You are on page 1of 7

SCO103

SCO103 New Empires: The Reach and


Frontiers of the Tech Sector

Group-based Assignment 1
January 2021
SCO103 Group-based Assignment 1

GROUP-BASED ASSIGNMENT 1

This assignment is worth 50% of the final grade for SCO103 New Empires: The Reach and
Frontiers of the Tech Sector. This is a group-based assignment. You should form a group of no
more than five members from your seminar T-group.

The cut-off date for this assignment is:

TERM 1 TERM 2
T-GROUP DEADLINE T-GROUP DEADLINE
T01 10 February, 2355hrs T09 9 April, 2355hrs
T02 10 February, 2355hrs T10 9 April, 2355hrs
T03 10 February, 2355hrs T11 9 April, 2355hrs
T04 10 February, 2355hrs T12 10 April, 2355hrs
T05 3 March, 2355hrs T13 10 April, 2355hrs
T06 3 March, 2355hrs T14 30 April, 2355hrs
T07 3 March, 2355hrs T15 30 April, 2355hrs
T08 3 March, 2355hrs T16 1 May, 2355hrs
T17 1 May, 2355hrs

Note to Students:

1. GBA01 is due on the day after your third class (at 2355hrs). Please prepare and submit all
parts of GBA01 as one PDF file under the correct assignment link – GBA01.

2. Please include the following in header section or front page of all your assignments: Course
code, full names and SUSS PI number of all group members, and submission date.

3. Each group shall appoint a group leader who will submit all parts of GBA01 on behalf of
the group. Having more than one submission by different group members will affect the
similarity index and your plagiarism report.

4. You are strongly encouraged to submit the assignment before the specified deadline. After
a grace period, you will lose ten marks for each 24-hr block via the automatic grade-book
system. Please refer to the Student Handbook (section 5.2, sub-section 1.8.3) for more details.

5. The University has strict guidelines concerning plagiarism, defined in the Student Handbook
as the submission of the “work of another person as original work”, and the paraphrasing or
directly quoting “material from a source without appropriate or adequate acknowledgement.”
(Handbook section 5.2, sub-section 1.4). The University will enforce severe sanctions for
confirmed cases of plagiarism (as listed in section 5.2, sub-section 1.5 of Student Handbook).

6. GBA01 is an important part of course assessment. An individual cannot submit GBA01 on


his / her own. If proven, non-participation is subjected to penalty.

SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SUSS) Page 2 of 7


SCO103 Group-based Assignment 1

Question / Premise

You and your group members are part of an elite PR agency. The agency has just been hired
by a loose conglomerate of American and Chinese tech giants (the list includes Facebook,
Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei and Xiaomi).
While they may be competitors, they are also seeking to improve their public profile in the
wake of societal and political pressure to break the large companies up, or to have them at least
severely regulated.

Your group’s task is to research a selected tech giant, analyse the socio-political impact of its
products and/or business approach, and decide on at least one major societal concern to address,
e.g. privacy, the impact of algorithms on our lives, fake news or employment/future of work.
(Refer to Study Unit 3 of the Study Guide for possible topics). The group will then develop
and communicate a PR strategy, using relevant digital technology tools and software, to counter
negative public perceptions and improve the company’s profile. The group’s task has three
components:

• Summary Report
• Infographic
• Class Presentation

Summary Report (30 Marks)

The summary report presents the group’s research findings in written form. The findings should
be based on a detailed evaluation of relationships, patterns and trends from available sources,
in order to inform further actions and/or generate wider insights (i.e. arrive at a better
understanding of the tech giant’s socio-political impact, identify problems arising from such
impact, and then recommend solutions to resolve consequent concerns and improve the
company’s public profile). The report must attempt the following:

• Examine and discuss the tech giant’s background, i.e. origins, and the successful apps
/ products and business approach that have made it successful and dominant.
• Determine and explain the underlying causes of the societal and political concerns
regarding the tech giant, e.g. what are some of the company’s recent and/or current
activities that could have raised concerns.
• Develop recommendation(s) to address one or several identified concerns arising from
the tech giant’s impact and to improve the tech giant’s public profile, i.e. the PR strategy
including how the infographic will be used.
• Consult a diverse range of sources, i.e. bibliography.

