Greek God Project Evaluation Rubric
Name: _______________________
Falls Short of Expectations
 Poster does not reflect time and
effort and only uses some of the
space on the paper provided.
 The poster reflects limited
preparation and is not an
Greek God accurate reflection of the god,
Poster goddess, or hero.
 Student’s name or name of Greek
/50 god, goddess, or hero was
missing.
 Student’s costume reflected limited
effort and creativity and was
Greek God not an accurate representation.
Day
 Student showed limited knowledge
of god, goddess or hero when
/25 presenting.
Grade: _____________
Greek Poster Due 10/20/20 Greek God Day 10/30/20
Meets Expectations
 The poster reveals time and effort and
makes good use of the space on the
paper provided.
 The poster reflects the most important
characteristics of your god, goddess,
or hero and is an accurate
representation.
 Student’s name as well as the name of
the Greek god, goddess, or hero is
clearly labeled.
 Student arrived at school creatively
dressed as his Greek god, goddess or
hero.
 Student was enthusiastic in sharing his
knowledge if his god, goddess or hero
with the younger boys.
Exceeds Expectations
 It is apparent that the student spent a
considerable amount of time and effort
and took great care in his work.
 The poster reflects creative use of different
mediums to portray and accurate
representation of the god, goddess, or
hero.
 Student clearly had an excellent under-
standing of topic and was able to teach
classmates about it (met “Little Professor”
status).
 Costume was original and was an excellent
representation.
 Greek Research Project Evaluation Rubric
Name: _______________________
Falls Short of Expectations
 Research notes do not account for
information in rough draft.
 Most subtopics were covered in some detail
Research  Paragraph structure is in need of
Paper Rough improvement (i.e. missing topic sentence,
Draft body or closing sentence).
 Paper did not meet length requirements
and/or was filled with grammatical or
/50 spelling errors.
 Rough Draft was not turned in on time.
 Bibliography was not in proper format or
incomplete.
 Research notes do not account for
information in final report.
 Most subtopics were covered in some detail
Research  Paragraph structure is in need of
Paper improvement (i.e. missing topic sentence,
Final Draft body or closing sentence).
 Paper did not meet length requirements
and/or was filled with grammatical or
spelling errors.
/100
 Bibliography was not in proper format or
incomplete.
 Final Draft was not turned in on time.
Grade: _____________
Rough Draft Due 11/9/20
Meets Expectations
 Notes are accounted for in rough draft.
 All Subtopics were addressed with accurate
detail.
 Student used good sentence and paragraph
structure (Topic sentence, body of
sentences supporting main idea and a
closing sentence).
 Paper fulfilled length requirements and
limited grammatical and spelling errors.
 Rough Draft was turned in on time.
 Bibliography is in proper format.
 Notes are accounted for in final paper.
 All Subtopics were addressed with accurate
detail.
 Student used good sentence and paragraph
structure (topic sentence, body of
sentences supporting main idea and a
closing sentence).
 Paper fulfilled length requirements and
limited grammatical and spelling errors.
 Bibliography was complete and in proper
format.
 Final Draft was turned in on time.
Final Paper Due 11/24/20
Exceeds Expectations
 A large bank of notes was generated for
each topic and the information in the
report was carefully selected from that
collection.
 Student went beyond the required amount of
subtopics in great detail.
 All paragraphs had good topic sentences, a
good body of sentences supporting the
one main idea and ended with a good
closing sentence.
 Paper went beyond requirements in length
and had virtually no grammatical or
spelling errors.
 A large bank of notes was generated for
each topic and the information in the
report was carefully selected from that
collection.
 Student went beyond the required amount of
subtopics in great detail.
 All paragraphs had good topic sentences, a
good body of sentences supporting the
one main idea and ended with a good
closing sentence.
 Paper went beyond requirements in length
and had virtually no grammatical or
spelling errors.