Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI: 10.1002/jdd.12439
A D VA N C I N G T H R O U G H I N N O VA T I O N
Lima, Peru
2 Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Federal Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
3 Division of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur, Miraflores, Lima, Peru
Correspondence
Dr. Denisse Aguilar-Gálvez, Professor in Charge of the Pediatric Dentistry Specialty of the Stomatology Career at the Universidad Cientifica del Sur, and
Postgraduate PhD student in Dentistry at the Universidad Federal Rio Grande do Su, Miraflores, Lima, Peru.
Email: daguilar@cientifica.edu.pe
F I G U R E 1 Complete process of
construction of the virtual learning objects
(VLO)
J Dent Educ. 2021;85(Suppl. 1):1123–1125. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jdd © 2020 American Dental Education Association 1123
1124 AGUILAR-GÁLVEZ et al.
TA B L E 1 Instrument to evaluate the VLO for dental students made for specialists. Adapted from Holanda et al.5
Evaluated Items Attributed value
Interaction and stimulus
1. Ease of navigation, quality of the resources and help for the user. 1 2 3 4 5
2. The environment proposes learning situations. 1 2 3 4 5
3. The activities are relevant and meet the proposed objectives. 1 2 3 4 5
4. Access to the modules is easy. 1 2 3 4 5
5. The VLO leads to taking an attitude and arouses interest from the users. 1 2 3 4 5
6. Design of visual and auditory information for learning. 1 2 3 4 5
7. Ability to study using the Virtual Learning Object (VLO). 1 2 3 4 5
Dedication, discipline and time management
8. It stimulates the search for other information in different research sources. 1 2 3 4 5
9. Organization of time for the VLO. 1 2 3 4 5
10. Self-discipline for online teaching. 1 2 3 4 5
Communication tools
11. The environment awakens the exchange of information between teachers and colleagues. 1 2 3 4 5
12. The environment must give feedback to the user during the interaction. 1 2 3 4 5
13. The links available are relevant to the content for learning. 1 2 3 4 5
14. Use of a method to clarify doubts about the content. 1 2 3 4 5
Teaching materials
15. Truthfulness, precision and balanced presentation of ideas. 1 2 3 4 5
16. The VLO is explanatory and easy to understand. 1 2 3 4 5
17. The information is presented in a logical and coherent way. 1 2 3 4 5
18. The writing style is easy to understand. 1 2 3 4 5
19. It presents information alternatives such as reading, animations and videos. 1 2 3 4 5
20. The VLO is reflecting the content proposed in the study bread. 1 2 3 4 5
21. Possibility of being used in different learning contexts and with students from different backgrounds. 1 2 3 4 5
Abbreviation: VLO, virtual learning objects.
Instructions: Answer the questions using the numbers from 1 to 5, to better represent the grade reached in each criterion: (1) Very adequate; (2) Considerably
adequate; (3) Very unsuitable; (4) Something suitable; (5) Nothing suitable.
delivering them in modules, this enhances their distri- favorable in all evaluated items and let us recommend the
bution and recombination—Teaching of diagnosis and applications of this new virtual proposal.
pulp therapy. (4) Adaptability, i.e., it can be adapted to
the different learning styles of the students—Prevention REFERENCES
teaching. (5) Reuse, i.e., it can be used in different edu- 1. Kavadella A, Kossioni AE, Tsiklakis K, et al. Recommendations
cational contexts and purposes, adapted, and combined for the development of e-modules for the continuing professional
within new training sequences—Semiology teaching. development of European dentists. Eur J Dent Educ. 2013;1(17
(6) Durability, i.e., they included a good validity of the suppl):45-54.
2. Passerini K, Granger MJ. A development model for distance
information, without the need for new designs. (7) Gamifi-
learning using internet. Comput Educ. 2000;34(1):1-15.
cation. This was the component with the greatest potential 3. Firmstone VR, Elley KM, Skrybant MT, Fry-Smith A, Bayliss S,
to achieve a special relationship with users, by capturing Torgerson CJ. Systematic review of the effectiveness of continuing
the user’s attention and focus and encouraging a change dental professional development on learning, behavior, or patient
in behavior by transmitting an ideal message. outcomes. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(3):300-315.
4. Tubelo RA, Branco VLC, Dahmer A, Samuel SMW, Collares
FM. The influence of a learning object with virtual simulation
3 RESULTS for dentistry: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Med Inform.
2016;85(1):68-75.
5. Holanda VR, Bezerra AK, Holanda ER, De lima MC. Teaching
The complete process of construction of the VLO to be used and learning in a virtual environment: nursing students’ attitude.
in managing learning in dentistry included 4 main stages: Rev Min Enferm. 2015;19(1):148-153.
(1) Construction of the VLO, (2) Validation by 10 special-
ists, (3) Assessment of learning, and (4) Assessment of the
VLO by students (Figure 1, Table 1). The 13 dental stu- How to cite this article: Aguilar-Gálvez D, Noal
dents exposed to the VLO group correctly answered 90% FC, de Araujo FB, Arriola-Guillén LE. Virtual
of the questions evaluated, in relation to the 12 students learning object: An asynchronous solution for
exposed to the virtual synchronous class group who cor- virtual learning in dentistry post COVID-19. J Dent
rectly answered 40% of the same questions evaluated. The Educ. 2021;85(Suppl. 1):1123–1125.
opinions of students about the proposed VLO were very https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12439