# Main reading (read full paper) Quantitative methods Notes

used
1
2 Mattioli, G. (2021). Transport poverty and car [none]
dependence: a European perspective. In: Pereira,
R.H., & Boisjoly, G. (Eds.) Social Issues in Transport
Planning, Elsevier
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.atpp.2021.06.004

3 Creutzig, F., Javaid, A., Soomauroo, Z., Lohrey, S., [not really]
Milojevic-Dupont, N., Ramakrishnan, A., ... &
Weddige, U. (2020). Fair street space allocation:
ethical principles and empirical insights. Transport
Reviews, 1-23.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1762795

4 Hidayati, I., Tan, W., & Yamu, C. (2020). How Logistic regression. DV:
gender differences and perceptions of safety shape reported perception of
urban mobility in Southeast Asia. Transportation safety. Correlation
research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, analysis.
73, 155-173.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.014

5 Chidambaram, B., Scheiner, J. (2021). Work-trip Multinomial logistic

mode choice in Germany – Affected by individual regression
constraints or by partner interaction? Travel DV: Work trip modes
Behaviour and Society 24, 231–244. (Car, PT, Cycle, Walk)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.04.007 Average Marginal
Effect for each trip
modes were reported
6 King, D. A., Smart, M. J., & Manville, M. (2019). The Logit regression. DV:
poverty of the carless: Toward universal auto household poverty
access. Journal of Planning Education and Research, status.
0739456X18823252.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0739456X18823252

7 Barnes, J. H., Chatterton, T. J., & Longhurst, J. W. [Bivariate charts]

(2019). Emissions vs exposure: Increasing injustice
from road traffic-related air pollution in the United
Kingdom. Transportation Research Part D:
Transport and Environment, 73, 56-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.05.012

8 González-Sánchez, G., Olmo-Sánchez, M.I., Maeso- SWOT analysis to

González, E., 2021. Challenges and Strategies for deploy post COVID
Post-COVID-19 Gender Equity and Sustainable urban mobility
Mobility. Sustainability 13, 2510. strategies
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052510
9 Fan, Y. (2017). Household structure and gender Pooled log-linear
differences in travel time: spouse/partner regression models. DV:
presence, parenthood, and breadwinner status. travel time for work /
Transportation, 44(2), 271-291. household support
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9637-7 activities for six group
of workers
1
Pooled regression is
adopted as an
alternative to separate
regression models. PR
facilitates the
comparison between
coefficients of
different groups using
 Chow test
1 Brand, C., & Preston, J. M. (2010). ‘60-20 Linear regression. DV:
0 emission’—The unequal distribution of greenhouse (log of) CO2 emissions.
gas emissions from personal, non-business travel in
the UK. Transport Policy, 17(1), 9-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.09.001

1 Martens, K. (2006). Basing transport planning on [none]

1 principles of social justice, Berkley Planning Journal,
19(1), 1-17. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/45509

1 Dilmaghani, M., 2021. The fast and the female: Multivariate regression
2 Gender differences in wellbeing and wage for
consequences of commute impedance. 1) Wellbeing
Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology consequence of
and Behaviour 80, 295–312. commute impedance:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.05.002 DV: life satisfaction
(dummy variable)
DV:work-life balance
(dummy variable)
2) Wage consequence
of commute duration:
DV- natural logarithm
of hourly wages.
1 Zannella, M., De Rose, A., 2021. Fathers’ and Descriptive analysis
2 mothers’ enjoyment of childcare: the role of assessing gender
multitasking. Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie differences in
der Wissenschaften. multitasking
https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2021.r
es3.3 Logistic Regression:
DV-Parents (separate
models for men and
women) unpleasant
feeling of childcare
(=1)

1
3