You are on page 1of 2

Geotechnical Engineering

CIVN4004: Direct Shear Box text (Group 11A)


1716238 – Hintsa Afikile; 1713180- Yehuda Wolovitz;
1742137 - Mokgoadi Ngwato; 1757986 - Mabilu Dumisane

Description of the Problem


Shear box tests were conducted on granular samples from
Namakwa Sands slimes Dams to determine shear strength
parameters, which will also help in assessing the stability of
the dam wall. Dense dry, dense saturated, loose saturated and
loose dry soil samples were analysed by adding normal Figure 1: Shear stress v Normal stress for dense soil
stresses of (50, 100 and 150 kPa) to determine the friction
angle. The friction angle was then used in the Bishop method
to determine factor of safety against sliding.

Approach to the problem:


Testing: Sample masses were weighed out for dense and
loose materials. The shear box was prepared, the samples were
placed the sample heights were recorded, and then the top cap
and ball bearing were placed. The normal load was then
applied by hanging weights. The bath was filled with water for
Figure 2 Shear stress v Normal stress for loose soil
saturated tests and left for a minute before displacement
readings were taken. Setscrews were carefully removed, and Analysis method, Solution and Evaluation: The slope
shear displacement applied until a horizontal displacement of stability analysis was carried out using the Bishop Routine
10mm was reached. The shear stress was applied at a rate of Method. This method was chosen because the slip surface was
40.0Hz – 0.5mm/min, and the shear force readings from the assumed to be circular and it has been proven to be
proving ring dial gauge were recorded at 0.5mm horizontal computationally reliable with smaller errors compared to other
displacement intervals. methods. For a structure like the Namakwa dam, we would
require a dense material to minimize water seepage. Water
Choice of friction: The peak and residual shear stress were seepage through the dam will decrease the shear strength of
analysed by plotting shear stress against normal load and best the material used to construct the dam and potentially lead to
lines of fit were then obtained. Mohr Coulomb Equation (𝜏 = 𝑐 piping. The material is assumed to be dense dry above the

+ 𝜎′tan𝜙′) which correspond to the line of best fit was used. water table and dense saturated below the water table.
The effective cohesion(𝑐′) was taken as zero because the
granular soil has no cohesion. The peak and residual frictions Using the Bishop’s Method Shown in the calculation sheet
were obtained from the slopes of graphs on figure 1 and 2. below, three circular slip surfaces are displayed in figure 3a,b
From table 1 below, all peak friction angles are greater than and c below were analysed to administer a conservative
the corresponding residual friction angles. High friction angles design. The circles were divided into 20 m width slices for
would result in high shear stresses. Thus, residual friction analysis. The soil density was calculated from the mass and
angle of 28° and 27° for dense-saturated and dense-dry dimensions measured during testing. The factors of safety for
respectively were used for analysis, soil was assumed to be the three slip surfaces were found to be 1.42, 1.02, 1.09,
respectively. The factor of safety against sliding is taken to be
Soil samples Peak(𝜙′) Residual(𝜙′)
the lowest one, in this case, it was B with FoS = 1.02. To
Dense-Saturated 30 28
increase the reliability of the dam, factors of safety of ranging
Dense-Dry 29 27 between 1.3 to 1.5 are generally more acceptable. The slip
Loose Saturated 31 27 surface shown in B has a factor of safety of 1.42, which is
Loose Dry 28 28 relatively high when compared to the other slip surfaces. This
implies that failure of that slip circle is unlikely to occur. A
dense. factor for safety of 1.3 is generally deemed as acceptable and
safe for unmonitored slopes.
FoS =
1.42
FoS
=1.02

FoS
=1.09

Figure 3: a, b, and c slip surfaces


References
1. Craig, R., 2009. Craigs soil mechanics. London: Spon
Press.
2. Fell, R., 1992. Geotechnical Engineering of dams. 2 ed. s.l.:
s.n.

You might also like