Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Individual who achieve goals through: human, technical and conceptual skills.
Organisation as a system:
Week 6 (motivation)
Individuals’ Intensity (how hard are we going to try), direction (will you help or
hinder), persistence (how long will you try)
Herzberg’s Two Factor Theory: satisfaction and dissatisfaction are separate construct
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: intrinsic (self-actualisation, esteem) and extrinsic
(physiological)
McClellan’s Theory of Needs: achievement, affiliation (close personal relationship),
power
Self-Determination Theory (SDT): extrinsic and intrinsic (autonomy: exert and
control, competence: have mastery over tasks, relatedness: sense of belongings)
Goal-setting theory: specific and difficult goals, with self-generated feedback lead to
higher performance. It depends on “I want to do & I can do”, goal commitment, task
characteristics, national culture.
Goals and self-efficacy (feeling that they can do task)
Equity theory: individuals compare their job inputs and outcomes with those of
others and then respond to eliminate any inequities
Organisational justice: overall perception of what is fair in the workplace
1. Distributive justice: perceived fairness of outcome (pay raise I deserved)
2. Procedural justice: fairness of process used to determine outcome (good
explanation of why I received the raise I did)
3. Interactional justice: perceived degree to which one is treated with dignity
and respect (supervisor was nice when telling me about my raise)
Expectancy theory:
Individual effort – individual performance – organisational rewards – personal goals
Applying expectancy theory:
Expectancy theory ensure valued rewards are available, ensure employees believe
they can do job and ensure performance is clearly linked to valued rewards
Goal setting theory outlines the path to performance. Individuals will compare their
results to themselves and other (equity theory) to determine if rewards are
appropriate and fair. Needs theory can explain whether the rewards have value
Job characteristics model:
1. Skill variety – how many different skills are used
2. Task identity – completion of work from start to finish
3. Task significance – impact on work or lives of others
4. Autonomy – deciding work procedures and scheduling
5. Feedback – effective completion of work is clear
Implications for managers: recognise individual differences, use goals and feedback,
allow employees to participate in decisions that affect them, link rewards to
performance and check system for equity
Week 7 (leadership)
Leadership: ability to influence group toward achievement of goals
Approach to leadership:
1. trait (personality traits of leaders): better at predicting leader emergence
than effectiveness
2. behavioural (effectiveness of leader behaviours and styles)
3. situational/contingency (interaction between traits/skills/styles and the
situation): environment or context
4. contemporary (transactional or transformational outcome)
Fiedler’s theory: task-oriented and relationship-oriented. Effectiveness depends on
match between leadership style and degree to which situation gives leader control
1. Leader-member relations: confidence and trust
2. Task structure: structure in the jobs
3. Position power: formal staffing authority
4. Positives: considerable evidence supports model, especially if original eight
situations are grouped into three
5. Problems: scores are not stable, contingency variables are complex and hard
to determine
Situational leadership theory (Hersey & Blanchard): follower readiness
1. Followers can accept or reject leader
2. Effectiveness depends on followers’ response to leader’s actions
3. Readiness – people have ability and willingness to accomplish task
4. Assumes leaders can change style to fit followers’ degree of readiness in
terms of task maturity (ability & experience) and psychological maturity
(willingness to take responsibility)
House’s Path-Goal theory: leader clarify path and provide information, support and
resources
Leadership types: directive (focus on work to be done), supportive (well-being),
participative (consults in decision-making), achievement-oriented (set challenging
goals)
Environmental contingency factors: task structure, formal authority system, work
group. Subordinate contingency factors: locus of control, experience, ability.
