the beginning of the subroutine of love / romance
?
We are going to select those two members .
Artist : " I want , that all felt for the table , they have a chance to ask their questions . All focused on
your questions , and I'll pick up on that , who concentrates the hardest ."
Make it seem , that you concentrate and then choose two people , who were nodding , when you
were interviewed at the launch .
Artist : " I'm going to answer both of your questions right away , I'm going to try to be really specific ,
but obviously to protect your privacy , which I'm never going to show , what question belongs to that
person .
Half the battle , output category , please , do not react in anyway .

I feel , that one of you thinks about the business , and the other thinks about love or romance .
Give me a yes , if I'm on the right track . "
“ Both think of love like that, of course , they are both going to say yes .” The audience
is now believed , that each party thinks about the issues , relating to the various
categories .
Artist : " Again, do not forget to keep a straight face and not give that - either . Let me deal with a
person , think of love / romance first . I feel , that it is - a very delicate situation , if I was to give you
an answer , I honestly I feel , that would play with your good will in this situation , and I could not live
with that on my conscience . I will say however , that I feel , that you already know the answer .
Since I feel bad about the short answer , I gave the question of love , which allows me to give a more
detailed and specific answer to a person who thinks about business . "
- You can just say , you do not want none of the participants
think about the business , meaning , it can be so in the form of specific as possible . Here is an
example , you might say .
Artist : " I feel , that the person to think about the business there is a very stubborn personality type .
Thus , I would say , probably , Taurus or Aries , I am going to bet on the Taurus . Whatever anyone thinks
about business , suggest to tell me the date , You were born ...
Well, I'm not clear , I would say the 26 th or the 28 th April . Promotion , for which you had hoped to
work , I think , that you're going to be nice
surprised , but you just have to continue to do that , what you do only one last Great Depression . "
The Contractor addresses one of the participants ,
Artist : " If you understand , that the answer to your question gives me yes ."
Member : yes .
The Contractor addresses the second participant ,
Artist : " If you understand , that the answer to your question gives me yes ."
Member : Yes .
- The table is 100% believe , that you picked up on the zodiac sign and date of birth , based on
your zodiac sign suggesting previous participant . Small convincers, working simultaneously
throughout this routine completely , helping to build the whole thing believable .
The performer then looks at the whole group and addresses them ,
Artist : " I have answered so many questions , as I can yet , I want to leave the band with the idea , more
than one person at this table felt recently down a bit , and I want to remind you all alone , how
important do you , asking you a question , that requires no response . I'm not going to second-guess the
answers to this question , as I feel , that the answer should be absolutely private .
Question , what would you have given , to spend five minutes with someone - then , who is not here is
now ? To hug them and tell them , you love them only once more .
For me it would be my Grandfather , I never got a chance to say goodbye . He became ill with cancer
and was taken to the theater and of the - of my differences with the other
an element from the family I never got a chance to say goodbye . I received a text message twelve
minutes after that , he entered the theater saying , ' ripped up , he was dead . "
I would give it - or , to spend five minutes with him , to get my chance to tell him , how much of
the inspiration he was , and get , to say my goodbye .
There's a reason , I asked this question , when you are feeling down , just remember , there is
someone - something there , which would have given it - any and all within five minutes of your time
. Every time , when you feel , down remember , that , you - time , it is important , and you - the
inspiration . "
- It's - the last statement , made in the Q and A, the history of my
grandfather at the end of a 100% - the second truth . Please , if you want to share this
change of feeling the last bit about my grandfather's true self-feeling . I think , that this
is - the best way to end this type of routines
where all the worksheet , feels better than it was then , when they arrived . Try to use your own intuition
, by performing this routine, and get a feel for the issues , what you feel , that the participant might
think . If you answer , what question do you feel , that the party is thinking condemned ( should really
believe it ), the participant will be also . Recorded this sub seem long and drawn out , in the
performance , which it really is not . I've had people , literally standing in line for me , to answer
questions after , as the show ended in the past .
RRV - Pablo Amira

History
I love creative challenges , and the ability to know , that simple idea propless way has been and is one
of them for a long time . I believe , that it is - one of my best creations in propless area . With a simple ,
bold method you will be able to know the first letter of the word and thought out to start your psychic
journey , ending , ( we hope ), with the opening of your thoughts participant . I love this type of
uncertainty , makes me alive during a performance that is different from reading a stand order, for
example , in which I clearly see a thought , and the opening process is a pure action . In here you will
know , but not very , therefore , the realistic aspect and the ability to use your psychological and
intuitive capacities will be huge .
External Reality
During a chance meeting, they ask a strange sentence . A mysterious man asks , his companion
imagined any fruit in his hand . Then through the process of visualization and some time of
empathic connection , the thought of fruits is shown !
Inner Reality
RRV stands for " Real Number Take Off Vision " because, in a sense , you are . Transmission is a beautiful
theme , to learn in life , especially as a performer . We can improve our lives , understanding the best
way to subtle aspects of effective communication , and performance, we can create a difference
between someone - then , who can not connect with it
participant / audience and success in creating entertainment and human connections , using
Mentalism .
You know , we both Mentalist has a tendency to make the all-too-rational and put too much attention to
it , what we say , write a script , language samples rather than thin , but the fundamental aspects of the
action / theater , applied in our context , is not verbal communication and an excellent method , which
we can use , to arrive at the results of our demands . RRV is not based on words in order to receive
information , it is more likely to observe in a secret way the imaginative process from your member .
Mentalism at its roots the establishment of reality with our minds , and it is - then , what we are doing .
Through your appropriate scenario , but most importantly , your effective communication and
observation, you will really know your member thought .
The basic way you ask , to visualize a number of participant

