You are on page 1of 18

CHAPTER IV

SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

FIGURE 4.1 GENDER DISTRIBUTION

GENDER

Male
Female
46%; 46%
54%; 54%

 In the data


shown above, 54% of the community are females and 46% are males. In a sample size
of 59, 32 are females and 27 are males. This indicates that there are more females in
the community compared to males. 

FIGURE 4.2 AGE DISTRIBUTION

AGE

5%; 5%
Adult (25-29)
24%; 24% Children (0-14)
44%; 44% Youth (15-24)
Senior (60-above)

27%; 27%

In a sample size of 59, 26 are adults with ages ranging from 25 to 29 taking up most
of the population with a percentage of 44%, 16 are children with ages ranging from 0 to
14, making it the second leading group with a percentage of 27%. There are 14 youths
with ages ranging from 15 to 24, taking up 24% of the population. Lastly, there are only
3 seniors with ages 60 and above, making it the lowest age group with only 5% of the
population.

FIGURE 4.3 FAMILY STRUCTURE

BASED OF COMPOSITION

Nuclear
33%; 33% Extended

67%; 67%

As shown in the data above, the majority are nuclear families with a percentage of
67%. Based on the data gathered, 8 out of the 12 families are nuclear families and 4 out
of 12 families are living as extended families, with a percentage of 33%. There were no
families living as beanpole and none of the families were also living with a single parent.
CHAPTER V

SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURE DATA

FIGURE 5.1 HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

HIGHEST EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT


2% 2% 2%

Elementary Graduate
Elementary Undergraduate
35% High School Graduate
High School Undergraduate
College Graduate
43%
College Undergraduate

16%

In the data shown above for the highest educational attainment, limiting the
responses to those who have worked and supported the household, the pie chart shows
that 13 respondents said are High School graduates, 11 respondents are College
graduates, and 5 are High School undergraduates. While one of each respondent said
are elementary graduate, elementary undergraduate, and college undergraduate.
FIGURE
OCCUPATION Unemployed 5.2
Saleslady
2% 2%
2% 2% Helper
2%
Driver
2%
Construction Worker
2%
2% Online Seller
2%
6% 38% Laborer
Teacher
Store Manager
6%
Vendor
Launderer
10% Electrician
Fisherman
Security Guard
12% 12%
Farmer

OCCUPATION

Based on the pie chart shown above for the occupation, limiting the respondents of
adults supporting the household, not including ages ranging from 17 below and 60
above, 12 of them said are unemployed, four respondents said working as a saleslady
and four also said to be working as a helper. Three of the respondents are working as a
driver. 2 respondents said working as a construction worker, and 2 also are online
sellers. The rest represents one respondent of the data works as a laborer, teacher,
store manager, vendor, launderer, electrician, fisherman, security guard, and farmer.

FIGURE 5.3 RELIGION AFFILIATION


RELIGION AFFILIATION
5%

Roman Catholic
31% Islam
Protestant

64%

The data shown above represent the religious affiliation of the 12 household families,
and 39 out of 59 of the residents are Roman Catholic, 19 out of 59 are Islam, and 3 out
of 59 are Protestant.

FIGURE 5.4 ETHNIC BACKGROUND

ETHNIC BACKGROUND
10%

10%
Zamboangueño
Tausug
Bisaya
Sinama
Tagalog
58%
22%
In the data shown above for the ethnic background of the 12 household families, 34
out of 59 are Zamboangeños, leading most of the residents in Enriquez Drive. 13 out of
59 are Tausug, 6 out of 59 are Bisaya and Sinama, and 3 out of 59 are Tagalog.

