Shear box tests were conducted on granular soil samples from Namakwa Sands slimes dams to determine shear strength parameters. Dense dry, dense saturated, loose saturated, and loose dry samples were tested under normal stresses of 50, 100, and 150 kPa. The peak and residual friction angles were determined by plotting shear stress against normal stress. A stability analysis of the dam wall was performed using the Bishop method with the residual friction angles of 28° for dense saturated soil and 27° for dense dry soil. Three potential circular slip surfaces were analyzed and yielded factors of safety of 1.42, 1.02, and 1.09, respectively. A factor of safety above 1.3 is generally considered safe for unmon
Shear box tests were conducted on granular soil samples from Namakwa Sands slimes dams to determine shear strength parameters. Dense dry, dense saturated, loose saturated, and loose dry samples were tested under normal stresses of 50, 100, and 150 kPa. The peak and residual friction angles were determined by plotting shear stress against normal stress. A stability analysis of the dam wall was performed using the Bishop method with the residual friction angles of 28° for dense saturated soil and 27° for dense dry soil. Three potential circular slip surfaces were analyzed and yielded factors of safety of 1.42, 1.02, and 1.09, respectively. A factor of safety above 1.3 is generally considered safe for unmon
Shear box tests were conducted on granular soil samples from Namakwa Sands slimes dams to determine shear strength parameters. Dense dry, dense saturated, loose saturated, and loose dry samples were tested under normal stresses of 50, 100, and 150 kPa. The peak and residual friction angles were determined by plotting shear stress against normal stress. A stability analysis of the dam wall was performed using the Bishop method with the residual friction angles of 28° for dense saturated soil and 27° for dense dry soil. Three potential circular slip surfaces were analyzed and yielded factors of safety of 1.42, 1.02, and 1.09, respectively. A factor of safety above 1.3 is generally considered safe for unmon
Shear box tests were conducted on granular samples from Namakwa Sands slimes Dams to determine shear strength parameters, which will also help in assessing the stability of the dam wall. Dense dry, dense saturated, loose saturated and loose dry soil samples were analysed by adding normal Figure 1: Shear stress v Normal stress for dense soil stresses of (50, 100 and 150 kPa) to determine the friction angle. The friction angle was then used in the Bishop method to determine factor of safety against sliding.
Approach to the problem:
Testing: Sample masses were weighed out for dense and loose materials. The shear box was prepared, the samples were placed the sample heights were recorded, and then the top cap and ball bearing were placed. The normal load was then applied by hanging weights. The bath was filled with water for Figure 2 Shear stress v Normal stress for loose soil saturated tests and left for a minute before displacement readings were taken. Setscrews were carefully removed, and Analysis method, Solution and Evaluation: The slope shear displacement applied until a horizontal displacement of stability analysis was carried out using the Bishop Routine 10mm was reached. The shear stress was applied at a rate of Method. This method was chosen because the slip surface was 40.0Hz – 0.5mm/min, and the shear force readings from the assumed to be circular and it has been proven to be proving ring dial gauge were recorded at 0.5mm horizontal computationally reliable with smaller errors compared to other displacement intervals. methods. For a structure like the Namakwa dam, we would require a dense material to minimize water seepage. Water Choice of friction: The peak and residual shear stress were seepage through the dam will decrease the shear strength of analysed by plotting shear stress against normal load and best the material used to construct the dam and potentially lead to lines of fit were then obtained. Mohr Coulomb Equation (𝜏 = 𝑐 piping. The material is assumed to be dense dry above the ′ + 𝜎′tan𝜙′) which correspond to the line of best fit was used. water table and dense saturated below the water table. The effective cohesion(𝑐′) was taken as zero because the granular soil has no cohesion. The peak and residual frictions Using the Bishop’s Method Shown in the calculation sheet were obtained from the slopes of graphs on figure 1 and 2. below, three circular slip surfaces are displayed in figure 3a,b From table 1 below, all peak friction angles are greater than and c below were analysed to administer a conservative the corresponding residual friction angles. High friction angles design. The circles were divided into 20 m width slices for would result in high shear stresses. Thus, residual friction analysis. The soil density was calculated from the mass and angle of 28° and 27° for dense-saturated and dense-dry dimensions measured during testing. The factors of safety for respectively were used for analysis, soil was assumed to be the three slip surfaces were found to be 1.42, 1.02, 1.09, respectively. The factor of safety against sliding is taken to be Soil samples Peak(𝜙′) Residual(𝜙′) the lowest one, in this case, it was B with FoS = 1.02. To Dense-Saturated 30 28 increase the reliability of the dam, factors of safety of ranging Dense-Dry 29 27 between 1.3 to 1.5 are generally more acceptable. The slip Loose Saturated 31 27 surface shown in B has a factor of safety of 1.42, which is Loose Dry 28 28 relatively high when compared to the other slip surfaces. This implies that failure of that slip circle is unlikely to occur. A dense. factor for safety of 1.3 is generally deemed as acceptable and safe for unmonitored slopes. FoS = 1.42 FoS =1.02
FoS =1.09
Figure 3: a, b, and c slip surfaces
References 1. Craig, R., 2009. Craigs soil mechanics. London: Spon Press. 2. Fell, R., 1992. Geotechnical Engineering of dams. 2 ed. s.l.: s.n.