Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Property, Plant
and Equipment
(Part 1)
NACAYA, OAFERINA, PAILAGAO, PALOMAR, PAYOT, PITAO,
QUIDLAT, QUIMZON
Definition of PPE
The samples generated from testing the equipment were sold for
P2,000.
The fair value of the building is thrice as much as the land. Of the options
taken, P120,000 relate to the land and building acquired; the balance relates
to properties not acquired.
Requirement: Compute for the costs of (a) land, (b) land improvement, and
(c) building.
ANSWERS:
(a) P2,690,000
(b) P320,000
(c) P8,450,000
Explanation
The fair values of the land and the building were determined using x + 3x = 10,000,000,
where x is land and 3x is building (given: the FV of the building is thrice as much as the
land). The fractions were determined by dividing the allocated FVs with the total FV
which is 10,000,000.
The lump-sum price was determined by allocating the lump-sum acquisition cost of P10M
according to the relative fair values/fractions of both the land and the building.
Payments to tenants and option paid are allocated both to the land and the building based on
their fractions. The entire 300K balance of option paid was not used since only 120K of it is related
to the land and building acquired.
Land titling cost and special assessment are capitalized to the land only. Building remodeling
prior to occupancy is capitalized to the building only.
Repairs and maintenance after occupancy are recognized as expense, therefore not included
in the cost of the building.
Landscaping on the premises and addition of driveway and parking lot on the premises are
land improvements, which are recognized separately from land.
Lump-sum acquisition -
Building demolished
5. Sunset Co. acquired land with old building for P6,000,00. After the
acquisition, Sunset Co. demolished the old structure and started the
construction of a new building. Sunset Co. incurred the following additional
costs:
Case 1: The land and the old building have fair value of P5,425,000 and
P775,000, respectively. Provide the journal entries.
Case 2: The old building is unusable and has no fair value. Provide the journal
entries.
CASE 1 JOURNAL ENTRIES
The land and the old building have fair value of P5,425,000 and P775,000, respectively.
Explanation
Computation for the total costs of land, old building, and new building:
When old building has a fair value given that the building is to be demolished right away, still, the
lump-sum price and other direct costs of acquisition are allocated to both the land and the building.
The cost allocated to the old building is recognized as loss.
Just like in the previous item, lump-sum price is allocated to the land and building based on their
relative fair values.
The finder's fee of real estate agent is also allocated to the land and building based on their relative
fair values.
The land registration cost and unpaid taxes on land prior to acquisition date are capitalized to the
land only.
The demolition cost capitalized to the new building is net of the proceeds from sale of salvaged value.
Materials, labor, and overhead are considered as construction cost as they are directly related in
constructing the new building. Thus, allocated in the cost of the new building.
Explanation
Journal entries:
When the old building is unusable such that it has no fair value, the lump sum price and
other direct costs of acquisition are allocated only to the land.
The cost of the new building is the same whether or not cost is allocated to the building.
Explanation
Journal entries:
The value of the land on the
debit column is based on
the lump-sum price on the
computation. The old
building is not recorded
since it is not usable
anymore and it has no fair
value.
LAND
Survey Cost - appropriately capitalized to land alone. It
is the costs of delineating the form, extent, and position
of tract of land. Refer to page 86.
The old equipment is credited since the exchange brought a new one to
the company.
Explanation
Assuming the Ima Co. cannot determine the fair value of the asset given
up, the fair value of asset received of Ima Co. is the given fair value of
Saka Co. The cash paid is also not recorded in Ima Co.'s book. However,
Saka Co.'s initial cost of non-monetary asset received is still the same
with case 1 which involved FV of asset given up.
The shortcut solution of gain (loss) is not applicable when using the fair
value of asset received. Thus, it is best computed by squeezing it
through preparing the journal entry.
Acquisition through issuance
of equity and debt instruments
9. Eure Co. acquired a machine in exchange for 10, 000 of its own shares
with par value of P10 per share and fair value of P130 per share.
Case 1: The cash selling price of the machine is P1, 400, 000. Provide the
journal entry.
Case 2: The cash selling price of the machine is not determinable. Provide the
journal entry.
Journal entry for Case 1: Cash selling price
Explanation: Case 1
The problem stated that the cash selling price of the machine is
P1,400,000, thus the amount on the journal entry. The share capital was
solved by multiplying the par value of the shares and the amount
exchanged, which equates to P100, 000. The share premium was taken
from subtracting the share capital and the asset acquired which
amounted to P1, 300, 000.
Journal entry for Case 2: Undeterminable
Explanation: Case 2
Case 1: The cash selling price of the machine is P1,400,000. Provide the journal
entry.
Case 2: The cash selling price of the machine is not determinable. The prevailing
market rate of interest for similar debt instruments is 10%. Provide the journal
entry.
No. 10: Case 1 Answer & Explanation
Case 1 Explanation: In accordance to PFRS 2, a PPE acquired through the issuance of a debt
instrument (e.g., bond payable, note payable, and the like) is initially measured using the ff.
order of priority: (1) FV of the asset received & (2) FV of the debt instrument issued.
It is stated in the problem that the cash selling price of the machine is P1,400,000. Hence the
amount placed in the journal entry. This is the "cash price equivalent" which refers to the
amount that would have been paid if the entity acquired the PPE on cash basis rather than defer
the payment by issuing a debt instrument.
No. 10: Case 2 Answer & Explanation
Case 2 Explanation: In accordance to PFRS 2, if the fair value of the asset received is
indeterminable, the PPE received is measured in relation to the fair value of the debt
instrument issued. Such fair value may be determined using an appropriate valuation
technique, e.g., present value of future cash flows discounted at the prevailing
market rate of interest for a similar instrument. Hence, the computation is as
followed in the next slide.
No. 10 Case 2 Solution
No. 11 Acquisition Through
Donation
11. Abu-abu Cow Co. received a machine from a donation. The
machine was originally acquired by the donor for P1,000,000 and had
a carrying amount of P280,000 in the donors' books at the time of
donation. The machine has a second-hand value of P320,000. There
are no conditions attached to the donation.
A PPE received from donation is measured at fair value and accounted for as:
"Donated Capital" - if the donor is an owner (shareholder)
"Income from donation" - if the donor is an unrelated party