FIGURE 5.5 MONTHLY BACKGROUND

MONTHLY BACKGROUND

13% Below 2,500


8% 33% 2,500 to 5,000
above 5,000 to 7,500
above 7,500 to 10,000
above 10,000 to 12,500
20%

28%

The chart shown above represents the monthly background check of the 12
household families, limiting the respondents to those who have worked for their family.
Eight respondents answered below 2,500, 7 respondents have around 2,500 to 5,000, 5
respondents have above 5,000 to 7,500, 3 respondents said to have above 10,000 to
12,500, and 2 have above 7,500 to 10,000.
CHAPTER VI

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

FIGURE 6.1 HOME OWNERSHIP

HOME OWNERSHIP

Owned
Rented
42%
Free

58%
The chart above represents 12 families concerning their homeownership. The said
question has three choices: owned, rented, free. 7 families own their homes, while 5
families answered that they are renting their own homes.

FIGURE 6.2 STRUCTURE OF THE HOUSE

STRUCTURE OF THE HOUSE

Light
33%
Mixed
Strong

67%

The 12 families were given 3 choices regarding the structure of their house: light,
mixed, strong. 4 family answered that their house's structure is light, and 8 families
responded that they used mixed materials for the structure of their house.

FIGURE 6.3 LIGHTING FACILITIES

LIGHTHING FACILITIES

8%

Electricity
Kerosene

92%
The chart above indicates the lightning facility of the 12 families. They were given 2
choices: kerosene, electricity. The chart shows that majority of the families use
electricity for their source of light, while only 1 family uses kerosene for their lightning
source.

FIGURE 6.4 WATER SUPPLY

DRINKING SOURCE

25%
Private
Public

75%

PORTABILITY

36% Safe
Unsafe

64%

Based on the chart, there


were choices given concerning
their water supply: private and public, and safe or unsafe. 9 families answered that they
have a public water supply, while 3 families responded that they have a private water
supply. 8 families responded that they have an unsafe water portability, and 4 families
responded that they have a safe water portability.
FIGURE 6.5 STORAGE WATER

STORAGE WATER

Direct from faucet or pipe


33%
Covered container with faucet
Large uncovered without fauces

67%

In the chart above, 12 households were asked how they store their water. Three
options were given: direct pipe, covered container, or a large uncovered without faucet.
4 households answered that their water storage is direct from a faucet or pipe, and 8
households answered that their water storage is in a covered container with a faucet.

FIGURE 6.6 COOKING FACILITIES

COOKING FACILITY

Electric
36% Gas stove
Firewood/Charcoal

64%

The chart shows the responses of the 12 families concerning their cooking facilities.
Three choices were given: electric, stove, firewood/charcoal. 4 families responded that
they utilize gas stoves for cooking, and the majority responded that they utilize
firewood/charcoal.

FIGURE 6.7 DRAINAGE FACILITIES

DRAINAGE FACILITIES

8%
Open drainage
Blind drainage
None
50%
42%

The chart reflects the drainage facilities of the 12 families. There were 3 options
in this question: open drainage, blind drainage, or if none. 6 families answered open
drainage, 5 answered blind drainage, and 1 family responded with no drainage facility.

FIGURE 6.8 METHODS OF DISPOSAL

METHODS OF DISPOSAL

25%
Open dumping
Open burning
42%
Garbage collection

33%
The 12 households were asked about the method of their waste disposal. There were 6
options listed: hog-feeding, open dumping, burial in pit, composting, open burning, garbage
collection. The chart shows that 5 families answered open dumping, 4 families answered open
burning, and 3 families answered that their waste disposal is through garbage collection.

FIGURE 6.9 TYPE OF TOILET

TYPE OF TOILET

17% 17%
Antipolo system
Pail system
Flush type
Other (Dry toilet)
25%

42%

In the data above, 12 families were given 9 options regarding the type of their
toilet: an overhung latrine, open-pit privy, closed pit privy, bored hole latrine, pail
system, Antipolo system, water sealed latrine, and if none. The chart shows that 2
families utilize the Antipolo system, 5 utilize the pail system, 3 families use flush type,
and 2 families answered others, specifying the utilization of dry toilets.

