Professional Documents
Culture Documents
QUESTIONS
1. Management determines in advance what required for each operation or for each
the cost should be to manufacture a product department to finish a unit of product and
and subsequently compares the actual cost must accurately estimate cost or rate per
of manufacturing the product with this hour for this time.
standard. Deviations from the standard can 6. A variance is a difference or deviation from
be immediately determined, inefficiencies an established goal. In standard cost
can be readily detected, and appropriate accounting, it indicates a difference between
action can be taken to correct an actual costs and standard costs. It is a
unfavorable situation. Under the standard deviation from predetermined manufacturing
cost accounting system, management has a costs.
specific goal for production costs. If this goal 7. Variances are usually recorded in the
is not reached, management also has the general journal at the end of the month,
information to determine why it was not except for the materials purchase price
achieved. variance, which is recorded at the time of
2. Standard cost is the predetermined purchase.
calculation of what the cost should be. 8. Price variances in materials costs are the
Actual cost is the historical cost, which can differences between standard and actual
be determined only after a product or job costs due to fluctuations in the price paid for
has been completed. the raw materials. Quantity variances in
3. A standard is a norm against which materials costs are the differences between
performance can be measured. In a standard and actual costs due to
manufacturing company, it represents what fluctuations in the quantities of materials
it should cost to manufacture a product used.
under certain given conditions. Depending 9. Rate variances in labor costs are the
on the approach of the company, differences between standard and actual
determination of standards may or may not costs due to fluctuations in wage rates.
take into consideration rest periods, Efficiency variances in labor costs are the
holidays, vacations, and inefficient differences between standard and actual
conditions such as lost time, waste, or costs due to fluctuations in the number of
spoilage. labor hours required to complete a product
4. Standard costs are determined for direct or job.
materials, direct labor, and factory 10. Not necessarily. A favorable variance simply
overhead. The standard costs, the actual
indicates that price and/or usage was below
costs, and the variances are recorded in
standard. Analysis might determine a “good”
appropriate accounts. Variances are
analyzed and investigated, and appropriate situation, such as more efficiency resulting
action is taken. in a true savings in quantity, time, price, or
rate; or this analysis might show a “bad”
5. The setting of standards involves a pooling
situation, such as a lower price being paid
of knowledge and experience of all the
factory executives. Thus it is possible to for inferior materials or unskilled workers, or
review completely every manufacturing quality being reduced by using smaller
element that affects the cost of a completed quantity of materials, or speeding up
article, and to establish a standard cost for production. An unfavorable variance
each article. In setting standard materials indicates the price and/or usage was above
cost, management must accurately standard. This situation can be “bad” if it is
determine the exact quantity of materials due to inefficiencies, but “good” if it results in
that should be procured and estimate the a better product.
cost per unit that should be paid. In setting 11. Standard costs for materials, labor, and
labor standards, management must factory overhead are charged to Work in
determine, after complete analysis, the time Process.
232
12. The finished goods and work in process but this variance might be offset by an un-
accounts are generally valued at standard favorable labor efficiency variance or an
cost, although some companies will adjust unfavorable materials quantity variance.
these accounts at the end of the accounting 16. Definitely yes! Even when there is no net
period to reflect actual cost. The materials variance, further analysis may produce a
account will reflect actual cost or standard materials price variance that exactly offsets
cost, depending on the method used by the a materials quantity variance. These
company. variances, even though offsetting, must still
13. The cost accountant must consider usage be analyzed by management.
and price. Consideration must be given to 17. The entry to transfer the cost of the finished
the actual quantity of materials and labor units from the first department to a
used in comparison with the standard, and a subsequent department in a standard cost
comparison must be made of the actual unit system is made at the standard cost that
cost of materials and labor with the should have been incurred to make the units
standard. in the department.
14. a. Inefficient purchasing methods, use of
different materials, or an increase in 18. A controllable variance is a deviation that
market price. arises when the actual factory overhead
exceeds or is less than the overhead
b. More efficient purchasing methods, use expense allowed at a given level of
of different materials, or a decrease in production.
market price.
