Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name:
Institution:
1
STAFFING AND ORGANIZATIONS 2
Introduction
Task importance refers to the process of ascertaining the value and significance of any
task. It involves a careful selection and planning of all the tasks before beginning to accomplish
them. In determining the importance of any task, one should have a critical assessment on what
would happen if the task is not fulfilled or if the task is delayed (Bradbury & Lichtenstein, 2000).
In order to effectively sort out tasks according to their importance, their long-term benefits are
considered. If the task influences an individual as well as his team players’ future results, then
the task is deemed important. These kinds of task should be tackled first before any other task
since failure to do so would have adverse effects on the performance of any company. On the
other hand, finishing these tasks and any other task of similar nature on time would result to the
individual and the company achieving their goals, dreams and success.
The urgency of any task should also be considered when sorting out tasks according to
their importance. Urgently needed work should be tackled first since they are considered
important (Steven & Thomas, 2006). They are given first priority and individuals should strive to
complete them within the stipulated time to avoid delays. Less urgent work should be set aside to
give room for the important ones to be dealt with first. This sorting out of tasks involves setting
priorities of each task and then embarking on serious work to accomplish the urgently needed
tasks before the less urgent ones. In doing so, the team players will be able to beat deadlines for
gathering indications on task importance. Tasks that prove difficult to tackle and accomplish
should be given extra attention and sufficient time. Such tasks should not be brushed aside with
STAFFING AND ORGANIZATIONS 3
the intention of doing them at a later date (Steven & Thomas, 2006). Pushing complex tasks for a
later date is procrastination of the highest degree and one may realize when it is late that the task
has not been done when the deadline is due or is just hours away. In considering these complex
tasks as important, the team players will join hands and work tirelessly in solving whatever is
proving difficult hence coming up with solutions. On the contrary, less complex work should not
be neglected. They should be tackled faster in order to create room for more task allocation.
The frequency with which a task is performed plays a major role in gathering indications
of task importance (Bradbury & Lichtenstein, 2000). Tasks that are performed daily are
considered to be important than those that are performed weekly or monthly. The daily
performed tasks are deemed important since they are instrumental in the running of any
organization and failure to perform them might stifle the operations and smooth running of the
company. These tasks should be given first priority and thus completed before any other task.
The damage caused by mistakes from a given task is instrumental in determining its
importance (Steven & Thomas, 2006). Tasks whose pitfalls results into major losses for the
organization are often considered highly important and thus are often handled with extreme
caution. Such tasks are given extra attention and enough time is allocated for them. Every team
player is expected to give his whole towards the accomplishment of the task and no amount
distraction is condoned (Bradbury & Lichtenstein, 2000). The task should be reviewed
thoroughly to correct any mistake that could have been made before its submission. All these
efforts are aimed at minimizing the losses that could arise from the task being poorly done and at
the same time maximizing the success and profits of the organization.
STAFFING AND ORGANIZATIONS 4
Conclusion
Task importance is of high significance to any organization that aspires to achieve its
visions and goals. It helps organizations plan their tasks and gives them guidelines on how to
References
Steven, M., & Thomas, M. H.(2006). Handbook of Test Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence