Professional Documents
Culture Documents
YU HUANG
Spring 2018
LANED-GE 2206-001
Title:
Yu Huang
Yu Huang
Immersive language learning has been discussed as a method to acquire language over
years in the studies of second language acquisition filed. Many researchers have studied and tried
to use immersion classroom in ESL teaching. More than two decades of research indicate that
and contents subjects (Curtain & Pesola, 1998, Genesee, 1987, Swain, 1984). However, some
people discussed that students who are only immersed in the target language instruction would
not be scored comparably in their other subjects or programs by the end of the elementary school
as those students in both types of programs (Melanie McGrath). My goal of this paper is to exam
the immersion classroom in beginning level and the intermediate level and see which level
classroom can gain more effectiveness and progress in the immersion classroom.
Yu Huang
learning is a long-term process and people are always trying to find an effective approach to
study a language. Additionally, lots of people have spent and wasted a myriad of time on
Merrill Swain and Sharon Lapkin designed an immersion classroom experiment for four
grade 8 French immersion classes. In the experiment, the students were grade students who had
been in an early French immersion program since kindergarten. All of their initial instruction,
through grade 3, had been in French. After that, instruction in English was introduced and by
grade 8, approximately 50% of their instruction was in English, 50% in French. In the
experiment, student dyads received a set of numbered pictures that told a story. The students
were to work out the story together and then write it out. After five-week immersion classroom
study, most students had reached the highest proficiency level according to Teacher’s Rating of
The immersion classroom experiment has accessed for the young age immersion classes of
an elementary school in the previous experiment. What is more, I found out that the immersion
classroom also can effectively work for University level learners, which the experiment is
provided by The University of the Basque (David Lasagabaster., 2011). This experiment was
asked to teach Basque language. there were three linguistic models. Students from Model A are
all Spanish speakers. And their goal is to understand Basque well and give basic explanations in
Basque on everyday matters; Model B is an early partial immersion programme in which both
Basque and Spanish are used as means of instruction, these students’ L1 is usually Spanish.
Model D is a total immersion programme for those students whose L1 is Spanish and a
maintenance programme for those with Basque as L1. Spanish is taught as a subject for only four
Yu Huang
to five hours per week. It is easy to see the result of these three models of students’ evolution in
We can see that Model A goes steadily down whereas models B and D go steadily up.
program of two immersion teaching teams. One team consists of a teacher and an assistant who
teach in English. The other team consisted of a teacher and an assistant who teach in Spanish.
Thus, each week half of the students in the school are taught in English and half are taught in
Spanish. All students were taught English and Spanish before either at home or in classes. All
students were under 5 years old. Then later a test was settled for these English and Spanish
speaker students, which was about the comprehensives sets of individually administered tests of
cognitive abilities and achievement in English and Spanish. They also administered the Pictures
Vocabulary and Applied Problems subtests from these batteries in both English and Spanish.
Yu Huang
All these three observational studies above (Merrill Swain and Sharon Lapkin; David
Lasagabaster; Steven Barnett and Donald J. Yarosz) presented that immersion classroom setting
is effective for language learning. Additionally, according to the University of Basque, it reflects
that the immersion classroom setting is acceptable and developmental in young language
learners. However, researchers above did not mention the efficiency of immersion classroom in
beginning level. All evidence were reflections about the immersion classroom in the intermediate
level.
Research Questions
Based on the careful analysis of previous research and the limitation found, this study aim is that
whether the immersion is more effective for beginning learners or intermediate learners.
Is immersion classroom more effective and progressive for beginning learners or intermediate
learners?
Method
Yu Huang
Participants
Two 8th grade Spanish classes in a middle school in the suburbs of Barcelona city of
Spain and will include students whose home language is not Spanish. Each class has
30 students and will be referred to as Class A and Class B. students will take an
entrance exam of speaking, reading, and writing to place them either in Spanish I
Instruments:
• Spanish I and II textbook will be utilized as a material source for this study.
• The textbook itself includes a short reading paragraph, speaking exercises, and writing
• Writing sheets, pens or pencils and record machines are asked for completing the task.
