You are on page 1of 5

4/12/2018 Uptime vs. TIA-942: Standard or guideline?

Select Language ▼
 (https://twitter.com/EPI_CDCP)

 (https://www.linkedin.com/company/728254)

 (https://www.epi-ap.com/general-enquiry)


Search

Uptime vs. TIA-942: Standard or guideline?

Uptime vs. TIA-942: Standard or


guideline?
Published on May 22, 2017

Edward van Leent


Edward Chairman & CEO at EPI Group of Companies
van
Leent
(https://www.linkedin.com/in/edwardv2)
There have been many debates on the internet to discuss this topic including the confusion about its relation to codes and
arguments about using a capital letter to indicate the term Standard. I think it is good to go back to one of the first definitions (as far
back as 1667) which defined a Standard as ‘a specified principle, example or measure used for comparison to a level of quality or
attainment’. A guideline was defined as ‘A non-specific rule or principle that provides direction to action, behaviour or outcome’.
These definitions of course still leave some level of interpretation about what exactly can be identified even to the point that some
would argue that the both terms can be used for the very same thing. I would argue that a Standard has a few important factors;

1. Standards are developed by an accredited SDO (Standard Development Organization). This title is awarded by any of the
three key members of the WSC (World Standards Cooperation) or their regional or national members who have been given
the authority to accredit SDO's. At a regional level you would have for example CEN which is the European standards body
issuing EN standards. At the country level you have for example ANSI in the USA, BSI for the UK, SPRING in Singapore
etc. Virtually any country in the world has their own.
2. The development of the Standard is following a transparent development process as laid down by the organization which is
governing the SDO development efforts. This typically includes key points such as that the process should be documented
and available for others, members involved should be balanced etc.
3. SDO’s are typically non-profit organizations
4. SDO’s do not perform audits nor do they provide certification Offline
https://www.epi-ap.com/content/28/293/Uptime_vs._TIA-942:_Standard_or_guideline 1/5
4/12/2018 Uptime vs. TIA-942: Standard or guideline?

5. All requirements of the standard are transparent i.e. ALL requirements are available to those who wish to have insight in the
standard and, just before you even ask the question; NO, this does not mean that the standard should be available for free.
6. The Standard must be reviewed on a regular basis not to exceed 5-years. The outcome of that review will yield in either
one of the three options, reaffirm, revise, withdraw.
7. The intellectual property (IP) extends only to the standard itself and not to its use. This means that others than the SDO can
use the material for various purposes such as using it for developing a service or product that uses the IP of the Standard.

There is a variance to the above which are typically called de-facto/semi standards which are defined as specifications which are
accepted by its relatively widely spread usage.

So how can one make sure that a standard is a real Standard? One can review it from a “legal” perspective or one could just apply
the following logic;

1. First of all, a real Standard would bear the prefix of the organization who accredited the SDO. for example, the long
description of the TIA-942 is ANSI/TIA-942 which means that ANSI is overseeing TIA as an SDO to ensure that whatever
they develop is following due process. Just to be clear, ANSI does not validate the content of the standard as this rests with
the SDO and their technical committee of SME's (Subject Matter Experts).
2. A real Standards (typically) has a numeral indicator e.g. ISO-9001, TIA-942
3. A real Standard is a document which provides a clear description of all audit criterion

Coming back to the main question and based on the explanation provided I believe it is very clear, and nobody can even argue,
that ANSI/TIA-942 is a real Standard. UTI-TST is not a Standard but a guideline. At best, and with a fair amount of imagination, you
could consider calling it a de-facto standard but anything beyond that statement clearly is a misrepresentation of the facts and the
intent as how WSC and its members would define and recognize an SDO and a Standard.

