2 X 3 Elementary Secondary College

Private 150 100 350

Public 300 170 120
Column total 450 270 470

Level of
Type of School
Education fo(observe frequency) fe(expected frequency)
Private Elementary 150 226.89
Public Elementary 300 223.11
Private Secondary 100 136.13
Public Secondary 170 133.87
Private College 350 236.97
Public College 120 233.03

1. Formualte Hypothesis: Null Hypothesis = There is no significant relationship on enrolment between lelvel of ed
Alternative Hypothesis = There is a significant relationship on enrolment between lel
2. Compute the Chi square: 180.63
3. Determine the Degree of Freedom: df= (r-1)(c-1)
(2-1)(3-1) df = 2
4. Make decision: Since the computed Chi-Square value is equivalent to 180.63 which is greate

3 X 3 Drugs Prostitution Theft/Robbery

Zone 1 20 10 55
Zone 2 50 5 60
Zone 3 30 15 38
Column total 100 30 153

Place Type of Crimes

fo(observe frequency) fe(expected frequency)
Zone 1 Drugs 20 30.04
Zone 2 Drugs 50 40.64
Zone 3 Drugs 30 29.33
Zone 1 Prostitution 10 9.01
Zone 2 Prostitution 5 12.19
Zone 3 Prostitution 15 8.80
Zone 1 Theft/Robbery 55 45.95
Zone 2 Theft/Robbery 60 62.17
Zone 3 Theft/Robbery 38 44.87

1. Formualte Hypothesis: Null Hypothesis: There is no significant relationship between the place and type of crim
Alternative Hypothesis: There is a significant relationship between
2. Compute the Chi square: 17.16
3. Determine the Degree of Freedom: df= (r-1) (c-1)
(3-1)(3-1) df = 4
4. Make decision: Since the computed Chi-Square value is equivalent to 17.16 which is greater than the Chi-Squa
therefore the Null Hypothesis i
 Marketing Product Price
Jollibee 25 65 100
Chowking 55 50 150
Mang Inasal 46 45 170
McDonald 25 35 180
Column total 151 195 600

Fast Food Chains Marketing Mix fo(observe frequency) fe(expected frequency)

Jollibee Marketing 25 29.67
Chowking Marketing 55 41.53
Mang Inasal Marketing 46 41.24
McDonald Marketing 25 38.57
Jollibee Product 65 38.31
Chowking Product 50 53.63
Mang Inasal Product 45 53.25
McDonald Product 35 49.80
Jollibee Price 100 117.88
Chowking Price 150 165.03
Mang Inasal Price 170 163.85
McDonald Price 180 153.24
Jollibee Ambiance 10 14.15
Chowking Ambiance 25 19.80
Mang Inasal Ambiance 17 19.66
McDonald Ambiance 20 18.39

1. Formualte Hypothesis: Null Hypothesis = There is no significant relationship between the fast food chains and
Alternative Hypothesis = There is a significant relationship between the fast food cha
2. Compute the Chi square: 47.01
3. Determine the Degree of Freedom: df= (r-1)(c-1)
(4-1)(4-1) df = 9
4. Make decision: Since the computed Chi-Square value is equivalent to 47.01 which is greater than the Chi-Squa
therefore the Null Hypoth
DAPO, JELYN ANN
BSBA-FM3D
 Row Total

600
590
1190

fo-fe (fo-fe)2 (fo-fe)2 / fe

-76.89 5912.19 26.06
76.89 5912.19 26.50
-36.13 1305.70 9.59
36.13 1305.70 9.75
113.03 12774.70 53.91
-113.03 12774.70 54.82
0.00 Chi-Square 180.63

olment between lelvel of education and type of school

p on enrolment between lelvel of education and type of schools.

nt to 180.63 which is greater than the Chi-Square critical value of 5.99 at the degree of freedom of 2 using 0.05 Alpha Level o
therefore the Null Hypothesis is Rejected, hence there is significant relationship on the level of sa
Row Total
85
115
83
283

fo-fe (fo-fe)2 (fo-fe)2 / fe

-10.04 100.71 3.35
9.36 87.68 2.16
0.67 0.45 0.02
0.99 0.98 0.11
-7.19 51.71 4.24
6.20 38.46 4.37
9.05 81.83 1.78
-2.17 4.72 0.08
-6.87 47.24 1.05
0.00 Chi-Square 17.16

the place and type of crimes.

ficant relationship between the place and type of crimes.

greater than the Chi-Square critical value of 9.49 at the degree of freedom of 4 using 0.05 Alpha Level of Significance,
efore the Null Hypothesis is Rejected, hence there is significant relationship on the level of satisfaction between the place and
 Ambiance Row Total
10 200
25 280
17 278
20 260
72 1018

fo-fe (fo-fe)2 (fo-fe)2 / fe

-4.67 21.77 0.73
13.47 181.38 4.37
4.76 22.70 0.55
-13.57 184.03 4.77
26.69 712.33 18.59
-3.63 13.21 0.25
-8.25 68.09 1.28
-14.80 219.14 4.40
-17.88 319.63 2.71
-15.03 225.88 1.37
6.15 37.81 0.23
26.76 716.01 4.67
-4.15 17.18 1.21
5.20 27.00 1.36
-2.66 7.09 0.36
1.61 2.60 0.14
0.00 Chi-Square 47.01

n the fast food chains and the marketing mix.

p between the fast food chains and the marketing mix.

s greater than the Chi-Square critical value of 19.02 at the degree of freedom of 4 using 0.05 Alpha Level of Significance,
therefore the Null Hypothesis is Rejected, hence there is significant relationship on the level of satisfaction between the fast
of 2 using 0.05 Alpha Level of Significance,
relationship on the level of satisfaction between gender and profession.

a Level of Significance,
faction between the place and type of crimes.
pha Level of Significance,
satisfaction between the fast food chains and the marketing mix..