Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.1
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.2
10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1
o
1A 1 nm 1 µm 1 mm 1 cm 1m
visual ability of human eye
wave length of visible light:
ultra-
X-rays and electron interferences microscope light microscope
electron microscope
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.2
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.3
Blatt 2
Mixtures of Polydisperse (Material) Particle Systems
10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1
disper- disperse
sant phase 1 Ao 1 nm 1 µm 1 mm 1 cm 1m
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.3
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.4
Bioavailability
Quantum effects
Strongly developed
surface effects
10–9 10–6 m
0,001 0,01 0,1 1 µm
1 10 100 1000 nm
Polymers
Proteins
Metal powders
Virus, DNS
Ceramic powders
Tobacco smoke
Atmospheric
aerosols
Nanoparticles for
life sciences
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.4
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.5
Expression of the Particle Size
characte- Eq./sketch measuring method,
ristic size quantity r = 0...3
breadth: b b + 1 b + l + t ⎛ b ⎞1 / 3 r = 0 number basis
, ,⎜ ⎟ , b
length: l 2 3 ⎝t⎠ r = 1 length
thickness: t 3 ⎛ 2lb + 2bt + 2lt ⎞
1/ 2
r = 2 area
, lb , ⎜ ⎟ t
1/ l + 1/ b ⎝ 6 ⎠ r = 3 volume basis
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.5
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.6
Characterisation of Disperse Material Systems
1
Qr(d)
dM dF 0,5 ΔQr(d)
dS
Qr(d2)
Qr(d1) Δd
0
dF FERET chord length du d1 d2 d0
dM MARTIN chord length d
dS maximum chord length
5. Particle size distribution function Q3(d) and frequency distribution of particle size q3(d) of
the above example 4.
0.20
a) b)
100 qr(d) ≈ Qr(di) - Qr(di-1)
0.15 di - di-1
q3(d) in mm-1
80
Q3(d) in %
60 0.1
di-1 + di
40 Qr(d*<di) dm,i =
2
0.05
20
0 0
0 4 8 12 16 20 0 4 8 12 16 20
particle size d in mm particle size d in mm
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.6
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.7
6. Three - parameter logarithmic 7. Comparison of particle size distribution functions
normal distribution (L) with upper in a full-logarithmic, RRSB and log - normal
limit do and transformation (T) diagram (net)
full-logarithmic net
RRSB - net
90 80 10 full-logarith- RRSB-net
L mic -net log - normal
Qr(d)
60 6
net
50 T transformed 40 4 10
distribution 20
2 5
10
10 5
5 1
1
1 0.5 0.5
0.20 100 101 102 103 104
10-1 100 101 102 103
0.02 10-2 10-1 100 101 102
1 5 10 50 100 500
d50 do particle size d in µm
δ16 δ50 δ84 d or δ in µm
1 Log-Normal distribution
2 RRSB-distribution
3 GGS-distribution
7.0 7.5 8 9 10 15 20 25 30
AS,V,K · d63 in m3/ m3
40
n 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 60
0.9 80
99.9 100
99 x 120
cumulative distribution Q3(d) in %
x 0.8 150
95
90 x 200
0.7 300
x 500
63.2 x 1000
50 0.6 2000
x 5000
0.5 10000
x
10 0.4
x
0.3
0.2
x
1 0.1
0.5 0
Pol -1
10 -3 10 -2 10 10 0 101 10
2
particle size d in mm
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.7
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.8
Probability Distributions
Normal Distribution:
⎡ 1 ⎛ x − μ ⎞2 ⎤
q (x ) =
1 σ2< σ1
exp ⎢ − ⋅ ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ q(x)
