You are on page 1of 2

HISTORICAL SOURCE SIMILARITIES DIFFERENCES

 The commonalities I found in  The distinction between the two


source materials 1 and 2 are sources in this article is
related to oblation. People Fernando Poe Sr. and
debate who is the true model Anastacio Caedo's differing
of oblation in this article, perspectives on the oblation's
however it is subsequently application. Fernando Poe Sr.
found that Fernando Poe Sr. was a UP student while National
The Oblation is not the model of oblation, Artist Guillermo Tolentino, a
but Anastacio Caedo is. Poe professor at the UP School of
model could Sr. and Anastacio Caedo are Fine Arts, was working on the
be FPJ’s both up student. They were
popular at the time, and they
oblation. Anastacio Caedo is
claimed to have been a student
father were involved in the of Professor Guillermo
commencement of oblation Tolentino, the artist who created
in Up, as well as in the the picture in 1935. Tolentino
creation today. FPJ's colorful allegedly sought to depict
name was mentioned by Filipino nationalism in his art.
both sources while The "Hubo't-Hubad" is a
discussing the model of the manifestation of the people's
Up Oblation Statue. self-sacrifice. Caedo went on to
become a fine arts professor,
following in the footsteps of
Tolentino. Caedo acknowledged
Prof Tolentino's aid at the time
and gave credit to the creature's
wife, Virgilio Raymundo.
Chancellor Grace Javier Alfonso
of the UP Open University
(UPOU) verified a
communication from Caedo, her
instructor, asking her to
Sino ang remember that he was the
Modelo ng UP model of oblation. Caedo,
according to Edward, followed
Oblation? Tolentino's steps in constructing
statues, one of which being the
Dr. Jose Rizal monument in
Idelstien, Germany.

You might also like