The document discusses the construct of communication in supplier relationships. It measures the extent to which importers actively exchange information with suppliers that facilitates importing activities. Specifically, it measures communication about business changes, information that may benefit both parties, market events and changes, frequency of contact, and new possibilities or problems. Five items are used to measure this construct.
The document discusses the construct of communication in supplier relationships. It measures the extent to which importers actively exchange information with suppliers that facilitates importing activities. Specifically, it measures communication about business changes, information that may benefit both parties, market events and changes, frequency of contact, and new possibilities or problems. Five items are used to measure this construct.
The document discusses the construct of communication in supplier relationships. It measures the extent to which importers actively exchange information with suppliers that facilitates importing activities. Specifically, it measures communication about business changes, information that may benefit both parties, market events and changes, frequency of contact, and new possibilities or problems. Five items are used to measure this construct.
2. Our major supplier is truthful 3. Promises made by our major supplier are reliable 4. Our major supplier is open in dealing business with us 5. Our major supplier has a high degree of integrity 6. Transactions with our major supplier do not need close supervision
Communication – Communication items measure the extent to which importers in
the supplier relationship actively exchange or communicate information that facilitates importing activities with each other. However, more specifically, this construct measures the extent to which an importer communicates business changes to the suppliers, information that may benefit one another, information about events and changes in the market, frequency of contact, and information about new possibilities and problems if they arise. As the domain specification of this measurement, three items (business changes to the suppliers, information that may benefit one another, information about events and changes in the market) were drawn from Coote et al.’s (2003) study where the alpha reliability score was reported as .85. Two additional items (frequency of contact, and information about new possibilities and problems if they arise) were extracted from Zineldin and Jonsson’s (2000) study Md._Abu_Saleh_Thesis 2006 to cover the additional facets in the measurement domain. Most of the items were used in other studies (Mohr et al., 1996; Mohr and Sohi, 1995; Selnes, 1998). All questionnaire items for this construct are shown below.
1. We keep our supplier informed about changes in our business
2. Our major supplier and our company exchange information that may benefit both 3. This supplier and our company keep each other informed about events and changes in the market 4. Our major supplier frequently discusses and informs us about new possibilities for business development 5. Our major supplier informs us immediately if any problem arises
Cultural similarity – This measure captures the import managers’ perception
regarding the extent of socio-business cultural similarity with their suppliers. This construct measure represents the extent to which an import manager perceives the similarity between the importer and supplier with respect to their style of greeting/address, business practice, legal formalities that influence business negotiations, standard of ethics, and the uses of contracts and agreements in business. This was measured differently in the extant literature. Hofstede’s (1980) country