" Alphabet cards flash - memory " from AZ, and you just ask to deal with them one by one , until it is
able to visualize the first letter of his thoughts about the word . From there, you will know some very
important information , which will lead you through other methods , to arrive at the final revelation . This
observation of actions will be secret , of course . Only the “ gypsy peek ” can be used for the propless
approach .
As you can see , I press the tip of the fingers to the right eye , showing a little of the obvious pressure
used , but in reality I looked with my left eye . If you need direct vision , you can use the gap between
your ring and your little finger .
You can also use a blindfold , though it always takes propless aspect , not that , that is an important
and sometimes he gives the performance a visual dramatic element .
So , as you can tell , with RRV can show any type of information , such as fruits , vegetables ,
beverages , names , signs of the zodiac , musical bands , and so on . d . Just adjust depending on your
performance context , participating and personal preference .
So , at first I act much , and I take that - something invisible from his pocket . Let us say , then , that we
use the theme ' favorite fruit . " Thus , you ask , to a participant in the vacuum visualized their favorite
fruit and thought that image , but also a word in his mind . Then out of my other pocket I take the "
invisible alphabet cards flash - memory ," and I explain important aspects . They are in order from AZ,
and the instruction must deal one card after another, "AB X ... " so on on the table , until it reaches
the first letter of his thought about the word, and only look at the letter in bold , print, and nothing to
say after this , until you connect to them ( in here , you can make an allusion to the fact , that you
drive with the conscious / rational buts and then unconscious / irrational mind , begging , so that he
visualized the fruits in your empty hand )
Thus , now the participant starts the dealing procedure in his hand , passing the cards to the bottom or
in the table , as you want . At this point you will use the " gypsy quick look " to create implication , that
you do not look . You can use the indirect line , such as : " Make it , while I focus here in an attempt to
connect to your samples mind ." Do not claim directly , you will not see , because it will put too much
attention to that fact .
So your participating stars are in contact and you just settle with him !
As you secretly watching , you know , when he stops , so knowing the first letter of the word .
Remember , that in your instructions you clearly said , that just do not look up to you an invisible map "
to connect with him ." After a few seconds , which stops my party , I say :
" I begin to understand your pattern of mind . Now lets , do that - something else ( Now , you can
actually close both eyes , take your hand away from the Roma peek , to gesticulate in an instant , thus
indirectly indicating , that both eyes were closed before ) , Choose what - or another letter from the
thought of fruits , good ? Now you just cut a piece of card ( make the action handed ), and see . The
new letter for μομεντ ... "
Thus , now your participant sees a new random letter , which , obviously , you do not know , but create
a small cognitive shift and add an attitude to the process . It also shares a logical idea to know the
letters , because it is incompressible , to know only information , but then , to ask , to another cut
invisible set of cards .
So you know , that you effectively know the first letter of his words , in this case, his favorite fruit . From
this simple information, you can work just a word, or at least 2-3 options , you can use it , what I call "
non verbal Fishing " to know , it takes on your part to be observant to nonverbal transfer your party first
, THAN he agrees or refutes your statement verbally , and so the original operator can obviously rephrase
you to correct it . Now, remove the focus on " card flash - memory " and go to render fruits in your
other hand . As it is very important , to make the process interesting , to really identify the different
images , sensations , variety , color , and so on . d . Avoid direct and quick discoveries , make it probable
So let's say , that the first letter is "P", thus , option : Papaya , Passion Fruit , Pear , Pineapple and Plum .
My strategy at this stage is that , just to suggest the use of my first feelings : " What fruit, I think , that
he chooses ?" As can be appreciated , each letter to each of the selected categories will be different
, so , you'll need to be flexible and to be focused to arrival at the climax / TADA moment . Although it
is
part can be used in a formal performance , I prefer to use it in informal situations , in which I have no
power , to create a more theatrical context TADA. I really do not care , if I do not hit directly with a
certain thought , far from it , if my assumption is not 100% correct , this is one design in myself the
identity of the operating secrets and fraud in the pejorative sense of the word .
You can do " Not Verbal Fishing " with the size , shape , color, and in this case a kind of object . Play with
your creativity , options , that you can come and do RRV your own . With practice and a proper
understanding of your own paths, you will discover many subtle methods . You can even create an
impromptu " Progressive anagram ", if you know , that the potential of thought 2 or 3, and you can
narrow down the floor , using a certain letter , to distinguish .
Thus , here we have a basic approach to the RRV, a simple way to know the idea , which will allow you to
create moments of telepathy anytime anywhere with the figurative collection of information , the
probable moments and fun challenges .
To take the place in the support , but I have found , that this approach to mentalism , in which you are
completely focusing in a direct hit , creates a huge probability among the real audience . Magicians
can be memorable his great manual dexterity and intelligence , but we are able as a Mentalist create
a memorable subjective and fantastic experience for the other , only using subtle methods , the
likelihood of accidental action and psychological direction , and RRV is a prime example of this
Additional Ideas
1. If your party has not dealt any cards , clear the first letter is "A", so again in the initial routine ,
expect a moment and then ask , that he visualized any of the letters from the word through the
contracting process .
2. This method RRV may also be used for the " invisible numbered cards flash - memory ". You can
play with options for ACAAN for example .
Loans and Inspiration