19. A controllable variance indicates that factory
c. Waste or spoilage of materials, the
overhead was more or less than the allowed
deliberate use of more materials, or amount. This variance must be traced to the
poor quality of materials. department in which it was incurred and the
d. Greater efficiency in planning and usage persons responsible must account for this
of materials, or the use of more highly variance. If the variance is unfavorable,
skilled workers. immediate action must be taken to eliminate
e. The hiring of more highly skilled workers inefficient conditions. If the variance is
than needed for the job, or an favorable, it must be determined whether
unforeseen change in wage rates due to any advantage can be derived from this
labor-management negotiations. situation.
f. A more efficient job in hiring employees, 20. A volume variance arises when actual
or the hiring of less skilled personnel at production is more or less than the standard
a lower rate. volume. Work in Process is charged with the
established standard unit cost for factory
g. Poor supervision in the factory allowing
overhead when actually, due to the effect of
employees to waste time, the use of
fixed costs remaining the same in total and
unskilled workers, machinery varying on a per unit basis, it would be
breakdowns, or poor scheduling. logical to expect that unit cost would change
h. Hiring of more highly skilled personnel, a inversely with volume.
speed-up in production, or more efficient
21. A volume variance indicates that the actual
supervision.
volume of production was not at the
15. Yes. Quite often there is a relationship standard level. A favorable variance
between variances. The cost accountant indicates that volume was higher than
and management must be alert to these standard, and an unfavorable variance
situations. For example, an unfavorable indicates that it was lower. It is possible that
labor rate variance caused by hiring more the actual volume was expected by
highly skilled personnel at a higher rate may management and is the result of normal,
be offset by time savings, as indicated by a seasonal increases and decreases in
favorable labor efficiency variance; or there production; but if not planned, the reason for
could be a favorable materials quantity the deviation must be investigated.
variance due to the fact that the personnel If actual volume was lower than
are more capable. The reverse is also true; anticipated, this might be due to poor
hiring less skilled personnel at a lower rate scheduling, machine breakdowns, or
may create a favorable labor rate variance,
234 Chapter 8
inefficient super-vision of labor. These 24. The controllable variance from the two-
conditions must be corrected. variance method encompasses the
If the volume was higher than expected, spending, efficiency, and budget variances
this might be due to extra-efficient from the four-variance method.
conditions, but it is not necessarily 25. The primary difference between the two
favorable. Overproduction can put a strain methods of calculation is that the three-
on facilities and can require extra variance method determines the budget
expenditures for handling, insurance, and allowances based on actual hours worked
taxes, as well as the extra investment in rather than on the standard number of hours
unneeded inventory. allowed for the units produced.
22. No. It is possible that there would be no
controllable variance if actual overhead is
the same as the amount allowed for the
actual level of production; however, when
production volume is more or less than the
standard level, there will be a volume
variance.
23. The controllable variance with a debit
balance indicates that the actual overhead
exceeded the flexible budget for overhead at
the level of activity attained.
The volume variance with a debit
balance indicates an underutilization of
capacity.
234
Chapter 8 235
EXERCISES
E8-1
c. Case 1
(1) Work in Process (2,000$8)........................... 16,000
Materials Price Variance (Unfavorable)
(2,000$0.50)............................................... 1,000
Materials (2,000$8.50)............................. 17,000
(2) Work in Process (1,000 hrs.$10).................. 10,000
Payroll.......................................................... 10,000
(3) Work in Process................................................ 4,000
Factory Overhead........................................ 4,000
Case 2
(1) Work in Process................................................ 16,000
Materials Quantity Variance (Favorable)
(100 $8).................................................... 800
Materials (1,900 $8).................................. 15,200
(2) Work in Process................................................ 10,000
Payroll.......................................................... 10,000
(3) Work in Process................................................ 4,000
Factory Overhead........................................ 4,000
d. Cases 1 and 2
Finished Goods................................................. 30,000
Work in Process........................................... 30,000
E8-2
a. Same as E8-1.
c. Case 1
(1) Work in Process................................................ 16,000
Materials...................................................... 16,000
(2) Work in Process................................................ 10,000
Labor Rate Variance (Unfavorable)
(1,000$0.20).................................................. 200
Payroll (1,000$10.20).............................. 10,200
(3) Work in Process................................................ 4,000
Factory Overhead........................................ 4,000
Case 2
(1) Work in Process................................................ 16,000
Materials...................................................... 16,000
(2) Work in Process................................................ 10,000
Labor Efficiency Variance (Favorable)
(100$10)................................................... 1,000
Payroll (900$10)...................................... 9,000
(3) Work in Process................................................ 4,000
Factory Overhead........................................ 4,000
d. Same as E8-1
Chapter 8 237
E8-3
a. Same as E8-1.
d. Same as E8-1.