Related

Article 1 | Uptime vs. TIA-942: Introduction, why this series of articles? (http://bit.ly/2qgeSzb)

Article 2 | Uptime vs. TIA-942: A short history (http://bit.ly/2qG23xZ)

Article 3 | Uptime vs. TIA-942: Standard or guideline? (http://bit.ly/2rLDyk0)

Article 4 | Uptime vs. TIA-942: What is within the scope? (http://bit.ly/2qYglHF)

Article 5 | Uptime vs. TIA-942: Outcome based or checklist or can it be both? (http://bit.ly/2s7jIO4)

Article 6 | Uptime vs. TIA-942: Uptime certification is easy, ANSI/TIA-942 certification is difficult (http://bit.ly/2sH4rHj)

More coming soon!

(https://www.epi-ap.com/#)

Offline
https://www.epi-ap.com/content/28/293/Uptime_vs._TIA-942:_Standard_or_guideline 2/5
4/12/2018 Uptime vs. TIA-942: Standard or guideline?

Tweets by @EPI_CDCP
EPI Retweeted

Datacenter Forum
@DatacenterForum
Presenting at the #DCFHEL18: @edwardvanleent,
Chairman & CEO - @EPI_CDCP Join us on 26 April
free of charge: buff.ly/2JkdyT1

Embed View on Twitter

Find classes near your location

- Select your region -

(https://www.epi-ap.com/content/31/67/EPI_Data_Centre_Framework)

(https://www.epi-

ap.com/services/1/6/89/Data_Centre_Operations_Standard_(DCOS))

(https://www.epi-

ap.com/content/31/83/EPI_Data_Centre_Competence_Framework_(EPI-DCCF))

(https://www.epi-

ap.com/services/1/3/2/EPI_Data_Centre_Training_Framework)

(https://www.epi-ap.com/data_centre_career_planning_tool)

Offline
https://www.epi-ap.com/content/28/293/Uptime_vs._TIA-942:_Standard_or_guideline 3/5
4/12/2018 Uptime vs. TIA-942: Standard or guideline?

(https://www.epi-

ap.com/services/1/3/15/EPI_IT_Management_Training_Framework)

(https://www.epi-ap.com/itcpt/)

(https://www.epi-ap.com/general-enquiry)

Home (http://www.epi-ap.com)
About Us
About Us (content/16/1/About_Us)
The Company (content/16/12/The_Company)
Management Team (content/16/13/Management_Team)
Industry Partners (content/16/14/Industry_Partners)

News (news-list)
Promotions & Events (promotion)
Articles (article-list)
Frameworks
EPI Data Centre Framework© (services/1/3/72/EPI_Data_Centre_Framework)
Data Centre Operations Standard (DCOS©) (services/1/6/89/Data_Centre_Operations_Standard_(DCOS))
EPI Data Centre Competence Framework (EPI-DCCF©) (services/1/3/73/EPI_Data_Centre_Competence_Framework)
EPI Data Centre Training Framework© (services/1/3/2/EPI_Data_Centre_Training_Framework)

Services
Audit Certification (services/1/1/24/Audit_Certification)
Consulting (services/1/2/57/Consulting)
Training (services/1/3/1/Training)
Career Tools (data_centre_career_planning_tool)

Contact Us
Contact EPI (content/20/5/Contact_EPI)
Training Partners - DC (https://www.epi-ap.com/partner-datacentretraining)
Training Partners - IT (https://www.epi-ap.com/partner-ittraining)
Audit Partners (https://www.epi-ap.com/partner-audit/0/0/TIA-942)
Become a Partner (content/20/16/Become_a_Partner)

Offline
https://www.epi-ap.com/content/28/293/Uptime_vs._TIA-942:_Standard_or_guideline 4/5
4/12/2018 Uptime vs. TIA-942: Standard or guideline?

 (https://twitter.com/EPI_CDCP)

 (https://www.linkedin.com/company/728254)

 (https://www.epi-ap.com/general-enquiry)

Copyright EPI Singapore 2018 | Privacy Policy (content/26/41/Privacy Policy) | Terms & Conditions (content/26/42/Terms & Conditions)

Offline
https://www.epi-ap.com/content/28/293/Uptime_vs._TIA-942:_Standard_or_guideline 5/5

You might also like