Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The total emissions from tire wear in [mg] are given by the following equation:
where
i = TSP, PM10, PM2.5, PM1, PM0.1 depending on the fraction used in the
equation each time.
fTi = the fraction of TSP that can be classified as TSP, PM10, PM2.5, PM1 or
PM0.1.
(EFT TSP)j = the TSP emission rate in [mg/vkm] at a speed of 80 km/h for
vehicle category j = PC (passenger car), LDV (light duty vehicle), HDV (heavy
duty vehicle) or MC (motorcycle).
ST(V) = the speed correction factor which depends on the mean vehicle
velocity.
In case that the mean trip speed is known, ST(V) factor can be obtained from the
following diagram:
1,6
speed correction factor [S(V)]
1,4
1,2
0,8
0,6
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
mean trip speed [V] (km/h)
V < 40km/h: ST(V) = 1,39
40km/h ≤ V ≤ 90km/h: ST(V) = -0,00974·V + 1,78
V > 90km/h: ST(V) = 0,902
• Emission factors
Note: The complete procedure that was followed in order to conclude to the
emission factors proposed here is presented in the annex.
The emission factors proposed for the different vehicle categories j are given below:
1. Passenger Cars
Using the values shown in Table 1 (Annex) and the procedure described there, we
have concluded to an (EFT TSP)PC range and an (EFT TSP)PC value.
Using the values shown in Table 3 (Annex) and the procedure described there, we
have concluded to an (EFT TSP)LDV range and an (EFT TSP)LDV value.
It appears that the TSP emission factor from tyre wear for light duty vehicles (16,9
mg/vkm) is approximately 60% greater than the respective emission factor for
passenger cars (10,7 mg/vkm), a fact which was expected due to the increased
LDV’s weight and its larger tyres.
Using the values shown in Table 4 (Annex), we have concluded to an (EFT TSP)HDV
range.
For reasons mentioned in the Annex, the following equation is proposed for the
calculation of the emission factor from tyre wear for HDV’s:
(EFT TSP ) PC
(EFT TSP ) HDV = N axle ⋅ LCF ⋅ (eq. 1)
2
where
Naxle = the number of the heavy vehicle’s axles.
LCF = the load correction factor, which can be obtained from the
following diagram. Load factor (LF) needs to be estimated on the
average truck’s load basis. If the truck is completely empty or fully
loaded, the load factor should be 0(%) and 100(%) respectively.
3
2,795
Load Correction Factor
0
0 100
Load Factor (%)
In case that there is no available information for the parameters Naxle and LF, an
average (EFT TSP)HDV value for Naxle=4 and LF=50 → LCF=2,1 (half-loaded truck) is
proposed:
4. Motorcycles
Using the values shown in Table 2 (Annex) and the procedure described there, we
have concluded to an (EFT TSP)MC range and an (EFT TSP)MC value.
As expected, the TSP emission factor from tyre wear for motorcycles (4,6 mg/vkm) is
approximately 40% smaller than the respective emission factor for passenger cars
(10,7 mg/vkm). This is due to the two wheels and the lighter weight per wheel for a
motorcycle.
• Fractions
For the calculation of mass emission from different particle sizes, the following
fractions fTi are suggested:
i fTi
TSP 1
PM10 0,6
PM2.5 0,42
PM1 0,06
PM0.1 0,048
As it is shown in the table above, the fraction of TSP that can be classified as PM10 is
0,6.
The next chart provides PM10 emission factors as a function of speed for different
vehicle categories. Smaller particle sizes are calculated on the basis of this.
60
50
EF for PM10 (mg/vkm)
PC
40 LDV
HDV, 4 axles, LF=20%
30
HDV, 4 axles, LF=100%
Motorcycles
20
10
0
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
mean speed (km/h)
ANNEX: TSP emission rates from tyre wear for passenger cars, light duty
vehicles, heavy duty vehicles and motorcycles - Methodology verification.
In order to estimate a final value of the TSP emission factor for each vehicle
category, all values found in the literature were collected (and shown in the tables
below), some of them were taken into consideration and others were rejected.
Table 1: Wear rates, PM10 emission factors and TSP emission factors from tyre wear for
passenger cars found in the literature
The values shown with red color have been estimated or calculated in surveys, while
the ones shown with black color are derived using the equations:
EFTSP = EFPM 10
0,6
It is found in the literature that 1-10% of a tyre’s wear is emitted as PM10. The factor
0,1 is the upper limit of this range. The factor 0,6, which is used for transformation
of PM10 to TSP, is also obtained from the literature (Miguel et al. 1999).
The proposed value for each vehicle category is calculated as the average of the
values shown in blue color in each table. Also, the min and max values in blue color
form the proposed range. The values that are not shown in blue in the column ‘EF
for TSP’ were excluded from the proposed range and the calculation of the proposed
value, because they were either out-dated or providing values which were much
higher than expected.
Therefore, using information from Table 1, the proposed TSP emission factors and
ranges from tyre wear for passenger cars respectively are:
Similarly, proposed emission rates for motorcycles, light duty vehicles and heavy
duty vehicles can be obtained.
Table 2: Wear rates, PM10 emission factors and TSP emission factors from tyre wear for
motorcycles found in the literature
As before, using information from Table 2, the proposed TSP emission factor and
range from tyre wear for motorcycles are derived from the values shown in blue:
Table 3: Wear rates, PM10 emission factors and TSP emission factors from tyre wear for light
duty vehicles found in the literature
Similarly, the proposed LDV TSP emission factor and range from tyre wear are
derived using information from Table 3:
The proposed TSP emission range from tyre wear for heavy duty vehicles is:
(EFT TSP ) PC
(EFT TSP ) HDV = N axle ⋅ LCF ⋅ (eq. 1)
2
Note that the average (EFT TSP)PC is used. Also, the parameter Naxle used in the
equation ranges from 3 to 6. For example, although it is likely that a part of the fleet
of the HDVs has only 2 axles or more than 6, the minimum value of 3 and the
maximum value of 6 for the parameter Naxle must be respectively used in this case.
The following figures 1 and 2 represent the dispersion of the values that appear in
the tables shown above.
PC, LDV and motorbikes TSP EFs
50,0
50,0
33,3
PC-Proposed value
27,2
EF/used
LDV-Proposed value
22,5
motorbikes-Values derived from
21,7
wear rate/used
20,0
20,0 20,0 20,0 motorbikes-Value derived from
18,7 PM10 EF/used
18,3
motorbikes-Proposed value
13,3
11,3 11,7
10,7 10,7 10,7
10,0
10,2
8,8 8,8
8,3
6,7
5,3
4,6 4,4
4,0
4,2
PC LDV Motor
0,0
Figure 1: Dispersion of the TSP emission factors from tyre wear for PCs, LDVs and MCs
HDV TSP EFs
350,0
333,3
300,0
250,0
HDV-Values derived from
233,8 wear rates/used
100,0
89,8
53,3
50,0 50,3
44,7
39,0
32,0 31,5
22,7
0,0
Figure 2: Dispersion of the TSP emission factors from tyre wear for HDVs