238 Chapter 8
E8-4
a. Same as E8-1.
E8-5
a. Same as E8-1.
E8-6
E8-7
Units producedstandard
Actual labor hours labor hours per unit
Actual labor cost standard rate per hour standard rate per hour
31,110 hrs.$13.05* = 31,110 hrs.$12.50 = 6,1004.5 hrs.$12.50 =
$405,985.50 $388,875 $343,125
E8-8
2.
(Actual price – Standard price) Actual quantity = Materials price variance
($ 4.20* - $4.00) 9,400 = $1,880 (unfav)
E8-9
Case 1 Case 2
Units produced 1,200 2,000
Standard hours per unit 2 0.6
Standard hours allowed 2,400 1,200
Standard rate per hour $5 $2
Actual hours used 2,340 1,220
Actual labor cost $12,425 $2,730
Labor rate variance $725 U $290 U
Labor efficiency variance $300 F $40 U
Case 1
Standard hours allowed = 1,2002 = 2,400 hours
Actual Labor Cost =
(Actual hours used x Standard rate per hour) +/- Labor rate variance
(2,340 x $5) + $725 = $12,425
Case 2
Units produced = 1,200 ¸ 0.6 = 2,000
Labor Efficiency Variance = SP (AQ – SQ)
$40 = SP (1,220 – 1,200)
$40 = 20 SP
$2 = Standard rate per hour
E8-10
E8-11
E8-12
E8-13
1.
Work in Process – Mixing......................................................... 185,000
Work in Process – Blending..................................................... 130,000
Materials Price Variance – Mixing............................................ 10,000
Materials Quantity Variance – Mixing............................... 2,000
Materials Price Variance – Blending................................. 4,000
Materials Quantity Variance – Blending........................... 2,000
Materials ........................................................................... 317,000
2.
Work in Process – Mixing......................................................... 110,000
Work in Process – Blending..................................................... 95,000
Labor Rate Variance – Mixing.................................................. 10,000
Labor Efficiency Variance – Mixing.................................. 3,000
Labor Rate Variance – Blending....................................... 8,000
Labor Efficiency Variance – Blending............................... 7,000
Payroll............................................................................... 197,000
3.
Factory Overhead.................................................................... 145,000
Various Credits.................................................................. 145,000
E8-13 Concluded
4.
Work in Process – Blending..................................................... 380,000*
Work in Process – Mixing................................................. 380,000
E8-14
Month 1 Month 2
E8-15
a. and b.
Actual factory overhead Budget based on standard hours Standard hours ´ standard rate
E8-16
Fixed: $ 6,000
Variable:
(90% of $12,000) 10,800 18,000 units ´ $0.90* =
$ 16,500 $ 16,800 $ 16,200
Fixed: $ 6,000
Variable:
(105% of $12,000) 12,600 21,000 units ´ $0.90 =
$ 19,000 $ 18,600 $ 18,900
248 Chapter 8
E8-17
The usual formula for calculating variances is shown below. Each step in developing
the figures is numbered in order.
$27,000 $26,800
Controllable Variance
$200 (unfavorable)
1. Data given.
2. The unfavorable controllable variance of $200 indicates that actual cost was
$200 more than the budget for this level of production; therefore, budgeted
cost was $26,800 ($27,000 – $200). (Note that you cannot use the budget
formula to compute the budgeted overhead because the actual level of
production is not given.)
250 Chapter 8
E8-18 (Appendix)
E8-19 (Appendix)
a-c.
