Case study 1:

We will analyzed the issue first. In this situation, the factual is the sample of company
discharge to city sewer having the amount of lead and arsenic that have negative effects to
human health. And the supervisor is tell that the company discharging is obey the city law.
For the solution, first of all, the engineer must have deeper investigated for the result of
testify is correct and the law of city about the amount of discharging heavy metal of company are
violate the law are not. If the company is not violate discharging law, there nothing the engineer
can do in situation. But in the hand, if the truth is company violate the law, the engineer need
another talk with her supervisor to persuade for stronger pollution controls. The conversation
should be support base on the engineer will hold paramount of priority public safety and welfare
means that the result of testify is truthfully announce and the company may face higher penalty
fee for unlawful discharging. And if the company can have some way to prevent her for public
the testify, the long term effect of heavy metal join to fertilizer and food change of citizen nearby
may lead to the government investigation which have same or even worse than the previous
ones.
If the supervisor is still not agreed, the engineer could write the letter for the CEO of
company for the unlawful discharge heavy metal issue of company and the hiding attitude of
your supervisor.

Case study 4:
If George taking the job, he would participate in research about the chemical and
biological warfare which can see as legal but unethical, his investment may lead to losing life of
thousand people in war using these welfare this can seem as undermine integrity by violating
one’s fundamental moral principles of engineer for hold environmental and public health and
welfare.
As the right ethics, human rights should be ultimate appeal, George should not accept to
join that laboratory, but in other hand can try with some field that not have self-interest as health.
As the utilitarian, the solution should be the one that have most good for most people, in
the case studies, there are no choice that violate law so we will not consider it here. In other
hand, we could chose the define for “good” as profit in money, since George family is in the
strain of money, taking the job for short term ( a half to 1 year) can ease the strain for his parent,
in contrast, if George refuse to join the Lab, may be there no much difference in the research
result.
Case study 5:
First, both of Joaquin and his boss should wait for the opinion of the scientific advisor
(who are under non-disclosure agreement) to determine if 60% is sufficient for further
determination. If the advisor suggest that 60% is reasonable enough, Joaquin should try to argue
his boss for giving the filter data with the method of filter, since if we filter the data without
explain, the SBA could not aware are there any mistake in the way we testing that effect the
selectivity or are there any way to improve the selectivity. Moreover, If the filter is found out, or
the result of 6-moth extended research is not give the selectivity is lower than the filter, both
Joaquin and his boss is losing the truth of SBA and affect their company’s reputation.

Case study 6:
First, Aston should seek for advice by her co-worker or her supervisor is there other way
for solving the issue without bribery. If there no other method is advised, she could negotiate
with the government for other method besides letting them know her difficulties. Finally, If there
are no method can meet the require of both side, she should discuss this issue to her team and
lead to decide for with draw the bid because the risk for bribery for just 1 project is not worth.

Case 7:
First, for announce the company the people whose information was compromised about
the information-breaching, Data-time Inc. need to spread the information to big news and
newspaper that can reach by most or all of these people with the message that our company are
having information breaching, What kind of information is breached, the company is conduct
investigation and fixing the problem.
Then, Data-time Inc. should conduct the investigated about the laptop that are being
stolen: who are receive it, are their being stolen by rob or being sell by the employer in company.
This investigation to have closer look about the issue and have method for prevent if there are
any happen in future.

Case 8:
First, Dylan should have advised by the production manager of custom products to know
are the information the customer want is Proprietary information and whether it can be used in
for malicious purposes. If the information is important for company, Dylan should find other
method for sharing information, such as persuade his costumer about his difficult and show the
emphasize the concern of his costumer, suggest customer can provided the properties that
expected the chip is achieve for electronic appliances and Dylan with provided the answer
whether the chip can work well or not.