Objective:
Yu Huang
To compare the exam scores of pre-exam and post-exam and see which level classroom can
gain more effectiveness and progress in the immersion classroom for beginning learners &
intermediate learners.
Procedure:
• Students will be asked to speak/share their opinions based on the topic of each chapter in
the course textbook. Topics include themes like family, travel, and food. Students will
learn words and how to make sentences based on simple grammars which relate to the
topics they learn every day. Students will be divided into six groups; each group has five
students; students will be asked to write down their opinions based on the written task at
the end of each chapter and share to their groupmates as daily practice; for speaking,
firstly students will work in pairs to ask and answer questions for each other, and then
share their opinions based on questions and topics they learn in the groups; finally, at the
last week of the programme (the eighth week), students will work as pairs and be asked
to choose one topic and have presentations for the class. Only Spanish is allowed to use
• The course textbook will not be same and used topics will not be the same as the Spanish
I level class uses. The Spanish II textbook will be harder than Spanish I. Students will be
asked to express their opinions based on the topic of each chapter in the course textbook
of Spanish II with vocabulary they learned from the previous study. Topics include
environment (climate, the geography of your city), the transportation of your city,
description of one place you would like to go on vacation etc. Students will learn words
and harder grammars and instructions which can help their study every day. Students will
be divided into six groups; each group has five students; students will be asked to write
down their opinions based on the written task at the end of each chapter and share to their
groupmates as daily practice; for speaking, firstly students will work in pairs to ask and
answer questions for each other; and then share their opinions based on questions and
topics they learn in the groups; finally, at the last week of the programme(the eighth
week) students will work as pairs and be asked to choose one topic and have
presentations for the class. Only Spanish is allowed to use in class conversation, cannot
Closure:
All students will be asked to take the final exam based on what they learn from
immersion instruction, which includes the speaking, reading and writing tests, to exam
students’ from uses of words in speaking and writing, accuracy and fluency of
ability of reading, etc. Teachers will collect their scores from this exam and then compare
to that of entrance exam to see how much improvement did these two groups students
achieved respectively.
Expected Result:
It is expected that both groups improve by the immersion classroom and it is effective for both
language levels learners. I also expected that the intermediate level learners gain much progress
which presents on pre-exam and post-exam than beginning level learners because language
learners are at least able to receive meaningful input. Intermediate level learners have mastered
some comprehensible inputs and got a solid foundation then build on materials that are not too
Analysis:
I think that immersion classroom setting is an effective approach for intermediate level
language learners to learn language especially for learning a second language because human
beings have a limited capacity for process information and central to the ability to process
information the ability to attend to deal with and organize new information. So It is very
effective when language learners are placed in an immersion atmosphere and pay attention
(theory of Attention in SLA) to learn the language because attention is effortful, limited and
selective; the more one can handle routinely, the more attentional resources she has available for
processing new information. If the actual result of this experiment showed that beginning level
learners gain much progress from presents on pre-exam and post-exam than intermediate level
learners, then the reasons could be like: intermediate level learners encounter the bottleneck
during their study process; beginning lever students spent double or triple times on studying
while intermediate level learners just normally follow the schedule times; or teacher of Spanish I
is an expert and designed lessons that all Spanish I students loved and enjoyed while teacher of
Spanish II was a new teacher who did not have much teaching experiences so her students were
not fully paid attention to the lessons. However, immersion classroom setting has its
Yu Huang
disadvantages too, which researchers did not mention in studies. It is hard for immersion
students.
Reference
David Lasagabaster (2011). Bilingualism, Immersion programmes and Language Learning in the
Merrill Swain. Sharon Lapkin (1998). Interaction and Second Language Learning Two
Yu Huang
September 1998.
Chamot, Anna Uhl. El-Dinary, Pamela Beard. Children’s Learning Strategies in Language
W. Steven Barnett, Donald J. Yarosz, Jessica Thomas, Dulce Blanco (2007). Two-Way and
National Institute for the Early Education Research Rutgers-The State University of New Jersey.