Actual Budget based on Actual hours ´ Standard hours ´
overhead actual hours standard rate standard rate
PROBLEMS
P8-1
(Actual price – Standard price) Actual quantity = Materials price variance
($27.50 - $25.00) 5.5 = $13.75 (unfav)
(Actual quantity – Standard quantity) Standard price = Materials qty. var
(5.5 -5.0) $25 = $12.50 (unfav)
(Actual rate – Standard rate) Actual hours = Labor rate variance
($17.50 - $18.00) 80 = $40.00 (fav)
(Actual hours – Standard hours) Standard rate = Labor efficiency variance
(80 – 60) $18 = $360 (unfav)
Chapter 8 253
P8-2
1-3. Materials:
4-6. Labor:
Actual hours ´ Standard hours ´
Actual cost standard rate standard rate
38,000* hours$5.68 = 38,000 hours$5.60 = 6,240** units6$5.60 =
$215,840.00 $212,800.00 $209,664.00
Chapter 8
P8-3
Standard Actual
Quantity Quantity Standard
or Hours or Hours Difference Cost Variance
253
1. Materials quantity variance:
Stomp.......................................... 640,000 gal.* 645,000 gal. 5,000 gal. $2.00/gal. $10,000
(unfav) (unfav)
Empty drums............................... 80,000 drums 80,000 drums -0- $1.00/drum -0-
3. Labor efficiency variance............... 80,000 hrs. 81,000 hrs. 1,000 hrs. $8.00/hr. $ 8,000
(unfav) (unfav)
Actual
Standard Actual Quantity
Cost Cost Difference or Hours Variance
2. Materials purchase price variance:
Stomp.......................................... $2.00/gal. $1.90/gal.** $0.10 600,000 gal. $60,000
(fav) (fav)
Empty drums............................... $1.00/drum $1.00/drum -0- 94,000 drums -0-
4. Labor rate variance........................ $8.00/hr. $8.08 hr.*** $0.08 81,000 hours $ 6,480
(unfav) (unfav)
Chapter 8
254
P8-4
Standard Actual
Quantity Quantity Standard
or Hours or Hours Difference Cost Variance
1. Materials quantity variance............ 5,000 lbs. 5,300 lbs. 300 lbs. $3.00/lb. $ 900
(unfav) (unfav)
3. Labor efficiency variance............... 8,000 hrs. 8,200 hrs. 200 hrs. $10.00/hr. $2,000
(unfav) (unfav)
Actual
Standard Actual Quantity
Cost Cost Difference or Hours Variance
2. Materials purchase price variance. $ 3.00/lb. $ 2.90/lb. $0.10 5,200 lbs. $ 520
(fav) (fav)
4. Labor rate variance........................ $10.00/hr. $9.80/hr. $0.20 8,200 hrs. $1,640
(fav) (fav)
Chapter 8 255
Chapter 8
P8-5
Standard Actual
Quantity Quantity Standard
or Hours or Hours Difference Cost Variance
255
1. Materials quantity variance
for Class. .................................... 80,000 ft.* 78,000 ft. 2,000 ft. $0.75/ft. $1,500
(fav) (fav)
2. Materials quantity variance for
Chic............................................. 24,000 ft.** 26,000 ft. 2,000 ft. $ 1.00/ft. $2,000
(unfav) (unfav)
5. Labor efficiency variance............... 32,000 hrs.*** 31,000 hrs. 1,000 hrs. $8.00/hr. $8,000
(fav) (fav)
*10 ft (8,000 units)
**3 ft (8,000 units)
***4 hours (8,000 units)
Actual
Standard Actual Quantity
Cost Cost Difference or Hours Variance
3. Materials purchase price
variance for Class....................... $0.75/ft. $0.72/ft. $0.03 100,000 ft. $3,000
(fav) (fav)
4. Materials purchase price
variance for Chic......................... $1.00/ft. $1.05/ft. $0.05 30,000 ft. $1,500
(unfav) (unfav)
6. Labor rate variance........................ $8.00/hr. $7.80/hr. $0.20 31,000 hrs. $6,200
(fav) (fav)
256 Chapter 8
P8-6
Standard Actual
Cost Cost Quantity
per Pound per Pound Difference Purchased Variance
Aluminum........ $0.40 $0.48 $0.08 (unfav) 1,800 $144 (unfav)
Plastic—regular
grade............ $0.38 $0.50 $0.12 (unfav) 3,000 $360 (unfav)
Plastic—low
grade............ $0.38 $0.29 $0.09 (fav) 6,000 $540 (fav)
Standard Actual
Cost Cost Actual
per Hour per Hour Difference Hours Variance
$8.00 $8.60 $0.60 (unfav) 2,700 $1,620 (unfav)
Chapter 8 257
P8-7
2. Liquid Lead:
P8-7 Continued
Varnish:
Labor:
Actual hours ´ Standard hours ´
Actual cost standard rate standard rate
10,000 hours$11.70 = 10,000 hours$12.00 = (9,500 units1 hr/unit)$12.00 =
$117,000 $120,000 $114,000