Leader-member exchange theory: the importance of different relationships between
supervisors and their subordinates
1. In groups: members are similar to leader, inner circle of communication,
receives more time and attention, greater responsibility and rewards
2. Out groups: managed by formal rules and policies, less attention, more likely
to retaliate against the organisation
Transactional: contingent reward, management by exception (active & passive)
Transformational: idealised influence, inspirational motivation, individualised
consideration)
Week 8 (power)
Source of dependency: importance, scarcity, substitutability
Source of power:
1. Formal: established by individual’s position
Legitimate power – formal control based on position
Coercive power – dependency through fear of negative outcomes
Reward power – control over valuable rewards
2. Personal: by individual’s characteristics
Expert power – based on special skills or knowledge
Referent power – inter-personal style
Power tactics: why in which individuals translate power bases into specific action
1. Rational persuasion
2. Inspirational appeals – emotional blackmail
3. Consultation – they can’t disagree with themselves
4. Legitimacy – don’t you know who I am?
5. Exchange – quid pro quo
6. Personal appeals – please…
7. Coalitions - we are one, yet we are many
8. Ingratiation – you are so pretty!
9. Impression management (conformity, excuses, apologies, self-promotion)
10. Pressure – don’t you know what I will do to you?
Factors influencing power tactics: sequencing of tactics – softer to harder work
better. Political skill of user, culture of organisation.
Political behaviour: (result of resource scarcity)
1. Legitimate: normal everyday politics – complaining, bypassing, obstructing
2. Illegitimate: extreme political behaviour that violates implied rues –
sabotage, whistle-blowing, symbolic protest
Making connections:
1. Personality – type A
2. Values – terminal/instrumental, power distance
3. Motivation – job autonomy, empowerment
4. Emotions – stress, emotional intelligence
5. Leadership – position, style, trust
Stage 1:
1. Communication: semantic difficulties, misunderstandings, noise in
communication channel
2. Structure: size, specialisation of jobs, leadership styles, reward systems,
degree of dependence between groups
3. Personal variables: personality, emotions, values
Stage 2:
1. Conflict is defined – awareness by one or more parties of conditions
2. Felt conflict – emotions are expressed that impact strongly on eventual
outcome, e.g. anxiety, tenseness, frustration
Stage 3: decisions to act in given way
1. Cooperativeness: attempting to satisfy the other party’s concerns
2. Assertiveness: attempting to satisfy one’s own concerns
Stage 4:
1. Includes the statements, actions and reactions made by conflicting parties
2. A dynamic process of interaction
3. Conflict-intensity continuum
Conflict management techniques
1. Conflict resolution: problem solving, expansion of resource, avoidance,
smoothing, compromise, authoritative command
2. Conflict stimulation: communication, bringing in outsiders, restructuring
organisation.
Stage 5:
1. Functional: increase group performance and quality of decisions, stimulation
of creativity, encouragement of interest, creation of environment for self-
evaluation and change
2. Dysfunctional: development of discontent, reduced group effectiveness,
communication and group cohesiveness, infighting
Negotiation distributive bargaining – dividing up fixed amount of resources in win-
lose situation
Integrative bargaining – finding one or more settlements that can create win-win
Negotiation process:
1. Preparation & planning: assess the goal
2. Definition of ground rule: decide where, when, how and then exchanging
3. Clarification and justification: original demands
4. Bargaining and problem solving: work out an agreement
5. Closure and implementation: formalising the agreement
BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement); bottom line for negotiations
Individual differences:
1. Personality traits: disagreeable introvert is best
2. Mood and emotion: ability to show anger – distributive; positive mood –
integrative
3. Gender
Short-answer question:
4. power and politics:
Power is relative to how dependent people are on the resource that a person in power
possesses. If someone possesses a valuable resource, they will likely have more power than
someone who does not. E.g. When I want something from you, then I am dependent on
you. And if you do not need much from me, then you have power over me. This is power-
dependency relationship.
The sources of dependency are importance, scarcity, substitutability.
Rational persuasion includes using facts, data, and logical arguments to convince
someone in a valid reason.
Inspirational appeals focus on values, emotions, and beliefs to gain support for a
request or course of action.
Consultation refers to getting others to participate in the planning process,
making decision and encourage changes.
Ingratiation refers to different ways of making others feel good about
themselves. (compliment)
Personal appeal refers to friendship and loyalty. Personal appeals are most
effective with people who know and like you.
Exchange refers to give-and-take in which someone does something for you, and
you do something for them in return.
