You are on page 1of 31

OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG

PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT


Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.1

1. Dispersity of particulate systems,


1.1 About rocks, gravel, lumps, nuggets, corn, particles, nanoparticles and
colloids
1.2 Particle characterisation - Granulometry,
1.3 Particle size distributions,
1.4 Physical particle properties

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.1
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.2

Size Scale of Polydisperse (Material) Particle Systems

10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1
o
1A 1 nm 1 µm 1 mm 1 cm 1m
visual ability of human eye
wave length of visible light:
ultra-
X-rays and electron interferences microscope light microscope

electron microscope

capacitive und inductive sensors

dispersity molecular-disperse colloid- high-disperse, fine-disperse coarse-disperse


disperse ultra-fine

pore dispersity microporous mesoporous macroporous

dispersed molecules makromolecules, ultra-fines fines medium grain coarse


elements colloids

one-dimensional surface coatings, liquid films, membranes


two-dimensional chains of macromolecules, needles, fibres, threads

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.2
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.3
Blatt 2
Mixtures of Polydisperse (Material) Particle Systems

10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1
disper- disperse
sant phase 1 Ao 1 nm 1 µm 1 mm 1 cm 1m

gas gas gas mixture


liquid aerosol, fog
solid aerosol, smoke
transition l-g foam
4B

liquid gas solution, lyosol, bubble system


liquid hydrosol micro-emulsion 5B emulsion
solid suspension 6B

solid gas xerogel, porous membrane


7B rigid-foam insulation
liquid gel 8B liquid filled, porous solid material
solid mixed crystal, solid solution, s-s alloy
9B

monodisperse = uniform-sized elements

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.3
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.4

Size Scale and Properties of Nanoparticles

Bioavailability

Quantum effects

Strongly developed
surface effects
10–9 10–6 m
0,001 0,01 0,1 1 µm

1 10 100 1000 nm
Polymers

Proteins

Metal powders

Virus, DNS

Ceramic powders

Tobacco smoke

Atmospheric
aerosols

Nanoparticles for
life sciences
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.4
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.5
Expression of the Particle Size
characte- Eq./sketch measuring method,
ristic size quantity r = 0...3
breadth: b b + 1 b + l + t ⎛ b ⎞1 / 3 r = 0 number basis
, ,⎜ ⎟ , b
length: l 2 3 ⎝t⎠ r = 1 length
thickness: t 3 ⎛ 2lb + 2bt + 2lt ⎞
1/ 2
r = 2 area
, lb , ⎜ ⎟ t
1/ l + 1/ b ⎝ 6 ⎠ r = 3 volume basis

(1) equivalent diameter d, for b ≈ l ≈ t ¾ image analysis d0


(2) equivalent length l, for rods l >> b ≈ t ¾ geometric anal. d0
(3) equivalent area b ⋅ l , for chips, plates ¾ geometric anal. d0
b ≈ l >> t
(4) equivalent mass ρ s ⋅ b ⋅ l ⋅ t , for extreme
¾ mass balancing d3
shaped clusters:
Feret image analysis,
diameter number basis d0
Martin image analysis,
diameter A = A1 + A 2 number basis d0
sieve a1 a2
1
(a 1 + a 2 ) or a 1a 2 sieving, mass or
diameter 2 volume basis d3
volume V equivalent volume diameter Coulter counter
equivalent 3
6⋅V/π electrical method,
diameter number basis d0
area A equivalent projection area light extinction,
equivalent diameter 4A / π number basis d0
diameter
surface area equivalent surface area diameter AS / π light extinction,
AS equiv. specific surface diameter V / A S number basis d0
diameter
physical Stokes diameter gravitational, centri-
feature v s ⋅ 18 ⋅ η fugal sedimentation
d St =
equivalent (ρ s − ρ f ) ⋅ a vs and impactor, mass
diameter basis d3
v s ⋅ 18 ⋅ η sedimentation, mass
aerodynamic diameter da =
a or volume basis d3
equivalent low angle laser light-
light-scattering scattering method,
diameter number basis d0