P8-7 Concluded
P8-8
P8-9
P8-9 Concluded
P8-10
P8-10 Concluded
P8-11
P8-12
P8-12 Continued
Materials
Mixing
Actual cost Actual quantity ´ standard price Standard cost
Labor
Mixing
Actual cost Actual hours ´ standard price Standard cost
P8-12 Continued
Blending
Mixing
P8-12 Concluded
P8-13
*Standard materials cost plus 80% complete as to standard cost of labor and overhead: $13.20 + (80% ´
$28.05)
P8-13 Concluded
P8-14
MATERIALS VARIANCES
Standard
Actual cost Actual gal. ´ standard price gallons ´ standard price
40,743 gal. ´ $0.38* = 40,743 gal. ´ ($32/80 gal.) = 503 batches x $32 =
LABOR VARIANCES
Standard
Actual cost Actual hours ´ standard rate hours ´ standard rate
P8-14 Concluded
Per hour
P8-15 (Appendix)
Actual variable cost Actual hours ´ standard rate Standard hrs ´ standard rate
P8-16 (Appendix)
1. MATERIAL VARIANCES
Actual parts ´ Units produced ´ standard
Actual cost standard price parts ´ standard price
LABOR VARIANCES
Actual hours ´ Units produced ´ standard
Actual cost standard rate hours ´ standard rate
P8-16 Concluded
FACTORY OVERHEAD VARIANCES
2. Factory Overhead
$4,000 fixed cost $4,000
Fixed rate = 2,000 units 2 hours = 4,000 hours
= $1.00 per hour
$3
Variable rate = = $1.50 per hour
2 hours
Actual variable cost Actual hrs ´ standard rate Standard hrs ´ standard rate
3,816 hrs ´ $1.50 = 3,600 hrs ´ $1.50 =
$4,800 $5,724 $5,400
Actual fixed overhead Budgeted fixed cost Standard hours ´ standard rate
3,600 hrs ´ $1.00 =
$4,100 $4,000 $3,600
P8-17 (Appendix)
Actual variable costs Actual hrs ´ standard rate Standard hrs ´ standard rate
13,015 hrs ´ $3.40 = 13,260 hrs ´ $3.40 =
$45,009 $44,251 $45,084
Actual fixed overhead Budgeted fixed cost Standard hours ´ standard rate
13,260 hrs ´ $3.85 =
$50,125 $50,050 $51,051
Proof:
Applied overhead (13,260 hrs ´ $7.25)................................. $ 96,135
Actual total overhead ($45,009 + $50,125)........................... 95,134
Overapplied factory overhead........................................ $ 1,001 (favorable)
Chapter 8 275
P8-17 Concluded
Labor Variances:
Actual labor cost Actual hrs ´ standard rate Standard hrs ´ standard rate
P8-18 (Appendix)
Mixing:
Actual Actual hours ´ Applied
overhead Budgeted overhead standard rate overhead
Blending:
Actual Actual hours ´ Applied
overhead Budgeted overhead standard rate overhead
P8-19 (Appendix)
REVIEW PROBLEM
1.
Variable rate: Per DLH
Variable costs.................................................................... $12,500 = $2.00
Direct labor hours.............................................................. 6,250
Fixed rate:
Total rate:
RP Continued
(b)
Actual factory overhead incurred:
Variable costs............................................................................................ $14,000
Fixed costs................................................................................................ 52,000
Total actual overhead costs........................................................................... $ 66,000
Factory overhead costs applied:
Standard hours allowed ´ standard rate:
7,000 hours ´ $10.00 .......................................................................... 70,000
Overapplied factory overhead............................................................................. $ 4,000
4. a. Two-variance method:
Fixed: = $50,000
Var: 7,000 hrs ´ $2 = 14,000 7,000 hrs ´ $10 =
$66,000* $64,000 $70,000
RP Concluded
c. Four-variance method:
Variable Costs
Actual Actual hrs ´ standard Standard hrs ´ standard
variable overhead variable rate variable rate
Fixed Costs
Actual fixed overhead Fixed cost: budgeted Standard hrs ´ standard fixedrate
7,000 hrs ´ $8 =
$52,000* $50,000 $56,000
*These total costs represent actual hours multiplied by actual rates per hour. When the total cost is given,
it is not necessary to determine the specific components which make up the total cost unless you do it to
understand the formulas being used.
