Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Written Assignment
By UoPeople Student
2
Introduction:
Elliot W. Eisner (2016) raise pertinent rhetorical questions in his piece entitled What
The first question is “Do students participate in the assessment of their own work? If
so, how? (Eisner, 2001). There are several reasons why students should be involved in the
assessment of their own work or assessment of their learning. First and foremost is that
students can pinpoint strengths and weaknesses in their own learning (Andrade & Valtcheva,
2009) leading to increased self-regulation (Irving 2007). Butler and Winne (1995), define
self-regulated learning as “a style of engaging with tasks in which students exercise a suite of
powerful skills: setting goals for upgrading knowledge; deliberating about strategies to select
those that balance progress toward goals against unwanted costs; and, as steps are taken and
the task evolves, monitoring the accumulating effects of their engagement” (p. 245).
The second question is, are parents helped to understand what their child has
accomplished in class? Deep reflections on the journey of learning have helped our parents
move away from being only focused on grades and understand the trials and tribulations that
their child has encountered in the classroom. Parents are guided in conferences to understand
that our school’s Confucian based shared values are at the forefront of what we regard as a
successful student (compassion, respect, justice, wisdom and honesty). In addition to these
values, our reports evaluate a student concerning the IBDP Learner Profile (“Learner profile
n.d.). Parents come to understand that by teachers placing emphasis on these values, profiles
and attitudes towards learning they can have a better holistic view of their child’s
development as individual and learner, irrespective of the grade they have achieved in a
3
specific subject. Sharing of this information could take place through regular feedback
through SeeSaw (https://web.seesaw.me/) where parents are also able to receive daily updates
of work that their child is doing by accessing tasks and reflections that have been uploaded.
Regular student-led conferences are also held where students share with parents their
artefacts that they found most challenging and then engage their parents in conversations of
how they approached the particular challenge and how they overcame it or how they plan to
overcome it.
Lastly, Eisner (2016) raises a pertinent question about professional development in the
second paragraph of page 303, where he asks “To what degree is professional discourse an
important aspect of what being a teacher means in the school?”. He further argues that it is
important to address the “real needs of teachers”. UNESCO (2016) also emphasizes that the
quality of student learning depends to a great extent on the quality of teaching. The reality
remains that there is disparity in the ways education systems view teaching and learning.
Although many teachers in many parts of the world – especially the developing world- feel
alienated from their fruits of labor because of lack of opportunities for continuous
professional development; there are examples of well-funded private schools that give utmost
Learning Networks (PLN) or Pineapple Chart practices[2]. Teachers world over have been
receptive especially in the current scenario of the pandemic, where they have had to move
their teaching online thus enabling Blended Learning[3]. This has resulted in teachers all
across the world share best practices and strategies with each other across platforms to ensure
References
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-
https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544
from https://les.psdschools.org/webfm/296
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical
Eisner, E (2016). What does it mean to say a school is doing well?. In Flinders, D. J., &
https://www.ibo.org/programmes/middle-years-programme/curriculum/
curriculum? Current and Critical Issues in Curriculum and Learning (2), pp.1-41.