σ⋅ 2⋅π ⎢⎣ 2 ⎝ σ ⎠ ⎥⎦ (1)
x
⎡ 1 ⎛ t − μ ⎞2 ⎤ σ1
Q (x ) =
1
σ ⋅ 2π
∫ ⎢⎢ − 2 ⋅ ⎜⎝ σ ⎟⎠ ⎥⎥ dt
exp (2)
−∞ ⎣ ⎦
normalised :
u
⎡ t2 ⎤
Q (x ) =
1
2π
∫− ∞ ⎢⎣ − 2 ⎥⎦ dt
exp (3) Q(x) = 0.5
with
x − x 50 x 84 − x 16 μ = xh = x50 x
u= (4 ) σ= (5) 0 x16 x84
σ 2
⎡ 1 ⎛ ln x − μ ⎞
2
⎤
q (x ) =
1 (6) q(x)
⋅ exp ⎢ − ⋅ ⎜⎜ ln
⎟⎟ ⎥
σ ln ⋅ x ⋅ 2 ⋅ π ⎢⎣ 2 ⎝ σ ln ⎠ ⎥⎦ 0.3
μln = 1, σln = 1
x ⎡ 1 ⎛ ln t − μ ⎞
2
⎤ (7) 0.2
Q (x ) =
1 1
σ ln ⋅ 2⋅π
∫0
t
⋅ exp ⎢ − ⎜⎜
⎢⎣ 2 ⎝ σ ln
ln
⎟⎟
⎠
⎥ dt
⎥⎦ μln = 3, σln = √3
d − d min (8) 0.1
μln = 3, σln = 1
x= ⋅ d max for d min ≤ d ≤ d max
d max − d
ln x − μ ln ⎛x ⎞ (10)
u= (9 ) σ ln =
1
⋅ ln ⎜⎜ 84 ⎟⎟ x
σ ln 2 ⎝ x 16 ⎠ 0 5 10 15
q(x) xu = 0
n = 0.5 n = 5.5 x* = x63 = 1
⎛ x − xu ⎞
n −1
⎡ ⎛ x−x ⎞
n
⎤
q (x ) = ∗
n 2.0
⋅ ⎜⎜ ∗ ⎟
⎟ ⋅ exp ⎢ − ⎜⎜ ∗ u
⎟
⎟ ⎥
(11)
x − xu ⎝ x − xu ⎠ ⎢⎣ ⎝ x − x u ⎠ ⎥⎦ n=3
n=2
⎡ ⎛ x−x ⎞
n
⎤ 1.0
Q (x ) = 1 − exp ⎢ − ⎜⎜ ∗ u
⎟⎟ ⎥ (12) n=1
⎢⎣ ⎝ x − x u ⎠ ⎥⎦
( )
N
∫ (d − d ) ∫ (d − d ) ⋅ dQ r (d ) ≈ ∑ d m,r ,i − d ∗
k
* k * k
d*
M k, r = ⋅ q r (d ) d (d ) = ⋅ μ r ,i (1)
du du i=1
d m, r M k , r = Z k ,r = ∫ ( d − d m ,r ) k q r ( d ) d ( d ) (3)
du
Incomplete k-th Initial Moment du...d, i...n and Complete Initial Moment du...do, i...n...N
d n do N
M t − r ,r
d
du
∫
du
d t − r q r (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
t−r
m , r ,i ⋅ μ r ,i
Q t (d ) = do = do ≈ N (9)
M t − r ,r
du ∫d t−r
q r (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
t−r
m , r ,i ⋅ μ r ,i
du
Conversion of cumulative distributions from number to mass basis or from mass to number
basis
d n d n
∫
du
3
d q 0 (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
3
m , 0 ,i ⋅ μ 0 ,i ∫
du
d −3 q 3 (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
−3
m , 3,i ⋅ μ 3,i
Q 3 (d ) = do ≈ N (10) Q 0 (d ) = do ≈ N (11)
∫d 3
q 0 (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
3
m , 0 ,i ⋅ μ 0 ,i ∫d −3
q 3 (d ) d (d ) ∑d
i =1
−3
m , 3,i ⋅ μ 3,i
du du
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.9
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.10
Cumulative Particle Size Distribution, Mass and Number Basis
d n
mass basis: Q 3 (d ) = ∫ q 3 (d ) ⋅ d(d ) ≈ ∑ μ 3,i
dU i =1
100
Verteilungsfunktion Q3(d) in %
90
80
70
60 Masseverteilung
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.5 1 5 10 50 100 500 1000
Partikelgröße in µm
d n μ 3 ,i
∫ d ⋅ q 3 ( d ) ⋅ d( d ) ∑d
−3
3
i =1
number basis: Q 0 (d ) = du
≈
m ,i
do N μ 3 ,i
∫d
−3
⋅ q 3 ( d ) ⋅ d( d ) ∑d
i =1
3
du m ,i
100
Verteilungsfunktion Q0(d) in %
90
80
70
60
Anzahlverteilung
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.5 1 5 10 50 100 500 1000
Partikelgröße in µm
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.10
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.11
Multi-modal Frequency Distribution
1.8
1.6
frequency distribution q*(log d)
1.4 subcollective 1
1.2
1.0 subcollective 2
0.8
0.6 subcollective 3
0.4
0.2
0
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
particle size d in mm
total frequency distribution: μSC,k(t) mass fraction of the k-th
[ ]
N
subcollective (subpopulation)
q3,tot (d, t) = ∑ μ SC,k ⋅ q3,k d, do,k , d50,k , σ ln,k
k =1
q3,k frequency distribution
truncated log-normal distribution:
of the k-th subcollective
do,k − d ⎛ u2 ⎞ do,k upper limit of the particle size
