Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6. Introduction:
The Agriculture is one of the largest economic sectors and it plays the
major role in economic development of our country. In our country the ever-increasing
population, losses involved in processing and the increasing demand of fruits of high
quality with good appearance, there is a need for the development of accurate, fast and
focused quality determination of food and agricultural products like fruits and
vegetables. Handling process of agricultural produce is performed in several steps like
first cutting of fruits or vegetables from the farm, washing, sorting, grading, packing,
transporting and finally storage. Amongst all these steps sorting and grading are major
processing tasks associated for preserving the quality of fresh-market stuff. Sorting of
agricultural products is done based on appearance of fruits. Whereas grading is done
based on the overall quality features of a fruits by considering a number of attributes
like shape, size, color etc.
Fruit market is getting highly selective, requiring their suppliers to
distribute the fruits of high standards of quality and presentation as well. So there is a
increasing need to supply quality fruits within a short period of time has given rise to
the development of automated Grading of fruits to improve the quality.
7. Literature Review :
1. M. R. Satpute and S. M. Jagdale, "Automatic fruit quality inspection system," 2016
(ICICT), 2016:[1]
In this paper, An automatic fruit quality inspection system for sorting and grading of
tomato fruit and defected tomato detection has been presented. The main aim of this
system is to replace the manual inspection system. This helps in speed up the process
improve accuracy and efficiency and reduce time. This system collect image from camera
which is placed on conveyor belt. Then image processing is done to get required features
of fruits such as texture, color and size. Defected fruit is detected based on blob detection,
color detection is done based on thresholding and size detection is based on binary image
of tomato. Sorting is done based on color and grading is done based on size.
In the Further design, this system can be modified by increasing size of conveyor belt so
that it is possible to perform quality inspection of large fruit than tomato, and increase
accuracy of the system so that it can differentiate between artificial , hybrid color from
original fruit color.
This paper proposed and appraised the frame for the determination of the ripeness of
tomato, estimation of size and shape and detection of defects of tomato. This work
presents the novel incorporated technique for grading tomatoes based on their ripeness.
The proposed approach used the concept of color detection algorithm for classifying
tomato in three classes and K-mean clustering algorithm for detecting the defects in
tomato and classifying them in defected class. The result analysis is able to accurately
determine the ripeness of tomato. The modularity and distributed nature of approach
makes the system easy to be upgraded in the future in order to increase quality standard.
3. Megha P. Arakeria, Lakshmanab, “Computer Vision Based Fruit Grading System for
Quality Evaluation of Tomato in Agriculture industry”, 7th International Conference
on Communication, Computing and Virtualization 2016.
The automated grading system not only speeds up the time of processing, but also
minimizes error. There is a great demand for tomatoes in both local and foreign markets.
The tomato fruit is very delicate and hence careful handling of this fruit is required
during grading. Thus, this paper proposes an automatic and effective tomato fruit grading
system based on computer vision techniques. The proposed quality evaluation method
consists of two phases: development of hardware and software. The hardware is
developed to capture the image of the tomato and move the fruit to the appropriate bins
without manual intervention. The software is developed using image processing
techniques to analyze the fruit for defects and ripeness.
Experiments were carried out on several images of the tomato fruit. It was observed that
the proposed method was successful with 96.47% accuracy in evaluating the quality of
the tomato.
4. Vilas D. Sadegaonkar, Kiran H. Wagh, " Automatic Sorting Using Computer Vision
& Image Processing For Improving Apple Quality," International Journal of
Innovative Research and Development: 2015
In agricultural sector the efficiency and the accurate grading process is very essential to
increase the productivity of produce. Everyday high quality fruits are exported to other
countries and generate a good income. That is why the grading process of the fruit is
important to improve the quality of fruits. However, fruit grading by humans in
agricultural industry is not sufficient, requires large number of labors and causes human
errors. Automatic grading system not only speeds up the process but also gives accurate
results. Therefore, there is a need for an efficient fruits grading or classification methods
to be developed. Fruit’s color, size, weight, component texture, ripeness are important
features for accurate classification and sorting of fruits such as oranges, apples, mangoes
etc. Objective of this paper is to emphasize on recent work reported on an automatic fruit
quality detection system. This paper presents the image processing techniques for feature
extraction and classification for fruit quality measurement system.
8. Concluding Remark :
• The most of the existing system are based on the color shape and size.
• The system may get failed for hybrid color of fruit
• The most of the vision based systems were failed due to intensity variations
• In the proposed system, we planned to develop the machine learning based system
• The solution for portability of the hardware can be solved by the using tiny
Raspberry Pi.
9. Problem Definition:
Currently, the fruits according to their ripeness and quality are sorted manually
by human. In this process due to human error the fruits can be sorted wrongly which
leads to wastage of fruit.
Fig. 1 and Fig 2 give an idea of how the system design is proposed. The
conveyor belt which will run on DC motors will bring the fruit in front of the camera.
Image processing will do on the image of the fruit. According to the features of the
image, it will be categorized into 3 types – raw, half ripe and ripe. From the resulted
category of the fruit it will be given to the sorting assembly which will sort the fruits.
Block Diagram:
Preprocessing Preprocessing
Image Image
segmentation segmentation
Feature Feature
extraction extraction
STOP Grade II
Grade I Grade III
The information of the modules and component to be use in the system is explain below
• Raspberry Pi:
• Camera
• Motors
DC motors will be used for the movement of the conveyor belt with 12v DC
input.
• Mechanical assembly
Mechanical assembly will contain a conveyor belt for transporting the fruit to the
sorting assembly.
1. Phase 1: To carry out the detailed literature survey regarding the image processing
based fruit sorter systems.
2. Phase 2: The actual arrangement of system hardware and software.
• Central library well equipped with reference books, latest electronics magazines.
19. Reference:
[1] M. R. Satpute and S. M. Jagdale, "Automatic fruit quality inspection system," 2016
International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Coimbatore,
2016, pp. 1-4.
[2] R. R. Mhaski, P. B. Chopade and M. P. Dale, "Determination of ripeness and grading of
tomato using image analysis on Raspberry Pi," 2015 Communication, Control and
Intelligent Systems (CCIS), Mathura, 2015, pp. 214-220.
[3] Megha. P. Arakeri, Lakshmana, “Computer Vision Based Fruit Grading System for
Quality Evaluation of Tomato in Agriculture industry”, 7th International Conference on
Communication, Computing and Virtualization 2016, pp. 426 – 433.
[4] Dr. Vilas D. Sadegaonkar, Kiran H. Wagh, “Automatic Sorting Using Computer Vision
& Image Processing For Improving Apple Quality”, International Journal of Innovative
Research and Development, Vol. 4. Issue 1, Jan 2015, pp.11-14