The use of observation , using participating action and invisible objects is inspired by Kenton ,
Knepper- truly Invisible , who took without permission the very famous British mentalist in his Card Magic
DVD . The idea is original in Kenton , and we need to know , that it supports the creators . At Fraser
Parker is also a work of great methods , to know the secret letters in words .
SHERLOCKED - Thaddius Stripping Pliers
Introduction
Many of us believe , that the schedule ACAAN holy grail of mental magic , and magicians , that may be
so . There are countless changes , which each artist brings his or her own touch . The problem is , that -
to the average lay person - it can be quite mild and predictable , to watch . Sure , this is an impressive
feat , but to them it is only other card tricks .
This is not to say , that I do not like the inclusion of playing cards in mentalism
- they , of course , has its place - but as society changes , so do the interests of our spectating
audience . The impact effect , which is centered around playing cards , depends on the conditions
, you want to include . The premise - something , which makes it - is significant , and relevant ( the
same could honestly be said about most of all , that we do ).
So , what is the way , which we can quickly weaken the barrier between the interests of our audience
and our art ? We hit them , where they live , which for most of us , is on our cell phones . There are
countless effects and the room , which is waiting , to be explored , which revolve around cell phones .
One of the most impressive , and most affected , discovery of the PIN code . 4 small numbers , which
contain as much impact on the lives of our customers ; 10 000 possible combinations , to choose from .
So many creators in front of me contributed their thoughts to this idea ; now it's - it's my turn to add
that - something to the mix .
Effect
The performer takes his place in front of his audience . Once settled , he asks his audience , " With a
hands- on demonstration , how many of you here have a cell phone for you tonight ?" Almost every
audience arm goes up the air . " As I thought . And , demonstration of hands , how many of you have a
secret PIN , which you use , to lock or unlock the phone , or perhaps manage banking credit card or
checking account ?" Even more hands restore performance . " For this experiment I'm going to choose
only one of you , a hand that rises . You , Miss ," he says with a finger , which indicates , " You , have
objected to accompany me on the stage ?" A woman makes her way to the stage and is next to the
performer . " Thank you for raising , for the benefit of clarity, we talked about before the show or pre-
planned that - anything ?"
“ No, ” she answers .
" Good . Now , I suppose , that you have a PIN code in mind - most likely belong to your cell phone or
your bank card . However , from the - for confidential PIN code , I'm not revealing it in front of all out
of respect for you . instead, I'm going to ask , that you create a new PIN code - the one , which is simple
and easy for you , to remember . for this, I would like to , you to think about the day of the year . It may
be that , which contains a kind of value you , as a birthday Whether anniversary , or it could be
something , which is completely random . I only ask , that you try to refrain from using any dates , that
have a recurring number , which will make it more challenging for me and more interesting for all of you
. Once you have done it is , I want , that you have made this date in the PIN code - 4 digit PIN code -
with 2 digits for month and 2 digits for the day of that month . this makes sense "?
“ Yes , ” she says .
" Wonderful . And you can feel free to change his mind so many times , as you want to , but once
you have settled on the PIN code of your choice , let me know ."
" Well , I have one ."
" Great . Fair enough , to say , it is impossible for me to know what kind of - any of these 4 digits
of the PIN ?"
" There is no way ," she claims , shaking her head .
" I would like for you to assume , that the PIN codes , as if he had written on the air between us on an
imaginary glass window with a big black marker Sharpie . Concentrate on each διγιτ ... In fact , I want ,
that you think about the figure , which has the lowest - the lowest number among them , you can do it ?
Think , where the figure is in sequence with the other ". The performer observes the participant's eyes ,
almost tracing their path to this imaginary arrangement . " Is it in second position ?"
" Yes !" she confirms .
" In fact , let's start with the highest number , whereas , it is always the most challenging . Can you
concentrate on its location for me instead ?" Again , he peers into her eyes , as if to trace their
movement . " This is in the last position , right ?"
" That's right ," she says .
" Good . I get the sense , that it is - the higher the number - more than five ?" She nods . " It's not an
even number , is it ?"
" This ."
" Great . Just say it in your μινδ ... is it 6? No, don't expect it - it 's 8, right ?"
" Yes !" she exclaims .
" Let's see , if we can speed up the process a little bit . Just concentrate on the rest of the PIN once
again . Yes , I think , that I have it ." Artist fights for a
notepad and sharpie marker , and begin to sketch out his convictions on the page in front of him . He
then goes on , to give a woman notebook , saying , " Please , keep it against his chest and refrain from
looking at it just yet ." Artist summarizes marker before , what to replace it in its envelope , and sighs ,
before asking , " For the first time , what is the PIN code , which did you think ?"
"1028, " she says .
" I'll let you be the first , to look at it , that I recorded , your face has to say to us all , we need to
know ." Member slowly turns a notebook in her hands , while she can not see the forecast , recorded
through it . Her eyes light up in surprise . " Turn this way , so that everyone else can see ."
She spins the notebook around , representing the numbers "1 - 0 - 2 - 8" in a large bold
notation , as she had imagined .
Method
Let me say , that the above effect is not a pipe dream . Method , you are going to learn , it can be used
independently or in conjunction with almost any other routine opening of the PIN code . It was a method
, which I have used for their own private performance , which has undergone several changes over the
last few years , of which only a chosen few people privy to . I believe , that this is one of the most
effective means of finding freely thought of PIN code - which I now share use with the magic community
for the first time .
In my experience, numbers are much easier to predict when done in bulk ; PIN code is no exception .
This routine uses ' restriction , without seeming restrictive ' principle . We begin by discussing the many
different uses of PIN codes and their inherent confidential nature . We then affirm , that of respect for
the privacy of our participants were asked , that they have created a new PIN code in place . You will
note , that this does not require any complex math or forces , and the number , they create - even
though , it is different - still significant and potentially applies to the participant , if they settle on a
date , which is special for them . Using a date , as the PIN code is not a far-fetched concept ; how
often do we use our birthday , favorite holiday , or anniversary as a pin ?
Instructions for the participants , in order to generate the required PIN is quick and easy , which is
important . What - or , that requires too many steps , I believe , poses a threat to the integrity of the
freedom of choice and emotional relevance to the subroutine . It is important to clarify , that they
could change their minds and choose any date , while there is no repetition of numbers . This is of
utmost importance to the rest of the subprogramme . Although seemingly a fair and innocent request ,
which is aligned with the width of the above scenarios , we strongly , reduces the number of dates , to
choose from for each month of the year . Definitely , we will go from 365 different possible only up to
129 options ( which sounds like a lot , but the knowledge , that
the location of the lowest rated figure helps to reduce this even more). We also guarantee a few
things for the rest of the routine:
The digit with the lowest value in this randomly generated PIN code will always be '0' (no matter what).
Placing this lowest number will tell us a substantial amount about the rest of the IDU. The ideal
placement of this figure anywhere, but the first position is the acceptance that we use the MM / DD
format (that is, 03/28); for DD / MM format (ie, 28/03), the ideal placement lowest figures have been
anywhere, but 3 - rd position.
( MM / DD format )
If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 1 - om POSITON, there are many possible outcomes to follow,
but we still have limited success of our party options, whereas, can be number 0 where - or back in
the sequence. The choice will be:
January 23 - January 1, 29 .
13- 02/02/19 in February.
03/12, 14-03.03.19, 03/21, 24 3/3/29 in March.
12-04.04.13, 15-04.04.19, 04/21, 04/23, 25 4/4/29 in April.
12-05.05.14, 16-05.05.19, 05/21, 23-05.05.24, 26- 05.05.29, 05/31 May.
12-06.06.15, 17-06.06.19, 06/21, 23-06.06.25, 27- 06.06.29 June.
12-07.07.16, 18-07.07.19, 07/21, 23-07.07.26, 28- 07.07.29, 07/31 July.