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.5
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.6
Characterisation of Disperse Material Systems

Characterisation of granulometric properties

1. Particle size characteristics by 2. Particle size distribution function


image analysis (cumulative distribution curve)
direction of measurement

1
Qr(d)

dM dF 0,5 ΔQr(d)
dS
Qr(d2)
Qr(d1) Δd
0
dF FERET chord length du d1 d2 d0
dM MARTIN chord length d
dS maximum chord length

4. Example of measured particle size distribution


3. Frequency distribution of particle size
particle size mass mass cumulative
(distribution density curve)
fraction fraction fraction
di-1 ... di in kg Q3(di)-Q3(di-1) Q3(d) in%
in mm in %
- 0.16 0.180 1.7 1.7
qr(d) dQr(d)
qr(d) = d(d) 0.16 ... 0.63 0.648 6.1 7.8
0.63 ... 1.25 0.919 8.7 16.5
1.25 ... 2.5 1.920 18.1 34.6
2.5 ... 5.0 3.021 28.6 63.2
5.0 ... 6.3 1.084 10.3 73.5
6.3 ... 10 1.748 16.6 90.1
10 ... 16 0.761 7.2 97.3
16 ... 20 0.232 2.2 99.5
du di-1 di di+1 d0 + 20 0.054 0.5 100.0
d
10.567 100.0

5. Particle size distribution function Q3(d) and frequency distribution of particle size q3(d) of
the above example 4.

0.20
a) b)
100 qr(d) ≈ Qr(di) - Qr(di-1)
0.15 di - di-1
q3(d) in mm-1

80
Q3(d) in %

60 0.1
di-1 + di
40 Qr(d*<di) dm,i =
2
0.05
20

0 0
0 4 8 12 16 20 0 4 8 12 16 20
particle size d in mm particle size d in mm
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.6
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.7
6. Three - parameter logarithmic 7. Comparison of particle size distribution functions
normal distribution (L) with upper in a full-logarithmic, RRSB and log - normal
limit do and transformation (T) diagram (net)

99.9 99.9 99,9


99.90 3 - parameter 99.5 95
60

cumulative distribution Q(d) in %


99.50 distribution 98 40
96 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 50
97 90 20

full-logarithmic net

RRSB - net
90 80 10 full-logarith- RRSB-net
L mic -net log - normal
Qr(d)

60 6
net
50 T transformed 40 4 10
distribution 20
2 5
10
10 5
5 1
1
1 0.5 0.5
0.20 100 101 102 103 104
10-1 100 101 102 103
0.02 10-2 10-1 100 101 102
1 5 10 50 100 500
d50 do particle size d in µm
δ16 δ50 δ84 d or δ in µm
1 Log-Normal distribution
2 RRSB-distribution
3 GGS-distribution

8. RRSB - distribution in a double - logarithmic diagram

7.0 7.5 8 9 10 15 20 25 30
AS,V,K · d63 in m3/ m3
40
n 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 60
0.9 80
99.9 100
99 x 120
cumulative distribution Q3(d) in %

x 0.8 150
95
90 x 200
0.7 300
x 500
63.2 x 1000
50 0.6 2000
x 5000
0.5 10000
x
10 0.4
x
0.3

0.2
x
1 0.1
0.5 0
Pol -1
10 -3 10 -2 10 10 0 101 10
2

particle size d in mm

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.7
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.8
Probability Distributions

Normal Distribution:

⎡ 1 ⎛ x − μ ⎞2 ⎤
q (x ) =
1 σ2< σ1
exp ⎢ − ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ q(x)
σ⋅ 2⋅π ⎢⎣ 2 ⎝ σ ⎠ ⎥⎦ (1)

x
⎡ 1 ⎛ t − μ ⎞2 ⎤ σ1
Q (x ) =
1
σ ⋅ 2π
∫ ⎢⎢ − 2 ⋅ ⎜⎝ σ ⎟⎠ ⎥⎥ dt
exp (2)
−∞ ⎣ ⎦
normalised :
u
⎡ t2 ⎤
Q (x ) =
1

