Target validation is considered a bottleneck in the drug discovery process. Large pharmaceutical companies typically start 100 screening programs per year but only 10-25 compounds make it to phase 1 clinical trials due to issues predicting toxicity and efficacy in human studies. Deep understanding of the drug's interaction with its target, including target expression and binding, can increase the likelihood of a compound advancing to phase 2 trials. Validated targets are more likely to succeed, such as genetic mutations linked to disease or enzymes known to be upregulated in disease states.
Target validation is considered a bottleneck in the drug discovery process. Large pharmaceutical companies typically start 100 screening programs per year but only 10-25 compounds make it to phase 1 clinical trials due to issues predicting toxicity and efficacy in human studies. Deep understanding of the drug's interaction with its target, including target expression and binding, can increase the likelihood of a compound advancing to phase 2 trials. Validated targets are more likely to succeed, such as genetic mutations linked to disease or enzymes known to be upregulated in disease states.
Target validation is considered a bottleneck in the drug discovery process. Large pharmaceutical companies typically start 100 screening programs per year but only 10-25 compounds make it to phase 1 clinical trials due to issues predicting toxicity and efficacy in human studies. Deep understanding of the drug's interaction with its target, including target expression and binding, can increase the likelihood of a compound advancing to phase 2 trials. Validated targets are more likely to succeed, such as genetic mutations linked to disease or enzymes known to be upregulated in disease states.
How do you identify a target? Target identification – considered fairly
easy, non-problematic for target validation - Target: the naturally existing cellular or molecular structure involve in the Due to its non-problematic and easy it is disease that the drug-in-development is hard “to pick a good idea” – difficult meant to act on decision to make and evaluate - Microscopic molecular level. What do Success rate in the Clinic you want your compound that physically finds you and have an effect - so you need to: o understand the molecules mechanism of the disease of interest o identify a therapeutic target in this mechanism (Enzyme, gene, receptor, channel, etc.) - the more precise you get in that process or pathway identify exactly what your target is (so If you protein you want, your group to bind to or inhibit/activate, important that the Success rate in the clinic, a different stage protein would that be will review) the of discovering development when you go better your off with subsequent later preclinical to phase 1 stages objectives start discovering developments - 64% of compounds make it to humans - so understand the basic research in - 44% make it to the phase 2 – evaluate pathophysiologic in exquisite detail the drug if it will treat a disease – 5-1 - comes out of basic research will make it possible
Prepared by: Fringle
Typical Large Pharma Numbers European Drug Target Review 2014
• Start 100 new screening programs/assays
¤ New targets ¨ • About 50 find acceptable leads or chemotypes to pursue ¨ • 20-25 advance into late stage lead optimization ¨ • 10 programs advance into phase I ¨
Attrition: action or process of gradually reducing
the strength or effectiveness of someone or Three (3) pillars that will increase the likelihood something through sustained attack or pressure. of candidate in Phase II trials: (google) • Deep understanding of the drug Why the attrition? exposure at the site of action • Target binding of the drug Why Compounds Fail • Clear expression of functional • Pharmacokinetics pharmacological activity → ¤ Human ADME An in-dept biological understanding of a Uses vitro models/testing to test the molecular target as one of the very early steps pharmacokinetic of the drug in the entire drug discovery and development → ¤ Rodent vs dog vs monkey vs human process which can determine later success or Compare the behavior of drug in different failure of the emerging drug candidate is species. Which one resembles the human the required best in terms of pharmacokinetic Lesson learned from the fate of AstraZeneca • Tox not predicted by animal studies Drug pipeline: a Five (5) dimensional • Commercial reasons framework (Example: Pfizer shut down all new generations The 5 R’s drug that they just experimented due to • Right target commercial issues) • Right Patient • Lack of efficacy • Right Tissue Most common reasons why compound fails • Right Safety → ¤ Biological rationale is incorrect • Right Commercial Potential – what’s the → ¤ Relevance of animal models added value beyond what already in the o Oncology market; know also the competitive edge o Alzheimer’s
Prepared by: Fringle
Common Rationale Academics • How will you screen? What is your readout? Direct measure of target activity or proxy • Target in the literature for 15 years • What are your secondary assays? • Multiple publications: looks like there is Primary assays use robots for the screen, validation assay that how to validate the results came • No one has found a drug… from the robot -predict orthology • start a program! • Are there species differences? -test to the homology of different species Things to thing about: • What animal models are available? ¤ Are there standards/known ❖ What type of modulator do you need? compounds as a control? ➢ Agonist? Antagonist? Partial agonist? ¤ Predictability? ¤ Biomarker?