08/08/08, 08/19, 08/21, 08/23/08. August 27, 08/29, 08/31.
12-09.09.18, 09/21, 23- 09/09/28 in September.
If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 2 - oh a position, we know that other numbers will always be
"102 _". The last digit will change, but we know that it cannot be 0, 1, or 2.
If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 3 - rd position, we know that other numbers will always be "120
_". Again, the last digit will change, but nonetheless, we know that it cannot be 0, 1, or 2.
If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 4 - oh positions, the only possible sequence of
numbers would be "1230".
( DD / MM format )
If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 1 - oh positions, we know that other numbers will always be
"0_12". Again, the second digit will change, but nonetheless, we know that it cannot be 0, 1, or 2.
If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 2 - oh positions, the only possible sequence of
numbers would be "3012".
If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 3 - rd POSITON, there are many possible outcomes to follow,
but we still have limited success of our party options, whereas, can be number 0 where - or back in
the sequence. The choice will be:
23 / 01- 29/01 of January

13 / 02- 19/02 February.
12/03, 14 / 03-19 / 03, 21/03, 24 / 03- 29/03 March.
04-13.12.04, 15 / 04-19 / 04, 21/04, 23/04, 25 / 04- 29/04 April.
05-14.12.05, 16 / 05-19 / 05, 21/05, 23 / 05-24 / 05, 26 / 05- 29/05, 31/05 May.
06-15.12.06, 17 / 06-19 / 06, 21/06, 23 / 06-25 / 06, 27 / 06- 29/06 June.
07-16.12.07, 18 / 07-19 / 07, 21/07, 23 / 07-26 / 07, 28 / 07- 29/07, 31/07

