Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student Name:
Affiliate Institution:
Date:
BALANCE IN THE CANADIAN MARKET REGULATIONS 2
Balance in the Canadian Market Regulations
Introduction
The Canadian economy is a free market wrought with international exposure, innovation
and invention, trading regulations, and favorable competition. However, the hegemony
practiced by monopolies tends to attract the competition bureau to impose policies that facilitate
the striking of a balance between the trading practices of these businesses and the consumer
rights at stake in the market. The policies do not bear upon the market practices to withdraw
free trade, and neither do they guarantee unwarranted consumer liberties. This has consequently
created a reasonable balance in the regulation of the Canadian economy. The significance of the
competition bureau in Canada is highlighted by the quantum leaps it has made in protecting
consumers from deceptive markets and generating fair and effective markets through
competition policies that constantly reform the markets based on trends, demography, and
consumer feedback.
The Canadian federal government has undertaken an uphill task over the years to institute
policies that regulate growing markets and curb trading practices that rely on extortion,
racketeering, and deception in boosting returns. These approaches have been executed by the
competition bureau, an agency within the Canadian federal government that imposes laws
relating to marketing, competition, and consumerism (Boyer et al., 2017). The Competition
Bureau was established as part of the Innovation, Science and Economic Development in
Canada. The functions of the competition bureau within the international landscape echo the
balance that has been achieved within the Canadian economy, which is reflected in the
government, which relates to trade. These include the Competition Act, the Textile Labelling
Act, Precious Metals Marking Act, and Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act (Canada, 2014).
The bureau launches investigations based on consumer complaints and market upheavals, then
challenges the practices in the competition tribunal or take the issue to the public prosecution
service of Canada who prosecutes criminal cases (Goldman & Joneia, 2019). This function of
the bureau allows it to castigate market changes, monitor competition, and evaluate the need to
impose protectionism in the market against aggressive trade practices. This overall effect of the
This Act of 1985 was implemented to help regulate commerce concerning competitive
practices and conspiracies, which would otherwise have created market imbalance resulting in
unhealthy business environments for low-income traders (Boyer et al., 2017). On the other
hand, the Act also recognizes the consumer rights that are likely to be affected by harmful
trading practices. Therefore, the effective application of this Act creates a balance in the
Domestic Service (SOR/2000-324), the Act criminalizes the Act of altering schedules and
affects the customers of these services and thereby affecting the market. The delays prompted
by the competitive strategies imposed by oligarchies and monopolies reflect in the stranded
businesses and lack of products and services to the end-user. These are insensitive private
trading practices that have consequent effects on traders and consumers' free trade.
BALANCE IN THE CANADIAN MARKET REGULATIONS 4
The Competition Bureau imposes competition laws and consumer protectionism whose
objectives include optimizing consumer interest within the market. However, there are instances
the balancing of the economy depends on promoting trading practices, which affects the
consumers but ultimately improves the market (Goldman & Joneia, 2019). In 2013, the hiking
of the propane prices during winter was supported by the competition bureau, which argues that
the short term hiking prices would prevent hoarding of the product and result in increased
market supplies (MordenJ, 2016). This restrictive price regulation on the propane businesses,
while on the other hand, it resulted in propane flooding the market for customers to use in
heating systems. The balancing effect was logically viable as it promoted the propane business
while also availing products to the customers, without infringing on their rights.
Deceptive Marketing
purchase. Deceptive marketing is, therefore, using dubious means of attracting customers to
make purchases of products. This violates the freedom of consumers and results in the sale of
low quality or harmful products. Deceptive marketing has been prevalent under COVID 19,
whereby traders are introducing chemical products into the market and claiming they can cure
or prevent the virus. The potential damage from this illegal and insensitive trade is the harmful
effects that will probably result in hospital congestion (Goldman & Joneia, 2019). The
competition bureau actively evaluates products and marketplaces to stem the deceptive
marketing angles that provide wrong impressions and result in physical and financial
curtail customers` rights. Under the Competition Act, it is a criminal offense to provide
BALANCE IN THE CANADIAN MARKET REGULATIONS 5
deceptive representations, telemarketing, pyramid selling, and double-ticketing (Gudofsky et
al., 2010). Additionally, Act also makes it illegal to use false testimonials or inflated advertising
prices. Coupled with the Competition Act, the Competition Bureau contributes to a flourishing
economy that is balanced for competitors and is favorable and sufficient to the needs of the
consumers.