Chapter 8 281
MINI-CASE
Materials:
(7,000 units x 4 lbs) @ $0.50 $14,000
30,000 lbs @ $0.52 $15,600 $(1,600)
(5,500 units x 1 gal) @ $1.00 $ 5,500
5,500 gal @ $0.95 $ 5,225 $ 275 $ 19,500 $ 20,825 $(1,325)
Labor:
7,000 hours @ $ 8.00 56,000
6,800 hours @ $ 8.00 54,400 1,600
5,500 hours @ $10.00 55,000
5,600 hours @ $10.20 57,120 (2,120) 111,000 111,520 (520)
Factory overhead:
Standard cost per unit
$1.00 7,000
Actual cost 7,000 None
Standard cost per unit
$2.00 11,000
Actual cost 11,000 None 18,000 18,000 None
Total $77,000 $77,000 None $71,500 $73,345 $(1,845) $148,500 $150,345 $(1,845)
282 Chapter 8
MINI-CASE Continued
2. a. Materials:
Mixing:
Actual quantity ´ Standard quantity ´
Actual cost standard price standard price
30,000 lbs $0.52 = 30,000 lbs$0.50 = 28,000 lbs$0.50 =
$15,600 $15,000 $14,000
Blending:
MINI-CASE Continued
Blending:
b. In Mixing, both the materials price variance and the materials quantity variance were
unfavorable. If they paid more for a better quality material in expectation of having a lesser
amount of waste and spoilage, the strategy was not successful. It is also possible that
there were price increases for material that were not foreseen when the standards were
determined. The labor variances were more satisfactory in Mixing. There was no labor
rate variance, and the labor efficiency variance was favorable. This means that giving the
caliber of labor they budgeted for, the amount of labor time needed to complete production
was less than budgeted.
In Blending, there was a favorable materials price variance and no materials quantity
variance. This indicates that they were able to use less expensive materials than
budgeted for, while maintaining good control over materials usage. It is also possible that
the price of materials of the quality that they had budgeted has declined. Blending’s
difficulties lie in the area of labor costs. Both the labor rate variance and the labor
efficiency variance were unfavorable. If their strategy was to employ more expensive
labor in hopes of having it complete production in a shorter amount of time, it was not
successful.
4. Mixing Blending
Costs charged to departments:
Materials............................................................................ $ 14,000 $ 5,500
Labor................................................................................. 56,000 55,000
Factory overhead.............................................................. 7,000 11,000
Prior department............................................................... — 66,000
$ 77,000 $ 137,500
Costs credited to departments................................................. 66,000 120,000
Balance of work in process...................................................... $ 11,000 $ 17,500
Mixing
2,000 units, one-half completed (2,0001/2$11)........ $ 11,000
Blending
Mixing cost—1,000 units @ $11.................... $ 11,000
Blending cost—1,000 units, one-half completed
(1,0001/2$13)......................................... 6,500 $ 17,500
Chapter 8 285
5.
Mixing Blending Total
Cost of production:
Materials......................................................... $ 15,600 $ 5,225 $ 20,825
Labor.............................................................. 54,400 57,120 111,520
Factory overhead........................................... 7,000 11,000 18,000
Total costs to be accounted for................ $ 77,000 $ 73,345 $ 150,345
Costs accounted for:
Charged to finished goods....................................................................... $ 120,000
Work in process....................................................................................... 28,500
Net unfavorable variance......................................................................... 1,845
Total costs accounted for.................................................................... $ 150,345
6.
Sales (4,000$40).............................................................................. $ 160,000
Cost of goods sold at standard (4,000$24)..................................... 96,000
a. Gross margin at standard cost............................................................. $ 64,000
Net unfavorable variance..................................................................... 1,845
b. Gross margin at actual cost................................................................. $ 62,155
c. The gross margin at actual cost is less than the gross margin at standard cost because
the net amount of all the variances was $1,845 unfavorable. In a standard cost system,
the production costs flow through the system at standard during the accounting period. At
the end of the period, the standard costs must be adjusted to actual when preparing the
financial statements.
INTERNET EXERCISE
One would expect food and paper costs to have a small favorable variance because food and
paper costs were 34.1% of 2004 sales by company-operated restaurants versus only 33.9% of
2005 sales. The other three cost items probably had small unfavorable variances because
payroll and employee benefits were only 26.2% of sales in 2004 versus 26.3% in 2005;
occupancy and other operating expenses were24.8% of 2004 sales versus 25.2% in 2005;
and selling, general, and administrative expenses were 10.4% of total revenues in 2004
versus 10.9% in 2005.