for July. 08-17.12.08, 19/08, 21/08, 23 / 08- 27/08, 29/08, 31/08 August.
09-18.12.09, 21/09, 23 / 09- 28/09 September.
If the lowest evaluated digit (0) is in the 4 - oh positions, we know that other numbers will always be
"2_10". The second digit will change, but we know that it cannot be 0, 1, or 2.
The month of November is not even an option, since the two numbers dictating the month are copies
of each other.
There will always be any 1 and / or 2 existing in this 4 - bit sequence. This gives us a free hit during
our deductive process. We can just say, "I get 1 or 2." The viewer will help us in verifying that it is - if
not and - and we then determine its location.
Each number in the sequence will depend on, or play away, the other numbers there. If you study the chart
above, you will notice that each month only has between 7 and 15 possible choices (save for "12/30" or
"30/12"), in contrast to which it would usually be 28 - 31 days. Remember that - in
format MM / DD - if we infer , that this one is in the 4 th position , a month can only be May , July or
August , and 3 rd figure would have to be 3. If it was DD / MM, then 1, located in the 2 nd position , I
would have told us , that the 1 st figure would be 3, and months again can only be between May , July or
August . So , in this case, only know the credentials of 2 digits , which are already data , actually tells us
the credentials of the other 2.
We will never have to display more than two numbers in the sequence , since the other two are "
freebies " from - for the scripts ( ie , 0 and 1 and / or 2). Then , where these numbers are falling , once
again , dictates other numbers , which might or might not be present . So , how do we identify the latter
opposite number or two ? There are countless methods ; let's discuss .
Logics
Silly , as it may sound , this is - a good method . After determining the location of the lowest
estimated figures (0) - which will always be our first step - going , asking , that the party has focused
on the large number , because it is the most difficult ( which is true ). We can now approve the
following :
" This is a higher number , yes ?" assumption , it is - more than 5. If they express any - any kind of
reluctance , just confront with , " This is - the greatest number , correct ?" ( In this sequence of numbers
), like to clarify something , that you originally approved .
We can then proceed , to inquire with the known symmetrical question , " This is not an even number ,
is not it ?" Whether they say yes or no , we can say , " It - it , I thought ." If they answer " Yes ", we ,
obviously , know , it's - actually an even number ; if they respond " No ", we know , it is - an odd
number .
Now , depending on their answer to the first two questions , this number will be one of two options :
If they respond to both questions with " Yes ", we know , that the number is either 6 or 8.
If they answer the first with “ Yes ” and the second with “ No ”, the number will be 7 or 9.
If they answered both questions with " No ", the number or will be 3 or 5.
If they answered " No " to the first question and " yes " to the second question , we know , that the
number is either 2 or 4.
At this point we can only say after a pause moment , " I believe , that this is - 7 -" ( or whatever , what
do you think , that it might be ), pauses for another moment , to gauge their reaction and searches any
resistance from your member ; if present , quickly confront with , " No - 9!"
If you are unhappy with this option , you can write 7 on a notepad as a contingency plan and then say ,
" Is this really 9?" If they say " yes ," then do not call attention to the notebook ; if they say " No ", then
followed with , " This is - a good thing , I went with the gut ", as you show your recordings .
Alternatively , you can use cleansing agents principle , what , you ask , that the party imagined this
number , as if it were written on the air between you , and you start pulling one of these two numbers
, which you believe , it is . If they respond positively , you , probably , have drawn the right ; if not,
then do an annoyed look , as you wipe an imaginary number, and then pull the other option before
them .
If you are unhappy with this option , then you can consider the call to another participant from the
audience , which is similar , that they paid attention . Ask , that your first participant , who sent the
number of participants , and for the second participant , to express in words the number , that feels
good to them . If they guess this number correctly , you have a good addition to your routine ; if they
do not assume it is correct , assured that the second person with kind words , saying , that it is not as
easy , as it looks . Then continue , to show the correct answer .
Finger Knows and Speaks by Al Baker

To my knowledge, the method for this principle was discussed by Peter in the section on the
psychological forces of the playing card . But to summarize this , the participant is asked to ascribe a
number from 1 to 10 to each of their fingers . In this case, we know , it will not be 1 or 10, and there
are no options for the 0th finger . If you use this method in conjunction with the method of Logic, you
can use this principle , to pay attention to only two of their fingers , but to create the illusion , that you
are working on a broader spectrum . Just ask , to party to focus on his finger , which coincides with this
number , they are concentrating on , and expect , that used the finger , to ask the appropriate key that
number on their phone or ATM. This should make their finger be a little tougher than others ; one way or
another, this finger will stand out from the rest . With their outstretched fingers, use the dominant index
finger , to gently move the tips of each finger , until you get to the order , which does not follow the
same basic
line as the other - the one , which deviates from the norm . This will give you your answer . I use this
principle sparingly , but it is - a single type of the routine , in which it makes sense next to everyone else
,. If you want , you can use this method for both numbers , which are left to guess after freebies - or
even all of the code pin in this respect .
Springboard by Michael Murray
If you are already familiar with Michael Murray's Springboard principle , you can use it next to this
routine . The format of MM / DD leads to the code PIN , which will always start with either 0 or 1. When ,
to ask , to participants to identify the lowest estimated figure , if it is , it turns out , is in the 1 st
position - and you perform for an audience , which uses the format of MM / DD - then you know , it's -
0. from there, you can Springboard principle completely , or you can use a shortened version , to help
you with more difficult number ( Lamy ). This method can be used in the DD / MM format , but it could
be a little more challenging . Use as you wish .
Bob Principle by Peter Turner

As an alternative , ending to your routine , you can turn on Bob Prinkipla Peter from his book Biggie 2.
After , as you found out
4- bit sequence , you can write it on pad surface or a business card , and then continue , to say , " If I
can only assume this PIN code , safe to say , that it would not take much more , to find out the PIN to
your bank account , will not you speak ? At least you made an impression , if I could tell you your PIN
bank ? " Expect confirmation of their response , and then bow down in , like whispering , " As previously
approved , I'm not going to show your actual PIN , but I think that , you think , now _____." The
participant will be
to respond to the fact , that you have shown randomly generated PIN completely , while the audience is
working under the assumption , that you have just shown the PIN code to their bank account . Then finish ,
saying , " Once again , we are not going to show all of your banking information here , but would you
mind , to tell everyone here the PIN code , you just thought ?" They claim their free-generated PIN , and
then you are mirrored around your notebook, or a business card , to show your recorded outlook , as
though for the first time .
Soft persuasion
The result , as used herein effect , ideal , while , there is much less guesswork involved . Statistically
speaking , this is much more likely
for the participant choose a date between January and September ; it is - the only problem , to which
we are facing . Therefore , it would be in our interests to try to gently encourage our member to choose
a date that is not at the beginning of the year . The method , which I personally do it , creating an
example , what I want , so they did . The following is a selection from the description of the effect with
an additional added touch :
"¼Instead, I'm going to ask , that you create a new PIN code - the one , which is simple and easy for you
to remember . For this, I would like to , you to think about the day of the year - it can be so , that
contains some sort of value to you , as a birthday or anniversary , or it could be something , which is
completely random . I only ask , that you try to refrain from using any dates , that have a recurring
number , which will make it more challenging for me and more interesting for all of you . Now, , if you
were to pick a date for Mr. chalu year , as the 28- th March - which is my birthday - you have turned it
into a 4- digit code for PIN - 03/28 - 2 digits for month and 2 digits for the day of that month . This
makes sense ? Of course , I want , that you think about what - what kind of your own choice , so , please
, settle on what - is another . "
Giving a demonstration of the 28 th March , I sort , create an imaginary timeline before my audience
with my hands , as if the present period of the year . I gesture to , where they would see the month of
March , falling , and access to the specified date with the finger , which indicates . After doing this, I ask
, so they settled on what - the other , making the arch movement , which is returned to the other end of
the imaginary spectrum . In this example, we used the visual and speculative proposal , to dissuade them
from movement with the date to the beginning of the year . We selected dates , which occur in January
and February , there will always be 0, 1, and 2 existing . Everyone considers these numbers to be free ,
because 0 will be our lowest number , and we have our question , with which we rant and 1 and 2. So ,
we could also use the date by the middle of the year for our example with the intent to convince them
to choose a date on the edge of either side of the year instead .
Seasonal Confirmation Principle