q3,k (d) = ⋅ exp⎜ − ⎟
2 π ⋅ σ ln,k ⋅ do,k ⋅d ⎝ 2⎠ of the k-th subcollective
with d50,k median particle size of the
1 ⎡ ⎛ do,k ⋅ d ⎞ ⎛ do,k ⋅ d50,k ⎞ ⎤ distribution function
u= ⎢ln⎜ ⎟ − ln⎜ ⎟⎥
σ ln,k ⎢⎣ ⎝ do,k − d⎠ ⎝ o,k
d − d 50,k ⎠ ⎥
⎦ σln,k standard deviation of the
normalisation: k-th subcollective
∞
⎛ u2 ⎞
lim ∑ μ SC,k ⋅ Q 3,k [d, d o,k , d 50,k , σ ln,k ] =
u
1
N→∞
k =1 2π ∫−∞exp⎜⎜⎝ − 2 ⎟⎟⎠ d(d) = Q3,tot (d, t)
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.11
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.12
dμ sc ,1
= −S n ,1 ⋅ μ sc ,1
n
dμ sc,3 N
n
= S n ,3,1 ⋅ μ sc,1 + S n ,3, 2 ⋅ μ sc, 2 ∑μ
k =1
sc , k =1
n number of stressing events
Sk,j kinetic constants for mass transfer from j to k subcollective
measured
3
model
1,0
0,8
0,6
0,4
1
0,2
2 0,0
k-th subcollective 2 3 4
3
0 1
number of stressing events n
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.12
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.13
Application of Image Analysis to Characterise Particle Size
0B
direct- trans-
light mitted
direct-light light
transmitted
light
particle
pixel number
2. Definition of Threshold Value
2B
4. Classification of Particles
• min. and maximum Feret diameter
dF,ma • equivalent circle diameter
d = 2⋅ A/π ,
A
dF,mi • shape factor ψ U = 4 ⋅ π ⋅
U2
dequ U = circumference, A = projection
area
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.13
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.14
Principle of Laser Light Diffraction
large diffraction for particle size d ≈ λ wavelength, small diffraction for d >> λ
sample cell
Fourier detector
lense system lense
r
laser
f
focal distance
d max
I tot = ∫N
d min
tot ⋅ q 0 (d ) ⋅ I( r , d i ) d (d )
100
Intensity I
50
r 0
particle size
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.14
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.15
In-Line Particle Size Analysis (Sympatec)
feed opening
particle loaded air stream
inductive sensor
on-line sampling
dispersion air
detector with
sensor array
laser beam
low-angle laser
light-scattering
instrument
(LALLS)
d = 0.5 – 1750
µm
nozzle and
sample cell
d
α
D D
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.15
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.16
In-Line Particle Size Analysis (Malvern)
isokinetic sampling
particle
stream
laser particle
feed back
pressurized air
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.16
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.17
Principle of Photon – Correlation Spectrometer (PCS)
¾ in suspensions at rest: light scattering at dispersed particles, that oscillate by Brownian
molecular motion
Photomultiplier Korrelator
Optische Einheit
fine particle
coarse particle
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.17
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.18
page 1
1. Physical Principle
Laser diffraction technique is based on the phenominon that particles scatter light
in all directions (backscattering and diffraction) with an intensity that is dependent
on particle size
2. Measurement setup
Using two laser beams with different wavelength (red and blue light) additional
information to particles smaller 0,2 µm is obtained
Laser Θ
Laser
Θ
- blue light (wavelength 466 nm) leads to a scattering signal for small particles