Price Fixing
The market is often plagued by seasons of the boom to bust and vice versa that compel the
traders to alter prices to retain profits. These actions are at times permitted by the competition
bureau, such as in the propane case of 2013 (MordenJ, 2016). However, oligopolists usually set
their prices due to their hegemony in their specific industry, such as oil or gas. The trend in a
single oligopoly industry permeates the other industries and result in hiking prices of products
and services as these oligopolists compete for sales and market share. Longitudinal studies
indicate that oligopolists create a high market concentration of huge profits from the
suppression of buyers through price-fixing. In the need to create balance in the economy, the
federal government of Canada, through the competition bureau, employs tools such as merger
control laws, the prohibition of cartels in the market, and stringent regulation on joint
dominance abuses (Gudofsky et al., 2010). The impact of the collective dominance often
downplays the significance of other plays in the market, thus causing chaotic pricing and
methods to outdo rivals, which ultimately results in customer boycotting services or suing over
rights infringement (Canada, 2014). In this case, the competition bureau acts as the advocate
against the overt collusion of traders who explicitly fix prices and therefore create market
imbalance.
Bid-Rigging
BALANCE IN THE CANADIAN MARKET REGULATIONS 6
Bid-rigging is a practice that allows the huge suppliers in the market to collude in the
tendering business and help eliminate competition through the withdrawal of bids or failure to
submit a bid. This Act orchestrated through business deals often eliminates smaller suppliers
and results in high pricing and unhealthy competition (Boyer et al., 2017). This affects both the
market and consumers, thus imbalance in the market. This practice can occur in government
projects such as infrastructure development or the private sector, such as warehousing. The
costs and harmful practices derail the market off its benefits, thus affecting the economy
significantly. The competition bureau employs the Competition Act section 47, which
criminalizes bid-rigging as a cartel practice (Goldman & Joneia, 2019). Bid-rigging is detected
where there are few bidders in a market where competitors' bids are received similarly, or a
similar bidder is winning irrespective of the competition present. To create balance in the
economy, the competition bureau imposes rules on the tendering process that includes
disclosure of particulars of potential bidders and treatment of all suppliers equally (Gudofsky et
al., 2010). The penalties include huge fines and imprisonment of up to fourteen years. These
measures help prevent hiking prices that affect customers and bidding practices that eliminate
The competition bureau regulates the Canadian economy based on the frequency in which
consumer welfare is threatened, and the instability of the market is on the rise (Boyer et al.,
2017). The bureau checks on market trends. Technology has created loopholes that allow traders
to employ deceptive marketing methods and pricing tactics in the current age. On the other
hand, the bureau has blended into the technological landscape through oversight operations, and
that helps track and monitor business activities concerning customer welfare (Canada, 2014).
BALANCE IN THE CANADIAN MARKET REGULATIONS 7
This helps to create a reasonable balance on the competing interest of businesses and consumer
rights.
Conclusion
The pervasive nature of illegal business incentives attracts suppliers and firms to invest in
deceptive functions that satisfy their market needs at the expense of other traders and
customers. Through the competition bureau, the Canadian federal government tries to
encourage measured competition that upholds the customers` welfare while constraining
predatory strategies. The bureau balances these markets through enforcing federal laws against
price inflation, bid-rigging, and deceptive advertising. The cause-effect relationship of buyers
and suppliers is also regulated through the Competition Act, which stipulates guidelines against
the oligarchies' exclusionary competitive habits and monopolies in the market. Lucidly, the
competition bureau's optimal regulation implies the reasonable balance achieved by the federal
References
BALANCE IN THE CANADIAN MARKET REGULATIONS 8
Boyer, M., Ross, T. W., & Winter, R. A. (2017). The rise of economics in competition policy:
d'économique, 50(5), 1489-1524.
Gudofsky, J., Kriaris, E. L., & Vital, L. (2010, September). Abuse of Joint Dominance: Is the
Cure Worse than the Disease? In the Canadian Bar Association. Annual Competition Law
Conference/Toronto.
Goldman, C. S., & Joneja, N. (2009). The Institutional Design of Canadian Competition
explore/search?query=any,contains,competition
%20bureau&tab=default_tab&search_scope=default_scope&vid=SFUL&lang=en_US&offset=