If our party is still grounded on a date with a 0 in the least desired position , we can use the seasonal
principle of Confirmation , to discover , that the approximate location of a year , in conjunction with
Peter , ' but then you ' principle , giving us a period of 3 - 4 months selects from .
" I'm going to say , you went with a date , which was closer to the end of the year - as the Fall or
Winter ," and then pause to check . If they respond
negative way , quickly confronted with , "¼but then you changed and settled on a date
where - somewhere to the beginning of the year in the Spring or Summer . It was Spring?"
Determination of the season , in which the selected date , will provide us with a window 3 - 4 months of
options , to choose from . In America, Spring usually occurs between the months of March and May .
Summer occurs between the months of May and July , sometimes August . The fall is usually between the
months of August and November . Winter between the months of December and February . Schedule
changes depending on whether during the four seasons , where you are from ; remember participating
audience , for which you are doing and where they live .
Locating the Lowest and Lowest

High Rated Figures
In the description of this effect, I try to deduce the location of the lowest digit first . To do this , I'm just
asking , to visualize participant PIN code in order and concentrate on this very low number . Then I just
follow the movement of their eyes . This will usually lead to positive results , telling you , where this is the
lowest figure drops . If you guess wrong , it honestly doesn't matter ; it is - only the potential bonus
routines , whereas , we have not even begun to predict that - either all the same . This is an assumption .
Once we know its location , we can collect the identity of most of the other numbers there . The highest
number will always be, or 2 nd or 4 th position . Once we deduce the location of the lowest estimated
figures , we on - apparently changed their minds , asking , so they concentrated on the highest digit .
We now know that , that we should continue with the routine , so there is no reason to show , that we
know , it is the lowest 0. If the highest number , is 6, we know , that the other numbers in the sequence
may be slightly higher than 5. The knowledge and the highest and lowest number tells us about a range
of numbers , we have to work with .
Probable miss
I would like to clarify that , while there is an abundant amount of methods , to bring the remaining
number ( la ) after the freebies , it's okay to be absent from time to time . If you managed to quickly
and easily output 3 from a 4- bit PIN , just make an educated guess for the remaining digit . Even if you
guess wrong , then it will seem impressive to your audience , that you were able to bring all the other
numbers with such precision . Miss can give rise to credibility with the right audience ; do not be afraid
of them .
Closing Thoughts
I can understand , if you have any - any reluctance to implement this due to the fact , that you can
not always guarantee the ease of opening . This is - one of those routines , that , when it hits , it's - fire
. When you get is not exactly , what you want , it still leads to a process , which you have designed for it
to . One result is just a little more of a difficult process , which - for mentalism - is good . The trip makes
our audience appreciate the destination .
If you can get a copy of Peter Turner Biggie 2, it covers some thought , I had unconsciously used the
same way to show the PIN code next to their own original ideas . If ESP is a real number , I feel , that
there is a mutually beneficial connection between the two of us because every time to look at a new
idea runs through my mind , it is , it seems , had entertained it also . It is both a flattering concept as
well as unbearable .
Part of me hopes , that many of you to read this book pereskochat through this section , thus allowing
me to keep this discovery knowing the PIN code to only a few selection . If you got to this point , I hope ,
that , should you choose to use this method , it serves you well - I know , she's got me .
Thanks for your time ,
T
Color the Seer with Fraser Parker
Then , it should be , it is the idea of my laptops for a true change in the classical psychological power of
color .
It is not force , as it - a way to always know what , that stain , the viewer focuses .
The problem with the classic psychological power of color is , it can sometimes stop working . This has limited
its use situations , where you could either take a hit or ignore it with an audience , not being aware , that the
effect of even took place . Then , what it is special in my approach , is the way , which it is structured , to
enable 100% - th correct result , which is always the premise effect .
The effect and how it looks externally ,
woven into a method to such a degree , there seems to be no deception in action , whatever .
I have always felt , that the use of color was what - then , it has been relatively unexplored in the literature
of mentalism . In my opinion , the opportunity to feel , that stains the viewer , focus , mind that - then , a
true psychic or a mind reader would be able to do , fairly easily .
The use of color also lends itself perfectly presentation mentalistic, where each color can be considered as
having a unique mental vibration corresponding to , it is - a visual duplicate of the real world , when it
exists only in the imagination of the participant . Another interesting fact , to consider about the colors in
terms of method - is , as they can be mixed together , to give you extra leverage , anticipating information