(isotropic scattering pattern) which can be detected from large angle- and
backscatter- detectors
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.18
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.19
Device features: - range: 20 nm to 2000 µm page 2
- high resolution
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
De t e c t or Numbe r
Result Report 6 60
5 Θ
4 40
3
2 20
1
0 0
1 10 100 1000 2000
Particle Size (µm)
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.19
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.20
Principle of Acoustic Attenuation Spectroscopy
¾ during acoustic wave penetration, amplitude and intensity attenuation (damping) of
ultrasonic frequency spectrum (1 to 100 MHz) in high concentrated particle
suspensions with sizes d = 10 nm – 1 mm
Suspension
Level sensor
HF Transmitter HF Receiver
LF Transmitter LF Receiver
Stopper motor
and digital
encoder
Transducer
Positioning Table
Stirrer Discharge
Control
module
Microwave
and
DSP module
100
50
frequency 0
particle size
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.20
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.21
Determination of Particle Size Distribution and Zeta-Potential using
Electroacoustic Effect - Electrokinetic Sonic Amplitude (ESA)
1. Physical Principle
Alternating electric field (frequency range 1 to 20 MHz) generates particle oscillations
at velocities that depend on their size and zeta potential (O' Brien- Theory)
Δρ
Δρ ∼ Δp ESA = A(ω ) ⋅ ϕ s ⋅ ⋅ Z ⋅ μE
ρp
ε0 permittivity of vacuum
εr permittivity
v particle velocity
E electric field strength
η viscosity
suspension
μ m = ∫ μ E (d , ζ , ϕ s ) ⋅ q(d )d (d )
3. Data Analysis
Particle motion in an electric field
E;v
µm
adjusting q(d) and zeta-potential ζ from
phase lag
dyn. mobility
the measured mobility spectrum
frequency
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.21
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.22
Photoluminescence
Wavelength of visible light
UV IR
400 500 600 700
wavelength λ in nm
energy level
inradiation transition
light radiation
initial particle particle after
excitation quasi transparent grinding
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.22
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.23
Online Size Measurement by Particle Photoluminescence
MIR
1
feed
particle
activation v discharge
cell
cuvette D
photomultiplier
a) Phosphorescence reduction (decreasing of transparency) due to
stressing, cracking, surface displacement and defects
2
I0 - initial intensity (J/m )
phosphorescence intensity ratio I/I0
1.0
I - current intensity
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.23
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.24
b) Fluorescence spectra of zinc sulfide particles to determine the surface
diameter
HeCd Laser
excitation at λ = 325 nm
Mono- Sample
chromator
CCD Camera
⎛ I(λ ) ⎞
Normalised fluorescence intensity i = I / ∫ I(λ)dλ and d = f ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ 1
λ
3B
⎝ I ( ) ⎠ 2
0.79μm
0.008 0.54μm
defect line
0.006
0.004
0.002
0.000
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650
Wavelength λ in nm
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.24
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.25
Particle Density Measurement by HELIUM-Pycnometer