Assessment: Summary Report (30 Marks). The report will be assessed on its research depth
and breadth, its analysis of the tech giant’s socio-political impact, the feasibility of
recommendations to address public concerns, and overall clarity and coherence.

Parameters and Style: The report should not be more than seven pages (excluding the
bibliography) and must adhere to the following parameters: Calibri, Arial or Times New
Roman font, font size twelve, one-inch page margins, and 1.5 line spacing. Please use APA
style for your in-text citations and bibliography. You can find more information here:
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_formatting_and_style_guide/
general_format.html.

SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SUSS) Page 3 of 7


SCO103 Group-based Assignment 1

Infographic (40 Marks)

An infographic is a visual illustration of researched information synthesised in an overarching


storyline or key message(s) for public consumption by multiple stakeholders. For this
assignment, the infographic is an integral component of the group’s proposed PR strategy, i.e.
a visual format that addresses one or several identified concerns arising from the socio-political
impact of the tech giants. The group must decide how the infographic will be presented to target
audience(s), i.e. as part of a broader PR strategy or a display ad on its own. (The group’s
strategy must be developed and included in the relevant section of the Summary Report). This
requires planning in conceptualisation and design, an appropriate balance between text and
graphics, and suitable graphics that effectively illustrate and convey the group’s primary
message(s).

Assessment: Visual Appeal (20 marks). The infographic should be visually striking and
appealing in order to attract and hold the attention of the group’s target audience(s), and then
communicate the infographic’s primary message(s) to them.

Assessment: Messaging / Public Impact (20 marks). The infographic should be developed and
illustrated in a manner that gives due consideration to how its key message(s) can be
communicated to target audience(s) with minimal explanation and for maximum public impact.

Parameters and Style: Groups are to free to imagine the style and format of the infographic,
bearing in mind the above assessments (i.e. that it must be clear and comprehensible in public
settings to target audience(s)). Below are some links that may help in the planning and design
of the infographic as well as different types of ads the infographic could be or could be part of.

• Ritchie, Josh (2020, Jul 1). What Is an Infographic? Why They’re Great & How to
Create Them. Column Five. Retrieved on Jan 9, 2021 from
https://www.columnfivemedia.com/infographic.
• Nediger, Midori (2020. Jun 25). What is an Infographic? Examples, Templates &
Design Tips. Venngage. Retrieved on Jan 9, 2021, from
https://venngage.com/blog/what-is-an-infographic/
• Goorevich, Emily (2019, Mar 21). 7 Types of Advertising (+How They're Used). G2.
Retrieved on Jan 9, 2021, from https://learn.g2.com/types-of-advertising
• Mahnoor Sheikh (2020, Feb). What is an Infographic? (Examples, Tips and Templates).
Visme. Retrieved on Jan 9, 2021, from https://visme.co/blog/what-is-an-infographic/.

Presentation (30 Marks)

The final GBA component is a five-minute presentation, where the group pitches its PR
strategy to improve the tech giant’s public profile and fields questions from the instructor.
Think of it as a slightly extended elevator pitch – some related info here:
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/elevator-pitch.htm and here:
https://www.thebalancecareers.com/elevator-speech-examples-and-writing-tips-2061976.

The presentation must be based on the group’s research and infographic. It should inform the
class of the tech giant’s socio-political impact and socio-political concerns the group has
identified to be significant, and the solution and strategy the group proposes.

SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SUSS) Page 4 of 7


SCO103 Group-based Assignment 1

Assessment: Presentation (20 marks). One to two group members will have five minutes
(maximum) to pitch the group’s proposed PR strategy based on its research and infographic.