. This is - a tool , which has yet to be fully explored . I experimented with this in my Zodiac Sign Prediction
Observation
Signs and continued to play with this concept in the work , which follows .
Moreover , it opens up avenues for you , to know something , he thinks the audience , it also creates a very
logical view , and process , which corresponds to the aesthetic , while helping to create a context believable
performance of mentalism .
I first will outline scenarios , which I would normally be used in the performance of this effect is so , so that you
can see , how this plays out and then break method , for simplicity and clarity of the study .
Artist sitting in front of the participant before , than any telepathy start and offers , so they will first try to tune
into thought processes of each other .
" I would like to , so we tried to be in tune with each other's thought processes to us , to work on the same
mental wavelength ."
" So focus on one of the primary colors : red , yellow or blue and imagine written in front of you . You can
calculate , how many letters are in that color ?"
The viewer , as noted , struggles to settle a little on the number of letters .
" In fact , we will focus on this color in its natural state . In each of the colors of the rainbow have them keep
vibrating level , and it is - then , what I try to tune , mentally . So just focus on color and imagine
it is in front of you as bright and bright as you can and I will do the same. "
The performer looks at the viewer and pauses for a moment , as if trying to be in tune with their thoughts .
" Interestingly , I now focus on color red ... so imitate and mix it with any color that you focus on so
then , that you create an entirely new color . "
" If you are , it turns out , focusing on the same color , then mix this color with any of the other primary colors
, you wish ."
The artist pauses a little .
" Well , I feel , that both of our thoughts are now perfectly blended together , and we can start ."
You are now ready to start your group after this simple process of tuning with thoughts about your
viewer .
That , that great without the help of this view , is the fact , you now know the exact color , which focuses the
audience - even after , they mixed the colors , to create a brand new color .
In this situation you will know for a specific , viewer focuses on color
ORANGE
They will be only when - or focus on color
ORANGE
or
PURPLE
You can now call back to this color later in your group or use it for a “ pig’s back ” to other information or
simply show it before moving on with your telepathy demonstration .
Now you understand , how it looks externally , I will break each of the components , which make it
work .
First of all, we begin the premise of entering a tune with the thoughts of the viewer as an introduction to
telepathy . This creates a context for , it should be , which guarantees , that will always appear , as if it were
- then , as is the case .
" I would like to , so we tried to be in tune with each other thought processes to us , to work on the same
mental wavelength ."
We then made , so that the viewer focused on one of the primary colors . The reason for using the primary
colors will be self-evident participant every time , when they have to blend the two colors together later . They
- the most basic color palette , which can be mixed together , to create all the other colors of the spectrum -
with very little effort .
" So focus on one of the primary colors : red , yellow or blue and imagine written in front of you . You can
calculate , how many letters are in that color ?"
Before , than move to a proper representation , we first calculate how much force the viewer
letters are in their chosen color . It - it , so , so that we can get a signal first , with respect to which the viewer
focuses color . This is - the only part of the method , which does not correspond to the ideal , aesthetic , we
are going for . Preferably , we would have just made , so that the viewer focused on color and imagined it as
the actual color , but not in this - the verbal equivalent . This, however , is a necessary part of the method . It
is for this reason , we apply the " principle " shift context Teylers Ross and immediately change our process to
the one , which best fits our premise , both on - apparently rejecting , what came before .
That , that great without the application of this principle , so it is , allows us to obtain the information , which
we need without it seeming , as if we do that - either . It will appear , like any process , which is , perhaps ,
help , was now thrown out , and for this reason, the participants also ignore the fact , that arrived , first, and
the feeling is negligible . This means , that no matter what , the process , which you use later , effectively
deprived of any method , which was continued by his .
We will actually move forward with the information , which ultimately will help us to anticipate whatever color ,
which ultimately focuses the viewer .
This is the main use for the Michael Murray Cups principle . I will not explain this principle fully , because it is
not mine , to teach , enough , to say , varies whether a viewer or struggling to calculate , how many letters
are in your thoughts about the color , it is safe to assume , what they think about the the long word of these
three primary colors and therefore , focusing on color
YELLOW
If they perform this task relatively quickly then , you know , that they are on one of the other primary colors
RED
or
BLUE
So far , we are only interested in the viewer , we focus on color