¾ Determination of pore–free particle volume by gas pressure measurement in a double-
chamber system by HELIUM gas (migration access of internal pores dPore > 0,1 nm)
probe chamber P pressure
5
VProbe
VCell 5, V Exp
35
VCell 35,
V Exp
VCell 150
150
V Exp
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.25
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.26
Measurement of Particle Surface by Gas Adsorption according to
BRUNAUER, EMMET and TELLER
¾ Physical adsorption of gas molecules at particle surfaces in multi-layers due to VAN
DER WAALS interaction
gas supply vacuum
P
adsorption
standard vessel
BET range
sorption isotherms
0 0.35 1
probe chamber relative partial pressure of gas p/p0
dewar vessel adsorbed
T p0 - test chamber gas molecules
(adsorpt)
liquid nitrogen adsorptiv
N2 at T = 77 K
p0 = 101 kPa particle surface
(adsorbens)
¾ BET- line, valid for: 0.05 < p/p0 < 0.3
• Adsorpt mono-layer coverage:
p / p0 1 C BET − 1
= + ⋅ p / p0 1
Vg (1 − p / p 0 ) Vg ,mono ⋅ C BET Vg ,mono ⋅ C BET Vg ,mono =
a+b
p / p0
• BET- constant:
Vg (1 − p / p0 ) ⎡ ΔH m − ΔH multi ⎤ a + b
C BET = exp ⎢ ⎥= a
b=
(CBET −1) ⎣ R⋅ T ⎦
ΔH m free molar adsorption enthalpy of
Vg,mono⋅ CBET mono-layer
ΔH multi molar bonding enthalpy of n
multi-layers ≅
1 ΔHcondensation
a=
Vg,mono⋅ CBET • Particle Surface:
A S = A M ,g ⋅ N A ⋅ Vg ,mono / Vm ,l
relative gas pressure p / p 0 AM,g cross-sectional area of adsorpt
molecule
NA AVOGADRO-number
Vm,l molar volume of condensed adsorpt
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.26
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.27
z c
Regular Packing Structures
β α
b
y porosity ε, coordination number k
x γ
a
cubic
a=b=c
α = β = γ = 90 °
a0
a0 ≈ 0,1nm k = 6 k = 12 k=8
monodisperse
sphere
packing
d = const.
d
ε = 0,4764 ε = 0,3955
hexagonal
a=b=c
α = β = 90 °
γ = 120 °
k = 12
octahedron
sphere vacancy
packing
tetrahedron
vacancy
ε = 0,2595
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.27
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.28
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.28
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT E.g. influence of packing density:
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.29
Stressing and Flow of Wet Particle Dispersions
particle in liquid dispersion (suspension) paste liquid in particle packing
diluted concentrated liquid saturated moist packing
τ τ σ τ σ τ
suspension ux
and particle
dy dy ux vx
flow pattern y
. du dy
x γ = dyx ux vx
flow function τ τ τ τ
τ ≠ f (σ) σ τ ≈ f ( γ. )
. . .
shear rate γ γ γ normal stress σ
cubical cell σ
τ d
packing d
τ τ d
model τ
d
a a
ϕs a
=
εs,0
( 1+ )
a -3 a
d
τ d
d τ
d τ τ
a a a
a
particle a a a a contact
separation >1 0 < d < 0.2 =0 contact -0.01 < <0
d d d deformation
particle π εs > π
volume ϕs < 0.066 π εs,0 =
0.3 < ϕs < 6 6
fraction
s
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.29
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.30
Sampling
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.30
OTTO-VON-GUERICKE-UNIVERSITY MAGDEBURG
PROCESS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Mechanical Process Engineering Figure 1.31
Fig_MPE_1.doc © Mechanical Process Engineering - Particle Technology Disperse Systems Prof. Dr. J. Tomas 16.03.2010 Figure 1.31