Assessment: Q&A / Response (10 marks). After the presentation, remaining group members
will respond to follow-up questions related to the pitch as well as the infographic and overall
research.

Canvas Discussion. For about a day after the presentation (until GBA01 submission deadline),
the group can also make use of Canvas Discussion in their respective T-group page to build on
their Q&A responses.

SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SUSS) Page 5 of 7


SCO103 Group-based Assignment 1

GBA01 Rubric

The following rubric will be used to assess this assignment.

GBA01: Summary Report (30 marks)


(1) Summary Report (30 24-30 Marks 18-23 Marks 12-17 Marks 0-11 Marks
Marks)

The Summary Report will be Summary Report addressed Summary Report Summary Report addressed Summary Report has not
assessed on its research depth all parts of the assigned addressed all parts of the some to all parts of the addressed the assigned task
and breadth, its analysis of task. assigned task. assigned task. directly.
the tech giant’s socio-
political impact, the Excellent effort is made to Good effort is made to Some to little effort made to There is little to no effort
feasibility of synthesise information on synthesise information on synthesise information on the in researching and writing
recommendations to address the tech giant and report the tech giant and report tech giant and report presents the report. Information
public concerns, and overall presents a good to excellent presents a fair to good a superficial analysis of the Analysis and
clarity and coherence. analysis of the tech giant’s analysis of the tech giant’s tech giant’s socio-political recommendations are
socio-political impact. socio-political impact. impact. Report identifies superficial.
Report clearly identifies Report identifies causes causes for one or several
causes for one or several for one or several societal societal concern(s) regarding Report is barely
societal concern(s) concern(s) regarding tech tech giant’s activities and comprehensible and a sum
regarding tech giant’s giant’s activities and recommended solution / of different parts. There
activities and recommended solution / strategy is somewhat may be instances of
recommended solution / strategy is largely feasible. feasible. plagiarism.
strategy is Some parts however could
original/innovative and need further clarification. The report is coherent but
feasible. largely a sum of parts. It
The report is well-written consulted a sufficient but
The report is well-written and fairly coherent. It is limited range of sources.
and organised in a coherent based on a good and Sources may not be properly
fashion. It is based on a relevant range of sources, cited and/or there are
diverse and relevant range and largely properly cited instances of chunking
of sources, properly cited and kept within assigned (wholesale copying). Report
and kept within assigned parameters. may not have observed stated
parameters. parameters.

Infographic (40 marks)


(2) Visual Appeal (20 16-20 Marks 12-15 Marks 8-11 Marks 0-7 Marks
marks)

The infographic should be Infographic is immediately Infographic is visually Infographic meets or barely Infographic does not meet
visually striking and striking / visually appealing appealing, and has a fair to meets expectations. It has a expectations or
appealing in order to attract at first glance, and has a good balance of text and decent balance of text and requirements.
and hold the attention of the good to excellent balance graphics. graphics, but borders on
group’s target audience(s), of text and graphics. being an essay with images, Little to no effort and
and then communicate the Infographic’s concept and or the opposite, graphics with thought went into
infographic’s primary Infographic’s concept and design is fairly strong or little to no context. conceptualising and
message(s) to them. design is strong, ranges good, i.e. has a smooth designing the infographic,
from good to excellent, and flow/layout of text and Minimal to sufficient effort resulting in a messy and
has a seamless flow/layout graphics that enhances the and thought went into confused flow/layout and
of text and graphics that infographic’s message(s). conceptualising and message
enhances the infographic’s designing the infographic,
message(s). resulting in a decent
flow/layout of text and
graphics but needing further
clarification.