∫− ∞ ⎢⎣ − 2 ⎥⎦ dt
exp (3) Q(x) = 0.5

with
x − x 50 x 84 − x 16 μ = xh = x50 x
u= (4 ) σ= (5) 0 x16 x84
σ 2

Four - Parameter Log - Normal Distribution:

⎡ 1 ⎛ ln x − μ ⎞
2

q (x ) =
1 (6) q(x)
⋅ exp ⎢ − ⋅ ⎜⎜ ln
⎟⎟ ⎥
σ ln ⋅ x ⋅ 2 ⋅ π ⎢⎣ 2 ⎝ σ ln ⎠ ⎥⎦ 0.3
μln = 1, σln = 1
x ⎡ 1 ⎛ ln t − μ ⎞
2
⎤ (7) 0.2
Q (x ) =
1 1
σ ln ⋅ 2⋅π
∫0
t
⋅ exp ⎢ − ⎜⎜
⎢⎣ 2 ⎝ σ ln
ln
⎟⎟

⎥ dt
⎥⎦ μln = 3, σln = √3
d − d min (8) 0.1
μln = 3, σln = 1
x= ⋅ d max for d min ≤ d ≤ d max
d max − d
ln x − μ ln ⎛x ⎞ (10)
u= (9 ) σ ln =
1
⋅ ln ⎜⎜ 84 ⎟⎟ x
σ ln 2 ⎝ x 16 ⎠ 0 5 10 15

WEIBULL (RRSB) - Distribution:

q(x) xu = 0
n = 0.5 n = 5.5 x* = x63 = 1
⎛ x − xu ⎞
n −1
⎡ ⎛ x−x ⎞
n

q (x ) = ∗
n 2.0
⋅ ⎜⎜ ∗ ⎟
⎟ ⋅ exp ⎢ − ⎜⎜ ∗ u

⎟ ⎥
(11)
x − xu ⎝ x − xu ⎠ ⎢⎣ ⎝ x − x u ⎠ ⎥⎦ n=3

n=2
⎡ ⎛ x−x ⎞
n
⎤ 1.0
Q (x ) = 1 − exp ⎢ − ⎜⎜ ∗ u
⎟⎟ ⎥ (12) n=1
⎢⎣ ⎝ x − x u ⎠ ⎥⎦

for xu = 0 and n = 1 follows the 0 1 2 x


1
Exponential Distribution if λ =
x63
Q(x) = 1 - exp(-λ·x) (13)
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.8
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.9
Statistical Moments of Particle Size Distributions
Complete k-th Moment of Particle Size Distribution Qr(d*<d) related to Quantity r:
do do

( )
N

∫ (d − d ) ∫ (d − d ) ⋅ dQ r (d ) ≈ ∑ d m,r ,i − d ∗
k
* k * k
d*
M k, r = ⋅ q r (d ) d (d ) = ⋅ μ r ,i (1)
du du i=1

First Initial Moment (k = 1, d* = 0) or Expected Value


do do N
M 1, r = d m,r = ∫ d ⋅ q r (d ) d (d ) = ∫ d ⋅ dQ r (d ) ≈ ∑ d m,r ,i ⋅ μ r ,i (2)
du du i =1

Central Moment related to expectation (mean) dm,r


do

d m, r M k , r = Z k ,r = ∫ ( d − d m ,r ) k q r ( d ) d ( d ) (3)
du

Second Central Moment or Variance


do do N
Z 2 ,r = σ = ∫ (d − d m,r ) q r (d ) d (d ) = ∫ (d − d m,r ) 2 dQ r (d ) ≈ ∑ (d m,r ,i − d m,r ) 2 ⋅ μ r ,i
2
r
2
(4)
du du i =1

