Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 19
1
◼ Performance Measurement – Introduction
◼ Sharpe vs Treynor
2
Performance Measurement – Introduction
◼ When we seek to measure performance of
financial investments we measure these against
the risk of the investment
We know that financial investments tend to compensate
the investors for risk taking
This is due to the fact that most investors tend to be
risk averse (Positive risk aversion coefficient) and must
be paid compensation for carrying risk
4
Sharpe Ratio
◼ The Sharpe ratio for a portfolio needs to be
measured against the Sharpe ratio of the market
index, which forms a benchmark:
E (rM ) − rf
Market.Sharpe.Ratio =
M
◼ If the Sharpe Ratio for a particular stock is greater
than the Market Sharpe, the performance is
relatively “Better”
5
Asset Allocation:1 risky & 1 risk free asset
The above figure shows the investment opportunity set in the µp – p plane
(expected return and standard deviation place): E (r ) − rf
It demonstrates that the investment opportunity set is linear, with slope
6
Treynor's ratio
◼ The second is Treynor's measure which measures
the expected excess return on the portfolio
relative to the beta risk of the portfolio
E (ri ) − rf
Treynor' s.Ratio =
i
◼ The measure should also be measured against the
market index (which has unit beta)
7
Treynor's ratio
◼ The Treynor's ratio is really a test of whether the
asset is on the security market line (SML)
◼ The CAPM model predicts that assets should be
priced according to the formula:
E (ri ) = rf + i (E (rM ) − rf )
8
E (ri ) = rf + i (E (rM ) − rf )
9
Sharpe vs Treynor
◼ To see the connection between the Sharpe & Treynor ratio
To compare two portfolios with different risk
characteristics it is important that the risk premium is
linear in the risk measure
10
Sharpe vs Treynor
◼ What is important here is that we have taken into account
total risk, but when we look at small portfolios on top of a
large diversified portfolio, total risk is roughly equal to
market or systematic risk
11
Sharpe vs Treynor
◼ If we look at a portfolio as an additional investment on
top of an already diversified holding
we need to consider the marginal contribution to
variance from the new investment
→ may be better evaluated using Treynor rather than
using Sharpe
12
Treynor’s ratio
◼ The graph shows the security market line in the - plane
13
◼ More portfolio performance measures
◼ Jensen Alpha – A version of Treynor measure
◼ Information Ratio
14
More portfolio performance measures
◼ A version of the Treynor measure is Jensen's alpha:
15
Sharpe ratio → M2 measure
◼ Let x the weight of our original portfolio
◼ and 1 – x be the imaginary weight in the risk free asset
◼ Suppose the original portfolio has standard deviation
◼ Then the standard deviation of the mixed portfolio = x
(Covariance and variance of rf with others are Zero)
16
Sharpe ratio → M2 measure
◼ We have M = x, which implies that the mixed
portfolio has now the same risk as the market portfolio,
we can then compare the return of the mixed
portfolio with the market portfolio, the difference is
the M2 measure
M = xE (r ) + (1 − x)rf − E (rM )
2
M M
M =2
E (r ) + (1 − )rf − E (rM )
An advantage of this performance measure is that it is
in terms of returns
→easy to evaluate the over or under performance
17
More portfolio performance measures
Information Ratio
◼ It is given by the ratio of the portfolio's (Jensen) alpha
measure to the standard deviation of the idiosyncratic risk
18