YELLOW
We secretly know , what they think about this color and can continue with the script .
" In fact , we will focus on this color in its natural state . In each of the colors of the rainbow have them
keep vibrating level , and it is - then ,
which I will try to be consonant with , mentally . So only focus on color and imagine
The performer looks at the viewer and pauses for a moment , as if trying to be in tune with their thoughts .
" What is interesting , now I focus on the color red ... so impersonate and mix it with any color , on which you
focus so , that you create an entirely new color ."
Here we derive a different color to that , we know , that they focus . It - it , so , so that we can do , so that the
audience was mixed to a different color , which we will always know . If they mix it thought about the color
yellow with our idea of the color red then , they will have to always end up , that focused on the color of an
orange .
We add the following scenarios , to make it appear , as if the viewer have even more choices to mix any color
, every time , when they are , it turns out , are focusing on the same color as us . Of course , they will not
think about the same thing , colorize this situation , so they will never get a chance to deviate from color
APELSIN .
" If you are , it turns out , focusing on the same color , then mix this color with any of the other primary colors
, you wish ."
Then , what is good about this view - that , as the fair is looking . It appears , as if the viewer , perhaps ,
just mix any colors together .
Of course , the subtext , the proposed performance - something , that you mix colors , to substantially mix
your thoughts , to be in tune with each other such mental fluctuations .
" Well , I feel , that both of our thoughts are now perfectly blended together , and we can start ."
If the viewer does not think about the color yellow color , then the effect would be played out as follows,
with the following changes in the values of the script , which takes place .
" In fact , we will focus on this color in its natural state . In each of the colors of the rainbow have them keep
vibrating level , and it is - then , what I try to tune , mentally . So just focus on color and imagine
The performer looks at the viewer and pauses for a moment , as if trying to be in tune with their
thoughts .
" What is interesting , now I focus on the color red ... so impersonate and mix it with any color , on which you
focus so , that you create an entirely new color ."
Previous scenarios will now be viewed either as disclosures or as further directions that the viewer
should follow .
This sets the situation for us , to show color , in which the viewer focuses . The way we do this is to bring out one
of the colors that they could focus on with the Hanging statement .
" Interestingly , I am now focusing on color red ..."
We pause a little after the output of the color RED and if the viewer reacts , we end the performance there .
Presentation of come full circle , and we did , what we say , that attempted . We successfully entered the tune
with the thoughts of the audience , and the proof is that we are both considering the same color .
If they do not respond immediately, then , we can assume , that it is not struck by their color and can continue
with the presentation as intended . We now know , that they have to think of the color blue color and may
cause them to mix our colors with them .
Of course , it would have told us , that they must now think about the color
PURPLE
These scripts can therefore be used , like , always to be seen , successfully anticipate their thought , paint
instances , they focus on the color red as well as allow you to secretly know , whether the viewer focuses on
the color orange color or purple after , they have , by - apparently it has the freedom to mix colors .
Everything is aligned in width by an obvious process of you trying to get into tune with their vibrations of
thought . The value and the result of your script , obviously , vary , depending on which color the audience ,
turns , focuses , and works as a sort of self contained multiple .
If you prefer to always do , so that the audience ended on the color purple color after color mixing then , you
can do , so that the audience has changed their first color to a different every time , you know , that they are
on the color yellow color .
I prefer to be in a situation , where they are 2 of the 3 times , get , to mix colors , so do not bother to
change them from color YELLOW initially .
You can also choose to display the color blue instead of red when using " freezes " the operator for the same
reason , as red most psychologically attractive color of the two . Obviously , it has in most cases the audience
, blending the colors . Depending on whether , you want to use this method , if you want , hits , the color itself
then output the color red , while , if you use it , to secretly know , that their idea of color is used later in your
group , then BLUE , the color , to withdraw . There you go . A simple and effective way to always be aware ,
that the stain of your audience , focus .
Conclusion
This leads us to conclude this volume . I really hope , that you understand the power of the material ,
be shared within these pages . Mentalism less support - of course , that - then , what have its place
alongside the classics , but classics are resting less , mentalism is relevant context .
Through my experiments in the world of mentalism support less I arrived , to which the subject is the one
, which is a little studied . That is why name predictions , contact discoveries, and element / object
guesses are so popular in this area of mentalism . I'm worried about , to see , how far things are
progressing in the coming years .
We are getting closer and closer to the ' Grail ' that the mentalists have pursued since the dawn of art
form .
I still feel , that traditional methods are going nowhere in the near future , and any worrying about the
current trends in the destruction of mentalism mentalism less support should send their concerns to bed .
Episode of the month was difficult , to write out - for pure lack of information out there
about the subject .
I really hope , that you enjoyed some of my thoughts on the subject -
Peter Turner 2017

Vol 12. Propless Mentalism @MagicTuts

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Vol 12. Propless Mentalism @MagicTuts

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Vol # 12 Prop-less / Mentalism AA

How do we even begin to consider , what is the support ?

Mark the reader *** Warning Tangent !

I would like to elaborate on its point , using a simple analogy .

What would your answer be ?

In all honesty, no answer is wrong - Let me explain .

Let's pretend , that we are working with rosette participant ,

Why does the participant record their thoughts ?

Why should a participant choose a long word from a book ?

Why the participant chooses a word from the Book of - first ?

Questions could go on and on and on , these are just a few .

The answer is absolutely none at all .

However , if you just say ,

Then combine the two , to create a random playing card .

Did I bring the gentleman up to date on his proposal ?

because , if there was a way to do it , it would have saved me a hell of a task .

It got me τηινκινγ ... a lot .

( He filled me on the following information - I was blissfully uninformed of her ).

Finish the famous ***

Now I got rid of my rant , let's go back to the introduction to

Peter Turner 2017

Finish the famous ***

Participant confirms , that they did it .

The participant opens it and inside is the name Daniel !

Finish the famous ***

We pretend , that I meet a member named James .

Artist : " Hello my names Pete , your name ?"

Member : " James ."

*** Mark the reader

that letter - That would be ' Mark .'

MARK - then , I'd recorded in the billet .

This is the rule to follow - let's look at another example .

Finish the famous ***

Pay close attention to this paragraph of scripting -

- This line is completed in a few seconds and is suggestive to

We will continue the routine after using this line .

Finish the famous ***

The Contractor addresses the participant ,

About what name did you think ? "

*** Mark the reader

Finish the famous ***

Member : " Mark ."

Member # 2: " Sarah ."

The participant opens it , and it says Mark !

Mark the reader ***

Look at the language in these paragraphs -

Then move to the disclosure .

Mark the reader ***

Artist : " What name are you thinking ."

Member of " Christopher "

Mark the reader ***

Finish the famous ***

The contractor is able to successfully withdraw both .

Each participant confirms , that the perpetrator was correct !

Did you get a random name in mind ?

Think about the number of letters in that name -

Let us look at the limitations ,

Total Performance / Failure Subtlety Changes

We assume , that the singer met with the participant .

Finish the famous ***

- What have we achieved , there must be eliminated 9 and 8 that

Member : " Good ."

- This is a simple set of instructions ; this paragraph is the most

- If the participant responds immediately , what did they think