Variance according to “Satz von Steiner”


N
σ 2r = Z 2 ,r = M 2 ,r − M 12,,r ≈ ∑ d 2m,r ,i ⋅ μ r ,i − d 2m,r (5)
i=1

Incomplete k-th Initial Moment du...d, i...n and Complete Initial Moment du...do, i...n...N
d n do N

∫ d q r (d) d (d ) ≈ ∑ d m,r ,i ⋅ μ r ,i ∫ d q r (d) d (d ) ≈ ∑ d km,r ,i ⋅ μ r ,i


k k
k
(6) (7)
du i =1 du i =1

Conversion from given quantity r to a searched quantity t of Frequency Distribution


d t − r ⋅ q r (d )
q t (d ) = (8)
M t − r ,r

and Cumulative Distribution


d n

M t − r ,r
d

du

du
d t − r q r (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
t−r
m , r ,i ⋅ μ r ,i
Q t (d ) = do = do ≈ N (9)
M t − r ,r
du ∫d t−r
q r (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
t−r
m , r ,i ⋅ μ r ,i
du

Conversion of cumulative distributions from number to mass basis or from mass to number
basis
d n d n


du
3
d q 0 (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
3
m , 0 ,i ⋅ μ 0 ,i ∫
du
d −3 q 3 (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
−3
m , 3,i ⋅ μ 3,i
Q 3 (d ) = do ≈ N (10) Q 0 (d ) = do ≈ N (11)
∫d 3
q 0 (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
3
m , 0 ,i ⋅ μ 0 ,i ∫d −3
q 3 (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
−3
m , 3,i ⋅ μ 3,i
du du

Conversion of k-th complete initial moment of a known quantity r in a searched quantity t


M k + t − r ,r
M k ,t = (12)
M t − r ,r

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.9
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.10
Cumulative Particle Size Distribution, Mass and Number Basis
d n
mass basis: Q 3 (d ) = ∫ q 3 (d ) ⋅ d(d ) ≈ ∑ μ 3,i
dU i =1

100
Verteilungsfunktion Q3(d) in %

90

80

70

60 Masseverteilung
50

40

30

20

10

0
0.5 1 5 10 50 100 500 1000
Partikelgröße in µm

d n μ 3 ,i
∫ d ⋅ q 3 ( d ) ⋅ d( d ) ∑d
−3
3
i =1
number basis: Q 0 (d ) = du

m ,i
do N μ 3 ,i
∫d
−3
⋅ q 3 ( d ) ⋅ d( d ) ∑d
i =1
3
du m ,i

100
Verteilungsfunktion Q0(d) in %

90

80

70

60
Anzahlverteilung
50

40

30

20

10

0
0.5 1 5 10 50 100 500 1000
Partikelgröße in µm

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.10
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.11
Multi-modal Frequency Distribution
1.8
1.6
frequency distribution q*(log d)

1.4 subcollective 1

1.2
1.0 subcollective 2

0.8
0.6 subcollective 3
0.4
0.2
0
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
particle size d in mm
total frequency distribution: μSC,k(t) mass fraction of the k-th

[ ]
N
subcollective (subpopulation)
q3,tot (d, t) = ∑ μ SC,k ⋅ q3,k d, do,k , d50,k , σ ln,k
k =1
q3,k frequency distribution
truncated log-normal distribution:
of the k-th subcollective
do,k − d ⎛ u2 ⎞ do,k upper limit of the particle size
q3,k (d) = ⋅ exp⎜ − ⎟
2 π ⋅ σ ln,k ⋅ do,k ⋅d ⎝ 2⎠ of the k-th subcollective
with d50,k median particle size of the
1 ⎡ ⎛ do,k ⋅ d ⎞ ⎛ do,k ⋅ d50,k ⎞ ⎤ distribution function
u= ⎢ln⎜ ⎟ − ln⎜ ⎟⎥
σ ln,k ⎢⎣ ⎝ do,k − d⎠ ⎝ o,k
d − d 50,k ⎠ ⎥
⎦ σln,k standard deviation of the
normalisation: k-th subcollective

dQ 3 (log d) ΔQ 3 (log d) μ 3,i N total number of subcollectives


q*3,tot = ≈ =
d(log d) Δ log d ⎛ d ⎞
log⎜ i ⎟
⎝ di−1 ⎠


⎛ u2 ⎞
lim ∑ μ SC,k ⋅ Q 3,k [d, d o,k , d 50,k , σ ln,k ] =
u
1
N→∞
k =1 2π ∫−∞exp⎜⎜⎝ − 2 ⎟⎟⎠ d(d) = Q3,tot (d, t)
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.11
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.12

Mass Fraction Related to the Number of Stressing Events

discrete mass balance model:

dμ sc ,1
= −S n ,1 ⋅ μ sc ,1
n
dμ sc,3 N

n
= S n ,3,1 ⋅ μ sc,1 + S n ,3, 2 ⋅ μ sc, 2 ∑μ
k =1
sc , k =1
n number of stressing events
Sk,j kinetic constants for mass transfer from j to k subcollective

measured
3
model

mass fraction µsc,k

1,0
0,8
0,6
0,4
1
0,2
2 0,0
k-th subcollective 2 3 4
3
0 1
number of stressing events n

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.12
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.13
Application of Image Analysis to Characterise Particle Size
0B

1. Image of Microscope by CCD-camera


1B

direct- trans-
light mitted
direct-light light

transmitted
light
particle

pixel number
2. Definition of Threshold Value
2B

Definition of grey tone limits


for particle detection in a 8-bit
grey tone image
0 grey tone distribution 255
3. Conversion of Grey Tone Image in a (black) (wite)
Binary Image (Binarisation)

Binary image means: which


pixel of original image is shown
by 0 (black) or by 255 (white)

4. Classification of Particles
• min. and maximum Feret diameter
dF,ma • equivalent circle diameter
d = 2⋅ A/π ,
A
dF,mi • shape factor ψ U = 4 ⋅ π ⋅
U2
dequ U = circumference, A = projection
area

Presentation of Particle Size Fractions


in a Colour Code

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.13
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.14
Principle of Laser Light Diffraction
large diffraction for particle size d ≈ λ wavelength, small diffraction for d >> λ
sample cell
Fourier detector
lense system lense
r

laser

f
focal distance

principle of laser light diffractometer


computer

¾ light diffraction pattern detector


Fourier lense
¾ radial light intensity
distribution at detector r

d max

I tot = ∫N
d min
tot ⋅ q 0 (d ) ⋅ I( r , d i ) d (d )

¾ particle size distribution prinziple of Fourier lense


cumulative distribution Q3 in %

frequency distribution q3 in 1/mm


particle size distribution

100
Intensity I

50

r 0
particle size

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.14
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.15
In-Line Particle Size Analysis (Sympatec)
feed opening
particle loaded air stream
inductive sensor

drive for rotating


sampling device

on-line sampling

dispersion air

detector with
sensor array
laser beam
low-angle laser
light-scattering
instrument
(LALLS)
d = 0.5 – 1750
µm
nozzle and
sample cell

isokinetic sampling device for a split particle stream:


rotating sector moving pipe

d
α

D D

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.15
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.16
In-Line Particle Size Analysis (Malvern)

isokinetic sampling

particle
stream

laser particle
feed back

Injektion nozzle detector

pressurized air

monitoring of size ranges: 0.5 - 200 µm


1.0 - 400 µm
2.25 - 850 µm

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.16
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.17
Principle of Photon – Correlation Spectrometer (PCS)
¾ in suspensions at rest: light scattering at dispersed particles, that oscillate by Brownian
molecular motion