Coalition tactics refer to a group of individuals working together toward a
common goal to influence others. (Unions)
Pressure refers to pushing someone to do what you want or else something
undesirable will occur. This often includes threats and frequent interactions until the
target agrees. Pressure tactics are most effective when used in a crisis.
Legitimating tactics occur when the appeal is based on legitimate or position
power. This tactic relies upon compliance with rules, laws, and regulations.
Resistance: occurs when the influence target does not wish to comply with the
request and either passively or actively repels the influence attempt.
Compliance: occurs when the target does not necessarily want to obey, but they
do.
Commitment: occurs when the target not only agrees to the request but also
actively supports it as well.
Political behaviour: involves attempts by some to influence the behaviours of others and the
course of events in the organization in order to protect their self-interests, meet their own
needs, and advance their own goals.
Illegitimate political behaviour is behaviour that violate the implied rules of the game. E.g.
whistle-blowing sabotage, and symbolic protest.
The first stage in the conflict process is the existence of conditions that allow conflict to
arise. it’s because of issues regarding communication, structure, or personal variables.
Communication. Conflict can arise from semantic issues, misunderstanding, or noise
in the communication channel that hasn’t been clarified. (show up halfway)
Structure. Conflict can arise based on the structure of a group of people who have to
work together.
Personal variables. Conflict can arise if two people who work together just don’t
care for each other.
If it’s been determined that potential opposition or incompatibility exists and both parties
feel it, then conflict is developing.
Intentions
Intentions come between people’s perceptions and emotions and help those who are
involved in the potential conflict to decide to act in a way.
Behaviour
Behaviour is the stage where conflict becomes evident, as it includes the statements,
actions and reactions of the parties involved in the conflict.
Outcomes
Context
The four contextual factors that appear to be most significantly related to team
performance are the presence of adequate resources, effective leadership, a climate of
trust, and a performance evaluation and reward system that reflects team contributions.
Adequate Resources
All work teams rely on resources outside the group to sustain it. And the scarcity of
resources directly reduces the ability of the team to perform its job effectively.
Leadership and Structure
Team members must agree on who is to do what and ensure that all members
contribute equally to sharing the workload. Agreeing on the specifics of work and how
they fit together to integrate individual skills requires team leadership and structure.
Climate of Trust
Members of effective teams trust each other. And they also exhibit trust in their leader’s
Interpersonal trust among team members facilitates cooperation, reduces the need to
monitor each others’ behavior, and bonds members around the belief that others on the
team won’t take advantage of them.
Performance Evaluation and Reward Systems
Individual performance evaluations, fixed hourly wages, individual incentives, and the like
are not consistent with the development of high-performance teams.
So, in addition to evaluating and rewarding employees for their individual contributions,
management should consider group-based appraisals, profit sharing, gain sharing, small
group incentives, and other system modifications that will reinforce team effort and
commitment.
Process
The final category related to team effectiveness is processed variables. These include
member commitment to a common purpose, the establishment of specific team goals,
team efficacy, a managed level of conflict, and minimizing social loafing.
A common purpose
Effective teams have a common and meaningful purpose that provides direction,
momentum, and commitment for members.
Specific goals
Successful teams translate their common purpose into specific, measurable, and realistic
performance goals. Goals lead individuals to higher performance, goals also energize
teams.
These specific goals facilitate clear communication. They also help teams maintain their
focus on getting results.
Team efficacy
Effective teams have confidence in themselves. They believe they can succeed. We call
this team efficacy.
Success breeds success. Teams that have been successful raise their beliefs about future
success which in turn motivates them to work harder.
Conflict levels
Conflict on a team is not necessarily bad.
Social loafing
It is common that individuals can hide inside a group. They car engage in social loafing
and coast on the group’s effort because their individual contributions can’t be identified.
Effective teams undermine this tendency by holding themselves accountable at both
individual and team level.
Successful teams make members individually and jointly accountable for the team’s
purpose, goals, and approach. They are clear on what they are individually responsible
for and what they are jointly responsible for.