(3) Public Impact (20 16-20 Marks 12-15 Marks 8-11 Marks 0-7 Marks
marks)

The infographic should be Infographic’s message(s) Infographic’s message(s) Infographic ranges from Infographic’s message(s)
developed and designed in a is/are accurate and crystal is/are overall accurate and somewhat accurate and clear, is/are unclear and
manner that gives due clear, with minimal to no clear, but require some to some inaccuracies and lack inaccurate
consideration to how its key explanation needed. clarification. of clarity – overall requiring
message(s) can be substantive clarification. Infographic has little to no
communicated to target Infographic has excellent Infographic has good public appeal and cannot
audience(s) with minimal public appeal, i.e. can be public appeal, i.e. can be Infographic has fair to be used in public spaces at
explanation and for used in various public used in various public minimal public appeal. It all. It demonstrates no
maximum public impact. spaces, demonstrates spaces, demonstrates good demonstrates some or awareness of what its
excellent and in-depth to some awareness of its superficial awareness of its target audience may be.
awareness of its target target audience, and can target audience, and overall This shows little to no
audience, and is influence public opinion is unable to can influence group effort in developing
sufficiently strong to but with some public opinion without major the infographic and little to

SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SUSS) Page 6 of 7


SCO103 Group-based Assignment 1

influence public opinion. clarification. This shows a revisions. This shows no knowledge of the
This shows an excellent good group effort in minimal to superficial group group’s target audience.
group effort in developing developing the infographic effort in developing the
the infographic and good and some knowledge of infographic and superficial
knowledge of the group’s the group’s target knowledge of the group’s
target audience. audience. target audience.

Presentation / Q&A (20 marks)


(4) Presentation (20 marks) 16-20 Marks 12-15 Marks 8-11 Marks 0-7 Marks

One to two group members Presentation is engaging Presentation is fairly Presentation can be more Presentation is barely or
will have five minutes and informative, engaging and informative, engaging. Certain parts of not at all engaging, i.e.
(maximum) to pitch the clear/coherent, organised clear/coherent and fairly presentation are less little to no attempt to
group’s proposed PR strategy and well executed, and well organised, and kept clear/coherent, and address the focus and
based on its research and within assignment within assignment presentation can be more purpose of the infographic.
infographic. parameters. Excellent effort parameters. Good effort organised. Minimal to Minimal to no effort made
and thought went into made in preparing and superficial effort made in in preparing and delivering
preparing and delivering delivering the preparing and delivering the the presentation, which is
the presentation, which presentation, which presentation, which makes it not persuasive.
easily persuades others of persuades others of the more difficult to persuade
the group’s intended goals group’s intended goals. others of the group’s
intended goals.

(5) Q&A / Response (10 8-10 Marks 6-7 Marks 4-5 Marks 0-3 Marks
marks)

After the presentation, Responses are excellent, on Responses are good, Responses are sufficient, Responses are superficial
remaining group members point (i.e. addressed the mostly on point (i.e. somewhat on point (i.e. and off-point, e.g. did not
will respond to follow-up questions/comments addressed the addressed the address the
questions related to the pitch directly), articulate, and questions/comments questions/comments in a questions/comments
as well as the infographic and able to discuss and connect directly), mostly articulate, tangential manner), directly.
overall research. group’s work to broader thoughtful and insightful. somewhat articulate, and
themes of the course. could have been more Little to no effort made to
Effort made to engage in thoughtful and insightful. engage in and sustain an
Effort consistently made to and sustain an in-depth in-depth discussion, and
engage in and sustain an in- discussion, and hence, Minimal to superficial effort hence, responses are
depth discussion, and responses are mostly made to engage in and unpersuasive of the
hence, responses are persuasive (with some sustain an in-depth group’s intended goals,
persuasive of the group’s clarification) of the discussion, and hence, and hence unable to move
intended goals, moving the group’s intended goals, responses are largely the audience towards a
audience towards a moving the audience unpersuasive of the group’s common outcome.
common outcome. towards a common intended goals, and hence
outcome. need significant clarification
before being able to the
audience towards a common
outcome.

--- END OF ASSIGNMENT ---

SINGAPORE UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES (SUSS) Page 7 of 7

You might also like