Laser Optik Probenbehälter

Photomultiplier Korrelator
Optische Einheit

¾ Determination of intensity – time function of scattered light (reasons: interferences,


change of particle number concentration within the charac-teristic volume element)
and calculation of autocorrelation function:
intensity of scattered light

autocorrelation function RI,I(τ)

fine particle
coarse particle

time t retardation time τ

• Autocorrelation function (Dp – particle diffusion coefficient, K – scattered light vector,


τ - retardation time)
T
R I, I (τ) = lim ∫ I( t ) ⋅ I( t + τ) dt = e
− 2⋅ D p ⋅ K 2 ⋅ τ
kB ⋅T
T →∞ with d =
−T 3 ⋅ π ⋅ η ⋅ Dp
• EINSTEIN equation (d – particle size, kB – BOLTZMANN constant, T – absolute
temperature, η - dynamic viscosity)

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.17
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.18
page 1

1. Physical Principle
Laser diffraction technique is based on the phenominon that particles scatter light
in all directions (backscattering and diffraction) with an intensity that is dependent
on particle size

2. Measurement setup

Using two laser beams with different wavelength (red and blue light) additional
information to particles smaller 0,2 µm is obtained

red light setup large angle


Detectors
forward angle
backscatter

Laser Θ

Fourier lens Sample chamber

- scattering light hits only forward angle detectors


- the angle of the deflected laser beam is inverse proportional to the particle size
large angle
Detectors
blue light setup forward angle
backscatter

Laser
Θ

Fourier lens Sample chamber

- blue light (wavelength 466 nm) leads to a scattering signal for small particles
(isotropic scattering pattern) which can be detected from large angle- and
backscatter- detectors
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.18
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.19
Device features: - range: 20 nm to 2000 µm page 2

- high resolution

- dilute suspension, (low particle concentration)

3. Data Analysis Technique


Light Scattering
1000

Light scattering data 500

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

De t e c t or Numbe r

Determining the Particle Size Distribution (equivalent sphere radius) by means of


MIE -Theory

light intensity distributionwhich receive each detector
I(Θ) = ∫I(r,Θ) q(r) dr r - particle radius
0 q(r) - frequency distribution of particles
Θ - angle of scattered light
at finite num ber of detectors the above integral equation induce to a system of
linear equations (area m atrix)

⎡f1 ⎤ ⎡c11 ⋅ c1n ⎤ ⎡r1 ⎤


⎢ ⋅ ⎥ = ⎢ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⎥⋅⎢ ⋅ ⎥ f - vector for measured detecor intensity
⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ⎥ c - Solutions of above equation I(Θ)
⎢⎣fn ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣cn1 ⋅ cnn ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣rn ⎥⎦ r - vector for particle size

Particle Size Distribution


10
100
9
8
80
7
V o lu m e ( % )

Result Report 6 60
5 Θ
4 40
3
2 20
1
0 0
1 10 100 1000 2000
Particle Size (µm)

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.19
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.20
Principle of Acoustic Attenuation Spectroscopy
¾ during acoustic wave penetration, amplitude and intensity attenuation (damping) of
ultrasonic frequency spectrum (1 to 100 MHz) in high concentrated particle
suspensions with sizes d = 10 nm – 1 mm
Suspension
Level sensor

HF Transmitter HF Receiver

LF Transmitter LF Receiver
Stopper motor
and digital
encoder
Transducer
Positioning Table

