Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eric S. Lindquist, Berti-Lindquist Consulting Engineers, Inc., 920 Country Club Drive, Suite 2A, Moraga,
California, USA
Rob Jameson, Malcolm Drilling Company, Inc., 3503 Breakwater Court, Hayward, California, USA
High groundwater levels combined with variable soil and rock profiles present
challenges to the design and construction of deep excavation support systems.
Increasingly, secant piling techniques are the preferred technical solution for
shoring in these cases. Recent developments in drilling equipment, tooling and
procedures allow cost-effective construction of deep, overlapped pile systems to
tight tolerances in extremely difficult ground conditions.
This paper summarizes critical design considerations for secant pile shoring
systems, detailing recent advances in installation procedures and verification
techniques that allow secant piles to be used for an expanding range of project
conditions. Technically- and commercially-viable secant pile shoring designs
require that stringent drilling tolerances be achieved in order to successfully
provide combined structural support and groundwater cutoff systems, particularly
for unreinforced circular secant pile shafts acting in ring compression. Modern
drill rigs and tooling can advance fully cased shafts in geotechnical conditions
which range from cohesionless soils below the groundwater table to hard rock,
within a single drillhole. Down-hole instrumentation provides verification that
tolerance requirements are met and allow secant pile shoring to be used at sites
previously considered unacceptably risky.
In California, secant pile shoring systems are being used for excavation depths of
over 100 ft (30 m) on projects with challenging site conditions. Two case studies
are presented detailing severe geotechnical conditions and excavation depths
which represent the regional state of practice in secant piled excavation support.
These projects provide real world examples of the design, construction and
construction verification techniques that permit secant pile shoring to be used in
more demanding geotechnical conditions and to greater depths than ever before.
Introduction
Design Considerations
Secant pile walls are formed by constructing a
series of overlapping “primary” and “secondary” The success of a secant pile system requires
concrete-filled drill holes. The primary piles are that the individual piles be structurally sound
constructed first, followed by secondary piles, over their full length, and that adjacent piles be
which are cut into the previously placed primary constructed to tolerances that maintain a
pile concrete. The amount of overlap required reasonable overlap between the primary and
between the adjacent piles is a function of the secondary piles.
structural design requirements and the
installation tolerance that can be achieved. Secant pile walls for excavation support are
designed to function in one of two ways. The
Secant pile walls can be used for both typical design approach develops the structural
excavation support and as a relatively capacity of the wall in the vertical direction. The
impermeable cutoff wall. Although they tend to wall spans between its points of support (e.g.,
be more expensive than either sheet piles or cross-lot bracing or tiebacks) as a vertical beam.
deep soil mix (DSM) walls, secant piling For this type of wall system, the primary piles
techniques can be employed in geotechnical are unreinforced, and the secondary piles are
conditions which preclude these other types of reinforced with either a wide flange section or a
shoring systems. rebar cage. The primary piles are designed to
act as lagging between the “structural” ground profiles ranging from saturated
secondary piles, and the secondary piles are cohesionless soils to hard rock, including
designed to have sufficient flexural and shear advance through cobbles and boulders and
strength as beams in the vertical direction. even man-made obstructions.
Secant pile walls can also be designed as ring For secant piling, installation tolerance is critical
compression structures. In this case, the piles to project success and directly related to cost.
are installed in a circular configuration and loads When tight tolerances are maintained, pile
are resisted in circumferential compression. spacing is maximized, reducing the number of
This type of structure is structurally-efficient piles required along an excavation perimeter.
because unreinforced concrete has significant Once the permissible tolerance is defined, the
compression capacity. Soil, groundwater and pile installer must select construction procedures
surcharge loads are resisted by thrust and equipment to satisfy this controlling
(compression) forces acting in the ring. The performance criterion, while minimizing unit
design compression strength of the unreinforced construction costs, typically by maximizing
ring can be computed using ACI 318 provisions production rates.
for unreinforced concrete, and, although rarely
critical, the buckling capacity of the ring should Tolerance is evaluated in terms of both layout
also be evaluated. control and drilling verticality. Significant overall
costs savings can be realized by using a guide
For unreinforced ring compression structures the trench and templates in order to ensure pile
quality of the pile installation is particularly location is controlled at ground surface. For
critical. The thickness of the “effective example, pile quantity can be reduced by 8% to
compression ring” that can be safely assumed 10% in a 40 ft (12 m) diameter shaft if location
for design purposes is directly related to the pile tolerance is controlled to within +/-1 inch (25
installation tolerance that can be achieved. mm) in plan, compared to an industry standard
Failure to achieve the minimum design overlap of +/-3 inches (75 mm) for layout based on
between the adjacent piles will compromise the surface staking.
structure’s ability to perform as designed. For
this reason, excavation depths for which secant
pile compression ring structures have been
employed have typically been limited to around
60 feet.
References