Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
ERROR IN MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION 2
Human is to err, and just like any other professionals, medics also commit some errors
once in a while. While some errors might seem minor, they might have some grave effects on the
patient’s health. That raises the debate of disclosure and nondisclosure of medical errors; should
a medic inform the patient in case they commit an error? Well, both choices have their legal and
ethical implications, but it is better to disclose an error. However, that does not mean that medics
should commit errors; in fact, there exist a procedure that one should follow in the process of
medical ethics, practitioners should be open with patients on their health status, as that is the only
way to adhere to the principle of autonomy. As Jahn (2011) put it, autonomy is about making
sound and deliberate decisions about one’s health; so, a nurse has to empower the patient by
being very transparent about the latter’s condition. Besides, nondisclosure would ruin the
“mutual respect, trust, and partnership between provider and patient” (Liang, 2002). Legally,
there is a possibility of facing a lawsuit if the patient later discovers that the nurse committed the
error, but did not disclose it (Rosner, Berger, Kark, Potash, & Bennett, 2000). That is because
nondisclosure is against the ethical principle of nonmaleficence; the error could cause harm to
the patient (Jahn, 2011). So, the patient would have a ground on which they could sue the nurse.
Likewise, disclosure would have some ethical and legal implications. Legally, the nurse
could face a lawsuit for their act of negligence. That is because the disclosure might spur some
emotional feelings in the patient, and thus, make them seek legal redress (Rosner et al., 2011).
However, people would not be allowed to testify against the provider in court, it would a case
ERROR IN MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION 3
between the plaintiff and the defendant (Rosner et al., 2011). Alternatively, the authorities might
warn the nurse against acting with such sheer negligence. Elsewhere, the nurse might be forced
to apologize to the plaintiff as a show of remorse and empathy towards the latter (Liang, 2002).
Need to note, disclosure would enable the patient to avert any possible negative effects of the
error; hence, it is an act of beneficence (Jahn, 2011). Indeed, disclosure has its ethical and legal
implications.
nurses have to operate within the realms of transparency so as to ascertain autonomy (Jahn,
2011). Disclosure would help in averting any possible negative impact that the drug would have
on the patient. Thus, it would be justified under the law of causing no harm to the patient,
apologize, and at the same time, maintain the trust that exists between the patient and I (Liang,
2002). On the contrary, the patient might feel annoyed by my negligence, but disclosure would
put me at a better position of being forgiven by the client as opposed to if they discovered by
themselves. Therefore, I would choose to disclose the error instead of letting the client either
Prescription involves a series of steps. One, the prescriber needs to collect data on,
analyze information on, and define a patient’s condition clearly. Secondly, the prescribe draws a
clear goal of intervention. Based on the goal, the medic selects the correct drug that would meet
the intervention’s goal without causing harm to the patient. Thereafter, it is essential to initiate
the therapy, and also, consider the nonpharmacological interventions that need to be part of the
ERROR IN MEDICAL PRESCRIPTION 4
intervention. Next, clear and detailed information on how to use the drugs should be given, and
the prescriber should follow up the therapy to ensure no allergic reactions (Pollock, Bazaldua, &
Dobbie, 2007). That is the general procedure that every medical practitioner should follow to
Also, there are numerous safety measures that practitioners could adhere to. One, it is
necessary for the medic to consider the patient’s ability to purchase a drug before prescribing it;
otherwise, the patient would opt for alternatives, which would not be the doctor’s prescription.
Also, due to human error, it is safer to use computer devices to prescribe as that would be more
eligible to the pharmacist (Pollock, Bazaldua, & Dobbie, 2007). Additionally, prescribers should
avoid abbreviations in their prescriptions; abbreviations could confuse the pharmacist. Further,
medical facilities should train their practitioners on the safety requirements as far as prescription
is concerned. Still, medical personnel could include the purpose of the drug in the prescription;
that would ensure that the right drug is issued for the right purpose (Recommendations to
References
Jahn W. T. (2011). The 4 basic ethical principles that apply to forensic activities are respect for
Liang, B. A. (2002). A system of medical error disclosure. BMJ Quality & Safety, 11(1), 64-68.
Pollock, M., Bazaldua, O. V., & Dobbie, A. E. (2007). Appropriate prescribing of medications:
prescription-writing
Rosner, F., Berger, J. T., Kark, P., Potash, J., & Bennett, A. J. (2000). Disclosure and prevention