Stirrer Discharge

Control
module

Microwave
and
DSP module

¾ detection of attenuation (damping) spectrum


¾ correlation between attenuation
RF generator RF detector
characteristics and particle size distribution
(K = 2⋅π/λ suspension wave number, k fluid x << λ
entrainment
wave number, ϕs particle volume
concentration, i = 1...n particle size fraction,
ri particle radius, Ami reflected compression
wave coefficient, ARe real contribution, m
number of acoustic dispersion coefficient):
3 n i ⋅ ϕs ,i ∞
2
⎛K⎞
⎜ ⎟ = 1 − ∑ 3 3 ∑ (2m + 1)A Re ⋅ A mi
⎝k⎠ 2 i=1 k ⋅ ri m=0 λ x >> λ
scattering
measuring zone
cumulative distribution Q3 in %

frequency distribution q3 in 1/mm

particle size distribution


damping

100

50

frequency 0
particle size

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.20
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.21
Determination of Particle Size Distribution and Zeta-Potential using
Electroacoustic Effect - Electrokinetic Sonic Amplitude (ESA)

1. Physical Principle
Alternating electric field (frequency range 1 to 20 MHz) generates particle oscillations
at velocities that depend on their size and zeta potential (O' Brien- Theory)

Δρ
Δρ ∼ Δp ESA = A(ω ) ⋅ ϕ s ⋅ ⋅ Z ⋅ μE
ρp

A(ω) calibration function


ϕs volume fraction of particles
Δρ suspension density difference
acoustic signal (ESA) as response ρp particle density
Z acoustic impedance (complex resistance)

2. Measurement Setup electrophoretic mobility (µE)


r
v ζ
μE = r = ε0 ⋅εr ⋅
ESA-Signal
Processing
E η

ε0 permittivity of vacuum
εr permittivity
v particle velocity
E electric field strength
η viscosity

suspension

μ m = ∫ μ E (d , ζ , ϕ s ) ⋅ q(d )d (d )
3. Data Analysis
Particle motion in an electric field
E;v

μm measured dynamic mobility


Tim e
ζ zeta-potential
applied electric field particle velocity d particle diameter
ϕs volume fraction of particles
q(d) particle size frequency distribution
Mobility Spectrum
phase lag

µm
adjusting q(d) and zeta-potential ζ from
phase lag

dyn. mobility
the measured mobility spectrum

frequency
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.21
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.22

Photoluminescence
Wavelength of visible light

UV IR
400 500 600 700
wavelength λ in nm

a) Phosphorescence, life time > 10-5 s, here t ≈ 20 min

energy level

inradiation transition
light radiation
initial particle particle after
excitation quasi transparent grinding

b) Fluorescence, wavelength shift λ↑, life time <10-5s

initial particle particle after grinding

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.22
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.23
Online Size Measurement by Particle Photoluminescence

MIR
1

feed
particle
activation v discharge
cell
cuvette D

stirred tank mill


phosphorescence cell

photomultiplier
a) Phosphorescence reduction (decreasing of transparency) due to
stressing, cracking, surface displacement and defects

2
I0 - initial intensity (J/m )
phosphorescence intensity ratio I/I0

1.0
I - current intensity

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25

surface diameter dST in μm

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.23
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.24
b) Fluorescence spectra of zinc sulfide particles to determine the surface
diameter

HeCd Laser
excitation at λ = 325 nm

Mono- Sample
chromator
CCD Camera
⎛ I(λ ) ⎞
Normalised fluorescence intensity i = I / ∫ I(λ)dλ and d = f ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ 1

λ
3B

⎝ I ( ) ⎠ 2

surface diameter dST


0.012
20 μm
8.1μm
0.010
initial line 1.5μm
Normalised intensity i

0.79μm
0.008 0.54μm
defect line
0.006

0.004

0.002

0.000
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650
Wavelength λ in nm

Advantage: Online measurement of crystalline particles without


agglomeration influence.