FIGURE 6.10 DOMESTIC ANIMAS


DOMESTIC ANIMAL

8 With Pets
10
Without Pets
Dogs Kept Inside
2 Dogs Kept Outside
11 Cats Kept Inside
Cats Kept Outside
10

12

The graph depicts the answer of the 12 households to the presence of pets or
domestic animals at their homes. Out of 12, only 10 households’ own pets at their
homes. 6 families have dogs as their pets, and 6 families have cats. 2 households have
both dogs and cats. 6 families keep their pets inside, while the rest keeps their pets
outside

FIGURE 6.11 GENERAL HOUSING CONDITIONS

GENERAL SANITARY CONDITION

33% Poor
Good
Excellent

67%
HOUSE CONGESTION

33% Uncongested
Congested

67%

PRESENCE OF BREEDING FACTORS

25%
Vector
None

75%

The general housing condition is divided into three essential subcategories: general
sanitary condition, house congestion, and breeding factors. In the General Sanitary
Condition category, among the 12 families, 8 families answered that they have a poor
general sanitary condition, and 4 families responded good. Under the House
Congestion category, 4 families answered that the spaces between their houses are not
congested, while 8 families answered congested. In terms of the presence of Breeding
Factors, 9 families answered that there are visible breeding factors in their area, and 3
answered that there are no presence of breeding factors around them.
CHAPTER VII

HEALTH PROFILE

FIGURE 7.1. NUTRITIONAL STATUS

NUTRITIONAL STATUS

Good
42% Not Good

58%

The chart shows the Nutritional Status of 12 households with a total of 59 members
surveyed in Zone II, Barangay Boalan. A total of 58% are in good condition while 42%
are with existing comorbidities such as Malnutrition, ranking as the major problem,
others with hypertension, asthma, diabetes, and Gout.

FIGURE 7.2. IMMUNIZATION STATUS OF CHILDREN

IMMUNIZATION STATUS

6%

Complete
Incomplete

94%
The chart shows the immunization status of 12 households with a total of 59
members surveyed in Enriquez Drive, Barangay Boalan. Majority of the households
were fully immunized except for one.

VACCINATION STATUS

31% Fully vaccinated


1st dose
Not yet vaccinated

2%
67%

The chart shows the Vaccination status of 12 households with a total of 59 members,
where children below 12 years old are not included in the survey of Enriquez Drive,
Barangay Boalan. A total of 67.3% are not yet vaccinated, 30.6% are fully vaccinated,
and 2% are done with their 1st dose. Most of the households failed to be vaccinated
due to certain factors (e.g., fear, perception, beliefs, and hoax news).

VACCINATION BRANDS

6%
Sinovac
13%
AstraZeneca
Pfizer
44% Moderna
Johnsons & Johnsons
25%

13%
The chart shows the Vaccine brands taken by the 12 households with a total of 59
members where children below 12 years old are not included in the survey of Enriquez
Drive, Barangay Boalan. A total of 44% were vaccinated of Sinovac, 12% of
AstraZeneca, 25% of Pfizer, 13% of Moderna, and 6% of Johnsons & Johnsons. Thus,
Sinovac is the most preferable vaccine brand of the majority.

VACCINATION IN AGE GROUPS

6% 6%
Children
Youth
25%
Adult
Senior

63%

The chart shows the Vaccination in age groups of the 12 households with a total
of 59 members where children below 12 years old are not included in the survey in
Enriquez Drive, Barangay Boalan. The group of adults (25-59) is the highest vaccinated
group of 63%, followed by the youth (15-24) of 25%, Senior (60 above) of 6%, and
Children (0-14) of 6%. The results vary depending on the individual’s perception,
beliefs, and feelings.

FIGURE 7.3.
FAMILY PLANNING FAMILY
PLANNING

Natural
Artificial

100%
The chart shows the Family planning of the 12 households with a total of 59
members surveyed in Enriquez Drive, Barangay Boalan. All the family members in the
12 households used the natural method.

You might also like