How many targets are there?
Agonist – drug that occupy receptors and
activate them Antagonist – drugs that occupy receptors but Example of Targets do not activate the. Blocks receptor activation • Receptors and enzymes by agonist Either intracellular or on membrane surface ¤ Examples: GPCRs, kinases, proteases, phosphatases • Transcription factors • Nuclear receptors • Ion channels, transporters • Protein-protein interactions
• Phenotypic screens can be difficult: what is
the target? Sometimes people propose phenotypic screens To know your target, you must know: Phenotypic screens: easy to set up but on the • What type of modulator do you need? back end it is quite troublesome ¤ Agonist? Antagonist? Partial agonist? • Where is the target?
Prepared by: Fringle
What do current drug target? Validated Target Examples (?) • Genetic mutations associated with disease This would give confidence ¤ Alzheimer’s: amyloid precursor protein (APP) (genetic mutation) and secretase (enzymes put some APP in results) Phase 3 is expensive trials in Alzheimer ¤ HER2 in breast cancer • Kinases -Oncology area • Upregulation in disease process ¤ Inflammation and COX2 Sometimes in disease processes you know certain enzyme are activated
• Classical COX inhibitors (NSAIDs): not Where Do Targets Come from? selective: side effects • Historically: natural products ¤ Irritation GI mucosa based on ¤ Herbal medicine, snake venom – mechanism, drug properties result physiological response • ‘90s: discovery of isoforms • Clinical observations ¤ COX1: present in most tissues, incluse Collaboration with clinicians GI tract, protective ¤ Side-effects known drugs: could be ¤ COX2: upregulated in inflammation useful in other indication ¤ Concept: inhibit COX2 but not COX2 • Rational approaches based on • COX2 inhibitors: Celecoxib (Celebrex, biochemistry/biology Pfizer), Rofecoxib (Vioxx, Merck) • Understanding genetic mutations in people ¤ Rofecoxib voluntarily withdrawn • Screening/systems biology 2004: increased chance of heart attack ¤ 2005: advisory panels: Merck did not -Omics put it back on market • New platform technologies ¤ Now: possible return? Tremeau ¤ Genomics, proteomics, Pharmaceuticals: joint pain in pharmacogenomics hemophilia; single phase III study ¤ RNAi screening ¤ Pathway analysis ¤ Transgenic animals All these technologies may give hints to pursue targets
¨ Key question always remains: how to validate?
Prepared by: Fringle
Forbes Magazine 2016
When do you consider a target validated?
• Mechanistic studies? • Analysis in cell culture? • Analysis in animal models? • Clinical data (protein or gene expression)? • Therapeutic intervention: phase II studies? (shows efficacy) • FDA approval?
Expert Musing
Target Evaluation Criteria
• Druggable? → What evidence is there to support a drug discovery program? ACS Med Chem Letters 2015 → Are there small molecule inhibitors for this class of targets? → Availability and predictive value of animal models? → Are there species differences? → Biomarker available? • Structural Information? The more information the better Excerpts and Blog Commentary ¤ Protein crystal structure, NMR • IP (Intellectual Property) Position ¤ Competition?
Prepared by: Fringle
ADDA examples • Phenotypic screens → ¤ HO-1, 14-3-3 theta, TXNIP → ¤ What is the target? → ¤ Will not be accepted in the ADDA program anymore • Defined target examples → ¤ CD38 → ¤ DPY30 → ¤ LRRK2 → ¤ Tau-Fyn (protein-protein interaction project)