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.24
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.25
Particle Density Measurement by HELIUM-Pycnometer
¾ Determination of pore–free particle volume by gas pressure measurement in a double-
chamber system by HELIUM gas (migration access of internal pores dPore > 0,1 nm)
probe chamber P pressure

feed valve discharge valve


Helium
filter
prep./ test valve
overpressure
valve

5
VProbe

VCell 5, V Exp
35

VCell 35,
V Exp

VCell 150
150
V Exp

• Pressure measurement in probe chamber: (VCell –VProbe) p1

• Pressure test in probe and expansion chamber: (VCell –VProbe) + VExp p2

• Calculation of probe volume and solid density, pre-measurement of particle mass ms


by balance
VExp ms
VPr obe = VCell − and
ρs =
p1 / p 2 − 1 VPr obe

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.25
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.26
Measurement of Particle Surface by Gas Adsorption according to
BRUNAUER, EMMET and TELLER
¾ Physical adsorption of gas molecules at particle surfaces in multi-layers due to VAN
DER WAALS interaction
gas supply vacuum
P

adsorbed gasv olume Vg


desorption
dosing
valve T P

adsorption

standard vessel
BET range
sorption isotherms

0 0.35 1
probe chamber relative partial pressure of gas p/p0
dewar vessel adsorbed
T p0 - test chamber gas molecules
(adsorpt)
liquid nitrogen adsorptiv
N2 at T = 77 K
p0 = 101 kPa particle surface
(adsorbens)
¾ BET- line, valid for: 0.05 < p/p0 < 0.3
• Adsorpt mono-layer coverage:
p / p0 1 C BET − 1
= + ⋅ p / p0 1
Vg (1 − p / p 0 ) Vg ,mono ⋅ C BET Vg ,mono ⋅ C BET Vg ,mono =
a+b
p / p0
• BET- constant:
Vg (1 − p / p0 ) ⎡ ΔH m − ΔH multi ⎤ a + b
C BET = exp ⎢ ⎥= a
b=
(CBET −1) ⎣ R⋅ T ⎦
ΔH m free molar adsorption enthalpy of
Vg,mono⋅ CBET mono-layer
ΔH multi molar bonding enthalpy of n
multi-layers ≅
1 ΔHcondensation
a=
Vg,mono⋅ CBET • Particle Surface:
A S = A M ,g ⋅ N A ⋅ Vg ,mono / Vm ,l
relative gas pressure p / p 0 AM,g cross-sectional area of adsorpt
molecule
NA AVOGADRO-number
Vm,l molar volume of condensed adsorpt

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.26
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.27
z c
Regular Packing Structures
β α
b
y porosity ε, coordination number k
x γ
a

lattice type primitive basic face- face-centred space-centred


centred

cubic
a=b=c
α = β = γ = 90 °

a0
a0 ≈ 0,1nm k = 6 k = 12 k=8

monodisperse
sphere
packing
d = const.

d
ε = 0,4764 ε = 0,3955

hexagonal
a=b=c
α = β = 90 °
γ = 120 °

k = 12

octahedron
sphere vacancy
packing

tetrahedron
vacancy
ε = 0,2595

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.27
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.28

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.28
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT E.g. influence of packing density:
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.29
Stressing and Flow of Wet Particle Dispersions
particle in liquid dispersion (suspension) paste liquid in particle packing
diluted concentrated liquid saturated moist packing
τ τ σ τ σ τ
suspension ux
and particle
dy dy ux vx
flow pattern y
. du dy
x γ = dyx ux vx

flow function τ τ τ τ
τ ≠ f (σ) σ τ ≈ f ( γ. )
. . .
shear rate γ γ γ normal stress σ
cubical cell σ
τ d
packing d
τ τ d
model τ
d
a a
ϕs a
=
εs,0
( 1+ )
a -3 a
d
τ d
d τ
d τ τ

a a a
a
particle a a a a contact
separation >1 0 < d < 0.2 =0 contact -0.01 < <0
d d d deformation

particle π εs > π
volume ϕs < 0.066 π εs,0 =
0.3 < ϕs < 6 6
fraction
s

6 pore saturation S = 1 S<1


particle
friction ϕi = 0 ϕi = 0 ϕi ≥ 0 ϕi > 30°

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.29
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.30
Sampling

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.30
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.31

Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.31

You might also like